DNA repair: easy to visualize, difficult to elucidate

Trends in Cell Biology

Volumn 19, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 617-629

  Nagy, Zita ^a   Soutoglou, Evi ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AFLATOXIN; AMSACRINE; BLEOMYCIN; CALICHEAMICIN; CAMPTOTHECIN; CHLORMETHINE; CISPLATIN; DNA; DOXORUBICIN; EDOTECARIN; ELLIPTICINE; ENDONUCLEASE; ETOPOSIDE; GENISTEIN; GIMATECAN; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEIN; KEDARCIDIN; PSORALEN; QUINOLONE DERIVATIVE; TENIPOSIDE; ZINOSTATIN;

ALPHA RADIATION; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BIOCHEMISTRY; CHROMOSOME TRANSLOCATION; CYTOLOGY; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; ENERGY FILTERED TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; GAMMA IRRADIATION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOME; IMAGING; IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGULATORY MECHANISM; REVIEW; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

ANIMALS; CYTOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; DEOXYRIBONUCLEASES; DNA; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; GENETIC TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; TRANSLOCATION, GENETIC;

EID: 70350357352     PISSN: 09628924     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2009.08.010     Document Type: Review

References (97)

1. Wyman C., and Kanaar R. DNA double-strand break repair: all's well that ends well. Annu. Rev. Genet. 40 (2006) 363-383
2. Hoeijmakers J.H. Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer. Nature 411 (2001) 366-374
3. Jiricny J. The multifaceted mismatch-repair system. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7 (2006) 335-346
4. Robertson A.B., et al. DNA repair in mammalian cells: base excision repair: the long and short of it. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 66 (2009) 981-993
5. Hanawalt P.C., and Spivak G. Transcription-coupled DNA repair: two decades of progress and surprises. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9 (2008) 958-970
6. Kanaar R., et al. Quality control of DNA break metabolism: in the 'end', it's a good thing. EMBO J. 27 (2008) 581-588
7. Bekker-Jensen S., et al. Spatial organization of the mammalian genome surveillance machinery in response to DNA strand breaks. J. Cell Biol. 173 (2006) 195-206
8. Reinhardt H.C., and Yaffe M.B. Kinases that control the cell cycle in response to DNA damage: Chk1, Chk2, and MK2. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21 (2009) 245-255
9. Rogakou E.P., et al. Megabase chromatin domains involved in DNA double-strand breaks in vivo. J. Cell Biol. 146 (1999) 905-916
10. Carney J.P., et al. The hMre11/hRad50 protein complex and Nijmegen breakage syndrome: linkage of double-strand break repair to the cellular DNA damage response. Cell 93 (1998) 477-486
11. Maser R.S., et al. hMre11 and hRad50 nuclear foci are induced during the normal cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17 (1997) 6087-6096
12. Asaithamby A., and Chen D.J. Cellular responses to DNA double-strand breaks after low-dose gamma-irradiation. Nucl. Acids Res 37 (2009) 3912-3923
13. Essers J., et al. Nuclear dynamics of RAD52 group homologous recombination proteins in response to DNA damage. EMBO J. 21 (2002) 2030-2037
14. Murga M., et al. Global chromatin compaction limits the strength of the DNA damage response. J. Cell Biol. 178 (2007) 1101-1108
15. Stewart G.S., et al. The RIDDLE syndrome protein mediates a ubiquitin-dependent signaling cascade at sites of DNA damage. Cell 136 (2009) 420-434
16. Povirk L.F. DNA damage and mutagenesis by radiomimetic DNA-cleaving agents: bleomycin, neocarzinostatin and other enediynes. Mutat. Res. 355 (1996) 71-89
17. Teicher B.A. Next generation topoisomerase I inhibitors: rationale and biomarker strategies. Biochem. Pharmacol. 75 (2008) 1262-1271
18. Burden D.A., and Osheroff N. Mechanism of action of eukaryotic topoisomerase II and drugs targeted to the enzyme. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1400 (1998) 139-154
