Genetic dissection of parallel sister-chromatid cohesion pathways

Genetics

Volumn 176, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 1417-1429

  Xu, Hong ^a   Boone, Charles ^a   Brown, Grant W ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COHESIN; MUTANT PROTEIN;

ALLELE; ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE G2 PHASE; CELL CYCLE M PHASE; CHROMOSOME PAIRING; CHROMOSOME REPLICATION; GENE DELETION; GENE FUNCTION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC DISORDER; MEIOSIS; MITOSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SISTER CHROMATID; SISTER CHROMATID COHESION; TEMPERATURE SENSITIVE MUTANT;

CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CHROMATIDS; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; MEIOSIS; MITOSIS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 34547131331     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: 00166731     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.072876     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. ALCASABAS, A. A., A. J. OSBORN, J. BACHANT, F. HU, P. J. WERLER et al., 2001 Mrc1 transduces signals of DNA replication stress to activate Rad53. Nat. Cell Biol. 3: 958-965.
2. BAETZ, K. K., N. J. KROGAN, A. EMILI, J. GREENBLATT and P. HIETER, 2004 The ctf13-30/CTF13 genomic haploinsufficiency modifier screen identifies the yeast chromatin remodeling complex RSC, which is required for the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24(3): 1232-1244.
3. BAILIS, J. M., P. BERNARD, R. ANTONELLI, R. C. ALLSHIRE and S. L. FORSBURG, 2003 Hsk1-Dfp1 is required for heterochromatinmediated cohesion at centromeres. Nat. Cell Biol. 5: 1111-1116.
4. BARBOUR, L., and W. XIAO, 2003 Regulation of alternative replication bypass pathways at stalled replication forks and its effects on genome stability: a yeast model. Mutat. Res. 532: 137-155.
5. BELLAOUI, M., M. CHANG, J. OU, H. XU, C. BOONE et al., 2003 Elg1 forms an alternative RFC complex important for DNA replication and genome integrity. EMBO J. 22: 4304-4313.
6. BERMUDEZ, V. P., Y. MANIWA, I. TAPPIN, K. OZATO, K. YOKOMORI et al., 2003 The alternative Ctf18-Dcc1-Ctf8-replication factor C complex requiredfor sister chromatid cohesion loads proliferating cell nuclear antigen onto DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 10237-10242.
7. BLOOM, K., 2000 It's a kar9ochore to capture microtubules. Nat. Cell Biol. 2: E96-E98.
8. BOITEUX, S., and M. GUILLET, 2004 Abasic sites in DNA: repair and biological consequences in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Rep. 3: 1-12.
9. BYLUND, G. O., and P. M. BURGERS, 2005 Replication protein A-directed unloading of PCNA by the Ctf18 cohesion establishment complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25: 5445-5455.
10. CALZADA, A., B. HODGSON, M. KANEMAKI, A. BUENO and K. LABIB, 2005 Molecular anatomy and regulation of a stable replisome at a paused eukaryotic DNA replication fork. Genes Dev. 19(16): 1905-1919.
11. CAMPBELL, J. L., and O. COHEN-FIX, 2002 Chromosome cohesion: Ring around the sisters? Trends Biochem. Sci. 27(10): 492-495.
12. CHANG, M., M. BELLAOUI, C. BOONE and G. W. BROWN, 2002 A genomewide screen for methyl methanesulfonate-sensitive mutants reveals genes required for S phase progression in the presence of DNA damage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 16934-16939.
13. CIOSK, R., W. ZACHARIAE, C. MICHAELIS, A. SHEVCHENKO, M. MANN et al., 1998 An ESP1/PDS1 complex regulates loss of sister chromatid cohesion at the metaphase to anaphase transition in yeast. Cell 93: 1067-1076.
14. CIOSK, R., M. SHIRAYAMA, A. SHEVCHENKO, T. TANAKA, A. TOTH et al., 2000 Cohesin's binding to chromosomes depends on a separate complex consisting of Scc2 and Scc4 proteins. Mol. Cell 5:243-254.
15. DAS, S. P., and P. SINHA, 2005 The budding yeast protein Chl1p has a role in transcriptional silencing, rDNA recombination, and aging. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 337(1): 167-172.
16. ENDOW, S. A., S. J. KANG, L. L. SATTERWHITE, M. D. ROSE, V. P. SKEEN et al., 1994 Yeast Kar3 is a minus-end microtubule motor protein that destabilizes microtubules preferentially at the minus ends. EMBO J. 13: 2708-2713.
17. FOSS, E. J., 2001 Tof1p regulates DNA damage responses during S phase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 157: 567-577.
