Structure characterization of the 26S proteasome

Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms

Volumn 1809, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 67-79

  Kim, Ho Min ^a   Yu, Yadong ^a   Cheng, Yifan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

26S proteasome; Structure

Indexed keywords

26S PROTEASOME; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; CELL SURFACE RECEPTOR; PROTEASOME; PROTEINASE; RPN11 ENZYME; UBIQUITIN RECEPTOR; UBP6 ENZYME; UCH37 ENZYME; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; USP14 ENZYME;

CELL ACTIVITY; COMPLEX FORMATION; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; HUMANS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEASOME ENDOPEPTIDASE COMPLEX; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEIN SUBUNITS;

EUKARYOTA;

EID: 79151472282     PISSN: 18749399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2010.08.008     Document Type: Review

References (163)

1. Ciechanover A., Schwartz A.L. The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway: the complexity and myriad functions of proteins death. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95:2727-2730.
2. Hershko A., Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin system. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1998, 67:425-479.
3. Glickman M.H., Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway: destruction for the sake of construction. Physiol. Rev. 2002, 82:373-428.
4. Glickman M.H., Adir N. The proteasome and the delicate balance between destruction and rescue. PLoS Biol. 2004, 2:E13.
5. Coux O., Tanaka K., Goldberg A.L. Structure and functions of the 20S and 26S proteasomes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1996, 65:801-847.
6. Groll M., Huber R. Substrate access and processing by the 20S proteasome core particle. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2003, 35:606-616.
7. Voges D., Zwickl P., Baumeister W. The 26S proteasome: a molecular machine designed for controlled proteolysis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1999, 68:1015-1068.
8. Verma R., Annan R.S., Huddleston M.J., Carr S.A., Reynard G., Deshaies R.J. Phosphorylation of Sic1p by G1 Cdk required for its degradation and entry into S phase. Science 1997, 278:455-460.
9. Kaiser P., Moncollin V., Clarke D.J., Watson M.H., Bertolaet B.L., Reed S.I., Bailly E. Cyclin-dependent kinase and Cks/Suc1 interact with the proteasome in yeast to control proteolysis of M-phase targets. Genes Dev. 1999, 13:1190-1202.
10. Bech-Otschir D., Kraft R., Huang X., Henklein P., Kapelari B., Pollmann C., Dubiel W. COP9 signalosome-specific phosphorylation targets p53 to degradation by the ubiquitin system. EMBO J. 2001, 20:1630-1639.
11. Bounpheng M.A., Dimas J.J., Dodds S.G., Christy B.A. Degradation of Id proteins by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. FASEB J. 1999, 13:2257-2264.
12. Karin M., Ben-Neriah Y. Phosphorylation meets ubiquitination: the control of NF-[kappa]B activity. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2000, 18:621-663.
13. Buschmann T., Fuchs S.Y., Lee C.G., Pan Z.Q., Ronai Z. SUMO-1 modification of Mdm2 prevents its self-ubiquitination and increases Mdm2 ability to ubiquitinate p53. Cell 2000, 101:753-762.
14. Hiller M.M., Finger A., Schweiger M., Wolf D.H. ER degradation of a misfolded luminal protein by the cytosolic ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Science 1996, 273:1725-1728.
15. Kloetzel P.M. Antigen processing by the proteasome. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2001, 2:179-187.
16. Sijts A., Zaiss D., Kloetzel P.M. The role of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway in MHC class I antigen processing: implications for vaccine design. Curr. Mol. Med. 2001, 1:665-676.
17. Yewdell J.W., Bennink J.R. Cut and trim: generating MHC class I peptide ligands. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2001, 13:13-18.
18. Rock K.L., York I.A., Goldberg A.L. Post-proteasomal antigen processing for major histocompatibility complex class I presentation. Nat. Immunol. 2004, 5:670-677.
19. Rock K.L., York I.A., Saric T., Goldberg A.L. Protein degradation and the generation of MHC class I-presented peptides. Adv. Immunol. 2002, 80:1-70.
20. Glickman M.H., Rubin D.M., Coux O., Wefes I., Pfeifer G., Cjeka Z., Baumeister W., Fried V.A., Finley D. A subcomplex of the proteasome regulatory particle required for ubiquitin-conjugate degradation and related to the COP9-signalosome and eIF3. Cell 1998, 94:615-623.
21. Glickman M.H., Rubin D.M., Fried V.A., Finley D. The regulatory particle of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteasome. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1998, 18:3149-3162.
