Protein degradation in DNA damage response

Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 538-545

  Kouranti, Ilektra ^a   Peyroche, Anne ^a  

^a SERVICE DE CHIMIE BIOORGANIQUE ET DE MARQUAGE   (France)

Author keywords

Checkpoint; DNA damage response; DNA repair; Protein degradation; Ubiquitin proteasome system

Indexed keywords

DNA TOPOISOMERASE; IMMUNOGLOBULIN ENHANCER BINDING PROTEIN; PROTEASOME; PROTEIN P53; RNA POLYMERASE II; UBIQUITIN; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE E3;

ACETYLATION; APOPTOSIS; CELL CYCLE REGULATION; DNA DAMAGE; DNA DAMAGE CHECKPOINT; DNA END JOINING REPAIR; DNA REPAIR; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; EXCISION REPAIR; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN DNA INTERACTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN MODIFICATION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN PROCESSING; PROTEIN STABILITY; REVIEW; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SUMOYLATION; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; UBIQUITINATION;

EID: 84863872306     PISSN: 10849521     EISSN: 10963634     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2012.02.004     Document Type: Review

References (75)

1. Zhou B.B., Elledge S.J. The DNA damage response: putting checkpoints in perspective. Nature 2000, 408:433-439.
2. Bartkova J., Horejsi Z., Koed K., Kramer A., Tort F., Zieger K., et al. DNA damage response as a candidate anti-cancer barrier in early human tumorigenesis. Nature 2005, 434:864-870.
3. Lisby M., Rothstein R. DNA damage checkpoint and repair centers. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2004, 16:328-334.
4. Stracker T.H., Usui T., Petrini J.H. Taking the time to make important decisions: the checkpoint effector kinases Chk1 and Chk2 and the DNA damage response. DNA Repair (Amst) 2009, 8:1047-1054.
5. Clémenson C., Marsolier-Kergoat M.-C. DNA damage checkpoint inactivation: adaptation and recovery. DNA Repair (Amst) 2009, 8:1101-1109.
6. Rodriguez-Rocha H., Garcia-Garcia A., Panayiotidis M.I., Franco R. DNA damage and autophagy. Mutat Res 2011, 711:158-166.
7. Wolf D.H., Hilt W. The proteasome: a proteolytic nanomachine of cell regulation and waste disposal. Biochim Biophys Acta 2004, 1695:19-31.
8. Glickman M.H., Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway: destruction for the sake of construction. Physiol Rev 2002, 82:373-428.
9. Komander D. The emerging complexity of protein ubiquitination. Biochem Soc Trans 2009, 37:937-953.
10. Pickart C.M., Fushman D. Polyubiquitin chains: polymeric protein signals. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2004, 8:610-616.
11. Chen Z.J., Sun L.J. Nonproteolytic functions of ubiquitin in cell signaling. Mol Cell 2009, 33:275-286.
12. Messick T.E., Greenberg R.A. The ubiquitin landscape at DNA double-strand breaks. J Cell Biol 2009, 187:319-326.
13. Al-Hakim A., Escribano-Diaz C., Landry M.-C., O'Donnell L., Panier S., Szilard R.K., et al. The ubiquitous role of ubiquitin in the DNA damage response. DNA Repair (Amst) 2010, 9:1229-1240.
14. Goldberg A.L. Functions of the proteasome: from protein degradation and immune surveillance to cancer therapy. Biochem Soc Trans 2007, 35:12-17.
15. Bhaumik S.R., Malik S. Diverse regulatory mechanisms of eukaryotic transcriptional activation by the proteasome complex. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 2008, 43:419-433.
16. Russell S.J., Reed S.H., Huang W., Friedberg E.C., Johnston S.A. The 19S regulatory complex of the proteasome functions independently of proteolysis in nucleotide excision repair. Mol Cell 1999, 3:687-695.
