Getting political and unraveling layers of gendered mathematical identifications

Cambridge Journal of Education

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 19-34

  Walshaw, Margaret ^a  

^a MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27944456466     PISSN: 0305764X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0305764042000332470     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (45)

1. Adler, J. & Lerman, S. (2003) Getting the description right and making it count: ethical practice in mathematics education research, in: A. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick & F. K.S. Leung (Eds) Second international handbook of mathematics education. Part 1 (Dordrecht, Kluwer), 441-470.
2. Apple, M. (1995) Taking power seriously: new directions in equity in mathematics education and beyond, in: W. Secada, E. Fennema & L. Adajian (Eds) New directions for equity in mathematics education (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press with NCTM), 329-348.
3. Becker, J. (1995) Women's ways of knowing in mathematics, in: P. Rogers & G. Kaiser (Eds) Equity in mathematics education: influences of feminism and culture (London, Palmer), 164-174.
4. Brown, T., Jones, L. & Bibby, T. (2004) Identifying with mathematics in initial teacher training, in: M. Walshaw (Ed.) Mathematics education within the postmodern (Greenwich, CT, Information Age), 161-179.
5. Burton, L. (1995) Moving towards a feminist epistemology of mathematics, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 28, 275-291.
6. Burton, L. (2003) Methodology and methods in mathematics education research: where is 'the why'?, in: S. Goodchild & L. English (Eds) Researching mathematics classrooms: a critical examination of methodology (Westport, CT, Praeger), 1-10.
7. Cabral, T. & Baldino, R. (2004) Formal inclusion and real diversity through mathematics in a new public university, proceedings of the Twenty-eighth Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Bergen, Bergen University College), 175-182.
8. Carr, W. (1997) Philosophy and method in educational research, Cambridge Journal of Education, 27(2), 203-209.
9. Damarin, S. (1995) Gender and mathematics from a feminist standpoint, in: W. Secada, E. Fennema & L. Adajian (Eds) New directions for equity in mathematics education (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press with NCTM), 242-257.
10. Davies, B. (1994) Poststructuralist theory and classroom practice (Melbourne, Deakin University Press).
11. Davies, B. (1997) Constructing and deconstructing masculinities through critical literacy, Gender and Education, 9(1), 9-30.
12. Ernest, P. (1995) Values, gender and images of mathematics: a philosophical perspective, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 26(3), 449-462.
13. Ernest, P. (2004) Postmodernism and the subject of mathematics, in: M. Walshaw (Ed.) Mathematics education within the postmodern (Greenwich, CT, Information Age), 15-33.
14. Fennema, E. & Peterson, P. (1985) Autonomous learning behaviour: a possible explanation of gender-related differences in mathematics, in: L. Wilkinson & C. Marrett (Eds) Gender-related differences in classroom interactions (New York, Academic), 17-35.
15. Fennema, E. & Peterson, P. (1986) Teacher-student interactions and sex-related differences in learning mathematics, Teaching and Teacher Education, 2(1), 19-42.
16. Fennema, E. & Tartre, L. (1985) The use of spatial visualization in mathematics by boys and girls, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16(3), 184-206.
17. Forgasz, H. (2002) Computers for learning mathematics: equity considerations, in: B. Barton, K. Irwin, M. Pfannkuch & M. Thomas (Eds) Mathematics education in the South Pacific, Proceedings of the Twenty-fifth Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (Sydney, MERGA), 260-267.
18. Forgasz, H. & Leder, G. (1996) Mathematics classrooms, gender and affect, Mathematics Education Research Journal, 8(2), 153-173.
19. Fox, L. & Soller, J. (2001) Psychological dimensions of gender differences in mathematics, in: J. Jacobs, J. Becker & G. Gilmer (Eds) Changing the faces of mathematics: perspectives on gender (Reston, VA, NCTM), 9-23.
