Cost-effective strategies for completing the interactome

Nature Methods

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 55-61

  Schwartz, Ariel S ^a   Yu, Jingkai ^b   Gardenour, Kyle R ^b   Finley Jr , Russell L ^b   Ideker, Trey ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN INTERACTION; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; DROSOPHILA PROTEINS; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

EID: 58149234807     PISSN: 15487091     EISSN: 15491676     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.1283     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Fields, S. High-throughput two-hybrid analysis. The promise and the peril. FEBS J. 272, 5391-5399 (2005).
2. Giot, L. et al. A protein interaction map of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 302, 1727-1736 (2003).
3. Ito, T. et al. A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 4569-4574 (2001).
4. Li, S. et al. A map of the interactome network of the metazoan C. elegans. Science 303, 540-543 (2004).
5. Rual, J.F. et al. Towards a proteome-scale map of the human protein-protein interaction network. Nature 437, 1173-1178 (2005).
6. Stelzl, U. et al. A human protein-protein interaction network: A resource for annotating the proteome. Cell 122, 957-968 (2005).
7. Suzuki, H. et al. Protein-protein interaction panel using mouse full-length cDNAs. Genome Res. 11, 1758-1765 (2001).
8. Uetz, P. et al. A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 403, 623-627 (2000).
9. Gavin, A.C. et al. Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. Nature 440, 631-636 (2006).
10. Gavin, A.C. et al. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature 415, 141-147 (2002).
11. Krogan, N.J. et al. Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 440, 637-643 (2006).
12. Harbison, C.T. et al. Transcriptional regulatory code of a eukaryotic genome. Nature 431, 99-104 (2004).
13. Pokholok, D.K. et al. Genome-wide map of nucleosome acetylation and methylation in yeast. Cell 122, 517-527 (2005).
14. Ren, B. et al. Genome-wide location and function of DNA binding proteins. Science 290, 2306-2309 (2000).
15. Tong, A.H. et al. Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants. Science 294, 2364-2368 (2001).
16. Collins, S.R., Schuldiner, M., Krogan, N.J. & Weissman, J.S. A strategy for extracting and analyzing large-scale quantitative epistatic interaction data. Genome Biol. 7, R63 (2006).
17. Bao, L. et al. Combining gene expression QTL mapping and phenotypic spectrum analysis to uncover gene regulatory relationships. Mamm. Genome 17, 575-583 (2006).
18. Chesler, E.J., Lu, L., Wang, J., Williams, R.W. & Manly, K.F. WebQTL: rapid exploratory analysis of gene expression and genetic networks for brain and behavior. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 485-486 (2004).
19. Petretto, E. et al. Heritability and tissue specificity of expression quantitative trait. loci. PLoS Genet. 2, e172 (2006).
20. Schadt, E.E. et al. Genetics of gene expression surveyed in maize, mouse and man. Nature 422, 297-302 (2003).
21. Rain, J.C. et al. The protein-protein interaction map of Helicobacter pylori. Nature 409, 211-215 (2001).
22. Parrish, J.R. et al. A proteome-wide protein interaction map for Campylobacter jejuni. Genome Biol. 8, R130 (2007).
23. LaCount, D.J. et al. A protein interaction network of the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Nature 438, 103-107 (2005).
24. Uetz, P. et al. Herpesviral protein networks and their interaction with the human proteome. Science 311, 239-242 (2006).
25. von Brunn, A. et al. Analysis of intraviral protein-protein interactions of the SARS coronavirus ORFeome. PLoS ONE 2, e459 (2007).
26. Lander, E.S. & Waterman, M.S. Genomic mapping by fingerprinting random clones: A mathematical analysis. Genomics 2, 231-239 (1988).
27. Weber, J.L. & Myers, E.W. Human whole-genome shotgun sequencing. Genome Res. 7, 401-409 (1997).
28. von Mering, C. et al. Comparative assessment of Large-scale data sets of protein-protein interactions. Nature 417, 399-403 (2002).
29. Hart, G.T., Ramani, A.K. & Marcotte, E.M. How complete are current yeast and human protein-interaction networks? Genome Biol. 7, 120 (2006).
30. Lappe, M. & Holm, L. Unraveling protein interaction networks with near-optimal efficiency. Nat. Biotechnol. 22, 98-103 (2004).
31. Cusick, M.E., Klitgord, N., Vidal, M. & Hill, D.E. Interactome: Gateway into systems biology. Hum. Mol. Genet. 14 (special issue 2), R171-R181 (2005).
32. Kocher, T. & Superti-Furga, G. Mass spectrometry-based functional proteomics: From molecular machines to protein networks. Natl Methods 4, 807-815 (2007).
33. Parrish, J.R., Gulyas, K.D. & Finley, R.L. Jr. Yeast two-hybrid contributions to interactome mapping. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 17, 387-393 (2006).
34. Deane, C.M., Salwinski, L., Xenarios, I. & Eisenberg, D. Protein interactions: Two methods for assessment of the reliability of high throughput observations. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 1, 349-356 (2002).
35. Stanyon, C.A. et al. A Drosophila protein-interaction map centered on cell-cycle regulators. Genome Biol. 5, R96 (2004).
36. Adams, M.D. et al. The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 287, 2185-2195 (2000).
37. Zhong, J., Zhang, H., Stanyon, C.A., Tromp, G. & Finley, R.L. Jr. A strategy for constructing large protein interaction maps using the yeast two-hybrid system: Regulated expression arrays and two-phase mating. Genome Res. 13, 2691-2699 (2003).
38. Sharan, R. et al. Conserved patterns of protein interaction in multiple species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 1974-1979 (2005).
39. Matthews, L.R. et al. Identification of potential interaction networks using sequence-based searches for conserved protein-protein interactions or "interologs". Genome Res. 11, 2120-2126 (2001).
40. Boulton, S.J. et al. Combined functional genomic maps of the C. elegans DNA damage response. Science 295, 127-131 (2002).
41. Ben-Hur, A. & Noble, W.S. Kernel methods for predicting protein-protein interactions. Bioinformatics 21 Suppl 1, i38-i46 (2005).
42. Jansen, R. et al. A Bayesian networks approach for predicting protein-protein interactions from genomic data. Science 302, 449-453 (2003).
43. Lee, I., Date, S.V., Adai, A.T. & Marcotte, E.M. A probabilistic functional network of yeast genes. Science 306, 1555-1558 (2004).
44. Lu, L.J., Xia, Y., Paccanaro, A., Yu, H. & Gerstein, M. Assessing the limits of genomic data integration for predicting protein networks. Genome Res. 15, 945-953 (2005).
45. von Mering, C. et al. STRING: A database of predicted functional associations between proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 258-261 (2003).
46. Yu, H., Paccanaro, A., Trifonov, V. & Gerstein, M. Predicting interactions in protein networks by completing defective cliques. Bioinformatics 22, 823-829 (2006).
47. Finley, R.L. Jr & Brent, R. Interaction mating reveals binary and ternary connections between Drosophila cell cycle regulators. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 12980-12984 (1994).
48. Kerrien, S. et al. IntAct-open source resource for molecular interaction data. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, D561-D565 (2007).