Ideas and identities: Supporting equity in cooperative mathematics learning

Review of Educational Research

Volumn 79, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 1008-1043

  Esmonde, Indigo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cooperative learning; Equity; Mathematics education

Indexed keywords

EID: 71449122027     PISSN: 00346543     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0034654309332562     Document Type: Article

References (193)

1. Ainsworth-Darnell, J., & Downey, D. (1998). Assessing the oppositional culture explanation for racial/ethnic differences in school performance. American Sociological Review, 63, 536-553.
2. Allexsaht-Snider, M., & Hart, L.E. (2001). Mathematics for all: How do we get there? Theory Into Practice, 40(2), 93-101.
3. Anderson, C.W., Holland, J.D., & Palincsar, A.S. (1997). Canonical and sociocultural approaches to research and reform in science education: The story of Juan and his group. The Elementary School Journal, 97(4), 359-383.
4. Anderson, D.D., & Gold, E. (2006). Home to school: Numeracy practices and mathematical identities. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8(3), 261-286.
5. Antil, L.R., Jenkins, J.R., Wayne, S.K., & Vadasy, P.F. (1998). Cooperative learning: Prevalence, conceptualizations, and the relation between research and practice. American Educational Research Journal, 35(3), 419-454.
6. Aronson, E., & Bridgeman, D. (1979). Jigsaw groups and the desegregated classroom: In pursuit of common goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5(4), 438-446.
7. Ashman, A.F., & Gillies, R.M. (1997). Children's cooperative behavior and interactions in trained and untrained work groups in regular classrooms. Journal of School Psychology, 35(3), 261-279.
8. Azmitia, M. (1988). Peer interaction and problem solving: When are two heads better than one? Child Development, 59(1), 87-96.
9. Azmitia, M., & Montgomery, R. (1993). Friendship, transactive dialogues, and the development of scientific reasoning. Social Development, 2(3), 202-221.
10. Baker, D., Street, B., & Tomlin, A. (2006). Navigating schooled numeracies: Explanations for low achievement, in mathematics of UK children from low SES background. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8(3), 287-307.
11. Baker, J. (2002). Trilingualism. In L. Delpit & J. K. Dowdy (Eds.), The skin that we speak: Thoughts on language and culture in the classroom (pp. 49-62). New York: New Press.
12. Ball, D. (2002). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Relations between research and practice. Mathematics and Education Reform Newsletter, 14(3), 1-5.
13. Ballenger, C. (1999). Teaching other people's children: Literacy and learning in a bilingual classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
14. Barron, B. (2000). Achieving coordination in collaborative problem-solving groups. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), 403-436.
15. Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307-359.
16. Barron, B., Casillas, N., Esmonde, I., Herrenkohl, L.R., Mercier, E., Mertl, V.,et al.(2007, April). Collaborative capacities as a component of adaptive expertise. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
17. Barwell, R. (2005). Integrating language and content: Issues from the mathematics classroom. Linguistics and Education, 16(2), 205-218.
18. Baxter, J.A., Woodward, J., & Olson, D. (2001). Effects of reform-based mathematics instruction on low achievers in five third-grade classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 101(5), 529-547.
19. Becker, J.R. (1995). Women's ways of knowing in mathematics. In P. Rogers & G. Kaiser (Eds.), Equity in mathematics education (pp. 163-175). London: Falmer Press.
20. Berger, J.B., Cohen, B.P., & Zelditch, M., Jr. (1972). Status characteristics and social interaction. American Sociological Review, 37, 241-255.
21. Berry, R.Q. (2003). Mathematics standards, cultural styles, and learning preferences: The plight and the promise of African American students. The Clearing House, 76(5), 244-249.
22. Bianchini, J.A. (1997). Where knowledge construction, equity, and context intersect: Student learning of science in small groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(10), 1039-1065.
23. Bianchini, J.A. (1999). From here to equity: The influence of status on student access to and understanding of science. Science Education, 83(5), 577-601.