17. Jelinsky S.A., Estep P., Church G.M., Samson L.D. Regulatory networks revealed by transcriptional profiling of damaged Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells: Rpn4 links base excision repair with proteasomes. Mol Cell Biol 2000, 20:8157-8167.
18. Burgis N.E., Samson L.D. The protein degradation response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to classical DNA-damaging agents. Chem Res Toxicol 2007, 20:1843-1853.
19. Gatti L., Hoe K.L., Hayles J., Righetti S.C., Carenini N., Bo L.D., et al. Ubiquitin-proteasome genes as targets for modulation of cisplatin sensitivity in fission yeast. BMC Genomics 2011, 12:44.
20. Le Tallec B., Barrault M.B., Courbeyrette R., Guerois R., Marsolier-Kergoat M.C., Peyroche A. 20S proteasome assembly is orchestrated by two distinct pairs of chaperones in yeast and in mammals. Mol Cell 2007, 27:660-674.
21. Doil C., Mailand N., Bekker-Jensen S., Menard P., Larsen D.H., Pepperkok R., et al. RNF168 binds and amplifies ubiquitin conjugates on damaged chromosomes to allow accumulation of repair proteins. Cell 2009, 136:435-446.
22. Stewart G.S., Panier S., Townsend K., Al-Hakim A.K., Kolas N.K., Miller E.S., et al. The RIDDLE syndrome protein mediates a ubiquitin-dependent signaling cascade at sites of DNA damage. Cell 2009, 136:420-434.
23. Alvaro D., Lisby M., Rothstein R. Genome-wide analysis of Rad52 foci reveals diverse mechanisms impacting recombination. PLoS Genet 2007, 3:e228.
24. Thorpe P.H., Alvaro D., Lisby M., Rothstein R. Bringing Rad52 foci into focus. J Cell Biol 2011, 194:665-667.
25. Morris J.R., Solomon E. BRCA1: BARD1 induces the formation of conjugated ubiquitin structures, dependent on K6 of ubiquitin, in cells during DNA replication and repair. Hum Mol Genet 2004, 13:807-817.
26. Yang X.H., Zou L. Launching a ubiquitination cascade at DNA breaks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007, 104:20645-20646.
27. Postow L., Ghenoiu C., Woo E.M., Krutchinsky A.N., Chait B.T., Funabiki H. Ku80 removal from DNA through double strand break-induced ubiquitylation. J Cell Biol 2008, 182:467-479.
28. Krogan N.J., Lam M.H., Fillingham J., Keogh M.C., Gebbia M., Li J., et al. Proteasome involvement in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Mol Cell 2004, 16:1027-1034.
29. Raman M., Havens C.G., Walter J.C., Harper J.W. A genome-wide screen identifies p97 as an essential regulator of DNA damage-dependent CDT1 destruction. Mol Cell 2011, 44:72-84.
30. Dexheimer T.S., Antony S., Marchand C., Pommier Y. Tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase as a target for anticancer therapy. Anticancer Agents Med Chem 2008, 8:381-389.
31. Lin C.-P., Ban Y., Lyu Y.L., Liu L.F. Proteasome-dependent processing of topoisomerase I-DNA adducts into DNA double strand breaks at arrested replication forks. J Biol Chem 2009, 284:28084-28092.
32. Zhang A., Lyu Y.L., Lin C.P., Zhou N., Azarova A.M., Wood L.M., et al. A protease pathway for the repair of topoisomerase II-DNA covalent complexes. J Biol Chem 2006, 281:35997-36003.
33. Hanawalt P.C. Subpathways of nucleotide excision repair and their regulation. Oncogene 2002, 21:8949-8956.
34. Nouspikel T. Multiple roles of ubiquitination in the control of nucleotide excision repair. Mech Ageing Dev 2011, 132:355-365.
35. Harreman M., Taschner M., Sigurdsson S., Anindya R., Reid J., Somesh B., et al. Distinct ubiquitin ligases act sequentially for RNA polymerase II polyubiquitylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009, 106:20705-20710.
