Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning

IEEE Engineering Management Review

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 65-90

  Dym, Clive L ^a   Agogino, Alice M ^b   Eris, Ozgur ^c   Frey, Daniel D ^d   Leifer, Larry J ^c  

^a HARVEY MUDD COLLEGE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

Author keywords

Classroom as laboratory; Cornerstone courses; Design thinking; Project based learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 69249167042     PISSN: 03608581     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/emr.2006.1679078     Document Type: Article

References (174)

1. Simon. H. A., The Sciences oftheArtflcial, 3rd ed., Cambridge, Mass.s: MIT Press, 1996.
2. Sheppard, S. D., "A Description of Engineering: An Essential Backdrop for Interpreting Engineering Education," Proceedings (CD), Mudd Design Workshop W, Claremont, Cal.: Harvey Mudd College, 2003.
3. Evans, D. L., McNeill, B. W., and Beakley, 0. C., "Design in Engineering Education: Past Views of Future Directions," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.79, No.4. 1990. Pp. 517-522.
4. Todd, R. H., and Magleby, S. P., "Evaluation and Rewards for Faculty Involved In Engineering Design Education," International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.20, No.3, 2004, pp. 333-340.
5. Grinter, L. E., "Report on the Evaluation of Engineering Education," Engineering Education, Vol.46, 1956, pp. 25-63.
6. Dym, C. L., "Design, Systems, and Engineering Education," International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.20, No.3, 2004, pp. 305-312.
7. Dutson, A. J., Todd, R. H., Magleby, S. P., and Sorensen, C. D., "A Review of Literature on Teaching Design Through Project-Oriented Capstone Courses," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.76, No.1, 1997, pp. 17-28.
8. Bright, A., "Teaching and Learning In the Engineering Clinic Program at Harvey Mudd College," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.83, No.1, 1994, pp. 113-116.
9. Dyrn, C. L.. "Learning Engineering: Design, Languages, and Experiences," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.88, No.2, 1999, pp. 145-148.
10. Agogino, A. M., Sheppard. S. D., and Oladipupo. A., "Making Connections to Engineering During the First Two Years," Proceedings, 1992 Frontiers in Education Conference, Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers.
11. Pavellch, M. J., Olds, B. M., and Miller, R. L., "Real-World Problem Solving In Freshman/Sophomore Engineering," in Gainen, J. and Willemsen, E., eds., Fostering Student Success in Quantitative Gateway Courses, San Francisco, Cal.: Jossey-Bass. 1995.
12. Daily, J. W., and Zhang, G. M., "A Freshman Engineering Design Course," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.83, No.2, 1994, pp. 83-91.
13. 4 Program: A Different Professional Experience for Engineering Students and Faculty," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.82, No.4, 1993, pp. 196-202.
14. Froyd, J. E., and Ohland, M. W., "Integrated Engineering Curricula," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.94, No.1, 2005, pp. 147-164.
15. Dym, C. L., "Teaching Design to Freshmen: Style and Content," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.83, No.4, 1994, pp. 303-310.
16. Dym, C. L., and Little, L., Engineering Design: A Project.Based Introduction, 2nd ed., New York, N.Y.: John Vi1ey, 2003.
17. McMasters, J. H., "Influencing Engineering Education: One (Aerospace) Industry Perspective." International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.20, No.3, 2004. pp. 353-437.
18. Crawley. E. F.. "Creating the CDIO Syllabus. A Universal Template for Engineering Education." Proceedings, 23rd Frontiers in Education Conference. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Vol.2, pp. f3f/8-f3f/12, 2002.
19. Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W., and Johnson. R. T., "Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom-based Practices," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.94. No.1. 2005, pp. 87-101.
20. Pahl, 0., "How and Why Collaboration with Cognitive Psychologists Began," Designers: The Key to Successful Product Development. Darmstadt, Germany: Darmstadt Symposium, 1997.