22. Cheng Y. Toward an atomic model of the 26S proteasome. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2009, 19:203-208.
23. Dikic I., Wakatsuki S., Walters K.J. Ubiquitin-binding domains-from structures to functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 10:659-671.
24. Finley D. Recognition and processing of ubiquitin-protein conjugates by the proteasome. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2009, 78:477-513.
25. Murata S., Yashiroda H., Tanaka K. Molecular mechanisms of proteasome assembly. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 10:104-115.
26. Schrader E.K., Harstad K.G., Matouschek A. Targeting proteins for degradation. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2009, 5:815-822.
27. Tanaka K. The proteasome: overview of structure and functions. Proc. Jpn Acad. B Phys. Biol. Sci. 2009, 85:12-36.
28. Nickell S., Beck F., Scheres S.H., Korinek A., Forster F., Lasker K., Mihalache O., Sun N., Nagy I., Sali A., Plitzko J.M., Carazo J.M., Mann M., Baumeister W. Insights into the molecular architecture of the 26S proteasome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106:11943-11947.
29. Takeuchi J., Chen H., Hoyt M.A., Coffino P. Structural elements of the ubiquitin-independent proteasome degron of ornithine decarboxylase. Biochem. J. 2008, 410:401-407.
30. Besche H., Haas W., Gygi S., Goldberg A. Isolation of mammalian 26S proteasomes and p97/VCP complexes using the ubiquitin-like domain from HHR23B reveals novel proteasome-associated proteins. Biochemistry 2009.
31. Hough R., Pratt G., Rechsteiner M. Purification of two high molecular weight proteases from rabbit reticulocyte lysate. J. Biol. Chem. 1987, 262:8303-8313.
32. Lowe J., Stock D., Jap B., Zwickl P., Baumeister W., Huber R. Crystal structure of the 20S proteasome from the archaeon T. acidophilum at 3.4 A resolution. Science 1995, 268:533-539.
33. Zhang F., Hu M., Tian G., Zhang P., Finley D., Jeffrey P.D., Shi Y. Structural insights into the regulatory particle of the proteasome from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii. Mol. Cell 2009, 34:473-484.
34. Hu G., Lin G., Wang M., Dick L., Xu R.M., Nathan C., Li H. Structure of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis proteasome and mechanism of inhibition by a peptidyl boronate. Mol. Microbiol. 2006, 59:1417-1428.
35. Groll M., Ditzel L., Lowe J., Stock D., Bochtler M., Bartunik H.D., Huber R. Structure of 20S proteasome from yeast at 2.4 A resolution. Nature 1997, 386:463-471.
36. Unno M., Mizushima T., Morimoto Y., Tomisugi Y., Tanaka K., Yasuoka N., Tsukihara T. The structure of the mammalian 20S proteasome at 2.75 A resolution. Structure 2002, 10:609-618.
37. Rock K.L., Goldberg A.L. Degradation of cell proteins and the generation of MHC class I-presented peptides. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 1999, 17:739-779.
38. Groll M., Bajorek M., Kohler A., Moroder L., Rubin D.M., Huber R., Glickman M.H., Finley D. A gated channel into the proteasome core particle. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2000, 7:1062-1067.
39. Groll M., Brandstetter H., Bartunik H., Bourenkow G., Huber R. Investigations on the maturation and regulation of archaebacterial proteasomes. J. Mol. Biol. 2003, 327:75-83.
40. Kohler A., Cascio P., Leggett D.S., Woo K.M., Goldberg A.L., Finley D. The axial channel of the proteasome core particle is gated by the Rpt2 ATPase and controls both substrate entry and product release. Mol. Cell 2001, 7:1143-1152.
41. Whitby F.G., Masters E.I., Kramer L., Knowlton J.R., Yao Y., Wang C.C., Hill C.P. Structural basis for the activation of 20S proteasomes by 11S regulators. Nature 2000, 408:115-120.
42. Sadre-Bazzaz K., Whitby F.G., Robinson H., Formosa T., Hill C.P. Structure of a Blm10 complex reveals common mechanisms for proteasome binding and gate opening. Mol. Cell 2010, 37:728-735.
43. Hirano Y., Hayashi H., Iemura S., Hendil K.B., Niwa S., Kishimoto T., Kasahara M., Natsume T., Tanaka K., Murata S. Cooperation of multiple chaperones required for the assembly of mammalian 20S proteasomes. Mol. Cell 2006, 24:977-984.