36. Malik S., Bagla S., Chaurasia P., Duan Z., Bhaumik S.R. Elongating RNA polymerase II is disassembled through specific degradation of its largest but not other subunits in response to DNA damage in vivo. J Biol Chem 2008, 283:6897-6905.
37. Ratner J.N., Balasubramanian B., Corden J., Warren S.L., Bregman D.B. Ultraviolet radiation-induced ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of the large subunit of RNA polymerase II. Implications for transcription-coupled DNA repair. J Biol Chem 1998, 273:5184-5189.
38. Svejstrup J.Q. Contending with transcriptional arrest during RNAPII transcript elongation. Trends Biochem Sci 2007, 32:165-171.
39. Jacquemont C., Taniguchi T. Proteasome function is required for DNA damage response and fanconi anemia pathway activation. Cancer Res 2007, 67:7395-7405.
40. Nagai S., Dubrana K., Tsai-Pflugfelder M., Davidson M.B., Roberts T.M., Brown G.W., et al. Functional targeting of DNA damage to a nuclear pore-associated SUMO-dependent ubiquitin ligase. Science 2008, 322:597-602.
41. Prudden J., Pebernard S., Raffa G., Slavin D.A., Perry J.J., Tainer J.A., et al. SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligases in genome stability. EMBO J 2007, 26:4089-4101.
42. Shi W., Ma Z., Willers H., Akhtar K., Scott S.P., Zhang J., et al. Disassembly of MDC1 foci is controlled by ubiquitin-proteasome-dependent degradation. J Biol Chem 2008, 283:31608-31616.
43. Zhang D., Zaugg K., Mak T.W., Elledge S.J. A role for the deubiquitinating enzyme USP28 in control of the DNA-damage response. Cell 2006, 126:529-542.
44. Ben-Aroya S., Agmon N., Yuen K., Kwok T., McManus K., Kupiec M., et al. Proteasome nuclear activity affects chromosome stability by controlling the turnover of Mms22, a protein important for DNA repair. PLoS Genet 2011, 6:e1000852.
45. Zhang Y.W., Otterness D.M., Chiang G.G., Xie W., Liu Y.C., Mercurio F., et al. Genotoxic stress targets human Chk1 for degradation by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Mol Cell 2005, 19:607-618.
46. Chini C.C., Chen J. Claspin, a regulator of Chk1 in DNA replication stress pathway. DNA Repair (Amst) 2004, 3:1033-1037.
47. Freire R., van Vugt M.A., Mamely I., Medema R.H. Claspin: timing the cell cycle arrest when the genome is damaged. Cell Cycle 2006, 5:2831-2834.
48. Agami R., Bernards R. Distinct initiation and maintenance mechanisms cooperate to induce G1 cell cycle arrest in response to DNA damage. Cell 2000, 102:55-66.
49. Santra M.K., Wajapeyee N., Green M.R. F-box protein FBXO31 mediates cyclin D1 degradation to induce G1 arrest after DNA damage. Nature 2009, 459:722-725.
50. Bassermann F., Pagano M. Dissecting the role of ubiquitylation in the DNA damage response checkpoint in G2. Cell Death Differ 2010, 17:78-85.
51. Silverman J.S., Skaar J.R., Pagano M. SCF ubiquitin ligases in the maintenance of genome stability. Trends Biochem Sci 2012, 37:66-73.
52. Andreson B.L., Gupta A., Georgieva B.P., Rothstein R. The ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor, Sml1, is sequentially phosphorylated, ubiquitylated and degraded in response to DNA damage. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, 38:6490-6501.
53. Lavin M.F., Gueven N. The complexity of p53 stabilization and activation. Cell Death Differ 2006, 13:941-950.
54. Li N., Banin S., Ouyang H., Li G.C., Courtois G., Shiloh Y., et al. ATM is required for IkappaB kinase (IKKk) activation in response to DNA double strand breaks. J Biol Chem 2001, 276:8898-8903.
55. Harris S.L., Levine A.J. The p53 pathway: positive and negative feedback loops. Oncogene 2005, 24:2899-2908.
56. Maya R., Balass M., Kim S.T., Shkedy D., Leal J.F., Shifman O., et al. ATM-dependent phosphorylation of Mdm2 on serine 395: role in p53 activation by DNA damage. Genes Dev 2001, 15:1067-1077.