21. Dym, C. L., Engineering Design: A Synthesis of Views. New York, N. Y.: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
22. Aristotle, Posterior Analytics, J. Barnes (transi.), 2nd ed., New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 1994.
23. Dillon, T. J., "The Classification of Research Questions," Review of Educational Research, Vol.54, 1984, pp. 327-361.
24. Lehnert, G. W., The Process of Question Answering, Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Eribaum Associates, 1978.
25. Graesser, A., Lang, K., and Horgan, D., "A Taxonomy for Question Generation," Questioning Exchange, Vol.2, No.1, 1988, pp. 3-15.
26. Graesser. A., and Person, N., "Question Asking During Tutoring," American Educational Research Journal, Vol.31, No.1, 1994, pp. 104-137.
27. Ens, O., Effective Inquiry for Innovative Engineering Design, Boston. Mass.: Kluwer Academic PublIshers, 2004.
28. Baya, V., Information Handling Behavior of Engineers in Conceptual Design: Three Experiments, Doctoral Dissertation, Stanford, California: Stanford University, 1996.
29. Hatchuel, A., and Well, B., "A New Approach of Innovative Design: an Introduction to C-K Theory," Proceedings, International Conference on Engineering Design, Stockholm, Sweden, 2003.
30. Vlnventi, W. G., What Engineers Know and How They Know It: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History, Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1990.
31. Mabogunje, A., Measuring Conceptual Design Performance in Mechanical Engineering: A Question Based Approach, Doctoral Dissertation, Stanford. California: Stanford University, 1997.
32. Mabogunje. A., and Leifer, L. J., "Noun Phrases as Surrogates for Measuring Early Phases of the Mechanical Design Process," Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1997.
33. Hughes, T. P., RescuIng Prometheus: Four Monumental Projects that Changed the Modern World, New York, N.Y.: Random House, 1998.
34. Reynolds, D., Carison, J. M., and Doyle, J.. "Design Degrees of Freedom and Mechanisms for Complexity," Physical Review E, Vol.66, No.016108. 2002, pp. 1-18.
35. Hastings. D., "The Future of Engineering Systems: Development of Engineering Leaders," Engineering Systems Symposium, Cambridge, Mass., 2004. (See also http://esd.mit.edu/symposium/pdfs/monograph/future.pdf.)
36. Ng. C., "Findings from a Web Based Survey of Degree Programs in Engineering Systems," Engineering Systems Symposium. Cambridge, Mass., 2004. (See also esd.mit.edu/symposium/pcifs/papers/ng.pdf.)
37. Senge, P. M.. The Ftfih Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, New York, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1990.
38. Sterman, J. D, "Learning in and About Complex Systems," System Dynamics Review, Vol.10. Nos. 2 and 3, 1994, pp. 291-330.
39. Gharajedaghl, J., and Ackoff. R. L., "Toward Systemic Education of Systems Scientists," Systems Research, Vol.2, No.1, 1985. pp. 21-27.
40. Sweeney, L. B., and Sterman, J. D., "Bathtub Dynamics: Initial Results of a Systems Thinking Inventory," System Dynamics Review, to appear 2004.
41. Doyle, J. K., "The Cognitive Psychology of Systems Thinking," System Dynamics Review, Vol.13, No.3, 1997, pp. 253-265, 1997.
42. Hazelrigg, G. A., "Rethinking the Cuniculum: Is Today's Engineering Education Irrelevant, Incomplete, and Incorrect?" Prism, December 1994.
43. Kahnemann, D., Slovic, D. P. and Tversky, A., Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
44. Vinkler, R. L., 'The Assessment of Prior Distributions In Bayesian Analysis," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 62, 1967, pp. 776-800.
45. Stone, A., Allen, K., Rhoads, T. R., Reed, T., Murphy, T. J., Shehab R. L., and Saha, C., "The Statistics Concept Inventory: A Pilot Study," Proceedings, 2003 Frontiers in Education Conference, Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers.
46. Glgerenzer, G., and Hoffrage, U., "How to Improve Bayesian Reasoning Without Instruction: Frequency Formats," Psychological Review, Vol.106, 1995, pp. 425-430.
