Sister chromatid cohesion establishment occurs in concert with lagging strand synthesis

Cell Cycle

Volumn 11, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 2114-2121

  Rudra, Soumya ^a   Skibbens, Robert V ^a  

^a LEHIGH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

CHL1; Cohesion; CTF7 ECO1; DNA replication; Establishment; FEN1; Replication fork

Indexed keywords

COHESIN; FLAP ENDONUCLEASE; HELICASE; OKAZAKI FRAGMENT;

ACETYLATION; ARTICLE; BIOCHEMISTRY; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CYTOGENETICS; SISTER CHROMATID; SYNTHESIS;

EID: 84861918348     PISSN: 15384101     EISSN: 15514005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cc.20547     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Onn I, Heidinger-Pauli JM, Guacci V, Unal E, Koshland DE. Sister chromatid cohesion: a simple concept with a complex reality. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2008; 24:105-29; PMID:18616427; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cellbio. 24.110707.175350.
2. Skibbens RV. Mechanisms of sister chromatid pairing. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol 2008; 269:283-339; PMID:18779060; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1937-6448(08) 01005-8.
3. Unal E, Heidinger-Pauli JM, Koshland D. DNA double-strand breaks trigger genome-wide sister-chromatid cohesion through Eco1 (Ctf7). Science 2007; 317:245-8; PMID:17626885; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1140637.
4. Ström L, Karlsson C, Lindroos HB, Wedahl S, Katou Y, Shirahige K, et al. Postreplicative formation of cohesion is required for repair and induced by a single DNA break. Science 2007; 317:242-5; PMID:17626884; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1140649.
5. Dorsett D. Cohesin: genomic insights into controlling gene transcription and development. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2011; 21:199-206; PMID:21324671; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2011.01.018.
6. Ciosk R, Shirayama M, Shevchenko A, Tanaka T, Toth A, Shevchenko A, et al. Cohesin's binding to chromosomes depends on a separate complex consisting of Scc2 and Scc4 proteins. Mol Cell 2000; 5:243-54; PMID:10882066; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80420-7.
7. Gerlich D, Koch B, Dupeux F, Peters JM, Ellenberg J. Live-cell imaging reveals a stable cohesin-chromatin interaction after but not before DNA replication. Curr Biol 2006; 16:1571-8; PMID:16890534; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.cub.2006.06.068.
8. Skibbens RV. Establishment of sister chromatid cohesion. Curr Biol 2009; 19:1126-32; PMID:20064425; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.10.067.
9. Unal E, Heidinger-Pauli JM, Kim W, Guacci V, Onn I, Gygi SP, et al. A molecular determinant for the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion. Science 2008; 321:566-9; PMID:18653894; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science. 1157880.
10. Rolef Ben-Shahar T, Heeger S, Lehane C, East P, Flynn H, Skehel M, et al. Eco1-dependent cohesin acetylation during establishment of sister chromatid cohesion. Science 2008; 321:563-6; PMID:18653893; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/ science.1157774.
11. Zhang J, Shi X, Li Y, Kim BJ, Jia J, Huang Z, et al. Acetylation of Smc3 by Eco1 is required for S phase sister chromatid cohesion in both human and yeast. Mol Cell 2008; 31:143-51; PMID:18614053; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. molcel.2008.06.006.
12. Skibbens RV, Corson LB, Koshland D, Hieter P. Ctf7p is essential for sister chromatid cohesion and links mitotic chromosome structure to the DNA replication machinery. Genes Dev 1999; 13:307-19; PMID:9990855; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.13.3.307.
13. Tóth A, Ciosk R, Uhlmann F, Galova M, Schleiffer A, Nasmyth K. Yeast cohesin complex requires a conserved protein, Eco1p (Ctf7), to establish cohesion between sister chromatids during DNA replication. Genes Dev 1999; 13:320-33; PMID:9990856; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.13.3.320.
