An orientation on the mathematics classroom that emphasizes power and identity: Reflecting on equity research

Urban Review

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 373-385

  Hodge, Lynn Liao ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cultural diversity; Equity; Mathematics education; Power

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845532571     PISSN: 00420972     EISSN: 15731960     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11256-006-0041-7     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Banks, J. (1995). The historical reconstruction of knowledge about race: Implications for transformative teaching. Educational Researcher 24:15-24
2. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice Cambridge: University Press
3. Cobb, P., & Nasir, N. (2002). Diversity, equity, and mathematical learning. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4 (2&3).
4. Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E., & McNeal, B. (1992). Characteristics of classroom mathematics traditions: An interactional analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 573-604.
5. Greeno, J. (1991). Number sense as situated knowing in a conceptual domain. Journal forResearch in Mathematics Education, 22 (3), 170-218.
6. Gutierrez, K. D., Baquedano-Lopez P., Tejeda, C. (1999). Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, and Activity 6: 286-303
7. Gutierrez, R. (2002). Enabling the practice of mathematics teachers in context: Toward a new research agenda. Mathematical Thinking and Learning 4: 145-189
8. Ladson-Billings, G. (1998). It doesn't add up: African American students' mathematics achievement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 28(7): 697-708
9. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Making mathematics meaningful in a multicultural context. In W. G. Secada, E. Fennema, & L. B. Adajian (Eds.), New directions for equity in mathematics education (pp. 126-145)
10. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Liu, E. (1998). Accidental asian: Notes of a native speaker. New York: Random House
12. Lubienski, S. (2002). Research, reform, and equity in U.S. mathematics education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4, 103-125.
13. Moll, L. (1997). The creation of mediating settings. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 4, 191-199.
14. Moses, R. P., Cobb, C. E. (2001). Radical equations: Math literacy and civil rights. Boston, MA: Beacon Press
15. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and evaluation tandards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
16. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1991). Professional Standards for Teaching. Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
17. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
18. Philips, S. (1972). Participant structures and communicative competence: Warm springs children in community and classroom. In: Cazden C., Hymes D., John V. (Eds.), Functions of language in the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press. pp. 370-394
19. Richards, J. (1991). Mathematical discussions. In E. von Glasersfeld (Ed.), Radical Constructivism in Mathematics Education (pp. 13-52). The Netherlands: Kluwer.
20. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2): 4-13
21. Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20-26.
22. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press
23. Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 458-477.