Assembling a protein-protein interaction map of the SSU processome from existing datasets

PLoS ONE

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2011, Pages

  Lim, Young H ^a   Charette, J Michael ^a   Baserga, Susan J ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN; RIBONUCLEOPROTEIN; SMALL NUCLEOLAR RNA; SMALL SUBUNIT PROCESSOME; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC COMPLEMENTATION; GENETIC CONSERVATION; ORTHOLOGY; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; TWO HYBRID SYSTEM; ANIMAL; DATA MINING; FUNGAL GENOME; GENETICS; HUMAN; METABOLISM; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN PROCESSING; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SMALL RIBOSOMAL SUBUNIT;

EUKARYOTA;

ANIMALS; DATA MINING; DATABASES, PROTEIN; GENOME, FUNGAL; HUMANS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL; RIBOSOME SUBUNITS, SMALL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; TWO-HYBRID SYSTEM TECHNIQUES;

EID: 79952505939     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017701     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Uetz P, Giot L, Cagney G, Mansfield TA, Judson RS, et al. (2000) A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 403: 623-627.
2. Ito T, Chiba T, Ozawa R, Yoshida M, Hattori M, et al. (2001) A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 4569-4574.
3. Yu H, Braun P, Yildirim MA, Lemmens I, Venkatesan K, et al. (2008) High-quality binary protein interaction map of the yeast interactome network. Science 322: 104-110.
4. Tarassov K, Messier V, Landry CR, Radinovic S, Serna Molina MM, et al. (2008) An in vivo map of the yeast protein interactome. Science 320: 1465-1470.
5. Hazbun TR, Malmstrom L, Anderson S, Graczyk BJ, Fox B, et al. (2003) Assigning function to yeast proteins by integration of technologies. Mol Cell 12: 1353-1365.
6. Giot L, Bader JS, Brouwer C, Chaudhuri A, Kuang B, et al. (2003) A protein interaction map of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 302: 1727-1736.
7. Formstecher E, Aresta S, Collura V, Hamburger A, Meil A, et al. (2005) Protein interaction mapping: a Drosophila case study. Genome Res 15: 376-384.
8. Schwartz AS, Yu J, Gardenour KR, Finley RL Jr, Ideker T, (2009) Cost-effective strategies for completing the interactome. Nat Methods 6: 55-61.
9. Stanyon CA, Liu G, Mangiola BA, Patel N, Giot L, et al. (2004) A Drosophila protein-interaction map centered on cell-cycle regulators. Genome Biol 5: R96.
10. Simonis N, Rual JF, Carvunis AR, Tasan M, Lemmens I, et al. (2009) Empirically controlled mapping of the Caenorhabditis elegans protein-protein interactome network. Nat Methods 6: 47-54.
11. Li S, Armstrong CM, Bertin N, Ge H, Milstein S, et al. (2004) A map of the interactome network of the metazoan C. elegans. Science 303: 540-543.
12. Xin X, Rual JF, Hirozane-Kishikawa T, Hill DE, Vidal M, et al. (2009) Shifted Transversal Design smart-pooling for high coverage interactome mapping. Genome Res 19: 1262-1269.
13. Boxem M, Maliga Z, Klitgord N, Li N, Lemmens I, et al. (2008) A protein domain-based interactome network for C. elegans early embryogenesis. Cell 134: 534-545.
14. Walhout AJ, Sordella R, Lu X, Hartley JL, Temple GF, et al. (2000) Protein interaction mapping in C. elegans using proteins involved in vulval development. Science 287: 116-122.
15. LaCount DJ, Vignali M, Chettier R, Phansalkar A, Bell R, et al. (2005) A protein interaction network of the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Nature 438: 103-107.
16. Boruc J, Van den Daele H, Hollunder J, Rombauts S, Mylle E, et al. (2010) Functional modules in the Arabidopsis core cell cycle binary protein-protein interaction network. Plant Cell 22: 1264-1280.
17. Hackbusch J, Richter K, Muller J, Salamini F, Uhrig JF, (2005) A central role of Arabidopsis thaliana ovate family proteins in networking and subcellular localization of 3-aa loop extension homeodomain proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 4908-4912.
18. Suzuki H, Fukunishi Y, Kagawa I, Saito R, Oda H, et al. (2001) Protein-protein interaction panel using mouse full-length cDNAs. Genome Res 11: 1758-1765.
19. Rual JF, Venkatesan K, Hao T, Hirozane-Kishikawa T, Dricot A, et al. (2005) Towards a proteome-scale map of the human protein-protein interaction network. Nature 437: 1173-1178.