47. Ramos, J., and Yokomoto, C., "Making Probabilistic Methods Real, Relevant, and Interesting Using MATLAB," Proceedings, 1999 Frontiers in Education Conference, Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers.
48. Clough, D. E., "Revitalizing Statistics in the Chemical Engineering Curriculum," Proceedings of the ASEE Conference & Exhibition, Milwaukee, Wis., 1997.
49. Thomason, N., Cumming, G., and Zangari, M., "Understanding Central Concepts of Statistics and Experimental Design in the Social Sciences," Proceedings of the International Federation for Information Processing, Melbourne, Australia, 1994.
50. Vood, V. H., "Decision-Based Design: A Vehicle for Curriculum Integration," International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.20, No.3, 2004, pp. 433-439.
51. Linder, B. M., Understanding Estimation and its Relation to Engineering Education, Doctoral Dissertation, Cambridge, Mass.: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1999.
52. Box, G. E. P., and Llu, P. T. Y., "Statistics as a Catalyst to Learning by Scientific Method," Journal of Quality Technology, Vol.31, No.1, 1999, pp. 1-29.
53. Hazelrigg, G. A, "An Axiomatic Framework for Engineering Design," Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol.121, 1999, pp. 342-343 47.
54. Radford, A. D., and Gero, J. S., "Multicriteria Optimization in Architectural Design," in Gero, J. S., ed., Design Optimization, Orlando, Fia.: Academic Press, 1985.
55. Dieter, G. E., Engineering Design: A Materials and Process Approach, New York, N.Y.: McGraw-Hill, 1983.
56. Pugh, S., Total Design: Integrated Methods for Successful Product Engineering, Wokingham, England: Addison-Wesley, 1990.
57. Pugh, S., "Concept Selection: A Method that Works," in Clausing, D. and Andrade, R., eds., Creating Innovative Products Using Total Design. Reading. Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1996.
58. Otto. K. N., and Wood, K. L., Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering and New Product Development. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 2001,
59. Rowe, P. G., Design Thinking, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1987.
60. Von Neumann, J., and Morgenstern, 0., Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1947.
61. Dym, C. L., Wood, W. H., and Scott, M. J., "Rank Ordering Engineering Designs: Palrwlse Comparison Charts and Borda Counts," Research In Engineering Design, Vol.13, 2002, pp. 236-242.
62. McAdams, D. A., and Dym, C. L., "Modeling and Information in the Design Process," Proceedings, 2004 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Salt Lake City, Utah, September 2004.
63. Howard, R. A., "Decision Analysis: Practice and Promise," Management Science, Vol.34, No.6, 1988, pp. 679-695.
64. Dym, C. L., Wesner, J. W., and Winner, L., "Social Dimensions of Engineering Design: Observations from Mudd Design Workshop III," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.92, No.1, 2003, pp. 105-107.
65. Quinn, R. G., "The Fundamentals of Engineering: The Art of Engineering," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.83, No.2, 1994, pp. 120-123.
66. Dym, C. L., "Teaching Design to Freshmen: Style and Content," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.83, No.4, 1994, pp. 303-310.
67. Sheppard, S., Jenison, R., Agogino, A. M., Bereton, M., Bucciareili. L. L., Daily, J., Demel, J., Dym, C. L., Evans. D., Faste, R., Henderson, M., Minderman, P., Mitchell, J., Oladipupo, A., Picket-May, M., Quinn, R., Reagan, T., and Wujek, J., "Examples of Freshman Design Education," International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.13, No.4, 1993, pp. 248-261.
68. Todd, R. H., Magleby, S. P., Sorensen, D. D., Swan, B. R., and Anthony, D. K., "A Survey of Capstone Engineering Courses in North America," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.84, No.2, 1995, pp. 165-174.
69. Tooley, M. S., and Kevin, D., "Using a Capstone Design Course to Facilitate ABET 2000 Program Outcomes." Proceedings, ASEE Conference & Exhibition, Session 1625, 1999.