24. Bishop, A. (2001). What values do you teach when you teach mathematics? In P. Gates (Ed.), Issues in mathematics teaching (pp. 93-104). London: RoutledgeFarmer.
25. Black, L. (2004). Teacher-pupil talk in whole-class discussions and processes of social positioning within the primary school classroom. Language and Education, 18(5), 347-360.
26. Boaler, J. (2002). Paying the price for sugar and spice: Shifting the analytical lens in equity research. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2-3), 127-144.
27. Boaler, J. (in press). Promoting relational equity and high mathematics achievement through an innovative mixed ability approach. British Educational Research Journal.
28. Boaler, J., Cobb, P.A., Gresalfi, M.S., Horn, I.S., Hodge, L.L., & Staples, M.E. (2006). Equity and identity in mathematics classrooms: Students' learning opportunities, knowledge orientation, persistence, and future selves. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
29. Boaler, J., & Staples, M.E. (in press). Creating mathematical futures through an equitable teaching approach: The case of Railside School. Teachers' College Record.
30. Bossert, S.T. (1988-1989). Cooperative activities in the classroom. Review of Research in Education, 15, 225-250.
31. Boykin, A.W. (1986). The triple quandary and the schooling of Afro-American children. In U. Neisser (Ed.), The school achievement of minority children: New perspectives (pp. 57-92). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33. Brown, A.L., & Palincsar, A.S. (1989). Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 393-451). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34. Buchs, C., Butera, F., Mugny, G., & Darnon, C. (2004). Conflict elaboration and cognitive outcomes. Theory Into Practice, 43(1), 23-30.
35. Buxton, C.A. (2003). Creating a culture of academic success in an urban science and math magnet high school. Science Education, 89(3), 392-417.
36. Carter, G., Jones, M.G., & Rua, M. (2003). Effects of partner's ability on the achievement and conceptual organization of high-achieving fifth-grade students. Science Education, 87(1), 94-111.
37. Chizhik, A.W. (2001). Equity and status in group collaboration: Learning through explanations depends on task characteristics. Social Psychology of Education, 5, 179-200.
38. Civil, M. (2007). Building on community knowledge: An avenue to equity in mathematics education. In N. I. S. Nasir & P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics: Diversity and equity in the classroom (pp. 105-117). New York: Teachers College Press.
39. Clarke, J. (1994). Pieces of the puzzle: The jigsaw method. In S. Sharan (Ed.), Handbook of cooperative learning methods (pp. 34-50). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
40. Cobb, P., & Hodge, L.L. (2002). A relational perspective on issues of cultural diversity and equity as they play out in the mathematics classroom. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2-3), 249-284.
41. Cohen, E.G. (1982). Expectation states and interracial interaction in school settings. Annual Review of Sociology, 8, 209-235.
42. Cohen, E.G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1-35.
43. Cohen, E.G., & Goodlad, J.I. (1994). Designing groupwork: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
44. Cohen, E. G., & Lotan, R. A. (Eds.). (1997). Working for equity in heterogeneous classrooms: Sociological theory in practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
45. Cohen, E.G., Lotan, R.A., Scarloss, B.A., & Arellano, A.R. (1999). Complex Instruction: Equity in cooperative learning classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 38(2), 80-86.
46. Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
47. Cotton, T. (2001). Mathematics teaching in the real world. In P. Gates (Ed.), Issues in mathematics teaching (pp. 23-37). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
48. Damon, W. (1984). Peer education: The untapped potential. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 5(4), 331-343.
49. Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 20, 43-63.
50. de Abreu, G. (1995). Understanding how children experience the relationship between home and school mathematics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
51. de Corte, E. (2004). Mainstreams and perspectives in research on learning (mathematics) from instruction. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53(2), 279-310.
52. de Haan, M., & Elbers, E. (2005). Reshaping diversity in a local classroom: Communication and identity issues in multicultural schools in the Netherlands. Language and Communication, 25, 315-333.
53. Dembo, M.H., & McAuliffe, T.J. (1987). Effects of perceived ability and grade status on social interaction and influence in cooperative groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(4), 415-423.