20. Stelzl U, Worm U, Lalowski M, Haenig C, Brembeck FH, et al. (2005) A human protein-protein interaction network: a resource for annotating the proteome. Cell 122: 957-968.
21. Venkatesan K, Rual JF, Vazquez A, Stelzl U, Lemmens I, et al. (2009) An empirical framework for binary interactome mapping. Nat Methods 6: 83-90.
22. Colland F, Jacq X, Trouplin V, Mougin C, Groizeleau C, et al. (2004) Functional proteomics mapping of a human signaling pathway. Genome Res 14: 1324-1332.
23. Wong J, Nakajima Y, Westermann S, Shang C, Kang JS, et al. (2007) A protein interaction map of the mitotic spindle. Mol Biol Cell 18: 3800-3809.
24. Drees BL, Sundin B, Brazeau E, Caviston JP, Chen GC, et al. (2001) A protein interaction map for cell polarity development. J Cell Biol 154: 549-571.
25. Cagney G, Uetz P, Fields S, (2001) Two-hybrid analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae 26S proteasome. Physiol Genomics 7: 27-34.
26. Schnaufer A, Wu M, Park YJ, Nakai T, Deng J, et al. (2010) A protein-protein interaction map of trypanosome ~20S editosomes. J Biol Chem 285: 5282-5295.
27. Lim J, Hao T, Shaw C, Patel AJ, Szabo G, et al. (2006) A protein-protein interaction network for human inherited ataxias and disorders of Purkinje cell degeneration. Cell 125: 801-814.
28. Goehler H, Lalowski M, Stelzl U, Waelter S, Stroedicke M, et al. (2004) A protein interaction network links GIT1, an enhancer of huntingtin aggregation, to Huntington's disease. Mol Cell 15: 853-865.
29. Fields S, Song O, (1989) A novel genetic system to detect protein-protein interactions. Nature 340: 245-246.
30. Michnick SW, Ear PH, Manderson EN, Remy I, Stefan E, (2007) Universal strategies in research and drug discovery based on protein-fragment complementation assays. Nat Rev Drug Discov 6: 569-582.
31. Cusick ME, Yu H, Smolyar A, Venkatesan K, Carvunis AR, et al. (2009) Literature-curated protein interaction datasets. Nat Methods 6: 39-46.
32. Dreze M, Monachello D, Lurin C, Cusick ME, Hill DE, et al. (2010) High-quality binary interactome mapping. Methods Enzymol 470: 281-315.
33. Salwinski L, Licata L, Winter A, Thorneycroft D, Khadake J, et al. (2009) Recurated protein interaction datasets. Nat Methods 6: 860-861.
34. Rajagopala SV, Goll J, Gowda ND, Sunil KC, Titz B, et al. (2008) MPI-LIT: a literature-curated dataset of microbial binary protein-protein interactions. Bioinformatics 24: 2622-2627.
35. Koegl M, Uetz P, (2007) Improving yeast two-hybrid screening systems. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic 6: 302-312.
36. Mrowka R, Patzak A, Herzel H, (2001) Is there a bias in proteome research? Genome Res 11: 1971-1973.
37. Boulon S, Marmier-Gourrier N, Pradet-Balade B, Wurth L, Verheggen C, et al. (2008) The Hsp90 chaperone controls the biogenesis of L7Ae RNPs through conserved machinery. J Cell Biol 180: 579-595.
38. Champion EA, Lane BH, Jackrel ME, Regan L, Baserga SJ, (2008) A direct interaction between the Utp6 half-a-tetratricopeptide repeat domain and a specific peptide in Utp21 is essential for efficient pre-rRNA processing. Mol Cell Biol 28: 6547-6556.
39. Freed EF, Baserga SJ, (2010) The C-terminus of Utp4, mutated in childhood cirrhosis, is essential for ribosome biogenesis. Nucleic Acids Res.
40. Gallagher JE, Baserga SJ, (2004) Two-hybrid Mpp10p interaction-defective Imp4 proteins are not interaction defective in vivo but do confer specific pre-rRNA processing defects in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 32: 1404-1413.
41. Goldfeder MB, Oliveira CC, (2010) Utp25p, a nucleolar Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein, interacts with U3 snoRNP subunits and affects processing of the 35S pre-rRNA. FEBS J 277: 2838-2852.
42. Gonzales FA, Zanchin NI, Luz JS, Oliveira CC, (2005) Characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Nop17p, a novel Nop58p-interacting protein that is involved in pre-rRNA processing. J Mol Biol 346: 437-455.