70. Mikic, B., and Grasso, D., Socially-Relevant Design: The TOYtech Project at Smith College," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 91, No. 3, 2002, pp. 319-326.
71. Pimmel, R., "Cooperative Learning Instructional Activities in a Capstone Design Course," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.90, No.3, 2001, pp. 413-421.
72. Ulrich, K. T., and Eppinger, S. D., Product Design and Development, 3rd ed., New York, N.Y.: McGraw-Hill, 2003.
73. Rittel, H. W. J., and Webber, M. M., "Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning," Policy Sciences, Vol.4, 1973, pp. 155-169.
74. Bucciarelli. L. L., Designing Engineers, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1994.
75. Bucciarelll, L. L. (amended by A. Smith), "Delta Design", Cambridge, Mass.: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 10 February 1997. (See also www.mit.edu/afs/athena/course/other/sp753/www/delta.html.)
76. Minneman, S., The Social Construction of a Technical Reality, Doctoral Dissertation, Stanford, California: Stanford University, 1991.
77. Agoglno, A. M., and M. C. Linn, "Retaining Female Engineering Students: Will Early Design Experiences Help?" Viewpoint Editorial, NSF Directions, National Science Foundation, Vol.5, No.2, 1992, PP. 8-9.
78. American Association of University Women Educational Foundation, Growing\Smart: What's Working for Girls in School, 1995.
79. Cassel, J., "Genderizing HCI," Jacko, J. A., and Sears, A., eds., HCI Handbook, \ Hilisdale, N.J.: Lawrence Eribaum Associates, 2002.
80. Kafai, Y. B., "Video Game Designs by Girls and Boys: Variability and Consistence of Gender Differences", in Cassel, J. and Jenkins, H., eds., From Barbie to Mortal Kombat: Gender and Computer Games, Cambridge, Mass.s: MIT Press, 1998.
81. Linn, M. C., "Technology and Gender Equity: What Works?" in Russo, N. F., Chan, C., Kenkel, M. B., Travis, C. B., and Vasques. M., eds., Women in Science and Technology, New York, N.Y.: American Psychological Association
82. NSF's Prog rain for Gender Equity in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics: A Brief Retrospective 1993-2001, Washington, D. C.: National Science Foundation, 2002.
83. Agogino, A. M., Newman, C., Bauer, M., and Mankoff, J., "Perceptions of the Design Process: An Examination of Gendered Aspects of New Product Development, International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 20, No. 3, 2004, pp. 452-460.
84. Carrlllo, A. G.. Engineering Design Team Performance: Quantitative Evidence That Membership Diversity Effects Are Time Dependent, Doctoral Dissertation, Stanford, California: Stanford University, 2002.
85. Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J., and Mount, M. K., "Relating Member Ability and Personality to Work-Team Processes and Team Effectiveness," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.83, No.3, 1998, pp. 377-391.
86. Reilly, R. R.. Lynn, G. S., and Aronson, Z. L., "The Role of Personality in New Product Development Team Performance," Journal of Engineering & Technology Management, Vol.19, No.1, 2002, pp. 39-58.
87. Wilde. D., "Design Team Formation Using Junglan Typology," Proceedings, National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance, 2000.
88. Lent, R. W., Schmidt, L., Schmidt, J., and Pertmer, G.. "Exploration of Collective Efficacy Beliefs in Student Project Teams: Implications for Student and Team Outcomes," Proceedings, ASEE Conference & Exhibition, 2002.
89. de Souza, C. S., "The Semiotic Engineering of User Interface Languages" International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, Vol.39, No.5, 1993, pp.753-773.
90. Bucclarelli, L. L., "Between Thought and Object in Engineering Design," Design Studies, Vol.23, 2002, pp. 219-231.
91. Dym, C. L., "Representing Designed Artifacts: The Languages of Engineering Design," Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, Vol.1, No.1, 1994, pp. 75-108.
92. Fleisher, A., "Grammatical Architecture?" Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Vol.19. 1992, pp. 221-226.
