Making the black box of collaborative learning transparent: Combining process-oriented and cognitive load approaches

Educational Psychology Review

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 139-154

  Janssen, Jeroen ^a   Kirschner, Femke ^b   Erkens, Gijsbert ^a   Kirschner, Paul A ^c   Paas, Fred ^b,c  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cognitive load measurement; Cognitive load theory; Collaborative learning; Group member interaction; Process oriented research

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952553215     PISSN: 1040726X     EISSN: 1573336X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10648-010-9131-x     Document Type: Review

References (108)

1. Adams, S. J., Roch, S. G., & Ayman, R. (2005). Communication medium and member familiarity: The effects on decision time, accuracy, and satisfaction. Small Group Research, 36, 321-353.
2. Andersson, J., & Rönnberg, J. (1995). Recall suffers from collaboration: Joint recall effects of friendship and task complexity. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 199-211.
3. Artzt, A. F., & Armour-Thomas, E. (1997). Mathematical problem solving in small groups: Exploring the interplay of students' metacognitive behaviors, perceptions, and ability levels. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 16, 63-74.
4. Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
5. Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 307-359.
6. Beers, P. J., Boshuizen, H. P. A., Kirschner, P. A., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2007). The analysis of negotiation of common ground in CSCL. Learning and Instruction, 17, 427-435.
7. Bernard, R. M., & Lundgren Cayrol, K. (2001). Computer conferencing: An environment for collaborative project-based learning in distance education. Educational Research and Evaluation, 7, 241-261.
8. Bossert, S. T. (1988). Cooperative activities in the classroom. In E. Z. Rothkopf (Ed.), Review of Research in Education Vol. 13 (pp. 225-250). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association (AERA).
9. Buchs, C., & Butera, F. (2009). Is a partner's competence threatening during dyadic cooperative work? It depends on resource interdependence. European Journal Of Psychology Of Education, 24, 145-154.
10. Ciborra, C., & Olson, M. H. (1988). Encountering electronic work groups: A transaction costs perspective. In Proceedings of the 1988 ACM conference on computer-supported collaborative work. OR: Portland.
11. Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64, 1-35.
12. Cowan, N. (2010). The magical mystery four: How is working memory capacity limited, and why? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 51-57.
13. De Jong, F., Kollöffel, B., van der Meijden, H., Kleine Staarman, J., & Janssen, J. (2005). Regulative processes in individual, 3D and computer supported cooperative learning contexts. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 645-670.
14. Denessen, E., Veenman, S., Dobbelsteen, J., & van Schilt, J. (2008). Dyad composition effects on cognitive elaboration and student achievement. Journal of Experimental Education, 76, 363-383.
15. Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Introduction: what do you mean by Collaborative Learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1-19). Amsterdam: Pergamon.
16. Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., & O'Malley, C. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In H. Spada & P. Reimann (Eds.), Learning in humans and machine: towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 189-211). Oxford: Elsevier.
17. Elbers, E., & Streefland, L. (2000). Collaborative learning and the construction of common knowledge. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15, 479-490.
18. Erkens, G., & Janssen, J. (2008). Automatic coding of online collaboration protocols. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (ijCSCL), 3, 447-470.
19. Erkens, G., Jaspers, J., Prangsma, M., & Kanselaar, G. (2005). Coordination processes in computer supported collaborative writing. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 463-486.
20. Fawcett, L. M., & Garton, A. F. (2005). The effect of peer collaboration on children's problem-solving ability. British Journal Of Educational Psychology, 75, 157-169.
21. Hasler, B. S., Kersten, B., & Sweller, J. (2007). Learner control, cognitive load and instructional animation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 713-729.
22. Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S., & Vollrath, D. A. (1997). The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 43-64.
23. Hogan, K., Nastasi, B. K., & Pressley, M. (1999). Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions. Cognition and Instruction, 17, 379-432.
24. Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kanselaar, G., & Jaspers, J. (2007). Visualization of participation: Does it contribute to successful computer-supported collaborative learning? Computers & Education, 49, 1037-1065.
25. Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., & Kanselaar, G. (2009). Influence of group member familiarity on online collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 161-170.
26. Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., & Kanselaar, G. (2010). Effects of representational guidance during computer-supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 38, 59-88.
27. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social Interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38, 365-379.
28. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Stanne, M. B. (1989). Impact of goal and resource interdependence on problem-solving success. The Journal of Social Psychology, 129, 621-629.
29. Jones, A., & Issroff, K. (2005). Learning technologies: Affective and social issues in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 44, 395-408.
30. Khawaja, M. A., Ruiz, N., & Chen, F. (2007). Potential speech features for cognitive load measurement. In Proceedings of the 19th Australasian conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Entertaining User Interfaces (pp. 57-60). New York: ACM.
31. Khawaja, M. A., Chen, F., & Marcus, N. (2009). Analysis of collaborative speech for grammatical cues of cognitive load. Paper presented at the Third International Cognitive Load Theory Conference, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
32. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75-86.