44. Yashiroda H., Mizushima T., Okamoto K., Kameyama T., Hayashi H., Kishimoto T., Niwa S., Kasahara M., Kurimoto E., Sakata E., Takagi K., Suzuki A., Hirano Y., Murata S., Kato K., Yamane T., Tanaka K. Crystal structure of a chaperone complex that contributes to the assembly of yeast 20S proteasomes. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2008, 15:228-236.
45. Zwickl P., Kleinz J., Baumeister W. Critical elements in proteasome assembly. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1994, 1:765-770.
46. da Fonseca P.C., Morris E.P. Structure of the human 26S proteasome: subunit radial displacements open the gate into the proteolytic core. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283:23305-23314.
47. Walz J., Erdmann A., Kania M., Typke D., Koster A.J., Baumeister W. 26S proteasome structure revealed by three-dimensional electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 1998, 121:19-29.
48. Mochida K., Tres L.L., Kierszenbaum A.L. Structural features of the 26S proteasome complex isolated from rat testis and sperm tail. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2000, 57:176-184.
49. Saeki Y., Toh-e A., Yokosawa H. Rapid isolation and characterization of the yeast proteasome regulatory complex. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2000, 273:509-515.
50. Fu H., Doelling J.H., Rubin D.M., Vierstra R.D. Structural and functional analysis of the six regulatory particle triple-A ATPase subunits from the Arabidopsis 26S proteasome. Plant J. 1999, 18:529-539.
51. Rubin D.M., Glickman M.H., Larsen C.N., Dhruvakumar S., Finley D. Active site mutants in the six regulatory particle ATPases reveal multiple roles for ATP in the proteasome. EMBO J. 1998, 17:4909-4919.
52. Hartmann-Petersen R., Tanaka K., Hendil K.B. Quaternary structure of the ATPase complex of human 26S proteasomes determined by chemical cross-linking. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2001, 386:89-94.
53. Forster A., Masters E.I., Whitby F.G., Robinson H., Hill C.P. The 1.9 A structure of a proteasome-11S activator complex and implications for proteasome-PAN/PA700 interactions. Mol. Cell 2005, 18:589-599.
54. Forster A., Whitby F.G., Hill C.P. The pore of activated 20S proteasomes has an ordered 7-fold symmetric conformation. EMBO J. 2003, 22:4356-4364.
55. Rabl J., Smith D.M., Yu Y., Chang S.C., Goldberg A.L., Cheng Y. Mechanism of gate opening in the 20S proteasome by the proteasomal ATPases. Mol. Cell 2008, 30:360-368.
56. Smith D.M., Chang S.C., Park S., Finley D., Cheng Y., Goldberg A.L. Docking of the proteasomal ATPases' carboxyl termini in the 20S proteasome's alpha ring opens the gate for substrate entry. Mol. Cell 2007, 27:731-744.
57. Baker T.A., Sauer R.T. ATP-dependent proteases of bacteria: recognition logic and operating principles. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2006, 31:647-653.
58. Sauer R.T., Bolon D.N., Burton B.M., Burton R.E., Flynn J.M., Grant R.A., Hersch G.L., Joshi S.A., Kenniston J.A., Levchenko I., Neher S.B., Oakes E.S., Siddiqui S.M., Wah D.A., Baker T.A. Sculpting the proteome with AAA(+) proteases and disassembly machines. Cell 2004, 119:9-18.
59. Zolkiewski M. A camel passes through the eye of a needle: protein unfolding activity of Clp ATPases. Mol. Microbiol. 2006, 61:1094-1100.
60. Kajava A.V. What curves alpha-solenoids? Evidence for an alpha-helical toroid structure of Rpn1 and Rpn2 proteins of the 26S proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277:49791-49798.
61. Effantin G., Rosenzweig R., Glickman M.H., Steven A.C. Electron microscopic evidence in support of alpha-solenoid models of proteasomal subunits Rpn1 and Rpn2. J. Mol. Biol. 2009, 386:1204-1211.
62. Rosenzweig R., Osmulski P.A., Gaczynska M., Glickman M.H. The central unit within the 19S regulatory particle of the proteasome. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2008, 15:573-580.
63. Smith D.M., Kafri G., Cheng Y., Ng D., Walz T., Goldberg A.L. ATP binding to PAN or the 26S ATPases causes association with the 20S proteasome, gate opening, and translocation of unfolded proteins. Mol. Cell 2005, 20:687-698.
64. Benaroudj N., Goldberg A.L. PAN, the proteasome-activating nucleotidase from archaebacteria, is a protein-unfolding molecular chaperone. Nat. Cell Biol. 2000, 2:833-839.