20. Hardy, T. (2004) 'There's no hiding place': Foucault's notion of normalization at work in a mathematics lesson, in: M. Walshaw (Ed.) Mathematics education within the postmodern (Greenwich, CT, Information Age), 103-119.
21. Kenway, J., Willis, S., Blackmore, J. & Rennie, L. (1998) Answering back: girls, boys, and feminisms in schools (Sydney, Routledge).
22. Klein, M. (2000) How active involvement in learning can preclude meaningful engagement: Contributions from Foucault, Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 8(1), 69-83.
23. Lather, P. (1997) Troubling the angels: women living with HIV/AIDS (Boulder, CO, Westview Press).
24. Leder, G. & Forgasz, H. (2003) Achievement self-rating and the gender stereotyping of mathematics, in: L. Bragg, C. Campbell, G. Herbert & J. Mousley (Eds) Mathematics education research: innovation, networking, opportunity (Sydney, MERGA), 476-483.
25. Lucey, H., Brown, M., Denvir, H., Askew, M. & Rhodes, V. (2003) Girls and boys in the primary maths classroom, in: C. Skelton & B. Francis (Eds) Boys and girls in the primary classroom (Buckingham, Open University Press), 43-58.
26. Maccoby, E. & Jacklin, C. (1974) The psychology of sex differences (Stanford, Stanford University Press).
27. Martino, W. & Meyenn, B. (2002) 'War, guns and cool, tough things': interrogating single-sex classes as a strategy for engaging boys in English, Cambridge Journal of Education, 32(3), 303-324.
28. Meaney, T. (2004) So what's power got to do with it?, in: M. Walshaw (Ed.) Mathematics education within the postmodern (Greenwich, CT, Information Age), 181-199.
29. Mendick, H. (2003) Choosing maths/doing gender: a look at why there are more boys than girls in advanced mathematics classes in England, in: L. Burton (Ed.) Which way social justice in mathematics education? (Westport, Praeger), 169-187.
30. Meyer, M. & Koehler, M. (1990) Initial influences on gender differences in mathematics, in: E. Fennema & G. Leder (Eds) Mathematics and gender (New York, Teachers College Press), 60-95.
31. Middleton, S. (1995) Doing feminist educational theory: a postmodernist perspective, Gender and Education, 7(1), 87-100.
32. Mol, A. (1998) Differences in medicine: an introduction, in: M. Berg & A. Mol (Eds) Differences in medicine: unraveling practices, techniques, and bodies (Durham, Duke University Press), 1-12.
33. Reay, D. (2002) Shaun's story: troubling discourses of white working class masculinities, Gender and Education, 14(3), 221-234.
34. Sells, L. (1978) Mathematics-a critical filter, The Science Teacher, 45, 28-29.
35. Schifter, D. (1999) Relationships between research and the NCTM Standards: an introduction, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(1), 2.
36. Skelton, C. B. & Francis, B. (Eds) (2003) Boys and girls in the primary classroom (Buckingham, Open University Press).
37. Sowder, J. (2000) Editorial, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(1), 2-4.
38. Valero, P. (2004) Postmodernism as an attitude of critique to dominant mathematics education research, in: M. Walshaw (Ed.) Mathematics education within the postmodern (Greenwich, CT, Information Age), 35-54.
39. Waiden, R. & Walkerdine, V. (1986) Characteristics, views and relationships in the classroom, in: L. Burton (Ed.) Girls into maths can go (London, Holt, Rinehart & Winston), 122-146.
40. Walkerdine, V. (1990) Schoolgirl fictions (London, Verso).
41. Walkerdine, V. (2003) Reclassifying upward mobility: femininity and the neo-liberal subject, Gender and Education, 15(3), 227-319.
42. Walshaw, M. (2001) A Foucauldian gaze on gender research: what do you do when confronted with the tunnel at the end of the light?, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(5), 471-492.
43. Walshaw, M. (2004) Pre-service teaching in the context of schools: an exploration into the constitution of identity, Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(1), 63-86.
44. Willis, S. (1990) Some beliefs about girls, mathematics and the early childhood years, Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 15(1), 47-48.
45. Zevenbergen, R. (1994) The construction of educational inequality: a critique of dominant discourses in mathematics education (Geelong, Deakin University Press).