To disagree, we must also agree: How intersubjectivity structures and perpetuates discourse in a mathematics classroom

Journal of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 523-563

  Nathan, Mitchell J ^a   Eilam, Billie ^b   Kim, Suyeon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 41349105282     PISSN: 10508406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10508400701525238     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Alibali, M. W. (2005). Gesture in spatial cognition: Expressing, communicating, and thinking about spatial information. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 5, 307-331.
2. Alibali, M. W., Heath, D. C., & Myers, H. J. (2001). Effects of visibility between speaker and listener on gesture production: Some gestures are meant to be seen. Journal of Memory and language, 44, 169-188.
3. Alibali, M. W., & Nathan, M. J. (2007). Teachers' gestures as a means of scaffolding students' understanding. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. J. Barron, & S. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 349-365). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Trans. by Vern W. McGee. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
5. Bakhtin, M. M. (1990). Art and answerability: Early philosophical essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
6. Ball, D. L. (1996). Teacher learning and the mathematics reforms: What we think we know and what we need to learn. Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 500-508.
7. Bateson, G. (1972). A theory of play and fantasy. In G. Bateson (Ed.), Steps to an ecology of mind: A revolutionary approach to man's understanding of himself (pp. 177-193). New York: Ballantine.
8. Brooks, S. D. (1906). Brooks's Readers (Seventh Year). New York: American Book Company.
9. Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229-270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Bruer, J. T. (1997). Education and the brain: A bridge too far. Educational Researcher, 26(11), 4-16.
11. Bruer, J. T. (2006, April). Education and the brain: Spanning disciplines. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
12. Carley, K. (1990). Content analysis. In R. E. Asher (EM.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics (pp. 725-730). Edinburgh, Scotland: Pergamon Press.
13. Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analysis of verbal data: A practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 271-315.
14. Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
15. Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & Wood, T. (1993). Discourse, mathematical thinking, and classroom practice. In E. Forman, N. Minick, & C. Stone (EMs.), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children's development (pp. 91-119). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
16. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1997). The Jasper project: Lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Cole, M. (1991). Conclusion. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 399-417). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
18. Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
19. Duncan, S. (n.d.). McNeill coding manual. Retrieved September 12, 2006, from http://mcneilllab. uchicago.edu/pdfs/Coding_Manual.pdf
20. Engle, R. A. (1998). Not channels but composite signals: Speech, gesture, diagrams and object demonstrations are integrated in multimodal explanations. In M. A. Gernsbacher & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 321-326). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Enyedy, N. (2005). Inventing mapping: Creating cultural forms to solve collective problems. Cognition and Instruction, 23, 427-466.
22. Fassnacht, C., & Woods, D. (2005). Transana v2.0x [Computer software]. Available from http://www.transana.org
23. French, A., & Nathan, M. J. (2006). Under the microscope of research and into the classroom: Reflections on early algebra learning and instruction. In J. O. Masingila (Ed.), Teachers engaged in research (pp. 49-68). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
24. Gallese, V. (2003a). The manifold nature of interpersonal relations: The quest for a common mechanism. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 358, 517-528.
25. Gallese, V. (2003b). The roots of empathy: The shared manifold hypothesis and the neural basis of intersubjectivity. Psychopathology, 36(4), 171-180.
26. Gee, J. P. (2004). What makes critical discourse analysis critical? In R. Rogers (Ed.), Critical discourse analysis in education (pp. 19-50). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Gee, J. P. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
28. Greenleaf, C., & Freedman, S. W. (1993). Linking classroom discourse and classroom content: Following the trail of intellectual work in a writing lesson. Discourse Processes, 16, 465-505.
29. Greeno, J. G., & MacWhinney, B. (2006). Learning as perspective taking: Conceptual alignment in the classroom. In S. Barab, K. Hay, & D. Hickey (EMs.), Proceedings of the International Conference on the Learning Sciences (pp. 930-931). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Greeno, J. G., & van de Sande, C. (2007). Perspectival understanding of conceptions and conceptual growth in interaction. Educational Psychologist, 42(1), 9-23.
31. Grossman, P., Wineburg, S., & Woolworth, S. (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. Teachers College Record, 103, 942-1012.
32. Hall, R., Stevens, R., & Torralba, A. (2002). Disrupting representational infrastructure in conversations across disciplines. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 9(3), 179-210.
33. Havas, D. A., Glenberg, A. M., & Rink, M. (2007). Emotion simulation during language comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
34. Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (1998). Conversation analysis. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
35. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book.
36. Kapur, M., Voiklis, J., Kinzer, C., & Black, J. (2006). Insights into the emergence of convergence in group discussions. In S. Barab, K. Hay, & D. Hickey (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on the Learning Sciences (pp. 300-306). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Krippendorf, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
38. Lampert, M., & Blunk, M. (1998). Talking mathematics in school: Studies of teaching and learning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
39. Latour, B. (1996). On interobjectivity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(4), 228-245.
40. Lehrer, R., Strom, D., & Confrey, J. (2002). Grounding metaphors and inscriptional resonance: Children's emerging understanding of mathematical similarity. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 359-398.
41. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
42. Lerman, S. (1996). Intersubjectivity in mathematics learning: A challenge to the radical constructivist paradigm? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 133-150.
43. Lerman, S. (2000). A case of interpretations of social: A response to Steffe and Thompson. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 210-227.
44. Lotman, Y. M. (1988). Text within a text. Soviet Psychology, 26(3), 32-51.
45. Matusov, E. (1996). Intersubjectivity without agreement. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3, 25-45.
46. Matusov, E. (2001). Intersubjectivity as a way of informing teaching design for a community of learners classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(4), 383-402.
47. Matusov, E., Bell, N., & Rogoff, B. (2002). Schooling as cultural process: Shared thinking and guidance by children from schools differing in collaborative practices. In R. Kail & H. W. Reese (Eds.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 29, pp. 129-160). New York: Academic Press.
48. Matusov, E., & White, C. (1996). Defining the concept of open collaboration from a sociocultural framework. Cognitive Studies: The Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, 3(4), 10-13.
49. McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
50. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
51. Mortimer, E. F., & Wertsch, J. V. (2003). The architecture and dynamics of intersubjectivity in science classrooms. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 10, 230-244.
52. Nathan, M. J., Elliott, R., Knuth, E., & French, A. (1997, April). Self-reflection on teacher goals and actions in the mathematics classroom. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
53. Nathan, M. J., & Knuth, E. (2003). A study of whole classroom mathematical discourse and teacher change. Cognition and Instruction, 21, 175-207.
54. Nathan, M. J., Knuth, E., & Elliott, R. (1998, April). Analytic and social scaffolding in the mathematics classroom: One teacher's changing practices. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
55. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
56. Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1991). Instructional discourse, student engagement and literature achievement. Research in the Teaching of English, 25, 261-291.
57. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
58. Palincsar, A. S., & Magnusson, S. J. (2000). The interplay of firsthand and text-based investigations in science education (CIERA Report No. 2-007). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED439928)
59. Palincsar, A. S., Magnusson, S. J., Marano, N., Ford, D., & Brown, N. (1998). Designing a community of practice: Principles and practices of the GIsML community. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(1), 5-19.
60. Peressini, D. D., & Knuth, E. J. (1998). Why are you talking when you could be listening? The role of discourse and reflection in the professional development of a secondary mathematics teacher. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(1), 107-125.
61. Piaget, J. (1985) The equilibration of cognitive structures: The central problem of intellectual development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1975)
62. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227.
63. Rittenhouse, P. (1998). The teacher's role in mathematical conversation: Stepping in and out. In M. Lampert & M. Blunk (Eds.), Talking mathematics in school: Studies of teaching and learning (pp. 163-189). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
64. Rizzolati, G., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2001). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 661-670.
65. Rommetveit, R. (1985). Language acquisition as increasing linguistic structuring of experience and symbolic behavior control. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.) Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 183-204). New York: Cambridge University Press.
66. Rommetveit, R. (1989). Psycholinguistics, hermeneutics, and cognitive science, In A. B. Ivar (Ed.), Basic issues inpsychology: A Scandinavian contribution (pp. 195-210). Soreidgrend, Norway: Sigma Forlag A/S.
67. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turns-taking in conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
68. Schegloff, E. A. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of inter-subjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1295-1345.
69. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1998). Toward a theory of teaching-in-context. Issues in Education, 4(1), 1-94.
70. Schwartz, D. L. (1995). The emergence of abstract representations in dyad problem solving, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 321-354.
71. Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.
72. Smolka, A. L., de Goes, M. C., & Pino, A. (1995). The constitution of the subject: A persistent question. In J. Wertsch, P. del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 165-184). New York: Cambridge University Press.
73. Songer, N. B. (2004, April). Persistence of inquiry: Evidence of complex reasoning among inner city middle school students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
74. Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
75. Steffe, L. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Interaction or intersubjectivity? A reply to Lerman. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 191-209.
76. Strom, D., Kemeny, V., Lehrer, R., & Forman, E. (2001). Visualizing the emergent structure of children's mathematical argument. Cognitive Science, 25, 733-773.
77. Suthers, D. (2006). Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, 315-337.
78. van Zee, E. H., & Minstrell, J. (1997). Reflective discourse: Developing shared understandings in a high school physics classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 19, 209-228.
79. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
80. Vygotsky, L. (1934/1986). Thought and language (A. Kozulin, Trans. & Ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
81. Waltz, D. (1975). Understanding line drawings of scenes with shadows. In P. H. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision (pp. 19-91). New York: McGraw-Hill.
82. Wells, G. (1993). Reevaluating the IRF sequence: A proposal for the articulation of theories of activity and discourse for the analysis of teaching and learning in the classroom. Linguistics and Education, 5, 1-38.
83. Wells, G., & Arauz, R. M. (2006). Dialogue in the classroom, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 379-428.
84. Wertsch, J. V. (1979). From social interaction to higher psychological processes: A clarification and application of Vygotsky's theory. Human Development, 22, 1-22.
85. Wertsch, J. V., & Sohmer, R. (1995). Vygotsky on learning and development. Human Development, 38, 332-337.
86. Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 458-477.