Landscape genetics: Combining landscape ecology and population genetics

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 189-197

  Manel, Stéphanie ^a   Schwartz, Michael K ^b   Luikart, Gordon ^a   Taberlet, Pierre ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ JOSEPH FOURIER   (France)

^b ROCKY MOUNTAIN RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENE FLOW; GENETIC VARIATION; LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY; LOCAL ADAPTATION; POPULATION GENETICS;

EID: 0037376204     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00008-9     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Turner M., et al. Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice. 2001;Springer-Verlag.
2. Smouse P.E., Peakall R. Spatial autocorrelation analysis of individual multiallele and multilocus genetic structure. Heredity. 82:1999;561-573.
3. Brown J.H., Lomolino M.V. Biogeography. 2nd edn: 1998;Sinauer Associates.
4. Sork V.L., et al. Landscape approaches to historical and contemporary gene flow in plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14:1999;219-224.
5. Reed D.H., Frankham R. How closely correlated are molecular and quantitative measures of genetic variation? A meta-analysis. Evolution. 55:2001;1095-1103.
6. Crandall K.A., et al. Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15:2000;290-295.
7. Moritz C. Strategies to protect biological diversity and the evolutionary processes that sustain it. Syst. Biol. 5:2002;238-254.
8. Sokal R.R., Thomson B.A. Spatial genetic structure of human populations in Japan. Hum. Biol. 70:1998;1-22.
9. Cassens I., et al. Mitochondrial DNA variation in the European otter (Lutra lutra) and the use of spatial autocorrelation analysis in conservation. J. Hered. 91:2000;31-35.
10. Piertney S., et al. Local genetic structure in red grouse (Lagopus lagopus scoticus): evidence from microsatellite DNA markers. Mol. Ecol. 7:1998;1645-1654.
11. Keyghobadi N., et al. Influence of landscape on the population genetic structure of the alpine butterfly Parnassius smintheus (Papilionidae). Mol. Ecol. 8:1999;1481-1495.
12. Hanski I. Metapopulation dynamics. Nature. 396:1998;41-49.
13. Piglucci M., Barbujani G. Geographical patterns of gene frequencies in Italian populations of Ornithogalum montanum (Liliaceae). Genet. Res. 58:1991;95-104.
14. Slate J., et al. Bovine microsatellite loci are highly conserved in red deer (Cervus elaphus), sika deer (Cervus nippon) and Soay sheep (Ovis aries). Anim. Genet. 29:1998;307-315.
15. Menotti-Raymond M.A., O'Brien S.J. Evolutionary conservation of ten microsatellite loci in four species of Felidae. J. Hered. 86:1995;319-322.
16. Atzmon G., et al. DNA markers and crossbreeding scheme as means to select sires for heterosis in egg production of chickens. Anim. Genet. 34:2002;132-139.
17. Hogan Z.S., May B.P. Twenty-seven new microsatellites for the migratory Asian catfish family Pangasiidae. Mol. Ecol. Notes. 2:2002;38-41.
18. Black W.C., et al. Population genomics: genome-wide sampling of insect populations. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 46:2001;441-469.
19. Vitalis R., et al. Interpretation of variation across marker loci as evidence of selection. Genetics. 158:2001;1811-1823.
20. Hardy O.J., et al. Spatial autocorrelation of allozyme and quantitative markers within a natural population of Centaurea jacea (Asteraceae). J. Evol. Biol. 13:2000;656-667.
21. McKay J.K., Latta R.G. Adaptative population divergence: markers, QTL and traits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:2002;285-291.
22. Wu C. The genic view of the process of speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 14:2001;851-865.
23. Lenormand T., et al. Tracking the evolution of insecticide resistance in the mosquito Culex pipiens. Nature. 400:1999;861-864.
24. Paetkau D., et al. Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears. Mol. Ecol. 4:1995;347-354.
25. Wright S. Isolation by distance. Genetics. 28:1943;114-138.
26. Rousset F. Genetic differentiation between individuals. J. Evol. Biol. 13:2000;58-62.
27. Mantel N. The detection of disease clustering and a generalised regression approach. Cancer Res. 27:1967;209-220.
28. Sumner J., et al. Neighbourhood size, dispersal and density estimates in the prickly forest skink (Gnypetoscincus queenslandiae) using individual genetic and demographic methods. Mol. Ecol. 10:2001;1917-1927.
29. Sokal R., Neal O. Spatial autocorrelation in biology, 2. Some implications and four applications of evolutionary interest. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 10:1978;229-249.
30. Barbujani G. Geographic patterns: how to identify them and why. Hum. Biol. 72:2000;133-153.
31. Pritchard J.K., et al. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 155:2000;945-959.
32. Dawson K., Belkhir K. A Bayesian approach to the identification of panmictic populations and the assignment of individuals. Genet. Res. 78:2001;59-77.
33. Stow A.J., et al. The impact of habitat fragmentation on dispersal of Cunningham's skink (Egernia cunninghami): evidence from allelic and genotypic analysis of microsatellites. Mol. Ecol. 10:2001;867-878.
