Rank ordering engineering designs: Pairwise comparison charts and Borda counts

Research in Engineering Design

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 236-242

  Dym, Clive L ^a   Wood, William H ^b   Scott, Michael J ^c  

^a HARVEY MUDD COLLEGE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY   (United States)

^c 1120 Science and Engineering Offices   (United States)

Author keywords

Arrow's theorem; Design decisions; Pairwise comparisons; Ranking alternatives; Social choice

Indexed keywords

CALCULATIONS; DECISION THEORY; SOCIAL ASPECTS; THEOREM PROVING;

BORDA COUNT; PAIRWISE COMPARISON CHARTS; RANKING ALTERNATIVES;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 0036763046     PISSN: 09349839     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00163-002-0019-8     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Arrow KJ (1951) Social choice and individual values, 1st edn. Wiley, New York.
2. Dym CL Little P (1999) Engineering design: a project-based introduction. Wiley, New York
3. Hazelrigg GH (1996) Systems engineering: an approach to information-based design. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey
4. Pahl G, Beitz W (1996) Engineering design: a systematic approach. Springer, London
5. Pugh S (1990) Total design: integrated methods for successful product engineering. Addison-Wesley, Wokingham, UK
6. Saari DG (1995) Basic geometry of voting. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
7. Saari DG (2001) Decisions and elections: explaining the unexpected. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
8. Scott MJ, Antonsson EK (1999) Arrow's theorem and engineering decision making. Res Eng Des 11:218-228
9. Simon HA (1996) The sciences of the artificial, 3rd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass
10. Ulrich KT, Eppinger SD (2000) Product design and development, 2nd edn. Irwin McGraw-Hill, Boston
11. Zangemeister C (1970) Nutzwertanalyse in der Systemtechnikl; eine Methodik zurmultidimensionalen Bewertung und Auswahl vonProjektalternativen. Verlagskommission Wittemannsche Buchhandlung, Munich