Mainstreams and Perspectives in Research on Learning (Mathematics) From Instruction

Applied Psychology

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 279-310

  De Corte, Erik ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1842683169     PISSN: 0269994X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2004.00172.x     Document Type: Article

References (105)

1. Alexander, P.A. (1995). Superimposing a situation-specific and domain-specific perspective on an account of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 30, 189-193.
2. Anderson, J.R., Reder, L.M., & Simon, H.A. (1996). Situated learning and education. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 5-11.
3. Bell, A., Burkhardt, H., & Swan, M. (1992). Balanced assesssment of mathematical performance, In R. Lesh & S.J. Lamon (Eds.), Assessment of authentic performance in school mathematics (pp. 119-144). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
4. Berliner, D.C., & Calfee, R.C. (Eds.) (1996). Handbook of educational psychology. New York: Macmillan.
5. Berry, J., & Sahlberg, P. (1996). Investigating pupils' ideas of learning. Learning and Instruction, 6, 19-36.
6. Bishop, A.J., Clements, K., Keitel, C., Kilpatrick, J., & Laborde, C. (Eds.) (1996). International handbook of mathematics education: Part 1 & 2. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
7. Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction, 7, 161-186.
8. Brophy, J. (Ed.) (2001). Subject-specific instructional methods and activities (Advances in Research on Teaching, Vol. 8). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
9. Brown, A.L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141-178.
10. Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
11. Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Caldwell, L. (1995). Contextual considerations in the solution of children's multiplication and division word problems. Unpublished undergraduate thesis. Belfast, Northern Ireland: Queen's University.
13. Cobb, P., & Bauersfeld, H. (1995). The emergence of mathematical meaning: Interactions in classroom cultures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Cobb, P., Wood, T., & Yackel, E. (1991). Learning through problem solving: A constructivist approach to second grade mathematics. In E. von Glasersfeld (Ed.), Constructivism in mathematics education (pp. 157-176). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
15. Cobb, P., & Yackel, E. (1998). A constructivist perspective on the culture of the mathematics classroom. In F. Seeger, J. Voigt, & U. Waschescio (Eds.), The culture of the mathematics classroom (pp. 158-190). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & Wood, T. (1995). The teaching experiment classroom. In P. Cobb & H. Bauersfeld (Eds.), The emergence of mathematical meaning (pp. 17-24). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1997). The Jasper-project: Lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment and professional development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. In E. Scanlon & T. O'Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology (Nato ASI Series F: Computers and Systems Sciences, Vol. 96, pp. 15-22). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
19. Collins, A., Brown, J.S., & Newman, S.E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics. In L.B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction. Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. De Corte, E. (1995a). Fostering cognitive development: A perspective from research on mathematics learning and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 30, 37-46.
21. De Corte, E. (1995b). Learning theory and instructional science. In P. Reiman & H. Spada (Eds.), Learning in humans and machines. Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 97-108). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
22. De Corte, E. (2000). Marrying theory building and the improvement of school practice: A permanent challenge for instructional psychology. Learning and Instruction, 10, 249-266.
23. De Corte, E., Greer, B., & Verschaffel, L. (1996). Mathematics teaching and learning. In D.C. Berliner & R.C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 491-549). New York: Macmillan.
24. De Corte, E., Op 't Eynde, P., & Verschaffel, L. (2002). Knowing what to believe: The relevance of mathematical beliefs for mathematics education. In B.K. Hofer & P.R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 297-320). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25. De Corte, E., & Somers, R. (1982). Estimating the outcome of a task as a heuristic strategy in arithmetic problem solving: A teaching experiment with sixth graders. Human Learning: A Journal of Practical Research and Applications, 1, 105-121.
26. De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (1981). Children's solution processes in elementary arithmetic problems: Analyses and improvement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 765-779.
27. De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., Lasure, S., Borghart, I., & Yoshida, H. (1999). Real-world knowledge and mathematical problem solving in upper primary school children. In J. Bliss, R. Säljö, & P. Light (Eds.), Learning sites: Social and technological contexts for learning (pp. 61-79). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
28. De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., & Op 't Eynde, P. (2000). Self-regulation: A characteristic and a goal of mathematics education. In M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 687-726). San Diego: Academic Press.
29. Dembo, M.H., & Eaton, M.J. (1997). School learning and motivation. In G.D. Phye (Ed.), Handbook of academic learning: Construction of knowledge (pp. 65-103). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
30. Ernest, P. (1996). Varieties of constructivism: A framework for comparison. In L.P. Steffe, P. Nesher, P. Cobb, G.A. Goldin, & B. Greer (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning (pp. 335-350). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31. Fennema, E., & Romberg, T.A. (Eds.) (1999). Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32. Fischbein, E. (1990). Introduction. In P. Nesher & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics and cognition: A research synthesis by the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 1-13, ICMI Study Series). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Frederiksen, N. (1990). Introduction. In N. Frederiksen, R. Glaser, A. Lesgold, & M.G. Shafto (Eds.), Diagnostic monitoring of skill and knowledge acquisition (pp. ix-xvii). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34. Frederiksen, N., Mislevy, R.J., & Bejar, I.I. (1993). Test theory for a new generation of tests. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