43. Granneman S, Lin C, Champion EA, Nandineni MR, Zorca C, et al. (2006) The nucleolar protein Esf2 interacts directly with the DExD/H box RNA helicase, Dbp8, to stimulate ATP hydrolysis. Nucleic Acids Res 34: 3189-3199.
44. Huang YC, Tseng SF, Tsai HJ, Lenzmeier BA, Teng SC, (2010) Direct interaction between Utp8p and Utp9p contributes to rRNA processing in budding yeast. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 393: 297-302.
45. Lebaron S, Froment C, Fromont-Racine M, Rain JC, Monsarrat B, et al. (2005) The splicing ATPase Prp43p is a component of multiple preribosomal particles. Mol Cell Biol 25: 9269-9282.
46. Lee SJ, Baserga SJ, (1999) Imp3p and Imp4p, two specific components of the U3 small nucleolar ribonucleoprotein that are essential for pre-18S rRNA processing. Mol Cell Biol 19: 5441-5452.
47. Liu PC, Thiele DJ, (2001) Novel stress-responsive genes EMG1 and NOP14 encode conserved, interacting proteins required for 40S ribosome biogenesis. Mol Biol Cell 12: 3644-3657.
48. Pandit S, Paul S, Zhang L, Chen M, Durbin N, et al. (2009) Spp382p interacts with multiple yeast splicing factors, including possible regulators of Prp43 DExD/H-Box protein function. Genetics 183: 195-206.
49. Park YU, Hwang O, Kim J, (2002) Two-hybrid cloning and characterization of OSH3, a yeast oxysterol-binding protein homolog. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 293: 733-740.
50. Wegierski T, Billy E, Nasr F, Filipowicz W, (2001) Bms1p, a G-domain-containing protein, associates with Rcl1p and is required for 18S rRNA biogenesis in yeast. RNA 7: 1254-1267.
51. Charette JM, Baserga SJ, (2010) The DEAD-box RNA helicase-like Utp25 is an SSU processome component. RNA 16: 2156-2169.
52. Rajagopala SV, Uetz P, (2009) Analysis of protein-protein interactions using array-based yeast two-hybrid screens. Methods Mol Biol 548: 223-245.
53. Dragon F, Gallagher JE, Compagnone-Post PA, Mitchell BM, Porwancher KA, et al. (2002) A large nucleolar U3 ribonucleoprotein required for 18S ribosomal RNA biogenesis. Nature 417: 967-970.
54. Bernstein KA, Gallagher JE, Mitchell BM, Granneman S, Baserga SJ, (2004) The small-subunit processome is a ribosome assembly intermediate. Eukaryot Cell 3: 1619-1626.
55. Phipps K, Charette JM, Baserga SJ, (2011) The small subunit processome in ribosome biogenesis- progress and prospects. WIREs RNA 2: 1-21.
56. Grandi P, Rybin V, Bassler J, Petfalski E, Strauss D, et al. (2002) 90S pre-ribosomes include the 35S pre-rRNA, the U3 snoRNP, and 40S subunit processing factors but predominantly lack 60S synthesis factors. Mol Cell 10: 105-115.
57. Dosil M, Bustelo XR, (2004) Functional characterization of Pwp2, a WD family protein essential for the assembly of the 90 S pre-ribosomal particle. J Biol Chem 279: 37385-37397.
58. Krogan NJ, Peng WT, Cagney G, Robinson MD, Haw R, et al. (2004) High-definition macromolecular composition of yeast RNA-processing complexes. Mol Cell 13: 225-239.
59. Rudra D, Mallick J, Zhao Y, Warner JR, (2007) Potential interface between ribosomal protein production and pre-rRNA processing. Mol Cell Biol 27: 4815-4824.
60. Aranda B, Achuthan P, Alam-Faruque Y, Armean I, Bridge A, et al. (2010) The IntAct molecular interaction database in 2010. Nucleic Acids Res 38: D525-531.
61. Breitkreutz BJ, Stark C, Reguly T, Boucher L, Breitkreutz A, et al. (2008) The BioGRID Interaction Database: 2008 update. Nucleic Acids Res 36: D637-640.
62. Issel-Tarver L, Christie KR, Dolinski K, Andrada R, Balakrishnan R, et al. (2002) Saccharomyces Genome Database. Methods Enzymol 350: 329-346.
63. Sayers EW, Barrett T, Benson DA, Bryant SH, Canese K, et al. (2009) Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res 37: D5-15.
64. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ, (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215: 403-410.
65. Killcoyne S, Carter GW, Smith J, Boyle J, (2009) Cytoscape: a community-based framework for network modeling. Methods Mol Biol 563: 219-239.
66. Gough J, Karplus K, Hughey R, Chothia C, (2001) Assignment of homology to genome sequences using a library of hidden Markov models that represent all proteins of known structure. J Mol Biol 313: 903-919.
67. Guldener U, Munsterkotter M, Kastenmuller G, Strack N, van Helden J, et al. (2005) CYGD: the Comprehensive Yeast Genome Database. Nucleic Acids Res 33: D364-368.
68. Finn RD, Mistry J, Tate J, Coggill P, Heger A, et al. (2010) The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 38: D211-222.
69. Sigrist CJ, Cerutti L, de Castro E, Langendijk-Genevaux PS, Bulliard V, et al. (2010) PROSITE, a protein domain database for functional characterization and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 38: D161-166.
70. Letunic I, Doerks T, Bork P, (2009) SMART 6: recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res 37: D229-232.
71. Marchler-Bauer A, Anderson JB, Chitsaz F, Derbyshire MK, DeWeese-Scott C, et al. (2009) CDD: specific functional annotation with the Conserved Domain Database. Nucleic Acids Res 37: D205-210.
72. Guldener U, Munsterkotter M, Oesterheld M, Pagel P, Ruepp A, et al. (2006) MPact: the MIPS protein interaction resource on yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 34: D436-441.
73. Salwinski L, Miller CS, Smith AJ, Pettit FK, Bowie JU, et al. (2004) The Database of Interacting Proteins: 2004 update. Nucleic Acids Res 32: D449-451.
74. Jensen LJ, Kuhn M, Stark M, Chaffron S, Creevey C, et al. (2009) STRING 8-a global view on proteins and their functional interactions in 630 organisms. Nucleic Acids Res 37: D412-416.
75. Wu X, Zhu L, Guo J, Fu C, Zhou H, et al. (2006) SPIDer: Saccharomyces protein-protein interaction database. BMC Bioinformatics 7 (Suppl 5): S16.
76. Uetz P, Finley RL Jr, (2005) From protein networks to biological systems. FEBS Lett 579: 1821-1827.
77. Wiles AM, Doderer M, Ruan J, Gu TT, Ravi D, et al. (2010) Building and analyzing protein interactome networks by cross-species comparisons. BMC Syst Biol 4: 36.
78. Van Damme E, Laukens K, Dang TH, Van Ostade X, (2010) A manually curated network of the PML nuclear body interactome reveals an important role for PML-NBs in SUMOylation dynamics. Int J Biol Sci 6: 51-67.
79. Grigoriev A, (2003) On the number of protein-protein interactions in the yeast proteome. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 4157-4161.
80. Jansen R, Yu H, Greenbaum D, Kluger Y, Krogan NJ, et al. (2003) A Bayesian networks approach for predicting protein-protein interactions from genomic data. Science 302: 449-453.
81. Bader GD, Hogue CW, (2002) Analyzing yeast protein-protein interaction data obtained from different sources. Nat Biotechnol 20: 991-997.
82. Blow N, (2009) Systems biology: Untangling the protein web. Nature 460: 415-418.
83. Jensen LJ, Bork P, (2008) Biochemistry. Not comparable, but complementary. Science 322: 56-57.
84. Gentleman R, Huber W, (2007) Making the most of high-throughput protein-interaction data. Genome Biol 8: 112.
85. von Mering C, Krause R, Snel B, Cornell M, Oliver SG, et al. (2002) Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein-protein interactions. Nature 417: 399-403.
86. Ali W, Deane CM, (2010) Evolutionary analysis reveals low coverage as the major challenge for protein interaction network alignment. Mol Biosyst 6: 2296-2304.
87. Stellberger T, Hauser R, Baiker A, Pothineni VR, Haas J, et al. (2010) Improving the yeast two-hybrid system with permutated fusions proteins: the Varicella Zoster Virus interactome. Proteome Sci 8: 8.
88. Pang E, Lin K, (2010) Yeast protein-protein interaction binding sites: prediction from the motif-motif, motif-domain and domain-domain levels. Mol Biosyst 6: 2164-2173.
89. Lebaron S, Papin C, Capeyrou R, Chen YL, Froment C, et al. (2009) The ATPase and helicase activities of Prp43p are stimulated by the G-patch protein Pfa1p during yeast ribosome biogenesis. EMBO J 28: 3808-3819.