The Development of Students' Helping Behavior and Learning in Peer-Directed Small Groups

Cognition and Instruction

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 361-428

  Webb, Noreen M ^a   Mastergeorge, Ann M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1042303024     PISSN: 07370008     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s1532690xci2104_2     Document Type: Review

References (132)

1. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271.
2. Azmitia, M. (1988). Peer interaction and problem solving: When are two heads better than one? Child Development, 59, 87-96.
3. Bargh, J. A., & Schul, Y. (1980). On the cognitive benefit of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 593-604.
4. Barron, B. (2000). Achieving coordination in collaborative problem-solving groups. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 403-436.
5. Bearison, D. J., Magzamen, S., & Filardo E. K. (1986). Socio-conflict and cognitive growth in young children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 32, 51-72.
6. Berger, J., Rosenholtz, S. J., & Zelditch, M. (1980). Status organizing processes. Annual Review of Sociology, 6, 479-508.
7. Bloom, B. S. (1953). Thought processes in lectures and discussions. Journal of General Education, 7, 160-170.
8. Bossert, S. T. (1988-1989). Cooperative activities in the classroom. Review of Research in Education, 15, 225-252.
9. Brown, A. L., & Palinscar, A. S. (1989). Guided, cooperative learning, and individual knowledge acquisition. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 393-451). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
10. Brown, P., & Goren, A. (1993). Ability grouping and tracking: Current issues and concerns. Washington, DC: National Governor's Association Publications.
11. Butler, R., & Neuman, O. (1995). Effects of task and ego achievement goals on help-seeking behaviors and attitudes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 261-271.
12. California State Department of Education. (1985). Mathematics framework for California public schools, kindergarten through grade twelve. Sacramento: Author.
13. California State Department of Education. (1992). Mathematics framework for California public schools, kindergarten through grade twelve. Sacramento: Author.
14. Carpenter, T. P. (1986). Conceptual knowledge as a foundation for procedural knowledge. In J. Heibert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp.113-132). Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., & Franke, M. L. (1996). Cognitively guided instruction: A knowledge base for reform in primary mathematics instruction. Elementary School Journal, 97, 3-20.
16. Chi, M. T. H. (2000). Self-explaining expository texts: The dual processes of generating inferences and repairing mental models. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology: Educational design and cognitive science (pp. 161-238). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
17. Chi, M. T. H., & Bassock, M. (1989). Learning from examples via self-explanations. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 251-282). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
18. Chi, M. T. H., Bassock, M., Lewis, M., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 5-182.
19. Clark, H. (1996). Using language. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Cobb, P., Wood, T., & Yackel, E. (1993). Discourse, mathematical thinking, and classroom practice. In E. A. Forman, N. M. Minick, & C.A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children's development (pp. 91-119). New York: Oxford University Press.
21. Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E., & McNeal, B. (1993). Mathematics as procedural instructions and mathematics as meaningful activity: The reality of teaching for understanding. In R. Davis & C. Maher (Eds.), Schools, mathematics and the world of reality (pp. 119-134). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
22. Cohen, E. G. (1982). Expectation states and interracial interaction in school settings. American Review of Sociology, 8, 209-235.
23. Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64, 1-35.
24. Cohen, E. G., Lotan, R., & Catanzarite, L. (1990). Treating status problems in the cooperative classroom. In S. Sharan (Ed.), Cooperative learning: Theory and research (pp. 203-230). New York: Praeger.
25. Coleman, E. B. (1998). Using explanatory knowledge during collaborative problem solving in science. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7, 387-427.
26. Confrey, J. (1990). What constructivism implies for teaching. In R. B. Davis, C. A. Maher, & N. Noddings (Eds.), Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 107-122). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
27. Cooper, M. A. (1999). Classroom choices from a cognitive perspective on peer learning. In A. M. O' Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 215-234). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
28. Covington, M. V. (1984). The self-worth theory of achievement motivation: Findings and implications. Elementary School Journal, 85, 5-20.
29. Davidson, J., Deuser, R., & Sternberg, R. (1994). The role of metacognition in problem solving. In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 207-226). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048.
31. Eicholz, R. E., O'Daffer, P. G., & Fleenor, C. F. (1989). Addison-Wesley mathematics (Grade 7). Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
32. Fantuzzo, J. W., Riggio, R. E., Connelly, S., & Dimeff, L. A. (1989). Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on academic achievement and psychological adjustment: A component analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 173-177.
33. Franke, M. L., Fennema, E., & Carpenter, T. (1997). Teachers creating change: Examining evolving beliefs and classroom practice. In E. Fennema & B. S. Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 255-282). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
34. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Phillips, N. B., Karns, K., & Dutka, S. (1997). Enhancing students' helping behavior during peer-mediated instruction with conceptual mathematical explanations. The Elementary School Journal, 97, 223-249.
35. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Kazdan, S., & Allen, S. (1999). Effects of peer-assisted learning strategies breading with and without training in elaborated help giving. Elementary School Journal, 99, 201-219.
36. Garcia, T., & Pintrich, P. R. (1994). Regulating motivation and cognition in the classroom: The role of self-schemas and self-regulatory strategies. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 127-153). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
37. Gibbs, J. (1987). Tribes: A process for social development and cooperative learning. Santa Rosa, CA: Center Source Publications.
38. Gillies, R. M., & Ashman, A. F. (1996). Teaching collaborative skills in primary school children in classroom-based work groups. Learning and Instruction, 6, 187-200.
39. Gillies, R. M., & Ashman, A. F. (1998). Behavior and interactions of children in cooperative groups in lower and middle elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 746-757.
40. Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1991). Sharing cognition through collective comprehension activity. In L. Resnik, J. Levine, & S. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 331-348). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
41. Hiebert, J., & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp. 1-27). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
42. Hooper, S. (1992). Effects of peer interaction during computer-based mathematics instruction. Journal of Educational Research, 85, 180-189.
43. Hythecker, V. I., Dansereau, D. F., & Rocklin, T. R. (1988). An analysis of the processes influencing the structured dyadic learning environment. Educational Psychologist, 23, 23-27.
44. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R T., & Holubec, E. J. (1988). Cooperation in the classroom, revised. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Co.
45. Karabenick, S. A., & Sharma, R. (1994). Seeking academic assistance as a strategic learning resource. In P. Pintrich, D. Brown, & C. E. Weinstein (Eds.), Student motivation, cognition, and learning: Essays in honor of Wilbert J. McKeachie (pp. 189-211). Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.
46. Kerr, N. L., & Bruun, S. E. (1983). Dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free-rider effects. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 44, 78-94.
47. King, A. (1989). Effects of self-questioning training on college students' comprehension of lectures. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 14, 366-381.
48. King, A. (1990). Enhancing peer interaction and learning in the classroom through reciprocal questioning. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 664-687.
49. King, A. (1992). Facilitating elaborative learning through guided student-generated questioning. Educational Psychologist, 27, 111-126.
50. King, A. (1999). Discourse patterns for mediating peer learning. In A. M. O'Donnell & A. King (Eds.) Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 87-116). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
51. Kuhn, D., Garcia-Mila, M., Zohar, A., & Andersen, C. (1995). Strategies of knowledge acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 60(4), pp. v-128.
52. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
53. Leont'ev, A. N. (1978). The problem of activity in psychology. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 37-71). White Plains, NY: Sharpe.
54. Lindow, J. A., Wilkinson, L. C., & Peterson, P. L. (1985). Antecedents and consequences of verbal disagreements during small-group learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 658-667.
55. Lucangeli, D., Coi, G., & Bosco, P. (1997). Metacognitive awareness in good and poor math problem solvers. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 12, 209-212.
56. Markman, E. M. (1981). Comprehension monitoring. In W. P. Dickson (Ed.), Children's oral communication skills (pp. 61-84). New York: Academic.
57. Mayer, R. E. (1984). Aids to prose comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 19, 30-42.
58. Mevarech, Z. R., & Kramarski, B. (1997). IMPROVE: A multidimensional method for teaching mathematics in heterogeneous classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 365-394.
59. Middleton, M., & Midgley, C. (1997). Avoiding the demonstration of the lack of ability: An underexplored aspect of goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 710-718.
60. Midgley, C., Maehr, M. L., Hruda, L. A., Anderman, E., Anderman, L., Gheen, M., et al. (2000). Manual for the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scale. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
61. Midgley, C., & Urdan, T. (1995). Predictors of middle school students' use of self-handicapping strategies. Journal of Early Adolescence, 15, 389-411.
62. Minick, N. (1989). Mind and activity in Vygotsky's work: An expanded frame of reference. Cultural Dynamics, 2, 162-187.
63. Mulryan, C. M. (1992). Student passivity during cooperative small groups in mathematics. Journal of Educational Research, 85, 261-273.
64. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA.
65. National Research Council. (1989). Everybody counts: A report to the nation of the future of mathematics education. Washington, DC: Mathematical Sciences Education Board, National Academy Press.
66. National Research Council. (1993). Measuring up: Prototypes for mathematics assessment. Washington, DC: Mathematical Sciences Education Board, National Academy Press.
67. Nattiv, A. (1994). Helping behaviors and math achievement gain of students using cooperative learning. Elementary School Journal, 94, 285-297.
68. Nelson-Le Gall, S. (1981). Help-seeking: An understudied problem-solving skill in children. Developmental Review, 1, 224-246.
