Collaboration scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning

The International Handbook of Collaborative Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 403-419

  Fischer, Frank ^a   Kollar, Ingo ^a   Stegmann, Karsten ^a   Wecker, Christof ^a   Zottmann, Jan ^a   Weinberger, Armin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878104351     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203837290-33     Document Type: Chapter

References (75)

1. Barron, B. (2000). Achieving coordination in collaborative problem-solving groups. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), 403-436.
2. Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307-359.
3. Beers, P. J., Boshuizen, H. P. A., Kirschner, P. A., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2005). Computer support for knowledge construction in collaborative learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 623-643.
4. Berlin, I. (1969). Two concepts of liberty. In Four essays on liberty (pp. 118-172). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
5. Demetriadis, S., Egerter, T., Hanisch, F., & Fischer, F. (2011). Peer review-based scripted collaboration to support domain-specific and domain-general knowledge acquisition in computer science. Computer Science Education, 21(1), 29-56.
6. De Wever, B., Van Keer, H., Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2009). Structuring asynchronous discussion groups: The impact of role assignment and self-assessment on students’ levels of knowledge construction through social negotiation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 177-188.
7. De Wever, B., van Keer, H., Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2010). Roles as a structuring tool in online discussion groups: The differential impact of different roles on social knowledge construction. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 516-523.
8. Dillenbourg P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL (pp. 61-91). Heerlen, The Netherlands: Open University Press.
9. Dillenbourg, P., & Hong, F. (2008). The mechanics of CSCL macro scripts. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(1), 5-23.
10. Dillenbourg, P., & Jermann, P. (2007). Designing integrative scripts. In F. Fischer, H. Mandl, J. Haake, & I. Kollar (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported communication of knowledge-cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (pp. 275-301). New York: Springer.
11. Dillenbourg, P., & Tchounikine, P. (2007). Flexibility in macro-scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 1-13.
12. Diziol, D., Walker, E., Rummel, N., & Koedinger, K. (2010). Using intelligent tutor technology to implement adaptive support for student collaboration. Educational Psychology Review, 22(1), 89-102.
13. Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Mandl, H., & Haake, J. M. (Eds.). (2007). Scripting computer-supported communication of knowledge-cognitive, computational, and educational perspectives. New York: Springer.
14. Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Stegmann, K. & Wecker, C. (in press). Toward a script theory of guidance in computer-supported collaborative learning. Educational Psychologist.
15. Gweon, G., Rosé, C. P., Zaiss, Z., & Carey, R. (2006). Providing support for adaptive scripting in an on-line collaborative learning environment. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 251-260). New York: ACM Press.
16. Hämäläinen, R., Oksanen, K., & Häkkinen, P. (2008). Designing and analyzing collaboration in a scripted game for vocational education. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(6), 2496-2506.
17. Harrer, A., Malzahn, N., & Hoppe, H. U. (2007). Graphical modeling and simulation of learning designs. In T. Hirashima, H. U. Hoppe, & S. S. Young (Eds.), Supporting learning flow through integrative technologies (pp. 291-294). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.
18. Hudson, J. A., Fivush, R., & Kuebli, J. (1992). Scripts and episodes: The development of event memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 483-505.
19. Kerr, N. L., & Bruun, S. E. (1983). Dispensability of member-effort and group motivation loss: Free-rider effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 78-94.
20. Kester, L., & Paas, F. (2005). Instructional interventions to enhance collaboration in powerful learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 689-696.
21. King, A. (1998). Transactive peer tutoring: Distributing cognition and metacognition. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 57-74.
22. King, A. (1999). Discourse patterns for mediating peer learning. In A. M. O’Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 87-115). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. King, A. (2007). Scripting collaborative learning processes: A cognitive perspective. In F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl, & J. M. Haake (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational, and educational perspectives (pp. 13-37). New York: Springer.
24. Kirschner, P. A., Beers, P. J., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2008). Coercing shared knowledge in collaborative learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(2), 403-420.
25. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.
26. Kobbe, L., Weinberger, A., Dillenbourg, P., Harrer, A., Hämäläinen, R., Häkkinen, P., & Fischer, F. (2007). Specifying computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2-3), 211-224.
27. Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2006). Supporting self-regulated learners for a while and what computers can contribute. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(4), 425-435.
28. Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. W. (2006). Collaboration scripts—A conceptual analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 18(2), 159-185.
29. Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Slotta, J. D. (2007). Internal and external scripts in computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning. Learning & Instruction, 17(6), 708-721.
30. Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Slotta, J. D. (2008). Argumentation in web-based collaborative inquiry learning: Scripts for writing and scripts for talking aren’t the same. In G. Kanselaar, V. Jonker, P. A. Kirschner, & F. Prins (Eds.), International perspectives in the learning sciences: creating a learning world: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference for the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2008 (Vol. 1, pp. 453-460). Utrecht, The Netherlands: ISLS.
31. Kollar, I., Wecker, C., Langer, S., & Fischer, F. (2011). Orchestrating web-based collaborative inquiry learning with small group and classroom scripts. In H. Spada, G. Stahl, N. Miyake, & N. Law (Eds.), Connecting computer-supported collaborative learning to policy and practice: CSCL2011 Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1, pp. 422-429). Hong Kong, China: ISLS.
32. Kolodner, J. L. (2007). The roles of scripts in promoting collaborative discourse in learning by design. In F. Fischer, H. Mandl, J. Haake, & I. Kollar (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning—Cognitive, computational, and educational perspectives (pp. 237-271). New York: Springer.
33. Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.
34. Laurillard, D. (2009). The pedagogical challenges to collaborative technologies. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(1), 5-20.
35. Linn, M. C., & Eylon, B.-S. (2011). Science learning and instruction: Taking advantage of technology to promote knowledge integration. New York: Routledge.
36. Linn, M.C., Lee, H.-S., Tinker, R., Husic, F., & Chiu, J. L. (2006). Teaching and assessing knowledge integration in science. Science, 313, 1049-1050.
37. Mäkitalo, K., Weinberger, A., Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., & Fischer, F. (2005). Epistemic cooperation scripts in online learning environments: Fostering learning by reducing uncertainty in discourse? Computers in Human Behavior, 21(4), 603-622.
38. Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., Kohnle, C., & Fischer, F. (2011). Computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning and classroom scripts: Effects on help-seeking processes and learning outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 21(2), 257-266.
39. Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59(1), 14-19.
40. McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. W. (2006). Supporting students’ construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 153-191.
41. Miao, Y., Harrer, K., Hoeksema, K., & Hoppe, U. (2007). Modeling CSCL scripts—A reflection on learning design approaches. In F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl, & J. M. Haake (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning—Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (pp. 117-135). New York: Springer.
42. Mu, J., Stegmann, K., Mayfield, E., Rosé, C., & Fischer, F. (2012). The ACODEA framework: Developing classification schemes for fully automatic classification of online discussions. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(2), 285-304.
43. O’Donnell, A. M., & Dansereau, D. F. (1992). Scripted cooperation in student dyads: A method for analyzing and enhancing academic learning and performance. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds.), Interactions in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning (pp. 120-141). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
44. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175.
45. Pea, R. D. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 423-451.
46. Pfister, H. R., & Oehl, M. (2009). The impact of goal focus, task type and group size on synchronous net-based collaborative learning discourses. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(2), 161-176.
47. Rall, M., & Gaba, D. M. (2005). Human performance and patient safety. In R. D. Miller (Ed.), Miller’s anesthesia (pp. 3021-3072). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier.
48. Reiser, B. J. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 273-304.
49. Ronen, M., Kohen-Vacs, D., Harrer, A., & Kali, Y. (2009). Modeling, creating and enacting online collaborative scripts. In A. Dimitracopoulou, C. O’Malley, D. Suthers, & P. Reimann (Eds.), Computer supported collaborative learning practices: CSCL2009 Community events proceedings (p. 218). Rhodes, Greece: ISLS.
50. Rosé, C. P., Wang, Y. C., Arguello, J., Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2008). Analyzing collaborative learning processes automatically: Exploiting the advances of computational linguistics in computer-supported collaborative learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3, 237-271.
51. Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2005). Learning to collaborate. An instructional approach to promoting collaborative problem-solving in computer-mediated settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 201-241.
52. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 249-268). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
53. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97-118). New York: Cambridge University Press.
54. Schank, R. C. (1999). Dynamic memory revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.
55. Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2005). Collaborative learning in asynchronous discussion groups: What about the impact on cognitive processing? Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 957-975.