65. Zwickl P., Ng D., Woo K.M., Klenk H.P., Goldberg A.L. An archaebacterial ATPase, homologous to ATPases in the eukaryotic 26S proteasome, activates protein breakdown by 20S proteasomes. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274:26008-26014.
66. Benaroudj N., Zwickl P., Seemuller E., Baumeister W., Goldberg A.L. ATP hydrolysis by the proteasome regulatory complex PAN serves multiple functions in protein degradation. Mol. Cell 2003, 11:69-78.
67. Horwitz A.A., Navon A., Groll M., Smith D.M., Reis C., Goldberg A.L. ATP-induced structural transitions in PAN, the proteasome-regulatory ATPase complex in Archaea. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282:22921-22929.
68. Stadtmueller B.M., Ferrell K., Whitby F.G., Heroux A., Robinson H., Myszka D.G., Hill C.P. Structural models for interactions between the 20S proteasome and its PAN/19S activators. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285:13-17.
69. Yu Y., Smith D.M., Kim H.M., Rodriguez V., Goldberg A.L., Cheng Y. Interactions of PAN's C-termini with archaeal 20S proteasome and implications for the eukaryotic proteasome-ATPase interactions. EMBO J. 2010, 29:692-702.
70. Djuranovic S., Hartmann M.D., Habeck M., Ursinus A., Zwickl P., Martin J., Lupas A.N., Zeth K. Structure and activity of the N-terminal substrate recognition domains in proteasomal ATPases. Mol. Cell 2009, 34:580-590.
71. Zhang F., Wu Z., Zhang P., Tian G., Finley D., Shi Y. Mechanism of substrate unfolding and translocation by the regulatory particle of the proteasome from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii. Mol. Cell 2009, 34:485-496.
72. Wang J., Song J.J., Franklin M.C., Kamtekar S., Im Y.J., Rho S.H., Seong I.S., Lee C.S., Chung C.H., Eom S.H. Crystal structures of the HslVU peptidase-ATPase complex reveal an ATP-dependent proteolysis mechanism. Structure 2001, 9:177-184.
73. Wang J., Song J.J., Seong I.S., Franklin M.C., Kamtekar S., Eom S.H., Chung C.H. Nucleotide-dependent conformational changes in a protease-associated ATPase HsIU. Structure 2001, 9:1107-1116.
74. Forster F., Lasker K., Beck F., Nickell S., Sali A., Baumeister W. An atomic model AAA-ATPase/20S core particle sub-complex of the 26S proteasome. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009, 388:228-233.
75. Ogura T., Wilkinson A.J. AAA + superfamily ATPases: common structure-diverse function. Genes Cells 2001, 6:575-597.
76. Vale R.D. AAA proteins. Lords of the ring. J. Cell Biol. 2000, 150:F13-F19.
77. Beyer A. Sequence analysis of the AAA protein family. Protein Sci. 1997, 6:2043-2058.
78. Karata K., Inagawa T., Wilkinson A.J., Tatsuta T., Ogura T. Dissecting the role of a conserved motif (the second region of homology) in the AAA family of ATPases. Site-directed mutagenesis of the ATP-dependent protease FtsH. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274:26225-26232.
79. Neuwald A.F., Aravind L., Spouge J.L., Koonin E.V. AAA+: A class of chaperone-like ATPases associated with the assembly, operation, and disassembly of protein complexes. Genome Res. 1999, 9:27-43.
80. Saeki Y., Tanaka K. Unlocking the proteasome door. Mol. Cell 2007, 27:865-867.
81. Gillette T.G., Kumar B., Thompson D., Slaughter C.A., DeMartino G.N. Differential roles of the COOH termini of AAA subunits of PA700 (19S regulator) in asymmetric assembly and activation of the 26S proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283:31813-31822.
82. Chen C., Huang C., Chen S., Liang J., Lin W., Ke G., Zhang H., Wang B., Huang J., Han Z., Ma L., Huo K., Yang X., Yang P., He F., Tao T. Subunit-subunit interactions in the human 26S proteasome. Proteomics 2008, 8:508-520.
83. Sharon M., Taverner T., Ambroggio X.I., Deshaies R.J., Robinson C.V. Structural organization of the 19S proteasome lid: insights from MS of intact complexes. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4:e267.
84. Funakoshi M., Tomko R.J., Kobayashi H., Hochstrasser M. Multiple assembly chaperones govern biogenesis of the proteasome regulatory particle base. Cell 2009, 137:887-899.
