Literature-curated protein interaction datasets

Nature Methods

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 39-46

  Cusick, Michael E ^a,b   Yu, Haiyuan ^a,b   Smolyar, Alex ^a,b   Venkatesan, Kavitha ^a,b,f   Carvunis, Anne Ruxandra ^a,b,c   Simonis, Nicolas ^a,b   Rual, Jean François ^a,b   Borick, Heather ^a,b,g   Braun, Pascal ^a,b   Dreze, Matija ^a,b   Vandenhaute, Jean ^d   Galli, Mary ^e   Yazaki, Junshi ^e   Hill, David E ^a,b   Ecker, Joseph R ^e   Roth, Frederick P ^a,b   Vidal, Marc ^a,b  

^a DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c LABORATOIRE TIMC IMAG   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NAMUR   (Belgium)

^e SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES   (United States)

^f NOVARTIS INSTITUTES FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH   (United States)

^g CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CONSERVATION GENETICS; GENE MAPPING; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; HUMAN; IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN DETERMINATION; PROTEIN PROCESSING; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN PURIFICATION; PUBLICATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DATABASES, PROTEIN; HUMANS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEINS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 58149213932     PISSN: 15487091     EISSN: 15491676     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.1284     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Cusick, M.E., Klitgord, N., Vidal, M. & Hill, D.E. Interactome: Gateway into systems biology. Hum. Mol. Genet. 14, R171-R181 (2005).
2. Bader, S., Kuhner, S. & Gavin, A.C. Interaction networks for systems biology. FEBS Lett. 582, 1220-1224 (2008).
3. Vidal, M. Interactome modeling. FEBS Lett. 579, 1834-1838 (2005).
4. Roberts, P.M. Mining literature for systems biology. Brief. Bioinform. 7, 399-406 (2006).
5. Venkatesan, K. et al. An empirical framework for binary interactome mapping. Nat. Methods 6, 83-90 (2008).
6. Stumpf, M.P. et al. Estimating the size of the human interactome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 6959-6964 (2008).
7. Yu, H. et al. High-quality binary protein interaction map of the yeast interactome network. Science 322, 104-110 (2008).
8. Parrish, J.R., Gulyas, K.D. & Finley, R.L. Jr. Yeast two-hybrid contributions to interactome mapping. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 17, 387-393 (2006).
9. Ito, T. et al. Roles for the two-hybrid system in exploration of the yeast protein interactome. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 1, 561-566 (2002).
10. Köcher, T. & Superti-Furga, G. Mass spectrometry-based functional proteomics: From molecular machines to protein networks. Nat. Methods 4, 807-815 (2007).
11. Suter, B., Kittanakom, S. & Stagljar, I. Interactive proteomics: What lies ahead? Biotechniques 44, 681-691 (2008).
12. Tarassov, K. et al. An in vivo map of the yeast protein interactome. Science 320, 1465-1470 (2008).
13. Garrels, J.I. YPD-A database for the proteins of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 24, 46-49 (1996).
14. Hong, E.L. et al. Gene Ontology annotations at SGD: New data sources and annotation methods. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, D577-D581 (2008).
15. Swarbreck, D. et al. The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR): Gene structure and function annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, D1009-D1014 (2007).
16. Pagel, P. et al. The MIPS mammalian protein-protein interaction database. Bioinformatics 21, 832-834 (2005).
17. Bader, G.D., Betel, D. & Hogue, C.W. BIND: The Biomolecular Interaction Network Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 248-250 (2003).
18. Salwinski, L. et al. The Database of Interacting Proteins: 2004 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, D449-D451 (2004).
19. Chatr-aryamontri, A. et al. MINT: The Molecular INTeraction database. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, D572-D574 (2007).
20. Kerrien, S. et al. IntAct-open source resource for molecular interaction data. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, D561-D565 (2007).
21. Reguly, T. et al. Comprehensive curation and analysis of global interaction networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. 5 11 (2006).
22. Mishra, G.R. et al. Human protein reference database - 2006 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, D411-D414 (2006).
23. Myers, C.L., Barrett, D.R., Hibbs, M.A., Huttenhower, C. & Troyanskaya, O.G. Finding function: Evaluation methods for functional genomic data. BMC Genomics 7, 187 (2006).
24. Mika, S. & Rost, B. Protein-protein interactions more conserved within species than across species. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2, e79 (2006).
25. Simonis, N. et al. Empirically-controlled mapping of the Caenorhabditis elegans protein-protein interaction network. Nat. Methods 6, 47-54 (2008).
26. Jansen, R. & Gerstein, M. Analyzing protein function on a genomic scale: the importance of gold-standard positives and negatives for network prediction. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 7, 535-545 (2004).
27. Braun, P. et al. An experimentally derived confidence score for binary protein-protein interactions. Nat. Methods 6, 91-97 (2008).
28. Bader, G.D. & Hogue, C.W. Analyzing yeast protein-protein interaction data obtained from different sources. Nat. Biotechnol. 20, 991-997 (2002).
29. Ramírez, F., Schlicker, A., Assenov, Y., Lengauer, T. & Albrecht, M. Computational analysis of human protein interaction networks. Proteomics 7, 2541-2552 (2007).
30. Howe, D. et al. The future of biocuration. Nature 455, 47-50 (2008).