93. Brown K. N., McMahon, C. A., and Sims, J. H., "Features, aka The Semantics of a Formal Language on Manufacturing," Research In Engineering Design, Vol.7, 1995, PP. 151-172.
94. Dong, A., Hill, A. H., and Agoglno, A. M. "Document Analysis as a Means for Predicting Design Team Performance," ASME Journal of Mechanical Design (in press, 2004).
95. Hill, A. H., Song, S., Dong, A., and Agogino, A. M., "Identl1ing Shared Understanding In Design using Document Analysis," Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Pittsburgh, Penn., 2001.
96. Hill, A. H., Dong, A., and Agogino, A. M., "'I'owards Computational Tools for Supporting the Reflective Team," ArtWcial Intelligence in Design '02, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kiuwer Academic Publishers, 2002.
97. Neck, C. P., Connerley, M. L., and Manz, C. C., "Toward a Continuum of Self-Managing Team Development," In Beyerlein, M. M. and Johnson, D. A., eds., Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams, Vol.4, Stamford, Conn.: JAI Press, 1997.
98. Song, S., Dong, A., and Agogino, A. M., "Time Variance of Design 'Story Telling' in Engineering Design Teams," (CD) Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED), The Design Society, 2003.
99. Do, E., Yi, L., Gross. M.. Neiman, B., and Zimring, C., "Intentions In and Relations Among Design Drawings," Design Studies, Vol.21, No.5, 2000, Pp. 483-503.
100. Schutze, M., Sachse, P., and Romer, A., "Support Value of Sketching in The Design Process," Research In Engineering Design, Vol.14, 2003, pp. 89-97.
101. Uliman, D., Wood, S., and Craig, D., "The Importance of Drawing in The Mechanical Design Process," Computers and Graphics, Vol.14, No.2, 1990, Pp. 263-274.
102. Song, S., and Agogino, A. M., "An Analysis of Designers' Sketching Activities in New Product Design Teams," Proceedings, 2004 ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2004.
103. Yang, M., "Concept Generation and Sketching: Correlations with Design Outcome," Proceedings, 2003 ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Chicago, III., 2003.
104. Shah, J., Vargas-Hernandez, N., and Smith, S., "Metrics for Measuring Ideation Effec tiveness," Design Studies, Vol.24, No.1, 2003, pp. 111-134.
105. Kolodner, J. L., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., and Puntembakar, S., "Putting a Student-Centered Learning by DeslgnTM Curriculum into Practice: Lessons Learned," Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol.12, No.4, 2003. (See also http://www.cc.gatech.edu/projects/lbd/ home.html)
106. Brereton, M., The Role of Hard ware in Learning Engineering Fundamentals: An Empirical Study of Engineering Design and Product Analysis Activity, Doctoral Dissertation, Stanford, California: Stanford University, 1999.
107. Koib, D. A., Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, Engiewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1984.
108. Whitbeck, C., Ethics in Engineering Practice and Research, New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
109. Oakes, V. C., Coyle, E. ,J., and Jamieson, L. H., "EPICS: A Model of Service Learning In the Engineering Curriculum," Proceedings, ASEE Conference and Exhibition, Session 3630, 2000.
110. National Science Foundation, Systemic Engineering Education Reform An Action Agenda, NSF98-27, www.nsfgov/cgi-bin/getpub? nsjP827, 1997.
111. Smith, K. A., Teamwork and Project Management, 2nd ed., New York, N.Y.: McGraw-Hill, 2004.
112. Katzenbach, J., and Smith, D., The Wisdom of Teams: Creating the High-performance Organization, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press, 1993.
113. Kjersdam, F., and Enemark, S., The Aalborg Experiment: Project Innovation in University Education, Aalborg, Denmark: Aalborg University Press, 1994. (Also available at auaw2.aua.auc.dk/fak-tekn/aalborg/engelsk.)
114. Luxhol, J. T., and Hansen, P. H. K., "Engineering Curriculum Reform at Aalborg," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.85, No.3, 1996, PP. 83-84.