85. Kaneko T., Hamazaki J., Iemura S., Sasaki K., Furuyama K., Natsume T., Tanaka K., Murata S. Assembly pathway of the Mammalian proteasome base subcomplex is mediated by multiple specific chaperones. Cell 2009, 137:914-925.
86. Park S., Roelofs J., Kim W., Robert J., Schmidt M., Gygi S.P., Finley D. Hexameric assembly of the proteasomal ATPases is templated through their C termini. Nature 2009, 459:866-870.
87. Roelofs J., Park S., Haas W., Tian G., McAllister F.E., Huo Y., Lee B.H., Zhang F., Shi Y., Gygi S.P., Finley D. Chaperone-mediated pathway of proteasome regulatory particle assembly. Nature 2009, 459:861-865.
88. Saeki Y., Toh-E A., Kudo T., Kawamura H., Tanaka K. Multiple proteasome-interacting proteins assist the assembly of the yeast 19S regulatory particle. Cell 2009, 137:900-913.
89. Besche H.C., Peth A., Goldberg A.L. Getting to first base in proteasome assembly. Cell 2009, 138:25-28.
90. Hendil K.B., Kriegenburg F., Tanaka K., Murata S., Lauridsen A.M., Johnsen A.H., Hartmann-Petersen R. The 20S Proteasome as an Assembly Platform for the 19S Regulatory Complex. J. Mol. Biol. 2009, 394:320-328.
91. Tomko R.J., Funakoshi M., Schneider K., Wang J., Hochstrasser M. Heterohexameric ring arrangement of the eukaryotic proteasomal ATPases: implications for proteasome structure and assembly. Mol. Cell 2010, 38:393-403.
92. Peng J., Schwartz D., Elias J.E., Thoreen C.C., Cheng D., Marsischky G., Roelofs J., Finley D., Gygi S.P. A proteomics approach to understanding protein ubiquitination. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003, 21:921-926.
93. Pickart C.M., Fushman D. Polyubiquitin chains: polymeric protein signals. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2004, 8:610-616.
94. Ikeda F., Dikic I. Atypical ubiquitin chains: new molecular signals. 'Protein Modifications: beyond the Usual Suspects' review series. EMBO Rep. 2008, 9:536-542.
95. Chen Z.J., Sun L.J. Nonproteolytic functions of ubiquitin in cell signaling. Mol. Cell 2009, 33:275-286.
96. Deveraux Q., Ustrell V., Pickart C., Rechsteiner M. A 26S protease subunit that binds ubiquitin conjugates. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269:7059-7061.
97. Young P., Deveraux Q., Beal R.E., Pickart C.M., Rechsteiner M. Characterization of two polyubiquitin binding sites in the 26S protease subunit 5a. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273:5461-5467.
98. Wang Q., Young P., Walters K.J. Structure of S5a bound to monoubiquitin provides a model for polyubiquitin recognition. J. Mol. Biol. 2005, 348:727-739.
99. Zhang N., Wang Q., Ehlinger A., Randles L., Lary J.W., Kang Y., Haririnia A., Storaska A.J., Cole J.L., Fushman D., Walters K.J. Structure of the s5a:k48-linked diubiquitin complex and its interactions with rpn13. Mol. Cell 2009, 35:280-290.
100. Fu H., Reis N., Lee Y., Glickman M.H., Vierstra R.D. Subunit interaction maps for the regulatory particle of the 26S proteasome and the COP9 signalosome. EMBO J. 2001, 20:7096-7107.
101. Huizinga E.G., Tsuji S., Romijn R.A., Schiphorst M.E., de Groot P.G., Sixma J.J., Gros P. Structures of glycoprotein Ibalpha and its complex with von Willebrand factor A1 domain. Science 2002, 297:1176-1179.
102. Husnjak K., Elsasser S., Zhang N., Chen X., Randles L., Shi Y., Hofmann K., Walters K.J., Finley D., Dikic I. Proteasome subunit Rpn13 is a novel ubiquitin receptor. Nature 2008, 453:481-488.
103. Schreiner P., Chen X., Husnjak K., Randles L., Zhang N., Elsasser S., Finley D., Dikic I., Walters K.J., Groll M. Ubiquitin docking at the proteasome through a novel pleckstrin-homology domain interaction. Nature 2008, 453:548-552.
104. Shimada S., Ogawa M., Schlom J., Greiner J.W. Identification of a novel tumor-associated Mr 110, 000 gene product in human gastric carcinoma cells that is immunologically related to carcinoembryonic antigen. Cancer Res. 1991, 51:5694-5703.
