Stochasticity overrules the "three-times rule": Genetic drift, genetic draft, and coalescence times for nuclear loci versus mitochondrial DNA

Evolution

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 182-190

  Hudson, Richard R ^a   Turelli, Michael ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Coalescence theory; Linked selection; Mitochondrial DNA; Monophyly; Species identification; Three times rule

Indexed keywords

COALESCENCE; EVOLUTION; GENETIC DRIFT; STOCHASTICITY;

EID: 0037286419     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00229.x     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Adams, M. D. et al. 2000. The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 287:2185-2195.
2. Andolfatto, P. 2001. Adaptive hitchhiking effects on genome variability. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 11:635-641.
3. Avise, J. C. 1994. Molecular markers, natural history and evolution. Chapman and Hall, New York.
4. _. 2000. Phylogeography. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.
5. Ballard, J. W. O. 2000. Comparative genomics of mitochondrial DNA in Drosophila simulans. J. Mol. Evol. 51:64-75.
6. Ballard, J. W. O., and M. Kreitman. 1994. Unraveling selection in the mitochondrial genome of Drosophila. Genetics 138:757-772.
7. Ballard, J. W. O., and M. Kreitman. 1995. Is mitochondrial DNA a strictly neutral marker? Trends Ecol. Evol. 10:485-488.
8. Ballard, J. W. O., B. Chernoff, and A. C. James. 2002. Divergence of mitochondrial DNA is not corroborated by nuclear DNA, morphology, or behavior in Drosophila simulans. Evolution 56:527-545.
9. Boore, J. L. 1999. Animal mitochondrial genomes. Nucleic. Acids Res. 27:1767-1780.
10. Casella, G., and R. L. Berger. 1990. Statistical inference. Brooks/Cole Pacific Grove, CA.
11. Charlesworth, B., M. T. Morgan, and D. Charlesworth. 1993. The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics 134:1289-1303.
12. de Queiroz, K. and M. J. Donoghue. 1988. Phylogenetic systematics and the species problem. Cladistics 4:317-338.
13. _. 1990. Phylogenetic systematics and species revisited. Cladistics 6:83-90.
14. Gillespie, J. H. 2000. Genetic drift in an infinite population: the pseudohitchhiking model. Genetics 155:909-919.
15. _. 2001. Is the population size of a species relevant to its evolution? Evolution 55:2161-2169.
16. Gillespie, J. H., and C. H. Langley. 1979. Are evolutionary rates really variable? J. Mol. Evol. 10:27-34.
17. Hare, M. P. 2001. Prospects for nuclear gene phylogeography. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:700-706.
18. Harrison, R. G. 1998. Linking evolutionary pattern and process. Pp. 19-31 in D. J. Howard and S. H. Berlocher, eds. Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford Univ. Press., Oxford, U.K.
19. Hoffmann, A. A., and M. Turelli. 1997. Cytoplasmic incompatibility in insects. Pp. 42-80 in S. L. O'Neill, J. H. Werren, and A. A. Hoffmann, eds. Influential passengers: inherited microorganisms and arthropod reproduction, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
20. Hudson, R. R. 1990. Gene genealogies and the coalescent process. Oxf. Surv. Evol. Biol. 7:1-44.
21. Hudson, R. R., M. Kreitman, and M. Aguadé. 1987. A test of neutral molecular evolution based on nucleotide data. Genetics 116:153-159.
22. Kaplan, N. L., R. R. Hudson, and C. H. Langley. 1989. The hitchhiking effect revisited. Genetics 123:887-899.
23. Kennedy, P., and N. W. Nachman. 1998. Deleterious mutations at the mitochondrial ND3 gene in South American marsh rats (Holochilus). Genetics 150:359-368.
24. Maddison, W. P. 1997. Gene trees in species trees. Syst. Biol. 46:523-536.
25. Maynard Smith, J., and J. Haigh. 1974. The hitch-hiking effect of a favorable gene. Genet. Res. Camb. 23:23-35.
26. McDonald, J. H., and M. Kreitman. 1991. Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila. Nature 351:652-654.
27. Nachman, M. W. 1998. Deleterious mutations in animal mitochondrial DNA. Genetica 102/103:61-69.
28. Palumbi, S. R., and F. Cipriano. 1998. Species identification using genetic tools: The value of nuclear and mitochondrial gene sequences in whale conservation. J. Hered. 89:459-464.
29. Palumbi, S. R., F. Cipriano, and M. P. Hare. 2001. Predicting nuclear gene coalescence from mitochondrial DNA data: the three-times rule. Evolution 55:859-868.
30. Rand, D. M., A. G. Clark, and L. M. Kann. 2001. Sexually antagonistic cytonuclear fitness interactions in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 159:173-187.
31. Simonsen, K. L., G. A. Churchill, and C. F. Aquadro. 1995. Properties of statistical tests of neutrality. Genetics 141:413-429.
32. Slatkin, M. and R. R. Hudson. 1991. Pairwise comparisons of mitochondrial DNA sequences in stable and exponentially growing populations. Genetics 129:555-562.
33. Strobeck, C. 1987. Average number of nucleotide differences in a sample from a single subpopulation: a test for population subdivision. Genetics 117:149-153.
34. Tajima, F. 1983. Evolutionary relationship of DNA sequences in finite populations. Genetics 105:437-460.
35. _. 1989. Statistical method for testing neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123:585-595.
36. Takahata, N., and M. Slatkin. 1984. Mitochondrial gene flow. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81:1764-1767.
37. Tavaré, S. 1984. Line-of-descent and genealogical processes, and their applications in population genetics models. Theor. Popul. Biol. 26:119-164.
38. Turelli, M., A. A. Hoffmann, and S. W. McKechnie. 1992. Dynamics of cytoplasmic incompatibility and mtDNA variation in natural Drosophila simulans populations. Genetics 132:713-723.
39. Weinreich, D. M., and D. M. Rand. 2000. Contrasting patterns of nonneutral evolution in proteins encoded in nuclear and mitochondrial genomes. Genetics 156:385-399.