Chromosome cohesion is regulated by a clock gene paralogue TIM-1

Nature

Volumn 423, Issue 6943, 2003, Pages 1002-1009

  Chan, Raymond C ^a   Chan, Annette ^a   Jeon, Mili ^b   Wu, Tammy F ^a   Pasqualone, Danielle ^a   Rougvie, Ann E ^b   Meyer, Barbara J ^a  

^a University of California Berkeley   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASSOCIATION REACTIONS; BIOCHEMISTRY; PROTEINS;

CHROMOSOME COHESION;

GENES;

COHESIN; PROTEIN TIM 1; PROTOZOAL PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS PROTEIN; DROSOPHILA PROTEIN; TIM 1 PROTEIN, C ELEGANS; TIM-1 PROTEIN, C ELEGANS; TIMELESS PROTEIN, DROSOPHILA;

CHROMOSOME; GENE; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CHROMOSOME; CHROMOSOME COHESION; GENE CONTROL; MEIOSIS; MITOSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; ANIMAL; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; DROSOPHILA; GENETICS; MUTATION; PHYSIOLOGY;

CAENORHABDITIS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; METAZOA; NEMATODA;

ANIMALS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS PROTEINS; CHROMOSOMES; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; DROSOPHILA; DROSOPHILA PROTEINS; MEIOSIS; MUTATION;

EID: 0038496744     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature01697     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Hirano, T. Chromosome cohesion, condensation, and separation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 69, 115-144 (2000).
2. Nasmyth, K. Disseminating the genome: joining, resolving, and separating sister chromatids during mitosis and meiosis. Annu. Rev. Genet. 35, 673-745 (2001).
3. Sumara, I. et al. The dissociation of cohesin from chromosomes in prophase is regulated by Polo-like kinase. Mol. Cell 9, 515-525 (2002).
4. Uhlmann, F., Lottspeich, F. & Nasmyth, K. Sister-chromatid separation at anaphase onset is promoted by cleavage of the cohesin subunit Scc1. Nature 400, 37-47 (1999).
5. Hodgkin, J., Horvitz, H. R. & Brenner, S. Nondisjunction mutants of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 91, 67-94 (1979).
6. Broverman, S. A. & Meneely, P. M. Meiotic mutants that cause a polar decrease in recombination on the X chromosome in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 136, 119-127 (1994).
7. Pasierbek, P. et al. A Caenorhabditis elegans cohesion protein with functions in meiotic chromosome pairing and disjunction. Genes Dev. 15, 1349-1360 (2001).
8. Chuang, P. T., Albertson, D. G. & Meyer, B. J. DPY-27: A chromosome condensation protein homolog that regulates C. elegans dosage compensation through association with the X chromosome. Cell 79, 459-474 (1994).
9. Lieb, J. D., Albrecht, M. R., Chuang, P. T. & Meyer, B. J. MIX-1: An essential component of the C. elegans mitotic machinery executes X chromosome dosage compensation. Cell 92, 265-277 (1998).
10. Jeon, M., Gardner, H. F., Miller, E. A., Deshler, J. & Rougvie, A. E. Similarity of the C. elegans developmental timing protein LIN-42 to circadian rhythm proteins. Science 286, 1141-1146 (1999).
11. Williams, J. A. & Sehgal, A. Molecular components of the circadian system in Drosophila. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 63, 729-755 (2001).
12. Young, M. W. & Kay, S. A. Time zones: A comparative genetics of circadian clocks. Nature Rev. Genet. 2, 702-715 (2001).
13. Benna, C. et al. A second timeless gene in Drosophila shares greater sequence similarity with mammalian tim. Curr. Biol. 10, R512-R513 (2000).
14. Gotter, A. L. et al. A time-less function for mouse timeless. Nature Neurosci. 3, 755-756 (2000).
15. Petronczki, M., Siomos, M. F. & Nasmyth, K. Un ménage à quatre: the molecular biology of chromosome segregation in meiosis. Cell 112, 423-440 (2003).
16. Schedl, T. in C. elegans II (eds Riddle, D. L., Blumenthal, T., Meyer, B. J. & Priess, J. R.) 241-270 (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, 1997).
17. MacQueen, A. J. & Villeneuve, A. M. Nuclear reorganization and homologous chromosome pairing during meiotic prophase require C. elegans chk-2. Genes Dev. 15, 1674-1687 (2001).
18. Dernburg, A. F. et al. Meiotic recombination in C. elegans initiates by a conserved mechanism and is dispensable for homologous chromosome synapsis. Cell 94, 387-398 (1998).
19. MacQueen, A. J., Colaiacovo, M. P., McDonald, K. & Villeneuve, A. M. Synapsis-dependent and -independent mechanisms stabilize homolog pairing during meiotic prophase in C. elegans. Genes Dev. 16, 2428-2442 (2002).
20. Klein, F. et al. A central role for cohesins in sister chromatid cohesion, formation of axial elements, and recombination during yeast meiosis. Cell 98, 91-103 (1999).
21. Ciosk, R. et al. Cohesin's binding to chromosomes depends on a separate complex consisting of Scc2 and Scc4 proteins. Mol. Cell 5, 243-254 (2000).
22. Hartman, T., Stead, K., Koshland, D. & Guacci, V. Pds5p is an essential chromosomal protein required for both sister chromatid cohesion and condensation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 151, 613-626 (2000).
23. Panizza, S., Tanaka, T., Hochwagen, A., Eisenhaber, F. & Nasmyth, K. Pds5 cooperates with cohesin in maintaining sister chromatid cohesion. Curr. Biol. 10, 1557-1564 (2000).
24. Haering, C. H., Lowe, J., Hochwagen, A. & Nasmyth, K. Molecular architecture of SMC proteins and the yeast cohesin complex. Mol. Cell 9, 773-788 (2002).
25. Vodovar, N., Clayton, J. D., Costa, R., Odell, M. & Kyriacou, C. P. The Drosophila clock protein Timeless is a member of the Arm/HEAT family. Curr. Biol. 12, R610-R611 (2002).
26. Howell, A. M., Gilmour, S. G., Mancebo, R. A. & Rose, A. M. Genetic analysis of a large autosomal region in Caenorhabditis elegans by the use of a free duplication. Genet. Res. 49, 207-213 (1987).
27. Howe, M., McDonald, K. L., Albertson, D. G. & Meyer, B. J. HIM-10 is required for kinetochore structure and function on Caenorhabditis elegans holocentric chromosomes. J. Cell Biol. 153, 1227-1238 (2001).
28. Chu, D. S. et al. A molecular link between gene-specific and chromosome-wide transcriptional repression. Genes Dev. 16, 796-805 (2002).
29. Gonczy, P. et al. Dissection of cell division processes in the one cell stage Caenorhabditis elegans embryo by mutational analysis. J. Cell Biol. 144, 927-946 (1999).