54. Dougherty, K.J. (1996). Opportunity-to-learn standards: A sociological critique. Sociology of Education (Extra issue), 40-65.
55. Echevarria, J., Vogt, M., & Short, D.J. (2000). Making content comprehensible for English-language learners: The SIOP model. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
56. Elliott, M. (1998). School finance and opportunities to learn: Does money well spent enhance students' achievement? Sociology of Education, 71, 223-245.
57. Enyedy, N., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2007). They don't show nothing I didn't know: Emergent tensions between culturally relevant pedagogy and mathematics pedagogy. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(2), 139-174.
58. Erickson, F. (2004). Talk and social theory: Ecologies of speaking and listening in everyday life. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
59. Esmonde, I. (2006). How are we supposed to, like, learn it, if none of us know?: Opportunities to learn and equity in mathematics cooperative learning structures. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
60. Esmonde, I. (2007). Equity and opportunities to learn in cooperative mathematical work. In P. Liljedahl (Ed.), Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group (pp. 103-110). Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group.
61. Esmonde, I. (in press). Mathematics learning in groups: Analysing equity in two cooperative activity structures. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(2).
62. Esmonde, I., & Langer-Osuna, J. (2007, April). Power in numbers: An analysis of how shifts in social and mathematical power among students in a cooperative group affect opportunities for learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
63. Esmonde, I., & O'Connor, K. (2008, March). Mathematics collaboration as situated practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
64. Fantuzzo, J.W., King, J.A., & Heller, J.R. (1992). Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on mathematics and school adjustment: A component analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 331-339.
65. Farivar, S., & Webb, N.M. (1994). Helping and getting help: Essential skills for effective group problem solving. Arithmetic Teacher, 41(9), 521-525.
66. Fawcett, L.M., & Garton, A.F. (2005). The effect of peer collaboration on children's problem-solving ability. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 157-169.
67. Flores, A. (2007). Examining disparities in mathematics education: Achievement gap or opportunity gap? The High School Journal, 91(1), 29-42.
68. Gee, J.P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (2nd ed.). London: Taylor & Francis.
69. Gee, J.P. (2000). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99-125.
70. Gillies, R.M. (2000). The maintenance of cooperative and helping behaviours in cooperative groups. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 97-111.
71. Gillies, R.M., & Ashman, A.F. (1998). Behavior and interactions of children in cooperative groups in lower and middle elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 746-757.
72. Ginsburg-Block, M.D., & Fantuzzo, J.W. (1998). An evaluation of the relative effectiveness of NCTM standards-based interventions for low-achieving urban elementary students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 560-569.
73. Good, T.L., McCaslin, M.M., & Reys, B.J. (1992). Investigating work groups to promote problem solving in mathematics. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching, Volume 3: Planning and managing learning tasks and activities (pp. 115-160). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press Inc.
74. Gonzalez, N., Andrade, R., Civil, M., & Moll, L. (2001). Bridging funds of distributed knowledge: Creating zones of practices in mathematics. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 6(1-2), 115-132.
75. Gutiérrez, K.D. (2002). Studying cultural practices in urban learning communities. Human Development, 45(4), 312-321.
76. Gutiérrez, K.D., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19-25.
77. Gutiérrez, R. (2002). Beyond essentialism: The complexity of language in teaching mathematics to Latino/a students. American Educational Research Journal, 39(4), 1047-1088.
78. Hand, V. (2009). Competent opposition: The negotiation of competing activity structures within a low-track mathematics classroom. Manuscript under review.
79. Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1991). Sharing cognition through collective comprehension activity. In R. L. Resnick, J. Levine, & S. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 341-348). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
80. Herrenkohl, L.R., Palincsar, A.S., DeWater, L.S., & Kawasaki, K. (1999). Developing scientific communities in classrooms: A sociocognitive approach. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3-4), 451-493.
81. Hitchcock, C., Meyer, A., Rose, D., & Jackson, R. (2002). Providing new access to the general curriculum: Universal design for learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(2), 8-17.