18. GAMBUS, A., R. C. JONES, A. SANCHEZ-DIAZ, M. KANEMAKI, F. VAN DEURSEN et al., 2006 GINS maintains association of Cdc45 with MCM in replisome progression complexes at eukaryotic DNA replication forks. Nat. Cell Biol. 8: 358-366.
19. GAME, J. C., G. W. BIRRELL, J. A. BROWN, T. SHIBATA, C. BACCARI et al., 2003 Use of a genome-wide approach to identify new genes that control resistance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to ionizing radiation. Radiat. Res. 160(1): 14-24.
20. GARY, R., M. S. PARK, J. P. NOLAN, H. L. CORNELIUS, O. G. KOZYREVA et al., 1999 A novel role in DNA metabolism for the binding of Fen1/Rad27 to PCNA and implications for genetic risk. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19: 5373-5382.
21. GERLICH, D., B. KOCH, F. DUPEUX, J. M. PETERS and J. ELLENBERG, 2006 Live-cell imaging reveals a stable cohesin-chromatin interaction after but not before DNA replication. Curr. Biol. 16(15): 1571-1578.
22. GILLESPIE, P. J., and T. HIRANO, 2004 Scc2 couples replication licensing to sister chromatid cohesion in Xenopus egg extracts. Curr. Biol. 14(17): 1598-1603.
23. GRUBER, S., C. H. HAERING and K. NASMYTH, 2003 Chromosomal cohesin forms a ring. Cell 112(6): 765-777.
24. GUACCI, V., D. KOSHLAND and A. STRUNNIKOV, 1997 A direct link between sister chromatid cohesion and chromosome condensation revealed through the analysis of MCD1 in S. cerevisiae. Cell 91: 47-57.
25. HAERING, C. H., J. LOWE, A. HOCHWAGEN and K. NASMYTH, 2002 Molecular architecture of SMC proteins and the yeast cohesin complex. Mol. Cell 9(4): 773-788.
26. HANNA, J. S., E. S. KROLL, V. LUNDBLAD and F. A. SPENCER, 2001 Saccharomyces cerevisiae CTF18 and CTF4 are required for sister chromatid cohesion. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21: 3144-3158.
27. HARTMAN, T., K. STEAD, D. KOSHLAND and V. GUACCI, 2000 Pds5p is an essential chromosomal protein required for both sister chromatid cohesion and condensation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 151: 613-626.
28. HUANG, C. E., M. MILUTINOVICH and D. KOSHLAND, 2005 Rings, bracelet or snaps: fashionable alternatives for Smc complexes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 360(1455): 537-542.
29. IVESSA, A. S., J. Q. ZHOU, V. P. SCHULZ, E. K. MONSON and V. A. ZAKIAN, 2002 Saccharomyces Rrm3p, a 5′ to 3′ DNA helicase that promotes replication fork progression through telomeric and subtelomeric DNA. Genes Dev. 16: 1383-1396.
30. KANELLIS, P., R. AGYEI and D. DUROCHER, 2003 Elg1 forms an alternative PCNA-interacting RFC complex required to maintain genome stability. Curr. Biol. 13: 1583-1595.
31. KATOU, Y., Y. KANOH, M. BANDO, H. NOGUCHI, H. TANAKA et al., 2003 S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-pausing complex. Nature 424: 1078-1083.
32. LAM, W. W., E. A. PETERSON, M. YEUNG and B. D. LAVOIE, 2006 Condensin is required for chromosome arm cohesion during mitosis. Genes Dev. 20(21): 2973-2984.
33. LENGRONNE, A., J. MCINTYRE, Y. KATOU, Y. KANOH, K. P. HOPFNER et al., 2006 Establishment of sister chromatid cohesion at the S. cerevisiae replication fork. Mol. Cell 23(6): 787-799.
34. MACRIS, M. A., and P. SUNG, 2005 Multifaceted role of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Srs2 helicase in homologous recombination regulation. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 33: 1447-1450.
35. MAYER, M. L., S. P. GYGI, R. AEBERSOLD and P. HIETER, 2001 Identification of RFC(Ctf18p, Ctf8p, Dcc1p): an alternative RFC complex required for sister chromatid cohesion in S. cerevisiae. Mol. Cell 7: 959-970.
36. MAYER, M. L., I. POT, M. CHANG, H. XU, V. ANELIUNAS et al., 2004 Identification of protein complexes required for efficient sister chromatid cohesion. Mol. Biol. Cell 15: 1736-1745.
37. MCHUGH, P. J., W. R. SONES and J. A. HARTLEY, 2000 Repair of intermediate structures produced at DNA interstrand cross-links in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20: 3425-3433.
