Automatic coding of dialogue acts in collaboration protocols

International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 447-470

  Erkens, Gijsbert ^a   Janssen, Jeroen ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Collaborative learning; Computer supported collaborative learning; Dialogue acts; Protocol analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 54249153163     PISSN: 15561607     EISSN: 15561615     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11412-008-9052-6     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. G. W. Alpers A. J. Winzelberg C. Classen H. Roberts P. Dev C. Koopman 2005 Evaluation of computerized text analysis in an Internet breast cancer support group Computers in Human Behavior 21 361 376
2. Barnes, D., & Todd, F. (1977). Communication and learning in small groups. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
3. Burton, D. (1981). Analysing spoken discourse. In M. Coulthard, & M. Montgomery (Eds.), Studies in discourse analysis (pp. 61-82). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
4. Byron, D. K., & Heeman, P. A. (1997). Discouse marker use in task-oriented spoken dialogue. Paper presented at the EuroSpeech'97, Rhodes, Greece, September.
5. Chinn, C. A. (2006). Assessing the quality of collaborative argumentation. In S. A. Barab, K. E. Hay, & D. T. Hickey (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) (Vol. 2, pp. 1063-1064). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. U. Cress 2008 The need for considering multilevel analysis in CSCL research: An appeal for the use of more advanced statistical methods International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 3 69 84
7. Dennis, A. R., & Valacich, J. S. (1999). Rethinking media richness: Towards a theory of media synchronicity. Paper presented at the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on Information Systems (HICSS), Kohala Coast, HI.
8. B. De Wever T. Schellens M. Valcke H. Van Keer 2006 Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review Computers & Education 46 6 28
9. B. De Wever H. Van Keer T. Schellens M. Valcke 2007 Applying multilevel modelling to content analysis data: Methodological issues in the study of role assignment in asynchronous discussion groups Learning and Instruction 17 436 447
10. Dönmez, P., Rosé, C., Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2005). Supporting CSCL with automatic corpus analysis technology. In T. Koschmann, D. D. Suthers, & T.-W. Chan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Computer support for collaborative learning: The next 10 years! (pp. 125-134). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Erkens, G. (2005). Multiple Episode Protocol Analysis (MEPA). Version 4.10. Retrieved October 24, 2005 from http://edugate.fss.uu.nl/mepa/
12. Erkens, G., Janssen, J., Jaspers, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2006). Visualizing participation to facilitate argumentation. In S. A. Barab, K. E. Hay, & D. T. Hickey (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) (Vol. 2, pp. 1095-1096). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. G. Erkens J. Jaspers M. Prangsma G. Kanselaar 2005 Coordination processes in computer supported collaborative writing Computers in Human Behavior 21 463 486
14. B. Fraser 1999 What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics 31 931 952
15. B. A. Goodman F. N. Linton R. D. Gaimari J. M. Hitzeman H. J. Ross G. Zarrella 2005 Using dialogue features to predict trouble during collaborative learning User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 15 85 134
16. A. C. Graesser N. K. Person 1994 Question asking during tutoring American Educational Research Journal 31 104 137
17. N. Hara C. J. Bonk C. Angeli 2000 Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course Instructional Science 28 115 152
18. Heeman, P. A., Byron, D., & Allen, J. F. (1998). Identifying discourse markers in spoken dialog. Paper presented at the AAAI Spring Symposium on Applying Machine Learning and Discourse Processing, Stanford, March.
19. Hutchinson, B. (2004). Acquiring the meaning of discourse markers. Paper presented at the 42nd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, Barcelona, Spain, July.