57. Miyamoto S. Nuclear initiated NF-kappaB signaling: NEMO and ATM take center stage. Cell Res 2011, 21:116-130.
58. Sugasawa K. Regulation of damage recognition in mammalian global genomic nucleotide excision repair. Mutat Res 2010, 685:29-37.
59. Gillette T.G., Huang W., Russell S.J., Reed S.H., Johnston S.A., Friedberg E.C. The 19S complex of the proteasome regulates nucleotide excision repair in yeast. Genes Dev 2001, 15:1528-1539.
60. Leung A., Geng F., Daulny A., Collins G., Guzzardo P., Tansey W.P. Transcriptional control and the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Ernst Schering Found Symp Proc 2008, 75-97.
61. Sugasawa K., Okuda Y., Saijo M., Nishi R., Matsuda N., Chu G., et al. UV-induced ubiquitylation of XPC protein mediated by UV-DDB-ubiquitin ligase complex. Cell 2005, 121:387-400.
62. Wang Q.E., Praetorius-Ibba M., Zhu Q., El-Mahdy M.A., Wani G., Zhao Q., et al. Ubiquitylation-independent degradation of Xeroderma pigmentosum group C protein is required for efficient nucleotide excision repair. Nucleic Acids Res 2007, 35:5338-5350.
63. Gillette T.G., Yu S., Zhou Z., Waters R., Johnston S.A., Reed S.H. Distinct functions of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway influence nucleotide excision repair. EMBO J 2006, 25:2529-2538.
64. Groisman R., Polanowska J., Kuraoka I., Sawada J., Saijo M., Drapkin R., et al. The ubiquitin ligase activity in the DDB2 and CSA complexes is differentially regulated by the COP9 signalosome in response to DNA damage. Cell 2003, 113:357-367.
65. Groisman R., Kuraoka I., Chevallier O., Gaye N., Magnaldo T., Tanaka K., et al. CSA-dependent degradation of CSB by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway establishes a link between complementation factors of the Cockayne syndrome. Genes Dev 2006, 20:1429-1434.
66. Friedberg E.C., Siede W.G., Wood W., Schultz R.D., Ellenberger R.A.T. DNA repair and mutagenesis 2005, ASM Press, Washington, DC.
67. Kristensen C.N., Bystol K.M., Li B., Serrano L., Brenneman M.A. Depletion of DSS1 protein disables homologous recombinational repair in human cells. Mutat Res 2010, 694:60-64.
68. Gudmundsdottir K., Lord C.J., Ashworth A. The proteasome is involved in determining differential utilization of double-strand break repair pathways. Oncogene 2007, 26:7601-7606.
69. Murakawa Y., Sonoda E., Barber L.J., Zeng W., Yokomori K., Kimura H., et al. Inhibitors of the proteasome suppress homologous DNA recombination in mammalian cells. Cancer Res 2007, 67:8536-8543.
70. Holloman W.K. Unraveling the mechanism of BRCA2 in homologous recombination. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2011, 18:748-754.
71. Wei S.J., Williams J.G., Dang H., Darden T.A., Betz B.L., Humble M.M., et al. Identification of a specific motif of the DSS1 protein required for proteasome interaction and p53 protein degradation. J Mol Biol 2008, 383:693-712.
72. Faza M.B., Kemmler S., Panse V.G. Sem1: a versatile "molecular glue"?. Nucleus 2010, 1:12-17.
73. Vucic D., Dixit V.M., Wertz I.E. Ubiquitylation in apoptosis: a post-translational modification at the edge of life and death. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2011, 12:439-452.
74. Froment P., Dupont J., Christophe-Marine J. Mdm2 exerts pro-apoptotic activities by antagonizing insulin-like growth factor-I-mediated survival. Cell Cycle 2008, 7:3098-3103.
75. Winter M., Sombroek D., Dauth I., Moehlenbrink J., Scheuermann K., Crone J., et al. Control of HIPK2 stability by ubiquitin ligase Siah-1 and checkpoint kinases ATM and ATR. Nat Cell Biol 2008, 10:812-824.