35. Glaser, R. (1976). Components of a psychology of instruction: Toward a science of design. Review of Educational Research, 46, 1-24.
36. Glaser, R., & Bassok, M. (1989). Learning theory and the study of instruction. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 631-666.
37. Glaser, R., & Silver, E. (1994). Assessment, testing, and instruction: Retrospect and prospect. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 20, pp. 393-419). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
38. Gravemeijer, K.P.E. (1994). Developing realistic mathematics education. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Freudenthal Institute, University of Utrecht.
39. Greeno, J.G. (1991). A view of mathematical problem solving in school. In M.U. Smith (Ed.), Toward a unified theory of problem solving. Views from the content domains (pp. 69-98). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
40. Greeno, J.G., Collins, A.M., & Resnick, L.B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In D.C. Berliner & R.C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 15-46). New York: Macmillan.
41. Greeno, J.G., & the Middle School Mathematics Through Applications Project Group (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53, 5-26.
42. Greer, B. (1996). Theories of mathematics education: The role of cognitive analysis. In L.P. Steffe, P. Nesher, P. Cobb, G.A. Goldin, & B. Greer (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning (pp. 179-196). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
43. Grouws, D.A. (Ed.) (1992). Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan.
44. Gruber, H., Law, L.C., Mandl, H., & Renkl, A. (1995). Situated learning and transfer. In P. Reimann & H. Spada (Eds.), Learning in humans and machines. Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 168-188). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
45. Gurova, L.L. (1985). De reflectie op het eigen handelen tijdens het oplossen van rekenopgaven bij schoolkinderen [Reflection on one's own activity during the solution of arithmetic tasks]. In L. Verschaffel & M. Wolters (Eds.), Zes Sovjetrussische bijdragen over vraagstukkenonderwijs en cognitieve ontwikkeling [Six Soviet contributions about word problem instruction and cognitive development] (Internal Report, No. 30, pp. 15-30). Leuven, Belgium: Afdeling Didactiek, Universiteit Leuven.
46. Hacker, D.J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A.C. (Eds.) (1998). Metacognition in educational theory and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
47. Hamers, J.H.M., Sijtsma, K., & Ruijssenaars, A.J.J.M. (1993). Learning potential assessment: Theoretical, methodological, and practical issues. Amsterdam/Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
48. Hatano, G. (1996). A conception of knowledge acquisition and its implications for mathematics education. In L.P. Steffe, P. Nesher, P. Cobb, G.A. Goldin, & B. Greer (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning (pp. 197-217). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
49. Janvier, C. (1996). Constructivism and its consequences for training teachers. In L.P. Steffe, P. Nesher, P. Cobb, G.A. Goldin, & B. Greer (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning (pp. 449-463). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
50. Krutetskii, V.A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in school children. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
51. Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 29-63.
52. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. Lesh, R., & Lamon, S.J. (Eds.) (1992). Assessment of authentic performance in school mathematics. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
54. Lester, F.K., & Garofalo, J. (1982). Metacognitive aspects of elementary school students' performance on arithmetic tasks. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, March.
55. McLeod, D.B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. In D.A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 575-596). New York: Macmillan.
56. Masters, G.H., & Mislevy, R.J. (1993). New views of student learning: Implications for educational measurement. In N. Frederiksen, R.J. Mislevy, & I.I. Bejar (Eds.), Test theory for a new generation of tests (pp. 219-242). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
57. Mevarech, Z.R., & Light, P.H. (Eds.) (1992). Cooperative learning with computers (Special issue). Learning and Instruction, 2, 155-285.
58. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
59. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
60. National Research Council (1989). Everybody counts. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
61. National Research Council. Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning and Committee on Learning Research and Educational Practice (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
62. Nelissen, J.M.C. (1987). Kinderen leren wiskunde: Een Studie over constructie en reflectie in het basisonderwijs [Children learning mathematics: A study of construction and reflection in elementary school children]. Gorinchem, The Netherlands: Uitgeverij De Ruiter.
63. Nesher, P., & Kilpatrick, J. (Eds.) (1990). Mathematics and cognition: A research synthesis by the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (ICMI Study Series). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64. Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (Eds.) (1997). Learning and teaching mathematics: An international perspective. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
65. Nunes, T., Schliemann, A.D., & Carraher, D.W. (1993). Street mathematics and school mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66. Overtoom, R. (1991). Informatieverwerking door hoogbegaafde leerlingen bij het oplossen van wiskundeproblemen [Information processing by gifted students in solving mathematical problems]. De Lier, The Netherlands: Academisch Boekencentrum.
67. Perkins, D. (1995). Outsmarting IQ: The emerging science of learnable intelligence. New York: The Free Press.