20. J. Janssen G. Erkens G. Kanselaar 2007 Visualization of agreement and discussion processes during computer-supported collaborative learning Computers in Human Behavior 23 1105 1125
21. J. Janssen G. Erkens G. Kanselaar J. Jaspers 2007 Visualization of participation: Does it contribute to successful computer-supported collaborative learning? Computers & Education 49 1037 1065
22. A. Jeong 2005 A guide to analyzing message-response sequences and group interaction patterns in computer-mediated communication Distance Education 26 367 383
23. Kanselaar, G., & Erkens, G. (1995). A cooperative system for collaborative problem solving. In J. L. Schnase, & E. L. Cunnius (Eds.), CSCL'95: The first international conference on computer support for collaborative learning (pp. 191-195). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Kanselaar, G., & Erkens, G. (1996). Interactivity in cooperative problem solving in computers. In S. Vosniadou, E. De Corte, R. Glaser, & H. Mandl (Eds.), International perspectives on the design of technology-supported learning environments (pp. 185-203). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25. K. Kreijns P. A. Kirschner W. Jochems 2003 Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research Computers in Human Behavior 19 335 353
26. Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
27. Law, N., Yuen, J., Huang, R., Li, Y., & Pan, N. (2007). A learnable content & participation analysis toolkit for assessing CSCL learning outcomes and processes. In C. A. Chinn, G. Erkens, & S. Puntambekar (Eds.), Mice, minds, and society: The Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Conference 2007 (Vol. 8, pp. 408-417). New Brunswick, NJ: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
28. C. Leaper T. E. Smith 2004 A meta-analytic review of gender variations in children's language use: Talkativeness, affiliative speech, and assertive speech Developmental Psychology 40 993 1027
29. Lehnert, W. G. (1978). The process of question answering: A computer simulation of cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. M. M. Louwerse H. H. Mitchell 2003 Toward a taxonomy of a set of discourse markers in dialog: A theoretical and computational linguistic account Discourse Processes 35 199 239
31. S. Manlove A. W. Lazonder T. De Jong 2006 Regulative support for collaborative scientific inquiry learning Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 22 87 98
32. J. E. McGrath 1991 Time, interaction, and performance (TIP) Small Group Research 22 147 174
33. Pennebaker, J. W., Booth, R. J., & Francis, M. E. (2007). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34. Reichman, R. (1985). Getting computers to talk like you and me. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. Ridgeway, C. L. (2001). Small-group interaction and gender. In N. J. Smelser, & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (Vol. 21, pp. 14185-141289). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
36. C. P. Rosé Y.-C. Wang Y. Cui J. Arguello A. Weinberger K. Stegmann 2008 Analyzing collaborative learning processes automatically: Exploiting the advances of computational linguistics in computer-supported collaborative learning International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 3 3 237 271
37. L. Rourke T. Anderson 2004 Validity in quantitative content analysis Educational Technology Research and Development 52 1 5 18
38. L. Rourke T. Anderson D. R. Garrison W. Archer 2001 Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 12 8 22
39. Samuel, K., Carberry, S., & Vijay-Shanker, K. (1999). Automatically selecting useful phrases for dialogue act tagging. Paper presented at the Fourth Conference of the Pacific Association for Computational Linguistics, Waterloo, Canada, June.
40. Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. A. Soller 2004 Computational modeling and analysis of knowledge sharing in collaborative distance learning User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 14 351 381
42. A. Stolcke N. Coccaro R. Bates P. Taylor C. Van Ess-Dykema K. Ries 2000 Dialogue act modeling for automatic tagging and recognition of conversational speech Computational Linguistics 26 339 373
43. J. W. Strijbos R. L. Martens F. J. Prins W. M. G. Jochems 2006 Content analysis: What are they talking about? Computers & Education 46 29 48
44. C. Van Boxtel J. Van der Linden G. Kanselaar 2000 Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge Learning and Instruction 10 311 330
45. H. Van der Meij 2007 What has quantitative research to say about gender-linked language differences in CMC and do elementary school children's emails fit this picture? Sex Roles 57 341 354
46. J. Van Drie C. Van Boxtel J. Jaspers G. Kanselaar 2005 Effects of representational guidance on domain specific reasoning in CSCL Computers in Human Behavior 21 575 602
47. A. Weinberger F. Fischer 2006 A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning Computers & Education 46 71 95
48. Zufferey, S., & Popescu-Belis, A. (2004). Towards automatic identification of discourse markers in dialogs: The case of like. Paper presented at the 5th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, Cambridge, MA, April