Using sentence openers to support students’ argumentation in an online learning environment;L’utilisation des formules d’ouverture des phrases (incipits) comme support de l’argumentation des étudiants dans un environnement d’apprentissage en ligne;Die Verwendung von Satzeröffnungen zur Unterstützung der Argumentation von Studenten im Rahmen einer Online-Lernveranstaltung;El uso de las formulas de apertura de las frases (incipits) como soporte de la argumentación de los estudiantes dentro de un entorno de aprendizaje en línea

Educational Media International

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 207-218

  Yiong Hwee, Teo ^a   Churchill, Daniel ^b  

^a MINISTRY OF EDUCATION   (Singapore)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79956361495     PISSN: 09523987     EISSN: 14695790     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09523980701491658     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Broadbear, J. T., and Keyser, B. B., 2000. An approach to teaching for critical thinking in health education. Journal of School Health, 70(8): 322–326.
2. Brown, A. L., Palinscar, A. S., and Armbruster, B. B., 1994. “ Instructing comprehension: Fostering activities in interactive learning situations ”. In Learning from texts, Edited by: Mandl, H., Stein, N., and Trabasso, T., 757–787. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Chang, J., 2001. “ Chinese speakers ”. In Learner English, (2nd edn), Edited by: Swan, M., and Smith, B., 310–324. London: Cambridge University Press.
4. Collison, G., Elbaum, B., Haavind, S., and Tinker, R., 2000. Facilitating online learning: Effective strategies for moderators, Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing.
5. Cook, J., 2000. “ Cooperative problem-solving dialogues in learning ”. In Intelligent tutoring systems, Edited by: Gautier, G., Fransson, C., and Van Lehn, K., 615–624. Berlin: Springer.
6. Curtis, D. D., and Lawson, M. J., 2001. Exploring collaborative online learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(1): 21–34.
7. Elder, L., and Paul, R., 1998. The role of Socratic questioning in thinking, teaching, and learning. Clearing House, 71(5): 297–301.
8. Guzdial, M., 1994. Software-realized scaffolding to facilitate programming for science learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 4(1): 1–44.
9. Guzdial, M., and Turns, J., 2000. Effective discussion through a computer-mediated anchored forum. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4): 437–469.
10. Henri, F., 1992. “ Computer conferencing and content analysis ”. In Collaborative learning through computer conferencing: The Najaden papers, Edited by: Kaye, A. R., 117–136. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
11. Howe, C., and Tolmie, A., 1998. Computer support for learning in collaborative contexts: Prompted hypothesis testing in physics. Computers & Education, 30(3–4): 223–235.
12. Inagaki, K., 1981. Facilitation of knowledge integration through classroom discussion. The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 3(2): 22–28.
13. Kassop, M., 2003. Ten ways online education matches, or surpasses, face-to-face learning. The Technology Source, May/June, Retrieved 2 July, 2007, from http://technologysource.org/article/ten_ways_online_education_matches_or_surpasses_facetoface_learning/
14. Lazonder, A. W., Wilhelm, P., and Ootes, S. A. W., 2003. Using sentence openers to foster student interaction in computer-mediated learning environments. Computers & Education, 41(3): 291–308.
15. Linn, M. C., diSessa, A., Pea, R. D., and Songer, N. B., 1994. Can research on science learning and instruction inform standards for science education?. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 3(1): 7–15.
16. Mason, R., 1994. Evaluation report on courses over JANUS, Vol. 1, Brussels: European Union.
17. McManus, M. M., and Aiken, R. M., 1995. Monitoring computer based collaborative problem solving. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 6(4): 308–336.
18. Meyer, K. A., 2004. Evaluating online discussions: Four different frames of analysis. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(2): 101–114.
19. Moore, D., 1993. Dialogue games for intelligent tutoring systems Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Leeds Metropolitan University
20. Newman, D. R., Johnson, C., Webb, B., and Cochrane, C., 1997. Evaluating the quality of learning in computer supported cooperative learning. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 48: 484–495.
21. Parkinson, M. G., and Ekachai, D., 2002. The Socratic method in the introductory PR course: An alternative pedagogy. Public Relations Review, 28(2): 167–174.
22. Paul, R., 1993. Critical thinking: What every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world, Santa Rosa, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
23. Pekarsky, D., 1994. Socratic teaching: A critical assessment. Journal of Moral Education, 23(2): 119–134.
24. Piaget, J., 1972. Science of education and the psychology of the child, New York: The Viking Press.
25. Pogrow, S., 1990. A Socratic approach to using computers with at-risk students. Educational Leadership, 47(5): 61–66.
26. Pontecorvo, C., 1993. Social interaction in the acquisition of knowledge. Educational Psychology Review, 5(3): 293–310.
27. Salmon, G., 2000. E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online, London: Kogan Page Limited.
28. Scardamalia, M., and Bereiter, C., 1991. Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1(1): 37–68.
29. Soller, A. L., 2001. Supporting social interaction in an intelligent collaborative learning system. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12(1): 40–62.
30. Songer, N. B., Learning science with a child-focused resource: A case study of kids as global scientists. In. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. pp. 935–940. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31. Teo, Y. H., 2006. Supporting collaborative critiquing in an online environment for novice video designers Melbourne Unpublished PhD dissertation, Monash University
32. Wilson, T., and Whitelock, D., 1998. What are the perceived benefits of participating in a computer-mediated communication (CMC) environment for distance learning computer science students?. Computers and Education, 30(3–4): 259–269.