68. Phillips, D.C. (1995). The good, the bad, and the ugly: The many faces of constructivism. Educational Researcher, 24(7), 5-12.
69. Phye, G.D. (1997). Epilogue: Classroom learning, looking ahead. In G.D. Phye (Ed.), Handbook of academic learning: Construction of knowledge (pp. 593-602). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
70. Pintrich, P.R. (Ed.) (1995). Current issues in research on self-regulated learning: A discussion with commentaries (Special issue). Educational Psychologist, 30, 171-228.
71. Pintrich, P.R., Marx, R.W., & Boyle, R.A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63, 167-199.
72. Pintrich, P.R., & Schrauben, B. (1992). Students' motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in academic tasks. In D. Schunk & J. Meece (Eds.), Students' perceptions in the classroom: Causes and consequences (pp. 149-183). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
73. Romberg, T.A. (Ed.) (1995). Reform in school mathematics and authentic assessment. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
74. Salomon, G. (Ed.) (1993a). Distributed cognition. Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
75. Salomon, G. (1993b). No distribution without individual's cognition: A dynamic interactional view. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognition: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 111-138). New York: Cambridge University Press.
76. Salomon, G., & Perkins, D.N. (1998). Individual and social aspects of learning. In P.D. Pearson & A. Iran-Nejad (Eds.), Review of research in education (Vol. 23, pp. 1-24). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
77. Schauble, L., & Glaser, R. (Eds.) (1996). Innovations in learning: New environments for education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
78. Schoenfeld, A.H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
79. Schoenfeld, A.H. (1988). When good teaching leads to bad results: The disasters of "well-taught" mathematics courses. Educational Psychologist, 23, 145-166.
80. Schoenfeld, A.H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. In D.A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics learning and teaching (pp. 334-370). New York: Macmillan.
81. Schoenfeld, A.H. (2002). Making mathematics work for all children: Issues of standards, testing, and equity. Educational Researcher, 31(1), 13-25.
82. Schunk, D.H., & Zimmerman, B.J. (1994a). Self-regulation in education: Retrospect and prospect. In D.H. Schunk & B.J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 305-314). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
83. Schunk, D.H., & Zimmerman, B.J. (Eds.) (1994b). Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
84. Schunk, D.H., & Zimmerman, B.J. (Eds.) (1998). Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice. New York: The Guilford Press.
85. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4-13.
86. Shavelson, R.J., & Baxter, G.P. (1992). Linking assessment with instruction. In F.K. Oser, A. Dick, & J.L. Patry (Eds.), Effective and responsible teaching: The new systhesis (pp. 80-90). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
87. Shepard, L.A. (2001). The role of classroom assessment in teaching and learning. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th edn., pp. 1066-1101). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
88. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
89. Silver, E.A., & Kenney, P.A. (1995). Sources of assessment information for instructional guidance in mathematics. In T.A. Romberg (Ed.), Reform in school mathematics and authentic assessment (pp. 38-86). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
90. Simons, R.J., Van der Linden, J., & Duffy, T. (2000). New learning. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publications.
91. Snow, R.E., & Mandinach, E.B. (1991). Integrating assessment and instruction: A research and development agenda. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
92. Snow, R.E., & Swanson, J. (1992). Instructional psychology: Aptitude, adaptation, and assessment. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 583-626.
93. Steffe, L.P., & Gale, J. (Eds.) (1995). Constructivism in education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
94. Steffe, L.P., Nesher, P., Cobb, P., Goldin, G.A., & Greer, B. (Eds.) (1996). Theories of mathematical learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
95. Terwilliger, J. (1997). Semantics, psychometrics, and assessment reform: A close look at "authentic" assessment. Educational Researcher, 26(8), 24-27.
96. Verschaffel, L., & De Corte, E. (1997). Teaching realistic mathematical modeling in the elementary school: A teaching experiment with fifth graders. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 577-601.
97. Verschaffel, L., De Corte, E., & Lasure, S. (1994). Realistic considerations in mathematical modeling of school arithmetic word problems. Learning and Instruction, 4, 273-294.
98. Verschaffel, L., De Corte, E., Lasure, S., Van Vaerenbergh, G., Bogaerts, H., & Ratinckx, E. (1999). Learning to solve mathematical application problems: A design experiment with fifth graders. Mathematical Learning and Thinking, 1, 195-229.
99. Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2000). Making sense of word problems. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
100. Vosniadou, S. (1996). Towards a revised cognitive psychology for advances in learning and instruction. Learning and Instruction, 6, 95-109.
101. Webb, N.M., & Palincsar, A.S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D.C. Berliner & R.C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 841-873). New York: Macmillan.
102. Weinert, F.E., & De Corte, E. (1996). Translating research into practice. In E. De Corte & F.E. Weinert (Eds.), International encyclopedia of developmental and instructional psychology (pp. 43-50). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
103. Wood, T., Cobb, P., & Yackel, E. (1991). Change in teaching mathematics: A case study. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 587-616.
104. Zimmerman, B.J. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education. In D.H. Schunk & B.J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 3-21). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
105. Zimmerman, B.J., & Risemberg, R. (1997). Self-regulatory dimensions of academic learning and motivation. In G.D. Phye (Ed.), Handbook of academic learning: Construction of knowledge (pp. 105-125). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.