The effect of a script and a structured interface in grounding discussions

International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 327-341

  Schoonenboom, Judith ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Computer support; Grounding; Group discussion; Learning; Scripting

Indexed keywords

EID: 50949116866     PISSN: 15561607     EISSN: 15561615     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11412-008-9042-8     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Baker, M., Hansen, T., Joiner, R., & Traum, D. (1999). The role of grounding in collaborative learning tasks. In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 31-63, 1st ed.). Amsterdam: Pergamon.
2. Baker, M., & Lund, K. (1997). Promoting reflective interactions in a CSCL environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13(3), 175-193.
3. Brennan, S. E., & Lockridge, C. B. (2006). Computer-mediated communication: A cognitive science approach. In E. K. Brown, & A. H. Anderson (Eds.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd rev. ed., pp. 775-780). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Ltd.
4. Brna, P., Cox, R., & Good, J. (2001). Learning to think and communicate with diagrams: 14 questions to consider. Artificial Intelligence Review, 15(1/2), 115-134.
5. Christoph, L. H. (2006). The role of metacognitive skills in learning to solve problems. Retrieved from http://dare.uva.nl/en/record/188642.
6. Collis, B., & Pals, N. (2000). A model for predicting an individual's use of a telematics application for a learning-related purpose. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 6(1), 63-103.
7. Collis, B., Peters, O., & Pals, N. (2001). A model for predicting the educational use of information and communication technologies. Instructional Science, 29(2), 95-125.
8. Cramton, C. D. (2001). The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organization science: A Journal of the Institute of Management Sciences, 12(3), 346-371.
9. Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In M. Winnubst, P. A. Kirschner, & W. M. G. Jochems (Eds.), Three worlds of CSCL: can we support CSCL? (pp. 61-91). Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.
10. Dugosh, K. L., & Paulus, P. B. (2005). Cognitive and social comparison processes in brainstorming. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(3), 313-320.
11. Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., & Byman, A. (2001). Sharing and making perspectives in web-based conferencing. In P. Dillenbourg & A. Eurelings (Eds.), European perspectives on computer-supported collaborative learning: proceedings of the first European conference on computer-supported collaborative learning: March 22-24, 2001, Universiteit Maastricht, the Netherlands (pp. 285-292). Maastricht: Universiteit Maastricht.
12. Hron, A., & Friedrich, H. F. (2003). A review of web-based collaborative learning: factors beyond technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(1), 70-79.
13. Hron, A., Hesse, F. W., Cress, U., & Giovis, C. (2000). Implicit and explicit dialogue structuring in virtual learning groups. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(1), 53-64.
14. Hron, A., Hesse, F. W., Reinhard, P., & Picard, E. (1997). Strukturierte Kooperation beim computerunterstützten kollaborativen Lernen. Unterrichtswissenschaft: Forschung und Entwicklung, Programmierung, Technologie, 25(1), 56-69.
15. King, A. (1999). Discourse patterns for mediating peer learning. In A. M. O'Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 87-115). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. W. (2003). Cooperation scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning. In B. B. Wasson & S. Ludvigsen (Eds.), Designing for change in networked learning environments: proceedings of the international conference on computer support for collaborative learning 2003 (pp. 59-61). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
17. Krauss, R. M., & Fussell, S. R. (1990). Mutual knowledge and communicative effectiveness. In J. Galegher, R. E. Kraut, & C. Egido (Eds.), Intellectual teamwork: social and technological foundations of cooperative work (pp. 111-145). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
18. Kraut, R. E., Fussell, S. R., Brennan, S. E., & Siegel, J. (2002). Understanding effects of proximity on collaboration: Implications for technologies to support remote collaborative work. In S. Kiesler & P. Hinds (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 137-162). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
19. Larkin, J. H., & Simon, H. A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11(1), 65-100.
20. Mäkitalo, K., Häkkinen, P., Leinonen, P., & Järvelä, S. (2002). Mechanisms of common ground in case-based web discussions in teacher education. The Internet and Higher Education: A Quarterly Review of Innovations in Post-Secondary Education, 5(3), 247-266.
21. Mäkitalo, K., Weinberger, A., Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., & Fischer, F. (2005). Epistemic cooperation scripts in online learning environments: fostering learning by reducing uncertainty in discourse. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(4), 603-622.
22. O'Donnell, A. M., & Dansereau, D. F. (1992). Scripted cooperation in student dyads: a method for analyzing and enhancing academic learning and performance. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups: the theoretical anatomy of group learning (pp. 120-141). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Saab, N. (2005). Chat and explore: the role of support and motivation in collaborative scientific discovery learning. Retrieved from http://dare.uva.nl/ en/record/166610.
24. Smith, J. A. (Ed.). (2003). Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods. London: Sage.
25. Strijbos, J.-W. (2004). The effect of roles on computer-supported collaborative learning. Maastricht: Datawyse.
26. Suthers, D. D., & Hundhausen, C. D. (2003). An experimental study of the effects of representational guidance on collaborative learning processes. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 183-218.
27. Veerman, A. L. (2000). Computer-supported collaborative learning through argumentation. Retrieved from http://igitur-archive.library.uu.nl/dissertations/ 1908992/inhoud.htm.
28. Weinberger, A. (2003). Scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning. Effects of social and epistemic cooperation scripts on collaborative knowledge construction. Munich, Germany: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München.
29. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: design and methods, Applied social research methods series (vol. 5, 3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.