33. Kirschner, P. A., Beers, P. J., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2008). Coercing shared knowledge in collaborative learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 403-420.
34. Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2009a). A cognitive load approach to collaborative learning: United brains from complex learning. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 31-42.
35. Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2009b). Efficiency of individual versus group learning as a function of task complexity. Manuscript submitted for publication.
36. Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2009c). Individual and group-based learning from complex cognitive tasks: Effects on retention and transfer efficiency. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 306-314.
37. Klein, J. D., & Pridemore, D. R. (1992). Effects of cooperative learning and need for affiliation on performance, time on task, and satisfaction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40, 39-47.
38. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 335-353.
39. Kuhn, D., & Udell, W. (2003). The development of argument skills. Child Development, 74, 1245-1260.
40. Kumpulainen, K., Salovaara, H., & Mutanen, M. (2001). The nature of students' sociocognitive activity in handling and processing multimedia-based science material in a small group learning task. Instructional Science, 29, 481-515.
41. Langfred, C. W. (2000). Work-group design and autonomy: A field study of the interaction between task interdependence and group autonomy. Small Group Research, 31, 54-70.
42. Laughlin, P. R., Bonner, B. L., & Miner, A. G. (2002). Groups perform better than the best individuals on Letters-to-Numbers problems. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88, 605-620.
43. Laughlin, P. R., Hatch, E. C., Silver, J. S., & Boh, L. (2006). Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers problems: Effects of group size. Journal Of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 644-651.
44. Leitão, S. (2000). The potential of argument in knowledge building. Human Development, 43, 332-360.
45. Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., & d'Apollonia, S. (2001). Small group and individual learning with technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71, 449-521.
46. Marcus, N., Cooper, M., & Sweller, J. (1996). Understanding instructions. Journal of Education & Psychology, 88, 49-63.
47. Mayer, R. E., Heiser, J., & Lonn, S. (2001). Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. Journal of Education & Psychology, 93, 187-198.
48. Mercer, N. (1996). The quality of talk in children's collaborative activity in the classroom. Learning and Instruction, 6, 359-377.
49. Meudell, P. R., Hitch, G. J., & Kirby, P. (1992). Are two heads better than one: Experimental investigations of the social facilitation of memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 525-543.
50. Mevarech, Z. R., & Kramarski, B. (2003). The effects of metacognitive training versus worked-out examples on students' mathematical reasoning. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 449-471.
51. Miller, G. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
52. Munneke, L., Andriessen, J., Kanselaar, G., & Kirschner, P. (2007). Supporting interactive argumentation: Influence of representational tools on discussing a wicked problem. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1072-1088.
53. Nichols, J. D. (1996). The effects of cooperative learning on student achievement and motivation in a high school geometry class. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 467-476.
54. O'Donnell, A. M., & O'Kelly, J. (1994). Learning from peers: Beyond the rhetoric of positive results. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 321-349.
55. Ortiz, A. E., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1996). The effect of positive goal and resource interdependence on individual performance. The Journal of Social Psychology, 136, 243-249.
56. Paas, F. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive load approach. Journal of Education & Psychology, 84, 429-434.
57. Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1993). The efficiency of instructional conditions: An approach to combine mental effort and performance measures. Human Factors, 35, 737-743.
58. Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1994). Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 351-371.
59. Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38, 1-4.
60. Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., Tabbers, H., & van Gerven, P. W. M. (2003). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist, 38, 63-71.
61. Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2004). Cognitive load theory: Instructional implications of the interaction between information structures and cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32, 1-8.
62. Paulus, T. M. (2005). Collaboration or cooperation? Analyzing small group interactions in educational environments. In T. S. Roberts (Ed.), Computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education (pp. 100-124). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
63. Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 1-28.
64. Phielix, C., Prins, F. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2010). Awareness of group performance in a CSCL-environment: Effects of peer feedback and reflection. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 151-161.
65. Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. O'Malley (Ed.), Computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 69-97). New York: Springer-Verlag.
66. Rosé, C. P., Wang, Y.-C., Cui, Y., Arguello, J., Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., et al. (2008). Analyzing collaborative learning processes automatically: Exploiting the advances of computational linguistics in computer-supported collaborative learning. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 3, 237-271.
67. Roseth, C. J., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2008). Promoting early adolescents' achievement and peer relationships: The effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 223-246.
68. Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005). Is there a big five in teamwork? Small Group Research, 36, 555-599.
69. Salomon, G., & Globerson, T. (1989). When teams do not function the way they ought to. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 89-99.
70. Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivistic framework. Educational Technology, 35, 31-38.
