Evaluation and rewards for faculty involved in engineering design education

International Journal of Engineering Education

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 333-340

  Todd, Robert H ^a   Magleby, Spencer P ^a  

^a Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENGINEERING FACULTIES; FACULTY EVALUATIONS; PUBLICATIONS; SCHOLARSHIPS;

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY; KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING; MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; PROBLEM SOLVING; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; TEACHING;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 3042654711     PISSN: 0949149X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Y. Neumann and E. Finaly-Neumann, The reward-support framework and faculty commitment to their university, Research in Higher Education, 31(1) (1990).
2. Restructuring Engineering Education: A Focus on Change, report of an NSF Workshop on Engineering Education, Division of Undergraduate Education, April 1995.
3. M. E. German et al., Transforming the engineering curriculum: Lessons learned from a summer at Boeing, International Journal of Engineering Education, 90(1) (2001) pp. 143-150.
4. P. J. Gray, R. C. Froh and R. M. Diamond, A national study of research universities on the balance between research and undergraduate teaching, Center for Instructional Development, Syracuse University, May 1992. The authors summarized this report in Myths and realities, AAHE Bulletin, 44(4) (1991) p. 4.
5. R. M. Felder, R. Brent, T. K. Miller, C. Brawner and R. H. Allen, Faculty teaching practices and perceptions of institutional attitutes toward teaching at eight engineering schools, Proceedings of the 1999 Frontiers in Education Conference, ASEE/IEEE, Phoenix, AZ, November 1998.
6. S. A. Bjorklund and C. L. Colbeck, The view from the top: Leaders' perspectives on a decade of change in engineering education, International Journal of Engineering Education, 90(1) (2001) pp. 13-20.
7. B. Seely, The other re-engineering of engineering education, 1900-1965, International Journal of Engineering Education, 88(3) (1999) pp. 285-294.
8. J. F. Blumrich, Science, 168 (1970) pp. 1551-1554.
9. G. Dieter, Engineering Design, McGraw-Hill, New York (2000).
10. G. L. Glegg, The Design of Design, Cambridge University Press, New York (1969).
11. E. Boyer, Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate, Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Princeton, NJ (1990).
12. J. W. Prados and S. I. Proctor, What will it take to reform engineering education?, Chemical Engineering Progress, 96(3) (2000) p. 91.
13. R. H. Todd, C. D. Sorensen and S. P. Magleby, Designing a senior capstone course to satisfy industrial customers, International Journal of Engineering Education, 82(2) (1993).
14. J. A. Lee, D. M. Castella and S. G. Middleton, Faculty perceptions of academe's evaluation system, International Journal of Engineering Education, July (1997).
15. N. Kannankutty, R. Morgan and R. Strickland, University-based engineering research in the United States, International Journal of Engineering Education, April (1999).
16. J. Shen, Mission involvement and promotion criteria in schools, colleges, and departments of education, American Journal of Education, 105 (1997).