19. Nouspikel T. DNA repair in mammalian cells: nucleotide excision repair: variations on versatility. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 66 (2009) 994-1009
20. Wyatt M.D., and Pittman D.L. Methylating agents and DNA repair responses: Methylated bases and sources of strand breaks. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 19 (2006) 1580-1594
21. Herrlich P., et al. Supreme EnLIGHTenment: damage recognition and signaling in the mammalian UV response. Mol. Cell 29 (2008) 279-290
22. Mone M.J., et al. Local UV-induced DNA damage in cell nuclei results in local transcription inhibition. EMBO Rep. 2 (2001) 1013-1017
23. Mori T., et al. Simultaneous establishment of monoclonal antibodies specific for either cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer or (6-4)photoproduct from the same mouse immunized with ultraviolet-irradiated DNA. Photochem. Photobiol. 54 (1991) 225-232
24. Nishi R., et al. UV-DDB-dependent regulation of nucleotide excision repair kinetics in living cells. DNA Repair (Amst) 8 (2009) 767-776
25. Hoogstraten D., et al. Versatile DNA damage detection by the global genome nucleotide excision repair protein XPC. J. Cell Sci. 121 (2008) 2850-2859
26. Volker M., et al. Sequential assembly of the nucleotide excision repair factors in vivo. Mol. Cell 8 (2001) 213-224
27. Nelms B.E., et al. In situ visualization of DNA double-strand break repair in human fibroblasts. Science 280 (1998) 590-592
28. Jakob B., et al. Biological imaging of heavy charged-particle tracks. Radiat. Res. 159 (2003) 676-684
29. Stap J., et al. Induction of linear tracks of DNA double-strand breaks by alpha-particle irradiation of cells. Nat. Methods 5 (2008) 261-266
30. Aten J.A., et al. Dynamics of DNA double-strand breaks revealed by clustering of damaged chromosome domains. Science 303 (2004) 92-95
31. Soutoglou E., et al. Positional stability of single double-strand breaks in mammalian cells. Nat. Cell. Biol. 9 (2007) 675-682
32. Kruhlak M.J., et al. Changes in chromatin structure and mobility in living cells at sites of DNA double-strand breaks. J. Cell Biol. 172 (2006) 823-834
33. Jakob B., et al. Live cell microscopy analysis of radiation-induced DNA double-strand break motion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106 (2009) 3172-3177
34. Hauptner A., et al. Microirradiation of cells with energetic heavy ions. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 42 (2004) 237-245
35. Limoli C.L., and Ward J.F. A new method for introducing double-strand breaks into cellular DNA. Radiat. Res. 134 (1993) 160-169
36. Dinant C., et al. Activation of multiple DNA repair pathways by sub-nuclear damage induction methods. J. Cell Sci. 120 (2007) 2731-2740
37. Kong X., et al. Comparative analysis of different laser systems to study cellular responses to DNA damage in mammalian cells. Nucl. Acids Res. 37 (2009) e68
38. Meldrum R.A., et al. Nanoscale spatial induction of ultraviolet photoproducts in cellular DNA by three-photon near-infrared absorption. EMBO Rep. 4 (2003) 1144-1149
39. Bekker-Jensen S., et al. Dynamic assembly and sustained retention of 53BP1 at the sites of DNA damage are controlled by Mdc1/NFBD1. J. Cell Biol. 170 (2005) 201-211
40. Ayoub N., et al. HP1-beta mobilization promotes chromatin changes that initiate the DNA damage response. Nature 453 (2008) 682-686
41. Kim J.S., et al. Independent and sequential recruitment of NHEJ and HR factors to DNA damage sites in mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol. 170 (2005) 341-347
42. Mari P.O., et al. Dynamic assembly of end-joining complexes requires interaction between Ku70/80 and XRCC4. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103 (2006) 18597-18602
43. Kim J.S., et al. Specific recruitment of human cohesin to laser-induced DNA damage. J. Biol. Chem. 277 (2002) 45149-45153
44. Paques F., and Duchateau P. Meganucleases and DNA double-strand break-induced recombination: perspectives for gene therapy. Curr. Gene Ther. 7 (2007) 49-66