14. Mönnich M, Kuriger Z, Print CG, Horsfield JA. A zebrafish model of Roberts syndrome reveals that Esco2 depletion interferes with development by disrupting the cell cycle. PLoS One 2011; 6:20051; PMID:21637801; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020051.
15. Terret ME, Sherwood R, Rahman S, Qin J, Jallepalli PV. Cohesin acetylation speeds the replication fork. Nature 2009; 462:231-4; PMID:19907496; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08550.
16. Sherwood R, Takahashi TS, Jallepalli PV. Sister acts: coordinating DNA replication and cohesion establishment. Genes Dev 2010; 24:2723-31; PMID:21159813; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1976710.
17. Lengronne A, McIntyre J, Katou Y, Kanoh Y, Hopfner KP, Shirahige K, et al. Establishment of sister chromatid cohesion at the S. cerevisiae replication fork. Mol Cell 2006; 23:787-99; PMID:16962805; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. molcel.2006.08.018.
18. Skibbens RV. Sticking a fork in cohesin - it's not done yet! Trends Genet 2011; 27:499-506; PMID:21943501; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2011.08.004.
19. Bernard P, Schmidt CK, Vaur S, Dheur S, Drogat J, Genier S, et al. Cell cycle regulation of cohesin stability along fission yeast chromosomes. EMBO J 2008; 27:111-21; PMID:18079700; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601955.
20. Gary R, Park MS, Nolan JP, Cornelius HL, Kozyreva OG, Tran HT, et al. A novel role in DNA metabolism for the binding of Fen1/Rad27 to PCNA and implications for genetic risk. Mol Cell Biol 1999; 19:5373-82; PMID:10409728.
21. Sommers CH, Miller EJ, Dujon B, Prakash S, Prakash L. Conditional lethality of null mutations in RTH1 that encodes the yeast counterpart of a mammalian 5′- to 3′-exonuclease required for lagging strand DNA synthesis in reconstituted systems. J Biol Chem 1995; 270:4193-6; PMID:7876174; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.270.9.4193.
22. Warren CD, Eckley DM, Lee MS, Hanna JS, Hughes A, Peyser B, et al. S-phase checkpoint genes safeguard high-fidelity sister chromatid cohesion. Mol Biol Cell 2004; 15:1724-35; PMID:14742710; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E03-09- 0637.
23. Farina A, Shin JH, Kim DH, Bermudez VP, Kelman Z, Seo YS, et al. Studies with the human cohesin establishment factor, ChlR1. Association of ChlR1 with Ctf18-RFC and Fen1. J Biol Chem 2008; 283:20925-36; PMID:18499658; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M802696200.
24. Skibbens RV. Chl1p, a DNA helicase-like protein in budding yeast, functions in sister-chromatid cohesion. Genetics 2004; 166:33-42; PMID:15020404; http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.166.1.33.
25. Mayer ML, Pot I, Chang M, Xu H, Aneliunas V, Kwok T, et al. Identification of protein complexes required for efficient sister chromatid cohesion. Mol Biol Cell 2004; 15:1736-45; PMID:14742714; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1091/mbc.E03-08-0619.
26. Petronczki M, Chwalla B, Siomos MF, Yokobayashi S, Helmhart W, Deutschbauer AM, et al. Sister-chromatid cohesion mediated by the alternative RF-CCtf18/Dcc1/Ctf8, the helicase Chl1 and the polymerase-alpha-associated protein Ctf4 is essential for chromatid disjunction during meiosis II. J Cell Sci 2004; 117:3547-59; PMID:15226378; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.01231.
27. Bylund GO, Burgers PM. Replication protein A-directed unloading of PCNA by the Ctf18 cohesion establishment complex. Mol Cell Biol 2005; 25:5445-55; PMID:15964801; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.25.13.5445-55.2005.
28. Boeke JD, Trueheart J, Natsoulis G, Fink GR. 5-Fluoroorotic acid as a selective agent in yeast molecular genetics. Methods Enzymol 1987; 154:164-75; PMID:3323810; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(87)54076-9.