56. Schoonenboom, J. (2008). The effect of a script and a structured interface in grounding discussions. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(3), 327-341.
57. Stahl, G. (2002). Rediscovering CSCL. In T. Koschmann, R. Hall, & N. Miyake (Eds.), CSCL 2: Carrying forward the conversation (pp. 169-181). New York: Springer.
58. Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 409-425). New York: Cambridge University Press.
59. Stegmann, K., Mu, J., Gehlen-Baum, V., & Fischer, F. (2011). The myth of over-scripting: Can novices be supported too much? In H. Spada, G. Stahl, N. Miyake, & N. Law (Eds.), Connecting computer-supported collaborative learning to policy and practice: CSCL2011 Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1, pp. 406-413). Hong Kong, China: ISLS.
60. Stegmann, K., Streng, S., Halbinger, M., Koch, J., Fischer, F., & Hussmann, H. (2009). eXtremely Simple Scripting (XSS): A framework to speed up the development of computer-supported collaboration scripts. In A. Dimitracopoulou, C. O’Malley, D. Suthers, & P. Reimann (Eds.), Computer supported collaborative learning practices: CSCL2009 community events proceedings (pp. 195-197). Rhodes, Greece: ISLS.
61. Stegmann, K., Wecker, C., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2012). Collaborative argumentation and cognitive elaboration in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Instructional Science, 40(2), 297-323.
62. Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2007). Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(4), 421-447.
63. Strijbos, J. W., Kirschner, P. A., & Martens, R. (2004). What we know about CSCL… and what we do not know (but need to) know about CSCL. In J. W. Strijbos, P. A. Kirschner, & R. Martens (Eds.), What we know about CSCL and implementing it in higher education (pp. 245-259). Boston, MA: Kluwer.
64. Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., Jochems, W. M. G., & Broers, N. J. (2004). The effect of functional roles on group efficiency: Using multilevel modeling and content analysis to investigate computer-supported collaboration in small groups. Small Group Research, 35, 195-229.
65. Teasley, S. D. (1995). The role of talk in children’s peer collaborations. Developmental Psychology, 31(2), 207-220.
66. Teasley, S. D., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Constructing a joint problem space: The computer as a tool for sharing knowledge. In S. P. Lajoie & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Discourse, tools, and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition (pp. 229-258). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
67. Walker, E., Rummel, N., & Koedinger, K. (2011). Adaptive support for CSCL: Is it feedback relevance or increased student accountability that matters? In H. Spada, G. Stahl, N. Miyake, & N. Law (Eds.), Connecting computer-supported collaborative learning to policy and practice: CSCL2011 Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1, pp. 334-341). Hong Kong, China: ISLS.
68. Wang, X., Kollar, I., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2011). Adaptable scripting in computer-supported collaborative learning to foster knowledge and skill acquisition. In H. Spada, G. Stahl, N. Miyake, & N. Law (Eds.), Connecting computer-supported collaborative learning to policy and practice: CSCL2011 Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1, pp. 382-389). Hong Kong, China: ISLS.
69. Wang, Y., Rosé, C. P., Joshi, M., Fischer, F., Weinberger, A., & Stegmann, K. (2007). Context based classification for automatic collaborative learning process analysis. Proceeding of the 2007 Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education: Building Technology Rich Learning Contexts that Work (pp. 662-664). Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS.
70. Wecker, C. & Fischer, F. (2011). From guided to self-regulated performance of domain-general skills: The role of peer monitoring during the fading of instructional scripts. Learning and Instruction, 21(6), 746-756.
71. Wecker, C., Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Prechtl, H. (submitted). Fostering scientific literacy in the classroom with continuous and faded computer-supported collaboration scripts.
72. Weinberger, A., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Epistemic and social scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 33(1), 1-30.
73. Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2010). Learning to argue online: Scripted groups surpass individuals (unscripted groups do not). Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 506-515.
74. Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2007). Scripting argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported learning environments. In F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl, & J. Haake (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported communication of knowledge—Cognitive, computational and educational Perspectives(pp. 191-211). New York: Springer.
75. Zottmann, J., Dieckmann, P., Rall, M., Fischer, F., & Taraszow, T. (2006). Fostering simulation-based learning in medical education with collaboration scripts. Simulation in Healthcare, 1(3), 193.