115. Christophersen, E., Coupe, p. 5., Lenschow, R. J., and Townson, J., Evaluation of Civil and Construction Engineering Education in Denmark, Centre for Quality Assurance and Evaluation of Higher Education in Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark, 1994,
116. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. R., eds., How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School, Washington, D. C.: National Academy Press, 1999.
117. Byrnes, J. P., Cognitive Development and Learning in Instructional Contexts, Boston, Mass.: Allyn and Bacon, 1996.
118. Barrows, H. S., How to Design a Problem-Based Curriculum for the Preclinical Years, New York, N.Y.: Springer Verlag, 1985.
119. Little, P., and Cardenas, M., "Use of 'Studio' Methods in the Introductory Engineering Design Curriculum," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.90, No.3, 2001, PP. 309-318.
120. Sheppard, S. D., "Mechanical Dissection: An Experience In How Things Work," Proceedings, Engineering Foundation Conference on Engineering Education: Curriculum Innovation and Integration, 1992.
121. Sheppard, S. D., "Mechanical Dissection," Stanford, California: Stanford University, www-adl.stanford.edu/.
122. Wood, K., Jensen, J., Bezdek, J., and Otto, K. N., "Reverse Engineering and Redesign: Courses to Incrementally and Systematically Teach Design," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.90, No.3, 2001, pp. 363-374.
123. Hirsch, P. L., Schwom, B. L., Yarnoff, C., Anderson, J. C., Kelso, D. M., Olson, G. B., and Colgate, J. E., "Engineering Design and Communication: The Case for Interdisciplinary Communication," International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.17, Nos. 4 and 5, 2001, pp. 343-348.
124. Ogot, M., and Kremer, G., Engineering Design: A Practical Guide, St. Victoria, Canada: Trafford Publishers, 2004.
125. Bright, A., and Dyrn, C. L., "General Engineering at Harvey Mudd: 1957-2003," (CD) Proceedings, ASEE Conference and Exhibition. Session 1471, 2004.
126. Adams, R. 5., Turns, J., Martin, J., Newman, J., and Atman, C., An Analysis on the State of Engineering Education," unpublished manuscript intended for submission to the Journal of Engineering Education, 2004.
127. Pavelich, M. J., and Moore, W. S., "Measuring the Effect of Experiential Education Using the Perry Model," Journal of Engineering Education, VoL 85, No.2, 1996, pp. 287-292.
128. Adams, R. S., Turns, J., and Atman, C. J., "Educating Effective Engineering Designers: The Role of Reflective Practice," Design Studies, Vol.24, No.3, 2003, pp. 275-294.
129. Olds, B. M., and Miller, R. L., "The Effect of a First-Year Integrated Engineering Curriculum on Graduation Rates and Student Satisfaction: A Longitudinal Study," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.93, No.1, 2004, pp. 23-35.
130. Rtchardson, J., and Dantzler, J., "Effect of a Freshman Engineering Program on Retention and Academic Performance," Proceedings. 2002 Frontiers in Education Conference, Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers. S2C-16-S2C-22.
131. Wllison, V., Monogue, T., and Malave, C., "First Year Comparative Evaluation of the Texas A & M Freshman Integrated Engineering Program," Proceedings, 1995 Frontiers In Education Conference Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers.
132. Hoit, M., and Ohiand, M., "The Impact of a Discipline-Based Introduction to Engineering Course on Improving Retention," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.87, No.1, 1998, pp. 79-85.
133. Gateway Engineering Education Coalition, Selected Metrics, www.gatewaycoalition.org.
134. Fromm, E., Personal Communication, June 30, 2004.
135. Knight, D. W., Carison, L. E., and Sullivan, J. F., "Staying in Engineering: Impact of a Hands-On, Team-Based, First-Year Projects Course on Student Retention," (CD) Proceedings, ASEE Conference and Exhibition, Session 3553, 2003.