38. MICHAELIS, C., R. CIOSK and K. NASMYTH, 1997 Cohesins: chromosomal proteins that prevent premature separation of sister chromatids. Cell 91(1): 35-45.
39. MILES, J., and T. FORMOSA, 1992 Evidence that POB1, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein that binds to DNA polymerase alpha, acts in DNA metabolism in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12: 5724-5735.
40. MILUTINOVICH, M., and D. E. KOSHLAND, 2003 Molecular biology. SMC complexes - wrapped up in controversy. Science 300 (5622): 1101-1102.
41. MOHANTY, B. K., N. K. BAIRWA and D. BASTIA, 2006 The Tof1p-Csm3p protein complex counteracts the Rrm3p helicase to control replication termination of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103(4): 897-902.
42. MOLDOVAN, G. L., B. PFANDER and S. JENTSCH, 2006 PCNA controls establishment of sister chromatid cohesion during S phase. Mol. Cell 23(5): 723-732.
43. MYTHREYE, K., and K. S. BLOOM, 2003 Differential kinetochore protein requirements for establishment versus propagation of centromere activity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 160: 833-843.
44. NAIKI, T., T. KONDO, D. NAKADA, K. MATSUMOTO and K. SUGIMOTO, 2001 Chl12 (Ctf18) forms a novel replication factor C-related complex and functions redundantly with Rad24 in the DNA replication checkpoint pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21: 5838-5845.
45. NAKADA, D., K. MATSUMOTO and K. SUGIMOTO, 2003 ATM-related Tel1 associates with double-strand breaks through an Xrs2-dependent mechanism. Genes Dev. 17: 1957-1962.
46. NASMYTH, K., 1999 Separating sister chromatids. Trends Biochem. Sci. 24(3): 98-104.
47. NEDELCHEVA, M. N., A. ROGUEV, L. B. DOLAPCHIEV, A. SHEVCHENKO, H. B. TASKOV et al., 2005 Uncoupling of unwinding from DNA synthesis implies regulation of MCM helicase by Tof1/Mrc1/ Csm3 checkpoint complex. J. Mol. Biol. 347: 509-521.
48. OSBORN, A. J., and S. J. ELLEDGE, 2003 Mrc1 is a replication fork component whose phosphorylation in response to DNA replication stress activates Rad53. Genes Dev. 17: 1755-1767.
49. PAGE, B. D., L. L. SATTERWHITE, M. D. ROSE and M. SNYDER, 1994 Localization of the Kar3 kinesin heavy chain-related protein requires the Cik1 interacting protein. J. Cell Biol. 124: 507-519.
50. PAN, X., P. YE, D. S. YUAN, X. WANG, J. S. BADER et al., 2006 A DNA integrity network in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 124: 1069-1081.
51. PANIZZA, S., T. TANAKA, A. HOCHWAGEN, F. EISENHABER and K. NASMYTH, 2000 Pds5 cooperates with cohesin in maintaining sister chromatid cohesion. Curr. Biol. 10: 1557-1564.
52. PARSONS, A. B., R. L. BROST, H. DING, Z. LI, C. ZHANG et al., 2004 Integration of chemical-genetic and genetic interaction data links bioactive compounds to cellular target pathways. Nat. Biotechnol. 22(1): 62-69.
53. PETRONCZKI, M., B. CHWALLA, M. F. SIOMOS, S. YOKOBAYASHI, W. HELMHART et al., 2004 Sister-chromatid cohesion mediated by the alternative RF-CCtf18/Dcc1/Ctf8, the helicase Chl1 and the polymerase-alpha-associated protein Ctf4 is essential for chromatid disjunction during meiosis II. J. Cell Sci. 117: 3547-3559.
54. POT, I., V. MEASDAY, B. SNYDSMAN, G. CAGNEY, S. FIELDS et al., 2003 Chl4p and iml3p are two new members of the budding yeast outer kinetochore. Mol. Biol. Cell 14: 460-476.
55. REDON, C., D. R. PILCH and W. M. BONNER, 2006 Genetic analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae H2A serine 129 mutant suggests a functional relationship between H2A and the sister-chromatid cohesion partners Csm3-Tof1 for the repair of topoisomerase I-induced DNA damage. Genetics 172: 67-76.
56. RYU, M. J., B. J. KIM, J. W. LEE, M. W. LEE, H. K. CHOI et al., 2006 Direct interaction between cohesin complex and DNA replication machinery. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 341(3): 770-775.
57. SCHWARTZ, K., K. RICHARDS and D. BOTSTEIN, 1997 BIM1 encodes amicrotubule-binding protein in yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 8: 2677-2691.