82. Hodge, L.L. (2006). An orientation on the mathematics classroom that emphasizes power and identity: Reflecting on equity research. The Urban Review, 38(5), 373-385.
83. Hogan, K. (1999). Sociocognitive roles in science group discourse. International Journal of Science Education, 21(8), 855-882.
84. Holland, D., Lachiotte, W., Jr., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (2001). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
85. Howe, C., McWilliam, D., & Cross, G. (2005). Chance favors only the prepared mind: Incubation and the delayed effects of peer collaboration. British Journal of Psychology, 96(1), 67-93.
86. Howe, C., Tolmie, A., & Rodgers, C. (1992). The acquisition of concpetual knowledge in science by primary school children: Group interaction and the understanding of motion down an incline. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 10, 113-130.
87. Humphreys, P., & Berger, J. (1981). Theoretical consequences of the status characteristics formulation. American Journal of Sociology, 86(5), 953-983.
88. Jacobs, J.E., Becker, J.R., & Gilmer, G.F. (2001). Changing the faces of mathematics: Perspectives on gender. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
89. Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1991). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive and individualistic learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
90. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., & Smith, K.A. (2000). Constructive controversy: The educative power of intellectual conflict. Change, 32(1), 28-37.
91. Kelly, C.A. (2002). Creating equitable classroom climates: An investigation of classroom strategies in mathematics and science instruction for developing preservice teachers' use of democratic social values. Child Study Journal, 32(1), 39-51.
92. Kilpatrick, J. (1992). A history of research in mathematics education. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 3-38). New York: MacMillan.
93. King, A. (1991). Effects of training in strategic questioning on children's problem-solving performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 307-317.
94. King, A. (1994). Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: Effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain. American Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 338-368.
95. King, A. (1997). ASK to THINK-TEL WHY: A model of transactive peer tutoring for scaffolding higher level complex learning. Educational Psychology, 32(4), 221-235.
96. King, L.H. (1993). High and low achievers' perceptions and cooperative learning in two small groups. The Elementary School Journal, 93(4), 399-416.
97. Kozol, J. (2005). The shame of the nation: The restoration of apartheid schooling in America. New York: Crown.
98. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). But that's just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory Into Practice, 34(3), 159-165.
99. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
100. LeBlanc, G., & Bearison, D.J. (2004). Teaching and learning as a bi-directional activity: Investigating dyadic interactions between child teachers and child learners. Cognitive Development, 19, 499-515.
101. Lee, C.D. (2008). Intervention research based on current views of cognition and learning. In J. E. King (Ed.), Black education: Transformative research and action agenda for the new century (pp. 73-114). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
102. Lee, C.D. (2009). A cultural modeling perspective on OTL: The creation of opportunity to learn through the cultural practices of classroom instruction. Manuscript in preparation.
103. Lee, J. (2002). Racial and ethnic achievement gap trends: Reversing the progress toward equity? Educational Researcher, 31(1), 3-12.
104. Lerman, S. (2000). A case of interpretations of social: A response to Steffe and Thompson. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(2), 210-227.
105. Lerman, S. (2001). Cultural, discursive psychology: A sociocultural approach to studying the teaching and learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46(1-3), 87-113.
106. Lopez-Reyna, N.A. (1997). Reflections on the positive effects of cooperative learning structures. Exceptionality, 7(4), 273-275.
107. Lotan, R.A. (2003). Group-worthy tasks. Educational Leadership, 60(7), 72-75.
108. Lubienski, S.T. (2002). Research, reform, and equity in U.S. mathematics education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2-3), 103-125.
109. Lubienski, S.T. (2007). Research, reform, and equity in U.S. mathematics education. In N. I. S. Nasir & P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics: Diversity and equity in the classroom (pp. 10-23). New York: Teachers College Press.
110. Lucas, S.R. (1999). Tracking inequality: Stratification and mobility in American high schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
111. Lucey, H., Melody, J., & Walkerdine, V. (2003). Uneasy hybrids: Psychosocial aspects of becoming educationally successful for working-class young women. Gender and education, 15(3), 285-299.