105. Simins A.B., Weighardt H., Weidner K.M., Weidle U.H., Holzmann B. Functional cloning of ARM-1, an adhesion-regulating molecule upregulated in metastatic tumor cells. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 1999, 17:641-648.
106. Hamazaki J., Iemura S., Natsume T., Yashiroda H., Tanaka K., Murata S. A novel proteasome interacting protein recruits the deubiquitinating enzyme UCH37 to 26S proteasomes. EMBO J. 2006, 25:4524-4536.
107. Qiu X.B., Ouyang S.Y., Li C.J., Miao S., Wang L., Goldberg A.L. hRpn13/ADRM1/GP110 is a novel proteasome subunit that binds the deubiquitinating enzyme, UCH37. EMBO J. 2006, 25:5742-5753.
108. Yao T., Song L., Xu W., DeMartino G.N., Florens L., Swanson S.K., Washburn M.P., Conaway R.C., Conaway J.W., Cohen R.E. Proteasome recruitment and activation of the Uch37 deubiquitinating enzyme by Adrm1. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006, 8:994-1002.
109. Lam Y.A., Lawson T.G., Velayutham M., Zweier J.L., Pickart C.M. A proteasomal ATPase subunit recognizes the polyubiquitin degradation signal. Nature 2002, 416:763-767.
110. Amerik A.Y., Hochstrasser M. Mechanism and function of deubiquitinating enzymes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2004, 1695:189-207.
111. Nijman S.M., Luna-Vargas M.P., Velds A., Brummelkamp T.R., Dirac A.M., Sixma T.K., Bernards R. A genomic and functional inventory of deubiquitinating enzymes. Cell 2005, 123:773-786.
112. Borodovsky A., Kessler B.M., Casagrande R., Overkleeft H.S., Wilkinson K.D., Ploegh H.L. A novel active site-directed probe specific for deubiquitylating enzymes reveals proteasome association of USP14. EMBO J. 2001, 20:5187-5196.
113. Lam Y.A., DeMartino G.N., Pickart C.M., Cohen R.E. Specificity of the ubiquitin isopeptidase in the PA700 regulatory complex of 26S proteasomes. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272:28438-28446.
114. Lam Y.A., Xu W., DeMartino G.N., Cohen R.E. Editing of ubiquitin conjugates by an isopeptidase in the 26S proteasome. Nature 1997, 385:737-740.
115. Leggett D.S., Hanna J., Borodovsky A., Crosas B., Schmidt M., Baker R.T., Walz T., Ploegh H., Finley D. Multiple associated proteins regulate proteasome structure and function. Mol. Cell 2002, 10:495-507.
116. Stone M., Hartmann-Petersen R., Seeger M., Bech-Otschir D., Wallace M., Gordon C. Uch2/Uch37 is the major deubiquitinating enzyme associated with the 26S proteasome in fission yeast. J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 344:697-706.
117. Verma R., Aravind L., Oania R., McDonald W.H., Yates J.R., Koonin E.V., Deshaies R.J. Role of Rpn11 metalloprotease in deubiquitination and degradation by the 26S proteasome. Science 2002, 298:611-615.
118. Yao T., Cohen R.E. A cryptic protease couples deubiquitination and degradation by the proteasome. Nature 2002, 419:403-407.
119. Holzl H., Kapelari B., Kellermann J., Seemuller E., Sumegi M., Udvardy A., Medalia O., Sperling J., Muller S.A., Engel A., Baumeister W. The regulatory complex of Drosophila melanogaster 26S proteasomes. Subunit composition and localization of a deubiquitylating enzyme. J. Cell Biol. 2000, 150:119-130.
120. Li T., Naqvi N.I., Yang H., Teo T.S. Identification of a 26S proteasome-associated UCH in fission yeast. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2000, 272:270-275.
121. Nishio K., Kim S.W., Kawai K., Mizushima T., Yamane T., Hamazaki J., Murata S., Tanaka K., Morimoto Y. Crystal structure of the deubiquitinating enzyme UCH37 (human UCH-L5) catalytic domain. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009, 390:855-860.
122. Johnston S.C., Larsen C.N., Cook W.J., Wilkinson K.D., Hill C.P. Crystal structure of a deubiquitinating enzyme (human UCH-L3) at 1.8 A resolution. EMBO J. 1997, 16:3787-3796.
123. Johnston S.C., Riddle S.M., Cohen R.E., Hill C.P. Structural basis for the specificity of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolases. EMBO J. 1999, 18:3877-3887.