58. SHERMAN, F., 1991 Getting started with yeast. Meth. Enzymol. 194: 3-21.
59. SHIMADA, K., and S. M. GASSER, 2007 The origin recognition complex functions in sister-chromatid cohesion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 128: 85-99.
60. SHIOMI, Y., A. SHINOZAKI, K. SUGIMOTO, J. USUKURA, C. OBUSE et al., 2004 The reconstituted human Chl12-RFC complex functions as a second PCNA loader. Genes Cells 9(4): 279-290.
61. SKIBBENS, R. V., 2004 Chl1p, a DNA helicase-like protein in budding yeast, functions in sister-chromatid cohesion. Genetics 166: 33-42.
62. SKIBBENS, R. V., L. B. CORSON, D. KOSHLAND and P. HIETER, 1999 Ctf7p is essential for sister chromatid cohesion and links mitotic chromosome structure to the DNA replication machinery. Genes Dev. 13: 307-319.
63. STEAD, K., C. AGUILAR, T. HARTMAN, M. DREXEL, P. MELUH et al., 2003 Pds5p regulates the maintenance of sister chromatid cohesion and is sumoylated to promote the dissolution of cohesion. J. Cell Biol. 163(4): 729-741.
64. STRUNNIKOV, A. V., V. L. LARIONOV and D. KOSHLAND, 1993 SMC1: an essential yeast gene encoding a putative head-rod-tail protein is required for nuclear division and defines a new ubiquitous protein family. J. Cell Biol. 123: 1635-1648.
65. SUTER, B., A. TONG, M. CHANG, L. YU, G. W. BROWN et al., 2004 The origin recognition complex links replication, sister chromatid cohesion and transcriptional silencing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 167: 579-591.
66. SZYJKA, S. J., C. J. VIGGIANI and O. M. APARICIO, 2005 Mrc1 is required for normal progression of replication forks throughout chromatin in S. cerevisiae. Mol. Cell 19(5): 691-697.
67. TAKEDA, T., K. OGINO, K. TATEBAYASHI, H. IKEDA, K. ARAI et al., 2001 Regulation of initiation of S phase, replication checkpoint signaling, and maintenance of mitotic chromosome structures during S phase by Hsk1 kinase in the fission yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 12: 1257-1274.
68. TONG, A. H., G. LESAGE, G. D. BADER, H. DING, H. XU et al., 2004 Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network. Science 303: 808-813.
69. TORRES, J. Z., S. L. SCHNAKENBERG and V. A. ZAKIAN, 2004 Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rrm3p DNA helicase promotes genome integrity by preventing replication fork stalling: viability of rrm3 cells requires the intra-S-phase checkpoint and fork restart activities. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24(8): 3198-3212.
70. TOTH, A., R. CIOSK, F. UHLMANN, M. GALOVA, A. SCHLEIFFER et al., 1999 Yeast cohesin complex requires a conserved protein, Eco1p(Ctf7), to establish cohesion between sister chromatids during DNA replication. Genes Dev. 13: 320-333.
71. TOURRIERE, H., G. VERSINI, V. CORDON- PRECIADO, C. ALABERT and P. PASERO, 2005 Mrc1 and Tof1 promote replication fork progression and recovery independently of Rad53. Mol. Cell 19: 699-706.
72. UHLMANN, F., and K. NASMYTH, 1998 Cohesion between sister chromatids must be established during DNA replication. Curr. Biol. 8(20): 1095-1101.
73. VISINTIN, R., S. PRINZ and A. AMON, 1997 CDC20 and CDH1: a family of substrate-specific activators of APC-dependent proteolysis. Science 278(5337): 460-463.
74. WARREN, C. D., D. M. ECKLEY, M. S. LEE, J. S. HANNA, A. HUGHES et al., 2004 S-phase checkpoint genes safeguard high-fidelity sister chromatid cohesion. Mol. Biol. Cell 15(4): 1724-1735.
75. WILLIAMS, D. R., and J. R. MCINTOSH (Editors), 2002 mcl11, the Schizosaccharomyces pombe homologue of CTF4, is important for chromosome replication, cohesion, and segregation. Eukaryot. Cell 1(5): 758-773.
76. XU, H., C. BOONE and H. L. KLEIN, 2004 Mrc1 is required for sister chromatid cohesion to aid in recombination repair of spontaneous damage. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24(16): 7082-7090.
77. ZHOU, Y., and T. S. WANG, 2004 A coordinated temporal interplay of nucleosome reorganization factor, sister chromatin cohesion factor, and DNA polymerase alpha facilitates DNA replication. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24(21): 9568-9579.