112. Martin, D.B. (2000). Mathematics success and failure among African-American youth: The roles of sociohistorical context, community forces, school influence, and individual agency. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
113. Martin, D.B. (2006). Mathematics learning and participation as racialized forms of experience: African American parents speak on the struggle for mathematics literacy. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8(3), 197-229.
114. McAdams, D.P., & Bowman, P.J. (2001). Narrating life's turning points: Redemption and contamination. In D. P. McAdams, R. Josselson, & A. Lieblich (Eds.), Turns in the road: Narrative studies of lives in transition (pp. 3-34). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
115. McAuliffe, T.J., & Dembo, M.H. (1994). Status rules of behavior in scenarios of peer learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 163-172.
116. McDermott, R., Goldman, S., & Varenne, H. (2006). The cultural work of learning disabilities. Educational Researcher, 35(6), 12-17.
117. McPartland, J.M., & Schneider, B. (1996). Opportunities to learn and student diversity: Prospects and pitfalls of a common core curriculum. Sociology of Education, 69(Extra issue), 66-81.
118. Mendick, H. (2005). A beautiful myth? The gendering of being/doing good at maths. Gender and education, 17(2), 203-219.
119. Mercier, E. (2008). Group goals: Their influence on interaction patterns and learning. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
120. Mitchell, S.N., Reilly, R., Bramwell, F.G., Solnosky, A., & Lilly, F. (2004). Friendship and choosing groupmates: Preferences for teacher-selected vs. student-selected groupings in high school science classes. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 31(1), 20-32.
121. Moschkovich, J. (2002). A situated and sociocultural perspective on bilingual mathematics learners. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2-3), 189-212.
122. Moses, R.P., & Cobb, C.E. (2001). Radical equations: Math literacy and civil rights. Boston: Beacon Press.
123. Mulryan, C.M. (1992). Student passivity during cooperative small groups in mathematics. Journal of Educational Research, 85(5), 261-273.
124. Mulryan, C.M. (1994). Perceptions of intermediate students' cooperative small-group work in Mathematics. Journal of Educational Research, 87(5), 280-291.
125. Mulryan, C.M. (1995). Fifth and sixth graders' involvement and participation in cooperative small groups in mathematics. Elementary School Journal, 95(4), 297-310.
126. Nasir, N.I.S., & Hand, V. (2006). Exploring sociocultural perspectives on race, culture, and learning. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 449-475.
127. Nasir, N.I.S., Rosebery, A.S., Warren, B., & Lee, C.D. (2006). Learning as a cultural process: Achieving equity through diversity. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 489-504). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
128. Nathan, M.J., Eilam, B., & Kim, S. (2007). To disagree, we must also agree: How intersubjectivity structures and perpetuates discourse in a mathematics classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(4), 523-563.
129. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics: An overview. Reston, VA: Author.
130. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Research Committee. (2005). Equity in school mathematics education: How can research contribute? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(2), 92-100.
131. Nattiv, A. (1994). Helping behaviors and math achievement gain of students using cooperative learning. The Elementary School Journal, 1994(94), 3.
132. Oakes, J., Joseph, R., & Muir, K. (2003). Access and achievement in mathematics and science: Inequalities that endure and change. In J. A. Banks & C. A. M. Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (2nd ed., Vol. 2). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
133. O'Donnell, A.M. (2006). The role of peers and group learning. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 781-802). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
134. O'Donnell, A.M., Dansereau, D.F., Hall, R.H., Skaggs, L.P., Hythecker, V.I., Peel, J.F.,et al.(1990). Learning concrete procedures: Effects of processing strategies and cooperative learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 171-177.
135. Olivera, F., & Straus, S.G. (2004). Group-to-individual transfer of learning: Cognitive and social factors. Small Group Research, 35, 440-465.