124. Misaghi S., Galardy P.J., Meester W.J., Ovaa H., Ploegh H.L., Gaudet R. Structure of the ubiquitin hydrolase UCH-L3 complexed with a suicide substrate. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280:1512-1520.
125. Das C., Hoang Q.Q., Kreinbring C.A., Luchansky S.J., Meray R.K., Ray S.S., Lansbury P.T., Ringe D., Petsko G.A. Structural basis for conformational plasticity of the Parkinson's disease-associated ubiquitin hydrolase UCH-L1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103:4675-4680.
126. Realini C., Rogers S.W., Rechsteiner M. KEKE motifs. Proposed roles in protein-protein association and presentation of peptides by MHC class I receptors. FEBS Lett. 1994, 348:109-113.
127. Ambroggio X.I., Rees D.C., Deshaies R.J. JAMM: a metalloprotease-like zinc site in the proteasome and signalosome. PLoS Biol. 2004, 2:E2.
128. Maytal-Kivity V., Reis N., Hofmann K., Glickman M.H. MPN+, a putative catalytic motif found in a subset of MPN domain proteins from eukaryotes and prokaryotes, is critical for Rpn11 function. BMC Biochem. 2002, 3:28.
129. Koulich E., Li X., DeMartino G.N. Relative structural and functional roles of multiple deubiquitylating proteins associated with mammalian 26S proteasome. Mol. Biol. Cell 2008, 19:1072-1082.
130. Sato Y., Yoshikawa A., Yamagata A., Mimura H., Yamashita M., Ookata K., Nureki O., Iwai K., Komada M., Fukai S. Structural basis for specific cleavage of Lys 63-linked polyubiquitin chains. Nature 2008, 455:358-362.
131. Kim H.M., Shin D.R., Yoo O.J., Lee H., Lee J.O. Crystal structure of Drosophila angiotensin I-converting enzyme bound to captopril and lisinopril. FEBS Lett. 2003, 538:65-70.
132. Pelmenschikov V., Blomberg M.R., Siegbahn P.E. A theoretical study of the mechanism for peptide hydrolysis by thermolysin. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 7:284-298.
133. Eddins M.J., Varadan R., Fushman D., Pickart C.M., Wolberger C. Crystal structure and solution NMR studies of Lys48-linked tetraubiquitin at neutral pH. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 367:204-211.
134. Datta A.B., Hura G.L., Wolberger C. The Structure and Conformation of Lys63-Linked Tetraubiquitin. J. Mol. Biol. 2009, 392:1117-1124.
135. Hu M., Li P., Song L., Jeffrey P.D., Chenova T.A., Wilkinson K.D., Cohen R.E., Shi Y. Structure and mechanisms of the proteasome-associated deubiquitinating enzyme USP14. EMBO J. 2005, 24:3747-3756.
136. Hanna J., Hathaway N.A., Tone Y., Crosas B., Elsasser S., Kirkpatrick D.S., Leggett D.S., Gygi S.P., King R.W., Finley D. Deubiquitinating enzyme Ubp6 functions noncatalytically to delay proteasomal degradation. Cell 2006, 127:99-111.
137. Thrower J.S., Hoffman L., Rechsteiner M., Pickart C.M. Recognition of the polyubiquitin proteolytic signal. EMBO J. 2000, 19:94-102.
138. Crosas B., Hanna J., Kirkpatrick D.S., Zhang D.P., Tone Y., Hathaway N.A., Buecker C., Leggett D.S., Schmidt M., King R.W., Gygi S.P., Finley D. Ubiquitin chains are remodeled at the proteasome by opposing ubiquitin ligase and deubiquitinating activities. Cell 2006, 127:1401-1413.
139. Eytan E., Armon T., Heller H., Beck S., Hershko A. Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase activity associated with the 26S protease complex. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268:4668-4674.
140. Bucher P., Karplus K., Moeri N., Hofmann K. A flexible motif search technique based on generalized profiles. Comput. Chem. 1996, 20:3-23.
141. Hofmann K., Bucher P. The PCI domain: a common theme in three multiprotein complexes. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1998, 23:204-205.
142. Bailly E., Reed S.I. Functional characterization of rpn3 uncovers a distinct 19S proteasomal subunit requirement for ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis of cell cycle regulatory proteins in budding yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1999, 19:6872-6890.
143. Isono E., Saeki Y., Yokosawa H., Toh-e A. Rpn7 Is required for the structural integrity of the 26S proteasome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279:27168-27176.