29. Loeillet S, Palancade B, Cartron M, Thierry A, Richard GF, Dujon B, et al. Genetic network interactions among replication, repair and nuclear pore deficiencies in yeast. DNA Repair (Amst) 2005; 4:459-68; PMID:15725626; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2004.11.010.
30. Tong AH, Lesage G, Bader GD, Ding H, Xu H, Xin X, et al. Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network. Science 2004; 303:808-13; PMID:14764870; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1091317.
31. Moldovan GL, Pfander B, Jentsch S. PCNA controls establishment of sister chromatid cohesion during S phase. Mol Cell 2006; 23:723-32; PMID:16934511; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2006.07.007.
32. Hou F, Zou H. Two human orthologues of Eco1/Ctf7 acetyltransferases are both required for proper sister-chromatid cohesion. Mol Biol Cell 2005; 16:3908-18; PMID:15958495; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E04-12-1063.
33. Gause M, Misulovin Z, Bilyeu A, Dorsett D. Dosage-sensitive regulation of cohesin chromosome binding and dynamics by Nipped-B, Pds5 and Wapl. Mol Cell Biol 2010; 30:4940-51; PMID:20696838; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00642-10.
34. Skibbens RV. Holding your own: establishing sister chromatid cohesion. Genome Res 2000; 10:1664-71; PMID:11076851; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.153600.
35. Reagan MS, Pittenger C, Siede W, Friedberg EC. Characterization of a mutant strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with a deletion of the RAD27 gene, a structural homolog of the RAD2 nucleotide excision repair gene. J Bacteriol 1995; 177:364-71; PMID:7814325.
36. 2/M. EMBO J 1990; 9:4347-58; PMID:2265610.
37. McNairn AJ, Gerton JL. Intersection of ChIP and FLIP, genomic methods to study the dynamics of the cohesin proteins. Chromosome Res 2009; 17:155-63; PMID:19308698; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10577-008-9007-9.
38. Jasencakova Z, Groth A. Restoring chromatin after replication: how new and old histone marks come together. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2010; 21:231-7; PMID:19815085; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2009.09.018.
39. Brosh RM Jr. Put on your thinking cap: G-quadruplexes, helicases and telomeres. Aging (Albany NY) 2011; 3:332-5; PMID:21732565.
40. Wu Y, Brosh RM Jr. DNA helicase and helicasenuclease enzymes with a conserved iron-sulfur cluster. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; In press; PMID:22287629; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks039.
41. Wu Y, Sommers JA, Khan I, de Winter JP, Brosh RM Jr. Biochemical characterization of Warsaw breakage syndrome helicase. J Biol Chem 2012; 287:1007-21; PMID:22102414; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.276022.
42. Mannini L, Menga S, Musio A. The expanding universe of cohesin functions: a new genome stability caretaker involved in human disease and cancer. Hum Mutat 2010; 31:623-30; PMID:20513141; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/humu.21252.
43. Longtine MS, McKenzie A, 3rd, Demarini DJ, Shah NG, Wach A, Brachat A, et al. Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR-based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 1998; 14:953-61; PMID:9717241; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(199807)14:10〈953:: AID-YEA293〉3.0.CO;2-U.
44. Nasmyth K. How might cohesin hold sister chromatids together? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2005; 360:483-96; PMID:15897174; http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1604.
45. Surcel A, Koshland D, Ma H, Simpson RT. Cohesin interaction with centromeric minichromosomes shows a multi-complex rod-shaped structure. PLoS One 2008; 3:2453; PMID:18545699; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002453.
46. Burgers PM. Polymerase dynamics at the eukaryotic DNA replication fork. J Biol Chem 2009; 284:4041-5; PMID:18835809; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc. R800062200.