34. Cornuet J.-M., et al. New methods employing multilocus genotypes to select or exclude populations as origins of individuals. Genetics. 153:1999;1989-2000.
35. Piazza A., et al. Synthetic gene frequency maps of man and selective effects of climate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 78:1981;2638-2642.
36. Cavalli-Sforza L., et al. The History and Geography of Human Genes. 1996;Princeton University Press.
37. Hanotte O., et al. African pastoralism: genetic imprints of origins and migrations. Science. 296:2002;336-339.
38. Monmonier M. Maximum-difference barriers: an alternative numerical regionalization method. Geog. Anal. 3:1973;245-261.
39. Womble W. Differential systematics. Science. 28:1951;315-322.
40. Barbujani G., et al. Detecting regions of abrupt change in maps of biological variables. Syst. Zool. 38:1989;389-1989.
41. Castric V., et al. Landscape structure and hierarchical genetic diversity in the brook charr. Salvelinus fontinalus. Evolution. 55:2001;1016-1028.
42. Spong G., Creel S. Deriving dispersal distances from genetic data. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B. 268:2001;2571-2574.
43. Riginos C., Nachman M.W. Population subdivision in marine environments: the contributions of biogeography, geographical distance and discontinuous habitat to genetic differentiation in a blennioid fish, Axoclinus nigricaudus. Mol. Ecol. 10:2001;1439-1453.
44. Angers B., et al. Canonical correspondence analysis for estimating spatial and environmental effects on microsatellite gene diversity in brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalus). Mol. Ecol. 8:1999;1043-1053.
45. Gram W.K., Sork V.L. Association between environmental and genetic heterogeneity in forest tree populations. Ecology. 82:2001;2012-2021.
46. Piazza A., et al. The making and testing of geographic gene-frequency maps. Biometrics. 37:1981;635-659.
47. Piazza A., et al. Genetics and the origin of European languages. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92:1995;5836-5840.
48. Jacquez G. The map comparison problem: tests for the overlap of geographical boundaries. Stat. Med. 14:1995;2343-2361.
49. Reich D.E., et al. Linkage disequilibrium in the human genome. Nature. 411:2001;199-204.
50. Primmer C.R., et al. Single-nucleotide polymorphism characterization in species with limited available sequence information: high nucleotide diversity revealed in the avian genome. Mol. Ecol. 11:2002;603-612.
51. Tabor H.K., et al. Candidate-gene approaches for studying complex genetic traits: practical considerations. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3:2002;391-396.
52. Nielsen R. Statistical tests of selective neutrality in the age of genomics. Heredity. 86:2001;641-647.
53. Estoup A., et al. Juxtaposed microsatellite systems as diagnostic markers for admixture: an empirical evaluation with brown trout (Salmo trutta) as model organism. Mol. Ecol. 9:2000;1873-1886.
54. Epperson B.K., Li T. Measurement of genetic structure within population using Moran's spatial autocorrelation statistics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93:1996;10528-10532.
55. Diniz-Filho J.A.F., Telles M.P.C. Spatial autocorrelation analysis and the identification of operational units for the conservation in continuous populations. Conserv. Biol. 16:2002;924-935.
56. Roach J.L., et al. Genetic structure of a metapopulation of black-tailed prairie dogs. J. Mammal. 82:2001;946-959.
57. Raymond M., Rousset F. Genpop (Version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J. Hered. 86:1995;248-249.
58. Bertorelle G., Barbujani G. Analysis of DNA diversity by spatial autocorrelation. Genetics. 140:1995;811-819.
59. Degen B., et al. SGS-Spatial genetic software: a computer program for analysis of spatial genetic and phenotypic structures of individuals and populations. J. Hered. 92:2001;447-448.
60. Hardy O., Vekemans X. Spagedi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Mol. Ecol. Notes. 2:2002;618.
61. Peakall R., Smouse P.E. GenAlEx V5: Genetic Analysis in Excel. Population Genetic Software for Teaching and Research. 2001;Australian National University.
62. Goudet J. FSTAT version 1.2: a computer program to calculate F statistics. J. Hered. 86:1995;485-486.
63. Crisci J.V. The voice of historical biogeography. J. Biogeogr. 28:2001;157-168.
64. Crisp M. Historical biogeography and patterns of diversity in plants, algae and fungi: introduction. J. Biogeogr. 28:2001;153-156.
65. Wallace A.R. On the Zoological Geography of the Malay Archipelago. J. Proc. Linn. Soc. Zool. 4:1860;172-184.
66. Petit E., et al. No evidence of bottleneck in the postglacial recolonization of Europe by the noctule bat (Nyctalus noctula). Evolution. 53:2001;1247-1258.
67. Mani F., Barrai I. Genetic structure and linguistic boundaries in Italy: a microregional approach. Hum. Biol. 73:2001;335-347.
68. Brassel K.E., Reif D. A procedure to generate Thiessen polygons. Geog. Anal. 325:1979;31-36.
69. Barbujani G., Sokal R. Zones of sharp genetic change in Europe are also linguistic boundaries. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87:1989;1816-1819.