136. Garrett, Jr., J. H., Personal Communication, April 1, 2004.
137. Oakes, W. C., Jamieson, L. H., and Coyle, E. J., "EPICS: Meeting EC 2000 Through Service-Learning," Proceedings, ASEE Conference and Exhthition, Session 3461, 2001.
138. Sadler, P. M., Coyle, H., and Schwartz, M., "Engineering Competitions in the Middle School Classroom: Key Elements in Developing Effective Design Challenges," Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol.9, No.3, 2000, pp. 259-286.
139. Richards, L. G., and Carison-Skalak, S., "Faculty Reactions to Teaching Engineering Design to First year Students," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.86, No.3, 1997, pp. 233-292.
140. Wulf, V. A., "Some Thoughts on Engineering as a Humanistic Discipline," International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.20, No.3, 2004, pp. 313-314.
141. National Research Council, Improving Engineering Design: Designing for Competitive Advantage, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1991.
142. National Academy of Engineering, The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press, 2004.
143. Henderson, M., and Dutta, D., eds., NSF' Workshop on Global Engineering Education, Tempe, ArIz: Arizona State University, (26-27 February 2004, final report pending).
144. Lelfer, L. J., "Design Team Performance: Metrics and the Impact of Technology," in Brown, S. M. and Seidner, C., eds., Evaluating Organizational Training, Boston, Mass.: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.
145. Eik-Nes, N. L., "Using e-Mail Logbooks to Facilitate Scientific Publication," Proceedings, e-Technologtes in Engineering Education: Learning Outcomes Providing Future Possibilities, Davos, Switzerland, 11-16 August 2002, http://services.bepress.com/eci/etechnologies/.
146. Stark, C. M., and Schmidt, K. J., "Creating e-Learning: A Comparison of two Development Programs," Proceedings, e-Technologies in Engineering Education: Learning Outcomes Providing Future Possibilities, Davos, Switzerland, 11-16 August 2002, http://servtces.bepress.com/eci/etechnologies/.
147. Dutta, D., and Weilbut, V., "Team Teaching and Team Learning on a Global Scale: An Insider's Account of a Successful Experiment," Proceedings, 2002 Networked Learning Conference, Berlin, May 2002.
148. Leifer, L. J., "On the Nature of Design and an Environment for Design," in Rouse, V. B., and Boff, K. R., eds., System Design: Behavioral Perspectives on Designers, Tools, and Organizations, New York, N.Y.: North- Holland, 1987.
149. Cross, K. P., and Steadman, M. H., Classroom Research.' Implementing the Scholarship of Teaching, San Francisco, Cal.: Jossey-Bass, 1996.
150. Angelo, T., and Cross, P., Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers, San Francisco, Cal.: Jossey-Bass, 1993.
151. Atman, C. J., Chimka, J. R., Bursic, K. M., and Nachtman, H. L., "A Comparison of Freshman and Senior Engineering Design Processes," Design Studies, Vol.20, No.2, 1999, pp. 131-152.
152. Adams, R. S., and Atman, C. J., "Characterizing Engineering Student Design Processes: An Illustration of Iteration," Proceedings, ASEE Conference and Exhthition, 2000.
153. Atman, C. J., Adams, R. S., and Turns, J., "Using Multiple Methods to Evaluate a Freshmen Design Course," Proceedings, 2000 Frontiers in Education Conference, Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, 2000.
154. Turns, J., Atman, C. J., Cardella, M., and Adams, R. S., "Do We See Within-Subject Change? Four Cases of Engineering Student Design Processes," Proceedings, Common Ground Conference, London, England: Design Research Society, 2002.
155. Adams, R. S., Punnakanta, P., Atman, C. J., and Lewis, C., "Comparing Design Team SelfReports with Actual Performance: Cross-Validating Assessment Instruments," Proceedings, ASEE Conference and Exhthition, 2002.
156. Prados, J. W, "Can ABET Really make a Difference?" International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.20, No.3, 2004, pp. 315-317.
157. Volkwein, J. S., Lattuca, L. R., Terenzini, P. T., Strauss, L. C., and Sukhbaatar,J., "Engineering Change: A Study of the Impact of EC2000," International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.20, No.3, 2004, pp. 318-328.