69. Nelson-Le Gall, S. (1985). Help-seeking behavior in learning. In E. V. Gordon (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 12, pp. 55-90). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
70. Nelson-Le Gall, S. (1992). Children's instrumental help-seeking: Its role in the social acquisition and construction of knowledge. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning (pp. 49-68). New York: Cambridge University Press.
71. Nelson-Le Gall, S., Gumerman, R. A., & Scott-Jones, D. (1983). Instrumental help-seeking and everyday problem-solving: A developmental perspective. In J. D. Fisher, A. Nadler, & B. M. DePaulo (Eds.), New directions in helping (Vol. 2, pp. 265-283). New York: Academic.
72. Newman, R. S. (1991). Goals and self-regulated learning: What motivates children to seek academic help? In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (pp. 151-183). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
73. Newman, R. S. (1994). Adaptive help seeking: A strategy of self-regulated learning. In D. Schunk & B. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 283-301). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
74. Newman, R. S. (1998). Students' help seeking during problem solving: Influences of personal and contextual achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 644-658.
75. Nicholls, J. G. (1979). Quality and equality in intellectual development: The role of motivation in education. American Psychologist, 34, 1071-1084.
76. O'Donnell, A. M. (1999). Structuring dyadic interaction through scripted cooperation. In A. M. O'Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 179-196). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
77. Palincsar, A. S., Anderson, C., & David, Y. M. (1993). Pursuing scientific literacy in the middle grades through collaborative problem solving. Elementary School Journal, 93, 643-658.
78. Palinscar, A. S., & Herrenkohl, L. R. (1999). Designing collaborative contexts: Lessons from three research programs. In A. M. O'Donnel & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 151-178). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
79. Peterson, P. L., Janicki, T. C., & Swing, S. R. (1981). Ability) Treatment interaction effects on children's learning in large-group and small-group approaches. American Educational Research Journal, 18, 453-473.
80. Peterson, P. L., Wilkinson, L. C., Spinelli, F. & Swing, S. R. (1984). Merging the process-product and the sociolinguistic paradigms: Research on small-group process. In P. L. Peterson, L. C. Wilkinson, & M. Hallinan (Ed.), The social context of instruction (pp. 126-152). Orlando, FL: Academic.
81. Rittle-Johnson, B., & Alibali, M. W. (1999). Conceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematics: Does one lead to the other? Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 175-189.
82. Rogoff, B. (1991). Guidance and participation in spatial planning. In L. Resnick, J. Levine, & S. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 349-383). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
83. Rogoff, B. (1998). Cognition as a collaborative process. In W. Damon (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 2 (pp. 679-744). New York: Wiley.
84. Rogoff, N. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
85. Ross, J. A., & Cousins, J. B. (1995a). Giving and receiving explanations in cooperative learning groups. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 41, 103-121.
86. Ross, J. A., & Cousins, J. B. (1995b), Impact of explanation seeking on student achievement and attitudes. Journal of Educational Research, 89, 109-117.
87. Ryan, A. M., Gheen, M. H., & Midgley, C. (1998). Why do some students avoid asking for help? An examination of the interplay among students' academic efficacy, teachers' social-emotional role, and the classroom goal structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 528-535.
88. Ryan, A. M., Hicks, L., & Midgley, C. (1997). Social goals, academic goals, and avoiding seeking help in the classroom. Journal of Early Adolescence, 17, 152-171.
89. Ryan, A. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). "Should I ask for help?" The role of motivation and attitudes in adolescents' help seeking in math class. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 329-341.
90. Ryan, A. M., Pintrich, P. R., & Midgley, C. (2001). Avoiding seeking help in the classroom: Who and why? Educational Psychology Review, 13, 93-1.
91. Salomon, G., & Globerson, T. (1989). When teams do not function the way they ought to. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 89-99.
92. Saxe, G. B., Gearhart, M., Note, M., & Paduano, P. (1993). Peer interaction and the development of mathematical understanding. In H. Daniels (Ed.), Charting the agenda: Educational activity after Vygotsky (pp. 107-4). London: Routledge.
93. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1989). Explorations of students' mathematical beliefs and behavior. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 338-355.
94. Schunk, D. H. (1989). Social cognitive theory and self-regulated learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 83-110). New York: Springer-Verlag.
95. Scribner, S. (1992). Mind in action: A functional approach to thinking. The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 14, 103-110.
96. Shavelson, R. J., Webb, N. M., Stasz, C., & McArthur, D. (1988). In R. Charles & E. Silver (Eds.), Teaching and assessing mathematical problem-solving: A research agenda (pp. 203-231) Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
97. Siegler, R. S. (1996). Emerging minds. New York: Oxford University Press.
98. Siegler, R. S., & Crowley, K. (1991). The microgenetic method: A direct means for studying cognitive development. American Psychologist, 46, 606-620.
