Intentions in and relations among design drawings

Design Studies

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 483-503

  Do, Ellen Yi Luen ^a   Gross, Mark D ^a   Neiman, Bennett ^b   Zimring, Craig ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^c GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; DRAWING (GRAPHICS); PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT;

DESIGN DRAWINGS;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 0034272722     PISSN: 0142694X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0142-694X(00)00020-X     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Larkin J.L., Simon H.A. Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science Journal. 11:1987;65-99.
2. Candrasekaran N., Narayanan H., Iwasaki Y. Reasoning with diagrammatic representations. AI Magazine. 14(2):1993;49-56.
3. Blackwell, A F 'Diagrams about thoughts about thoughts about diagrams', in M Anderson (ed.) Reasoning with diagrammatic representations II: AAAI 1997 Fall Symposium, AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA (1997) pp 77-84.
4. Goodman, N Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols, Oxford University Press, London (1969).
5. Bertin, J Graphics and Graphic Information Processing, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin (1981).
6. Ittelson W.H. Visual perception of markings. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 3:1996;171-187.
7. Fish, J C How Sketches Work - A Cognitive Theory for Improved System Design (PhD dissertation), Loughborough University of Technology (1996).
8. Suwa, M and Tversky, B 'What architects and students see in architectural design sketches: a protocol analysis', in 1st International Symposium on Descriptive Models of Design Istanbul, Turkey (1996).
9. Van Sommers, P Drawing and Cognition - Descriptive and Experimental Studies of Graphic Production Processes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1984).
10. Goel, V Sketches of Thought, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1995).
11. Schon D.A. Designing: rules, types and worlds. Design Studies. 9(3):1988;181-219.
12. Schön, D A The Design Studio, RIBA Publications, London (1985).
13. Schön D.A., Wiggins G. Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing. Design Studies. 13(2):1992;135-156.
14. Goldschmidt G. Problem representation versus domain of solution in architectural design teaching. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research. 6(3):1989;204-215.
15. Goldschmidt G. The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Research Journal. 4(2):1991;123-143.
16. Ullman D.G., Wood S., Craig D. The importance of drawing in the mechanical design process. Computer Graphics. 14(2):1990;263-274.
17. Hewitt M. Representational forms and modes of conception: an approach to the history of architectural drawing. JAE. 39(2):1985;2-9.
18. Akin O., Lin C. Design protocol data and novel design decisions. Design Studies. 16(2):1995;211-236.
19. Ericsson, K A and Simon, H A Protocol Analysis, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1984).
20. Cross, N, Christiaans, H and Dorst, K (eds) Analyzing Design Activity, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1996).
21. Dorst, K and Cross, N 'Protocol analysis as a research technique for analysing design activity', in Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Vol 2 No DE-83 (1995) pp 563-570.
22. Schooler J.W., Engstler-Schooler T.Y. Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: some things are better left unsaid. Cognitive Psychology. 22:1990;36-71.
23. Wilson T.D. The proper protocol: validity and completeness of verbal reports. Psychological Science: a journal of the American Psychological Societ. APS. 5(5):1994;249-252.
24. Galle P., Kovács L.B. Introspective observations of sketch design. Design Studies. 13(3):1992;229-272.
25. Porter W. Notes on the inner logic of designing: two thought-experiments. Design Studies. 9(3):1988;169-180.
26. Do, E Y-L 'What's in a diagram that a computer should understand', in M Tan and R The (eds) CAAD Futures '95: The Global Design Studio, Sixth International Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Futures, National University of Singapore, Singapore (1995) pp 469-482.
27. Do, E Y-L and Gross, M D 'Inferring design intention from sketches - an investigation of freehand drawing conventions in design', in Y L Liu and J Y Tsou (eds) CAADRIA, Computer Aided Design Research in Asia 97, Hu's Publishing, Taipei (1997) pp 211-221.
28. Do, E Y-L The Right Tool at the Right Time - Investigation of Freehand Drawing as an Interface to Knowledge Based Design Tools (PhD dissertation), Georgia Institute of Technology (1998).
29. Archea, J 'Puzzle making: what architects do when no one is looking', in Y Kalay (ed.) Computability of Design, Wiley Interscience, New York (1987).
30. Wang M Ways of Arrangement: The Basic Operations of Form-making (PhD dissertation) Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1987).
31. Graves M. The necessity for drawing: tangible speculation. Architectural Design. 6(77):1977;384-394.