144. Isono E., Saito N., Kamata N., Saeki Y., Toh E.A. Functional analysis of Rpn6p, a lid component of the 26S proteasome, using temperature-sensitive rpn6 mutants of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280:6537-6547.
145. Takeuchi J., Fujimuro M., Yokosawa H., Tanaka K., Toh-e A. Rpn9 is required for efficient assembly of the yeast 26S proteasome. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1999, 19:6575-6584.
146. Yen H.C., Espiritu C., Chang E.C. Rpn5 is a conserved proteasome subunit and required for proper proteasome localization and assembly. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278:30669-30676.
147. Hinnebusch A.G. eIF3: a versatile scaffold for translation initiation complexes. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2006, 31:553-562.
148. Sharon M., Mao H., Boeri Erba E., Stephens E., Zheng N., Robinson C.V. Symmetrical modularity of the COP9 signalosome complex suggests its multifunctionality. Structure 2009, 17:31-40.
149. Zhou M., Sandercock A.M., Fraser C.S., Ridlova G., Stephens E., Schenauer M.R., Yokoi-Fong T., Barsky D., Leary J.A., Hershey J.W., Doudna J.A., Robinson C.V. Mass spectrometry reveals modularity and a complete subunit interaction map of the eukaryotic translation factor eIF3. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105:18139-18144.
150. Pick E., Hofmann K., Glickman M.H. PCI complexes: Beyond the proteasome, CSN, and eIF3 Troika. Mol. Cell 2009, 35:260-264.
151. Pick E., Pintard L. In the land of the rising sun with the COP9 signalosome and related Zomes. Symposium on the COP9 signalosome, Proteasome and eIF3. EMBO Rep. 2009, 10:343-348.
152. Faza M.B., Kemmler S., Jimeno S., Gonzalez-Aguilera C., Aguilera A., Hurt E., Panse V.G. Sem1 is a functional component of the nuclear pore complex-associated messenger RNA export machinery. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 184:833-846.
153. Wilmes G.M., Bergkessel M., Bandyopadhyay S., Shales M., Braberg H., Cagney G., Collins S.R., Whitworth G.B., Kress T.L., Weissman J.S., Ideker T., Guthrie C., Krogan N.J. A genetic interaction map of RNA-processing factors reveals links between Sem1/Dss1-containing complexes and mRNA export and splicing. Mol. Cell 2008, 32:735-746.
154. Wei Z., Zhang P., Zhou Z., Cheng Z., Wan M., Gong W. Crystal structure of human eIF3k, the first structure of eIF3 subunits. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279:34983-34990.
155. Scheel H., Hofmann K. Prediction of a common structural scaffold for proteasome lid, COP9-signalosome and eIF3 complexes. BMC Bioinform. 2005, 6:71.
156. Dessau M., Halimi Y., Erez T., Chomsky-Hecht O., Chamovitz D.A., Hirsch J.A. The Arabidopsis COP9 signalosome subunit 7 is a model PCI domain protein with subdomains involved in COP9 signalosome assembly. Plant Cell 2008, 20:2815-2834.
157. Davy A., Bello P., Thierry-Mieg N., Vaglio P., Hitti J., Doucette-Stamm L., Thierry-Mieg D., Reboul J., Boulton S., Walhout A.J., Coux O., Vidal M. A protein-protein interaction map of the Caenorhabditis elegans 26S proteasome. EMBO Rep. 2001, 2:821-828.
158. Kapelari B., Bech-Otschir D., Hegerl R., Schade R., Dumdey R., Dubiel W. Electron microscopy and subunit-subunit interaction studies reveal a first architecture of COP9 signalosome. J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 300:1169-1178.
159. Baker S.P., Grant P.A. The proteasome: not just degrading anymore. Cell 2005, 123:361-363.
160. Collins G.A., Tansey W.P. The proteasome: a utility tool for transcription?. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2006, 16:197-202.
161. Lee D., Ezhkova E., Li B., Pattenden S.G., Tansey W.P., Workman J.L. The proteasome regulatory particle alters the SAGA coactivator to enhance its interactions with transcriptional activators. Cell 2005, 123:423-436.
162. Ferdous A., Gonzalez F., Sun L., Kodadek T., Johnston S.A. The 19S regulatory particle of the proteasome is required for efficient transcription elongation by RNA polymerase II. Mol. Cell 2001, 7:981-991.
163. Krogan N.J., Lam M.H., Fillingham J., Keogh M.C., Gebbia M., Li J., Datta N., Cagney G., Buratowski S., Emili A., Greenblatt J.F. Proteasome involvement in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Mol. Cell 2004, 16:1027-1034.