45. Haber J.E. In vivo biochemistry: physical monitoring of recombination induced by site-specific endonucleases. Bioessays 17 (1995) 609-620
46. Lisby M., et al. Choreography of the DNA damage response: spatiotemporal relationships among checkpoint and repair proteins. Cell 118 (2004) 699-713
47. Rouet P., et al. Introduction of double-strand breaks into the genome of mouse cells by expression of a rare-cutting endonuclease. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14 (1994) 8096-8106
48. Choulika A., et al. Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15 (1995) 1968-1973
49. Donoho G., et al. Analysis of gene targeting and intrachromosomal homologous recombination stimulated by genomic double-strand breaks in mouse embryonic stem cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18 (1998) 4070-4078
50. Lambert S., and Lopez B.S. Characterization of mammalian RAD51 double strand break repair using non-lethal dominant-negative forms. EMBO J. 19 (2000) 3090-3099
51. Pierce A.J., et al. Ku DNA end-binding protein modulates homologous repair of double-strand breaks in mammalian cells. Genes Dev. 15 (2001) 3237-3242
52. Pierce A.J., and Jasin M. Measuring recombination proficiency in mouse embryonic stem cells. Methods Mol. Biol. 291 (2005) 373-384
53. Pierce A.J., et al. XRCC3 promotes homology-directed repair of DNA damage in mammalian cells. Genes Dev. 13 (1999) 2633-2638
54. Richardson C., and Jasin M. Frequent chromosomal translocations induced by DNA double-strand breaks. Nature 405 (2000) 697-700
55. Richardson C., et al. Double-strand break repair by interchromosomal recombination: suppression of chromosomal translocations. Genes Dev. 12 (1998) 3831-3842
56. Posfai G., et al. Markerless gene replacement in Escherichia coli stimulated by a double-strand break in the chromosome. Nucl. Acids Res. 27 (1999) 4409-4415
57. Puchta H., et al. Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strand breaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease. Nucl. Acids Res. 21 (1993) 5034-5040
58. Rong Y.S., and Golic K.G. Gene targeting by homologous recombination in Drosophila. Science 288 (2000) 2013-2018
59. Gouble A., et al. Efficient in toto targeted recombination in mouse liver by meganuclease-induced double-strand break. J. Gene Med. 8 (2006) 616-622
60. Berkovich E., et al. Roles of ATM and NBS1 in chromatin structure modulation and DNA double-strand break repair. Nat. Cell Biol. 9 (2007) 683-690
61. Porteus M.H. Mammalian gene targeting with designed zinc finger nucleases. Mol. Ther. 13 (2006) 438-446
62. Urnov F.D., et al. Highly efficient endogenous human gene correction using designed zinc-finger nucleases. Nature 435 (2005) 646-651
63. Maeder M.L., et al. Rapid 'open-source' engineering of customized zinc-finger nucleases for highly efficient gene modification. Mol. Cell 31 (2008) 294-301
64. Guirouilh-Barbat J., et al. Defects in XRCC4 and KU80 differentially affect the joining of distal nonhomologous ends. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104 (2007) 20902-20907
65. Rodrigue A., et al. Interplay between human DNA repair proteins at a unique double-strand break in vivo. EMBO J. 25 (2006) 222-231
66. Kim J.A., et al. Heterochromatin is refractory to gamma-H2AX modification in yeast and mammals. J. Cell Biol. 178 (2007) 209-218
67. De Bont R., and van Larebeke N. Endogenous DNA damage in humans: a review of quantitative data. Mutagenesis 19 (2004) 169-185
68. Labib K., and Hodgson B. Replication fork barriers: pausing for a break or stalling for time?. EMBO Rep. 8 (2007) 346-353
69. Ramiro A., et al. The role of activation-induced deaminase in antibody diversification and chromosome translocations. Adv. Immunol. 94 (2007) 75-107
70. Sadofsky M.J. The RAG proteins in V(D)J recombination: more than just a nuclease. Nucl. Acids Res. 29 (2001) 1399-1409
71. Meaburn K.J., et al. Spatial genome organization in the formation of chromosomal translocations. Semin. Cancer Biol. 17 (2007) 80-90
72. Liang F., et al. Chromosomal double-strand break repair in Ku80-deficient cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93 (1996) 8929-8933