31. Rual, J.F. et al. Towards a proteome-scale map of the human protein-protein interaction network. Nature 437, 1173-1178 (2005).
32. Peri, S. et al. Development of Human Protein Reference Database as an initial platform for approaching systems biology in humans. Genome Res. 13, 2363-2371 (2003).
33. Orchard, S. et al. Submit your interaction data the IMEx way. A step by step guide to trouble-free deposition. Proteomics 7, 28-34 (2007).
34. Kerrien, S. et al. Broadening the horizon - Level 2.5 of the HUPO-PSI format for molecular interactions. BMC Biol. 5, 44 (2007).
35. Gavin, A.C. et al. Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. Nature 440, 631-636 (2006).
36. Gavin, A.C. et al. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature 415, 141-147 (2002).
37. Ho, Y. et al. Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature 415 180-183 (2002).
38. Krogan, N.J. et al. Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 440, 637-643 (2006).
39. Ito, T. et al. A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 4569-4574 (2001).
40. Uetz, P. et al. A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 403, 623-627 (2000).
41. Alfarano, C. et al. The Biomolecular Interaction Network Database (BIND) and related tools 2005 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, D418-D424 (2005).
42. Mathivanan, S. et al. An evaluation of human protein-protein interaction data in the public domain. BMC Bioinformatics 7, S19 (2006).
43. Gentleman, R. & Huber, W. Making the most of high-throughput protein-interaction data. Genome Biol. 8, 112 (2007).
44. Mackay, J.P., Sunde, M., Lowry, J.A., Crossley, M. & Matthews, J.M. Protein interactions: Is seeing believing? Trends Biochem. Sci. 32, 530-531 (2007).
45. Mackay, J.P., Sunde, M., Lowry, J.A., Crossley, M. & Matthews, J.M. Response to ChatT-aryamontri et al.: Protein interactions: to believe or not to believe? Trends Biochem. Sci. 33, 242-243 (2008).
46. Nelson, D.R. Gene nomenclature by default, or BLASTing to Babel. Hum. Genomics 2, 196-201 (2005).
47. Krogan, N.J. et al. A Snf2 family ATPase complex required for recruitment of the histone H2A variant Htz1. Mol. Cell 12, 1565-1576 (2003).
48. Zanzoni, A. et al. MINT: A Molecular INTeraction database. FEBS Lett. 513, 135-140 (2002).
49. Philippi, S. & Kohler, J. Addressing the problems with life-science databases for traditional uses and systems biology. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7, 482-488 (2006).
50. Kiemer, L., Costa, S., Ueffing, M. & Cesareni, G. WI.-PHI a weighted yeast interactome enriched for direct physical interactions. Proteomics 7, 932-943 (2007).
51. Chatr-Aryamontri, A., Ceol, A., Licata, L. & Cesareni, G. Protein interactions: Integration leads to belief. Trends Biochem. Sci. 33, 241-242 (2008).
52. Boxem, M. et al. A protein domain-based interactome network for C. elegans early embryogenesis. Cell 134, 534-545 (2008).
53. von Mering, C. et al. Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein-protein interactions. Nature 417, 399-403 (2002).
54. Batada, N.N., Hurst, L.D. & Tyers, M. Evolutionary and physiological importance of hub proteins. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2, e88 (2006).
55. Orchard, S. et al. The minimum information required for reporting a molecular interaction experiment (MIMIx). Nat. Biotechnol. 25 894-898 (2007).
56. Hermjakob, H. et al. The HUPO PSI's molecular interaction format-a community standard for the representation of protein interaction data. Nat. Biotechnol. 22, 177-183 (2004).
57. Ceol, A., Chatr-Aryamontri, A., Licata, L. & Cesareni, G. Linking entries in protein interaction database to structured text: The FEBS Letters experiment. FEBS Lett. 582, 1171-1177 (2008).
58. Gerstein, M., Seringhaus, M. & Fields, S. Structured digital abstract makes text mining easy. Nature 447, 142 (2007).
59. Taylor, C.F. et al. Promoting coherent minimum reporting guidelines for biological and biomedical investigations: The MIBBI project. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 889-896 (2008).
60. Stevens, S.W. et al. Composition and functional characterization of the yeast spliceosomal penta-snRNP. Mol. Cell 9, 31-44 (2002).
61. Fromont-Racine, M., Rain, J.C. & Legrain, P. Toward a functional analysis of the yeast genome through exhaustive two-hybrid screens. Nat. Genet. 16, 277-282 (1997).
62. Walhout, A.J. et al. Protein interaction mapping in C. elegans using proteins involved in vulval development. Science 287 116-122 (2000).
63. Matthews, L.R. et al. Identification of potential interaction networks using sequence-based searches for conserved protein-protein interactions or "interologs". Genome Res. 11, 2120-2126 (2001).
64. Yu, H. et al. Annotation transfer between genomes: Protein-protein interologs and protein-DNA regulogs. Genome Res. 14, 1107-1118 (2004).
65. Ramani, A.K., Bunescu, R.C., Mooney, R.J. & Marcotte, E.M. Consolidating the set of known human protein-protein interactions in preparation for large-scale mapping of the human interactome. Genome Biol. 6 R40 (2005).
66. Sharan, R. et al. Conserved patterns of protein interaction in multiple species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 1974-1979 (2005).
67. Levy, E.D. & Pereira-Leal, J.B. Evolution and dynamics of protein interactions and networks. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 18, 349-357 (2008).
68. Tompa, P. & Fuxreiter, M. Fuzzy complexes: Polymorphism and structural disorder in protein-protein interactions. Trends Biochem. Sci. 33, 2-8 (2008).
69. Fuxreiter, M., Tompa, P. & Simon, I. Local structural disorder imparts plasticity on linear motifs. Bioinformatics 23, 950-956 (2007).
70. Beltrao, P. & Serrano, L. Specificity and evolvability in eukaryotic protein interaction networks. PLoS Comput. Biol. 3, e25 (2007).