136. Perrenet, J., & Terwel, J. (1997, March). Interaction patterns in cooperative groups: The effects of gender, ethnicity, and ability. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
137. Perry, T. (2003). Up from the parched Earth: Toward a theory of African-American achievement. In Young, gifted and Black: Promoting high achievement among African-American students (pp. 1-108). Boston: Beacon Press.
138. Phelps, E., & Damon, W. (1989). Problem solving with equals: Peer collaboration as a context for learning mathematics and spatial concepts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(4), 639-646.
139. Porter, A. (1995). The uses and misuses of opportunity-to-learn standards. Educational Researcher, 24(1), 21-27.
140. Rodd, M., & Bartholomew, H. (2006). Invisible and special: Young women's experiences as undergraduate mathematics students. Gender and Education, 13(1), 35-50.
141. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
142. Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
143. Rohrbeck, C.A., Ginsburg-Block, M.D., Fantuzzo, J.W., & Miller, T.R. (2003). Peer-assisted learning interventions with elementary school students: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 240-257.
144. Ross, J.A. (1995). Effects of feedback on student behavior in cooperative learning groups in a Grade 7 math class. The Elementary School Journal, 96(2), 125-143.
145. Ross, J.A., Haimes, D.H., & Hogaboam-Gray, A. (1996). Improving student helpfulness in cooperative learning groups. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 31(2), 13-22.
146. Rousseau, C., & Powell, A. (2005). Understanding the significance of context: A framework to examine equity and reform in secondary mathematics. High School Journal, 88(4), 19-31.
147. Rousseau, C., & Tate, W.F. (2003). No time like the present: Reflecting on equity in school mathematics. Theory Into Practice, 42(3), 210-216.
148. Sawyer, R.K., & Berson, S. (2004). Study group discourse: How external representations affect collaborative conversation. Linguistics and Education, 15(4), 387-412.
149. Saxe, G.B. (1991). Culture and cognitive development: Studies in mathematical understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
150. Saxe, G.B. (1999). Cognition, development, and cultural practices. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 83, 19-35.
151. Saxe, G.B., Gearhart, M., Note, M., & Paduano, P. (1993). Peer interaction and the development of mathematical understandings: A new framework for research and educational practice. In H. Daniels (Ed.), Charting the agenda: Educational activity after Vygotsky (pp. 107-144). London: Routledge.
152. Schegloff, E.A. (1991). Conversation analysis and socially shared cognition. In R. L. Resnick, J. Levine, & S. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 150-171). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
153. Schoenfeld, A.H. (2002). Making mathematics work for all children: Issues of standards, testing, and equity. Educational Researcher, 31(1), 13-25.
154. Schwartz, D.L., & Martin, T. (2004). Inventing to prepare for future learning: The hidden efficiency of encouraging original student production in statistics instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22(2), 129-184.
155. Schwartz, D.L., & Okita, S. (2009). The productive agency in learning by teaching. Manuscript submitted for publication.
156. Secada, W. (1989). Educational equity versus equality of education: An alternative conception. In W. Secada (Ed.), Equity in education (pp. 68-88). New York: Falmer Press.
157. Secada, W. (2000). Changing the faces of mathematics: Perspectives on multiculturalism and gender equity. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
158. Sfard, A., & Prusak, A. (2005). Telling identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 14-22.
159. Sharan, S. (Ed.). (1999). Handbook of cooperative learning methods. Westport, CT: Praeger.
160. Shelly, R.K., & Troyer, L. (2001). Emergence and completion of structure in initially undefined and partially defined groups. Social Psychology Quarterly, 64(4), 318-332.
161. Slavin, R.E. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(1), 43-69.
162. Slavin, R.E., & Cooper, R. (1999). Improving intergroup relations: Lessons learned from cooperative learning programs. Journal of Social Issues, 55(4), 647-663.
163. Solomon, Y. (1998). Teaching mathematics: Ritual, principle and practice. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 32(3), 377-390.
164. Steele, C.M., Spencer, S.J., & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 379-440.
165. Stevens, R. (2000). Who counts what as math? Emergent and assigned mathematics problems in a project-based classroom. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 105-144). Westport, CT: Ablex.