71. Slavin, R. E. (1980). Cooperative Learning. Review of Educational Research, 50, 315-342.
72. Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 43-69.
73. Slof, B., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., & Jaspers, J. G. M. (in press). Design and effects of a representational scripting tool on group performance. Educational Technology Research and Development.
74. Springer, L., Donovan, S. S., & Stanne, M. E. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69, 21-51.
75. Stodolsky, S. S. (1984). Frameworks for studying instructional processes in peer work-groups. In P. L. Peterson, L. C. Wilkinson, & M. Hallinan (Eds.), The social context of instruction: Group organization and group processes (pp. 107-124). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
76. Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., Prins, F. J., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2006). Content analysis: What are they talking about? Computers & Education, 46, 29-48.
77. Sweller, J. (2004). Instructional design consequences of an analogy between evolution by natural selection and human cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32, 9-31.
78. Sweller, J. (2010, this issue). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous and germane cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review.
79. Sweller, J., & Sweller, S. (2006). Natural information processing systems. Evolutionary Pscyhology, 4, 434-458.
80. Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251-296.
81. Teasley, S. D., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Constructing a joint problem space: The computer as a tool for sharing knowledge. In S. P. Lajoie (Ed.), Computers as cognitive tools: Technology in education (pp. 229-258). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
82. Tindale, R. S., & Kameda, T. (2000). Social sharedness as a unifying theme for information processing in groups. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 3, 123-140.
83. Tindale, R. S., & Sheffey, S. (2002). Shared information, cognitive load and group memory. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 5, 5-18.
84. Tudge, J. R. H. (1989). When collaboration leads to regression: Some negative consequences of socio-cognitive conflict. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19(2), 123-138.
85. Tudge, J. R. H., Winterhoff, P. A., & Hogan, D. M. (1996). The cognitive consequences of collaborative problem solving with and without feedback. Child Development, 67(6), 2892-2909.
86. Tuovinen, J. E., & Paas, F. (2004). Exploring multidimensional approaches to the efficiency of instructional conditions. Instructional Science, 32, 133-152.
87. van Boxtel, C., van der Linden, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2000). Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 10, 311-330.
88. van der Linden, J. L., Erkens, G., Schmidt, H., & Renshaw, P. (2000). Collaborative learning. In P. R. J. Simons, J. L. van der Linden, & T. Duffy (Eds.), New learning (pp. 1-19). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
89. van der Meijden, H., & Veenman, S. (2005). Face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication in a primary school setting. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 831-859.
90. van Gerven, P. W. M., Paas, F., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Schmidt, H. G. (2002). Cognitive load theory and aging: Effects of worked examples on training efficiency. Learning and Instruction, 12, 87-105.
91. van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2008). Instructional efficiency: Revisiting the original construct in educational research. Educational Psychologist, 43, 16-26.
92. van Gog, T., Kester, L., Nievelstein, F., Giesbers, B., & Paas, F. (2009). Uncovering cognitive processes: Different techniques that can contribute to cognitive load research and instruction. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 325-331.
93. van Gog, T., Paas, F., Marcus, N., Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2009). The mirror neuron system and observational learning: Implications for the effectiveness of dynamic visualizations. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 21-30.
94. van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17, 147-177.
95. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
96. Webb, N. M. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 21-39.
97. Webb, N. M. (1991). Task-related verbal interaction and mathematics learning in small groups. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(5), 366-389.
98. Webb, N. M., & Palincsar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. C. Berliner (Ed.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 841-873). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
99. Webb, N. M., & Farivar, S. (1999). Developing productive group interaction in middle school mathematics. In A. O'Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 117-149). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
100. Webb, N. M., & Mastergeorge, A. (2003). Promoting effective helping behavior in peer-directed groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 73.
101. Webb, N. M., Troper, J. D., & Fall, R. (1995). Constructive activity and learning in collaborative small groups. Journal of Education & Psychology, 87, 406-423.
102. Webb, N. M., Nemer, K. M., Chizhik, A. W., & Sugrue, B. (1998). Equity issues in collaborative group assessment: Group composition and performance. American Educational Research Journal, 35(4), 607-651.
103. Webb, N. M., Nemer, K. M., & Zuniga, S. (2002). Short circuits or superconductors? Effects of group composition on high-achieving students' science assessment performance. American Educational Research Journal, 39, 943-989.
104. Wegner, D. M. (1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 185-208). New York: Springer-Verlag.
105. Wegner, D. M. (1995). A computer network model of human transactive memory. Social Cognition, 13, 319-339.
106. Weldon, M. S., & Bellinger, K. D. (1997). Collective memory: Collaborative and individual processes in remembering. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1160-1175.
107. Yackel, E., Cobb, P., & Wood, T. (1991). Small-group interactions as a source of learning opportunities in second-grade mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 390-408.
108. Yamane, D. (1996). Collaboration and its discontents: Steps toward overcoming barriers to successful group projects. Teaching Sociology, 24, 378-383.