73. Janicijevic A., et al. The molecular machines of DNA repair: scanning force microscopy analysis of their architecture. J. Microsc. 212 (2003) 264-272
74. Silva L.P. Imaging proteins with atomic force microscopy: an overview. Curr Protein Pept. Sci. 6 (2005) 387-395
75. Moreno-Herrero F., et al. Mesoscale conformational changes in the DNA-repair complex Rad50/Mre11/Nbs1 upon binding DNA. Nature 437 (2005) 440-443
76. van der Linden E., et al. RAD50 and NBS1 form a stable complex functional in DNA binding and tethering. Nucl. Acids Res. 37 (2009) 1580-1588
77. Brar S.S., et al. Activation-induced deaminase. AID, is catalytically active as a monomer on single-stranded DNA. DNA Repair (Amst) 7 (2008) 77-87
78. de Bruijn W.C., et al. Engery-filtering transmission electron microscopy of biological specimens. Scanning Microsc. 7 (1993) 693-708
79. Shin D.S., et al. Structure and function of the double-strand break repair machinery. DNA Repair (Amst) 3 (2004) 863-873
80. Stucki M., et al. MDC1 directly binds phosphorylated histone H2AX to regulate cellular responses to DNA double-strand breaks. Cell 123 (2005) 1213-1226
81. Hopfner K.P., et al. Structural biochemistry and interaction architecture of the DNA double-strand break repair Mre11 nuclease and Rad50-ATPase. Cell 105 (2001) 473-485
82. Moncalian G., et al. The rad50 signature motif: essential to ATP binding and biological function. J. Mol. Biol. 335 (2004) 937-951
83. Hopfner K.P., et al. The Rad50 zinc-hook is a structure joining Mre11 complexes in DNA recombination and repair. Nature 418 (2002) 562-566
84. Rivera-Calzada A., et al. Three-dimensional structure and regulation of the DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs). Structure 13 (2005) 243-255
85. Spagnolo L., et al. Three-dimensional structure of the human DNA-PKcs/Ku70/Ku80 complex assembled on DNA and its implications for DNA DSB repair. Mol. Cell 22 (2006) 511-519
86. Williams R.S., et al. Mre11 dimers coordinate DNA end bridging and nuclease processing in double-strand-break repair. Cell 135 (2008) 97-109
87. Huang B., et al. Super-resolution fluorescence microscopy. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 78 (2009) 993-1016
88. Bewersdorf J., et al. H2AX chromatin structures and their response to DNA damage revealed by 4Pi microscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103 (2006) 18137-18142
89. Ruiz de Almodovar J.M., et al. A comparison of methods for calculating DNA double-strand break induction frequency in mammalian cells by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 65 (1994) 641-649
90. Cedervall B., et al. Methods for the quantification of DNA double-strand breaks determined from the distribution of DNA fragment sizes measured by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Radiat. Res. 143 (1995) 8-16
91. van Hoffen A., et al. Transcription-coupled repair removes both cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers and 6-4 photoproducts with equal efficiency and in a sequential way from transcribed DNA in xeroderma pigmentosum group C fibroblasts. EMBO J. 14 (1995) 360-367
92. Tashiro S., et al. Rad51 accumulation at sites of DNA damage and in postreplicative chromatin. J. Cell Biol. 150 (2000) 283-291
93. Mortusewicz O., et al. Recruitment of DNA methyltransferase I to DNA repair sites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102 (2005) 8905-8909
94. Lan L., et al. Accumulation of Werner protein at DNA double-strand breaks in human cells. J. Cell Sci. 118 (2005) 4153-4162
95. Lan L., et al. In situ analysis of repair processes for oxidative DNA damage in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101 (2004) 13738-13743
96. Bradshaw P.S., et al. Human telomeric protein TRF2 associates with genomic double-strand breaks as an early response to DNA damage. Nat Genet. 37 (2005) 193-197
97. Paull T.T., et al. A critical role for histone H2AX in recruitment of repair factors to nuclear foci after DNA damage. Curr. Biol. 10 (2000) 886-895