Shifted Transversal Design smart-pooling for high coverage interactome mapping

Genome Research

Volumn 19, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 1262-1269

  Xin, Xiaofeng ^a   Rual, Jean François ^b,c   Hirozane Kishikawa, Tomoko ^b,c   Hill, David E ^b,c   Vidal, Marc ^b,c   Boone, Charles ^a   Thierry Mieg, Nicolas ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d LABORATOIRE TIMC IMAG   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; GENE INTERACTION; GENE LIBRARY; GENE MAPPING; GENE POOL; GENE SEQUENCE; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NONHUMAN; OPEN READING FRAME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SHIFTED TRANSVERSAL DESIGN; TWO HYBRID SYSTEM; WORKLOAD; YEAST;

ANIMALS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; OPEN READING FRAMES; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SOFTWARE; TWO-HYBRID SYSTEM TECHNIQUES;

EID: 67650022867     PISSN: 10889051     EISSN: 15495469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/gr.090019.108     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Barabasi AL, Oltvai ZN. 2004. Network biology: Understanding the cell's functional organization. Nat Rev Genet 5: 101-113.
2. Bruno WJ, Knill E, Balding DJ, Bruce DC, Doggett NA, Sawhill WW, Stallings RL, Whittaker CC, Torney DC. 1995. Efficient pooling designs for library screening. Genomics 26: 21-30.
3. Deplancke B, Mukhopadhyay A, Ao W, Elewa AM, Grove CA, Martinez NJ, Sequerra R, Doucette-Stamm L, Reece-Hoyes JS, Hope IA, et al. 2006. A gene-centered C. elegans protein-DNA interaction network. Cell 125: 1193-1205.
4. Gandhi TK, Zhong J, Mathivanan S, Karthick L, Chandrika KN, Mohan SS, Sharma S, Pinkert S, Nagaraju S, Periaswamy B, et al. 2006. Analysis of the human protein interactome and comparison with yeast, worm and fly interaction data sets. Nat Genet 38: 285-293.
5. Ito T, Chiba T, Ozawa R, Yoshida M, Hattori M, Sakaki Y. 2001. A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98: 4569-4574.
6. Jin F, Hazbun T, Michaud GA, Salcius M, Predki PF, Fields S, Huang J. 2006. A pooling-deconvolution strategy for biological network elucidation. Nat Methods 3: 183-189.
7. Jin F, Avramova L, Huang J, Hazbun T. 2007. A yeast two-hybrid smart-pool-array system for protein-interaction mapping. Nat Methods 4: 405-407.
8. Kainkaryam RM, Woolf PJ. 2008. poolHiTS: A shifted transversal design based pooling strategy for high-throughput drug screening. BMC Bioinformatics 9: 256. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-256.
9. Lamesch P, Milstein S, Hao T, Rosenberg J, Li N, Sequerra R, Bosak S, Doucette-Stamm L, Vandenhaute J, Hill DE, et al. 2004. C. elegans ORFeome version 3.1: Increasing the coverage of ORFeome resources with improved gene predictions. Genome Res 14: 2064-2069.
10. Reboul J, Vaglio P, Rual JF, Lamesch P, Martinez M, Armstrong CM, Li S, Jacotot L, Bertin N, Janky R, et al. 2003. C. elegans ORFeome version 1.1: Experimental verification of the genome annotation and resource for proteome-scale protein expression. Nat Genet 34: 35-41.
11. Ren R, Mayer BJ, Cicchetti P, Baltimore D. 1993. Identification of a ten-amino acid proline-rich SH3 binding site. Science 259: 1157-1161.
12. Rual JF, Venkatesan K, Hao T, Hirozane-Kishikawa T, Dricot A, Li N, Berriz GF, Gibbons FD, Dreze M, Ayivi-Guedehoussou N, et al. 2005. Towards a proteome-scale map of the human protein-protein interaction network. Nature 437: 1173-1178.
13. Stelzl U, Worm U, Lalowski M, Haenig C, Brembeck FH, Goehler H, Stroedicke M, Zenkner M, Schoenherr A, Koeppen S, et al. 2005. A human protein-protein interaction network: A resource for annotating the proteome. Cell 122: 957-968.
14. Thierry-Mieg N. 2006a. A new pooling strategy for high-throughput screening: The shifted transversal design. BMC Bioinformatics 7: 28. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-28.
15. Thierry-Mieg N. 2006b. Pooling in systems biology becomes smart. Nat Methods 3: 161-162.
16. Thierry-Mieg N, Bailly G. 2008. Interpool: Interpreting smart-pooling results. Bioinformatics 24: 696-703.
17. Tong AH, Drees B, Nardelli G, Bader GD, Brannetti B, Castagnoli L, Evangelista M, Ferracuti S, Nelson B, Paoluzi S, et al. 2002. A combined experimental and computational strategy to define protein interaction networks for peptide recognition modules. Science 295: 321-324.
18. Tong AH, Lesage G, Bader GD, Ding H, Xu H, Xin X, Young J, Berriz GF, Brost RL, Chang M, et al. 2004. Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network. Science 303: 808-813.
19. Uetz P, Giot L, Cagney G, Mansfield TA, Judson RS, Knight JR, Lockshon D, Narayan V, Srinivasan M, Pochart P, et al. 2000. A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 403: 623-627.
20. Venkatesan K, Rual JF, Vazquez A, Stelzl U, Lemmens I, Hirozane-Kishikawa T, Hao T, Zenkner M, Xin X, Goh KI, et al. 2009. An empirical framework for binary interactome mapping. Nat Methods 6: 83-90.
21. Vermeirssen V, Deplancke B, Barrasa MI, Reece-Hoyes JS, Arda HE, Grove CA, Martinez NJ, Sequerra R, Doucette-Stamm L, Brent MR, et al. 2007. Matrix and Steiner-triple-system smart pooling assays for high-performance transcription regulatory network mapping. Nat Methods 4: 659-664.
22. Wu Y, Liu L, Close TJ, Lonardi S. 2008. Deconvoluting BAC-gene relationships using a physical map. J Bioinform Comput Biol 6: 603-622.
23. Yu H, Braun P, Yildirim MA, Lemmens I, Venkatesan K, Sahalie J, Hirozane-Kishikawa T, Gebreab F, Li N, Simonis N, et al. 2008. High-quality binary protein interaction map of the yeast interactome network. Science 322: 104-110.
24. Zhong J, Zhang H, Stanyon CA, Tromp G, Finley RL Jr. 2003. A strategy for constructing large protein interaction maps using the yeast two-hybrid system: Regulated expression arrays and two-phase mating. Genome Res 13: 2691-2699.