99. Siegler, R. S., & Jenkins, E. (1989). How children discover new strategies. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
100. Siegler, R. S., & Stern, E. (1998). Conscious and unconscious strategy discoveries: A microgenetic analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 377-397.
101. Silver, E.A. (1986). Using conceptual and procedural knowledge: A focus on relationships. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp. 181-197). Hillside, NJ; Erlbaum.
102. Skemp, R. (1978). Relational and instrumental understanding. Arithmetic Teacher, 26(3), 9-15.
103. Slavin, R. E. (1987). Developmental and motivational perspectives on cooperative learning: A reconciliation. Child Development, 58, 1161-1167.
104. Slavin, R. E. (1990). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
105. Sweller, J. (1989). Cognitive technology: Some procedures for facilitating learning and problem solving in mathematics and science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 457-466.
106. Swing, S. R., & Peterson, P. L. (1982). The relationship of student ability and small-group interaction to student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 259-274.
107. Tudge, J., & Rogoff, B. (1989). Peer influences on cognitive development: Piagetian and Vygotskian perspectives. In M. H. Bornstein & J. S. Bruner (Eds.), Interaction in human development (pp. 17-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
108. Turner, J. C., Midgley, C., Meyer, D. K., Gheen, M., Anderman, E. M., & Kang, Y., et al. (2002). The classroom environment and students' reports of avoidance strategies in mathematics: A multimethod study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 88-106.
109. Urdan, T., Midgley, C., & Anderman, E. M. (1998). The role of classroom goal structure in students' use of self-handicapping strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 101-122.
110. Valsiner, J. (1987). Culture and the development of children's action. New York: Wiley.
111. Vedder, P. (1985). Cooperative learning. A study on processes and effects of cooperation between primary school children. Westerhaven Groningen, The Netherlands: Rijkuniversiteit Groningen.
112. Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functioning. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity In Soviet psychology (pp. 4-188). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
113. Webb, N. M. (1984). Sex differences in interaction and achievement in cooperative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 33-34.
114. Webb, N. M. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 21-40.
115. Webb, N. M. (1991). Task-related verbal interaction and mathematics learning in small groups. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 366-389.
116. Webb, N. M., & Farivar, S. (1994). Promoting helping behavior in cooperative small groups in middle school mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 369-395.
117. Webb, N. M., & Farivar, S. (1999). Developing productive group interaction in middle school mathematics. In A. M. O'Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 117-150). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
118. Webb, N. M., & Palincsar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 841-873). New York: Macmillan.
119. Webb, N. M., Troper, J. D., & Fall, R. (1995). Constructive activity and learning in collaborative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 406-423.
120. Weinstein, C. F., & Mayer, R. F. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching, third edition (pp. 315-327). New York: Macmillan.
121. Wertsch, J. V. & Hickmann, M. (1987). Problem solving in social interaction: A microgenetic analysis. In M. Hickmann (Ed.), Social and functional approaches to language and thought (pp. 251-266). Orlando, FL: Academic.
122. Wilkinson, L. C. (1985). Communication in all-student mathematics groups. Theory into Practice, 24(1), 8-13.
123. Wilkinson, L. C., & Calculator, S. (1982a). Effective speakers: Students' use of language to request and obtain information and action in the classroom. In L. C. Wilkinson (Ed.), Communicating in the classroom (pp. 85-99). New York: Academic.
124. Wilkinson, L. C., & Calculator, S. (1982b). Requests and responses in peer-directed reading groups. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 107-120.
125. Wilkinson, L. C., Lindow, J., & Chang, C. P. (1985). Sex differences and sex segregation in students' small-group communication. In L. C. Wilkinson & C. B. Marrett (Eds.), Gender influences in classroom interaction (pp. 185-208). Orlando, Fl: Academic
126. Wilkinson, L. C., & Spinelli, F. (1983). Using requests effectively in peer-directed instructional groups. American Educational Research Journal, 20, 479-502.
127. Wittrock, M. C. (1990). Generative processes of comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 24, 345-376.
128. Wood, T., Cobb, P., & Yackel, E. (1991). Change in teaching mathematics: A case study. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 587-616.
129. Yackel, E., Cobb, P., & Wood, T. (1991). Small-group interactions as a source of learning opportunities in second-grade mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 390-408.
130. Yackel, E., Cobb, P., Wood, T., Wheatley, G., & Merkel, G. (1990). The importance of social interactions in children's construction of mathematical knowledge. In T. Cooney (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematics in the 1990's (pp. xxx-xxx). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
131. Yager, S., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1985). Oral discussion, group-to-individual transfer, and achievement in cooperative learning groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 60-66.
132. Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Perceptions of efficacy and strategy use in the self-regulation of learning. In D. H. Schunk & J. L. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 185-207). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.