166. Stevens, R.J., & Slavin, R.E. (1995). The cooperative elementary school: Effects on students' achievement, attitudes, and social relations. American Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 321-351.
167. Straus, S.G. (1999). Testing a typology of tasks: An empirical validation of McGrath's (1984) group task circumplex. Small Group Research, 30(2), 166-187.
168. Strough, J., Berg, C.A., & Meegan, S.P. (2001). Friendship and gender differences in task and social interpretations of peer collaborative problem solving. Social Development, 10(1), 1-22.
169. Tate, W.F. (1995). School mathematics and African American students: Thinking seriously about opportunity-to-learn standards. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31, 424-448.
170. Tate, W.F. (1997). Race-ethnicity, SES, gender, and language proficiency trends in mathematics achievement: An update. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(6), 652-679.
171. Trentacosta, J., & Kenney, M.J. (1997). Multicultural and gender equity in the mathematics classroom: The gift of diversity. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
172. Veenman, S., Denessen, E., van den Akker, A., & van der Rijt, J. (2005). Effects of a cooperative learning program on the elaborations of students during help seeking and help giving. American Educational Research Journal, 42(1), 115-151.
173. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
174. Vygotsky, L.S. (1986). Thought and language (A. Kozulin, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
175. Walker, E.N. (2006). Urban high school students' academic communities and their effects on mathematics success. American Educational Research Journal, 43(1), 43-78.
176. Walshaw, M. (2005). Getting political and unraveling layers of gendered mathematical identifications. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(1), 19-34.
177. Webb, N.M. (1984). Sex differences in interaction and achievement in cooperative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(1), 33-44.
178. Webb, N.M. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 21-39.
179. Webb, N.M. (1991). Task-related verbal interaction and mathematics learning in small groups. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(5), 366-389.
180. Webb, N.M., & Farivar, S.H. (1994). Promoting helping behavior in cooperative small groups in middle school mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 369-395.
181. Webb, N.M., Farivar, S.H., & Mastergeorge, A.M. (2002). Productive helping in cooperative groups. Theory Into Practice, 41(1), 13-20.
182. Webb, N.M., & Mastergeorge, A.M. (2003). The development of students' helping behavior and learning in peer-directed small groups. Cognition and Instruction, 21(4), 361-428.
183. Webb, N.M., Nemer, K.M., & Zuniga, S. (2002). Short circuits or superconductors? Effects of group composition on high-achieving students' science assessment performance. American Educational Research Journal, 39(4), 943-989.
184. Webb, N.M., & Palincsar, A.S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 841-873). New York: Macmillan.
185. Weinstein, C., Curran, M., & Tomlinson-Clarke, S. (2003). Culturally responsive classroom management: Awareness into action. Theory Into Practice, 42(4), 269-276.
186. Weissglass, J. (2000). No compromise on equity in mathematics education: Developing an infrastructure. In W. Secada (Ed.), Changing the faces of mathematics: Multiculturalism and gender equity (pp. 5-24). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
187. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
188. Wertsch, J.V. (1984). The zone of proximal development: Some conceptual issues. In B. Rogoff & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), Children's learning in the zone of proximal development (Vol. 23, pp. 7-18). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
189. Wilczenski, F.L., Bontrager, T., Ventrone, P., & Correia, M. (2001). Observing collaborative problem-solving processes and outcomes. Psychology in the Schools, 38(3), 269-281.
190. Woodson, C. (1972). The mis-education of the Negro. New York: AMS Press. (Originally published 1933).
191. Yackel, E., Cobb, P., & Wood, T. (1991). Small-group interactions as a source of learning opportunities in second-grade mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(5), 390-408.
192. Yackel, E., Cobb, P., & Wood, T. (1999). The interactive constitution of mathematical meaning in one second grade classroom: An illustrative example. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(4), 469-488.
193. Zajac, R.J., & Hartup, W.W. (1997). Friends as coworkers: Research review and classroom implications. The Elementary School Journal, 98(1), 3-13.