158. Duffy, A. H. B., and Brazier, F. M. T., eds., Learning and Creativity in Design. Special Issue of Artflcial Intelligence for Engineering, Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, Vol.18, No.4, 2004.
159. Means, B., and Olson, K., "The Link Between Technology and, Authentic Learning." Educational Leadership, Vol.5, 1994, pp. 15-18.
160. Jensen, G. H., "Learning Styles," in Provost, J. A. and Anchors, S., eds., Applications of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator in Higher Education, Palo Alto, Cal.: Consulting Psychologist Press, 1987. pp. 181-206.
161. Felder, R. M., and Silverman, L. K., "Learning and Teaching Styles in Journal of Engineering Education," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.78, No.7, 1988, PP. 674-681.
162. Felder, R. M., Felder, G. N., and Dietz, E. J., "The Effects of Personality Type on Engineering Student Performance and Attitudes," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.91, No.1, 2002, pp. 3-17.
163. Chen, H. L., Goode, C. F., Iiyoshi, T., Mazow, C., and Stricker, A. G., "Exploring the Pedagogical Implications of Electronic Portfolios for Students, Faculty, and Institutions," Syllabus Conference, San Jose, Cal., 2003.
164. Ybarra, C., "Implications of Rapid Change In Educational Technology," Society for the Social Study of Science, Annual Meeting, Boston, Mass., November 2001.
165. Leifer, L., Chen, H., and Masow, C., "PBL-X: Next Generation Product-Based-Learning with Corporate Partners and Learning Portfolios," Proposal Submitted to the Wallenberg Global Learning Network, August 16, 2003 (Available from the first author).
166. Ens, O., and Leifer. L. J., "Facilitating Product Development Knowledge Acquisition: Interaction Between the Expert and the Team," International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.19, No.1, 2003. pp. 142-152.
167. Leifer, L. J.. Culpepper, W. J., Cannon, D., Ens, 0., Liang. T., Bell, D., Bier, E., and Pier, K., "Measuring the Performance of Online Distributed Team Innovation (Learning) Services," Proceedings of the e-Technologies in Engineering Education:'Learning Outcomes Providing Future Possibilities. Davos, Switzerland, August 11-16, 2002,.bepress.com/eci/ etechnologies/.
168. Olds, B. M.. "Effective Strategies to Assess the Impact of e- Learning," Proceedings of the e-Technologies in Engineering Education: Learning Outcomes Providing Future Possibilities, Davos, Switzerland, August 11-16, 2002, http://services.bepress.com/eci/etechnologies/.
169. Hargadon, A. B., "Technology Brokering and Innovation in a Product Development Firm," Administrative Science, Vol.42, 1997, pp. 716-734.
170. Hsi, S., and Agogino, A. M., "Scaffolding Knowledge Integration through Designing Multimedia Case Studies of Engineering Design," Proceedings, 1995 Frontiers in Education Conference, Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers.
171. Hsi, S., and Agogino, A. M., "The Impact and Instructional Benefit of Using MultimedIa Case Studies to Teach Engineering Design." Journal of Educational Hypermedia and Multimedia, Vol.3, Nos. 3 and 4, 1994, pp. 35 1-376.
172. Davis, D. C., Gentili, K. L., Trevisan, M. S., Christianson, R. K., and McCauley, J. F., "Measuring Learning Outcomes for Engineering Design Education," Proceedings, ASEE Conference and Exhthition, 2000.
173. Richkus, R., Agogino, A. M., Yu, D., and Tang, D., "Virtual Disk Drive Design Game with Links to Math, Physics and Dissection Activities," Proceedings, 1999 Frontiers in Education Conference, Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, pp. 12c3-18 to 12c3-22.
174. Dym, C. L.. Rossmann, J. S., and Sheppard, S. D., "On Designing Engineering Education: Lessons Learned at Mudd Design Workshop IV," International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.20, No.3, 2004. pp. 470-474.