Seq-gen: An application for the monte carlo simulation of dna sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees

Bioinformatics

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 235-238

  Rambaut, Andrew ^a   Grassly, Nicholas C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DNA SEQUENCE; EVOLUTION; MODEL; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYSTEM ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; BASE SEQUENCE; DNA; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; MODELS, GENETIC; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PHYLOGENY; SOFTWARE;

EID: 0030928378     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/13.3.235     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Adachi.J. and Hasegawa.M. (1996) Programs for Molecular Phylogenelics Based on Maximum Likelihood (MOLPHY). Version 2.3. The Institute of
2. Statistical Mathematics, Tokyo. Adell.J.C. and Dopazo.J. (1994) Monte Carlo simulation in phylogenies: An application to test the constancy of evolutionary rates. J. Mol. Evoi, 38, 305-309.
3. Bull.J.J., Cunningham.C.W., Molineux, I.J., Badgett, M.R. and Hillis, D.M. (1993) Experimental evolution of bacteriophage T7. Evolution, 47, 993-1007.
4. Felsenstein.J. (1981) Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol., 17, 368-376.
5. Felsenstein, J. (1993) Phytogeny Inference Package (PHYUP). Version 3.5. Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle.
6. Felsenstein.J. and Churchill.G. (1996) A hidden markov model approach to variation among sites in rate of evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol., 13,93-104.
7. Garland.T.J., Dickerman.A.W., Janis.C.M. and Jones.J.A. (1993) Phylogenetic analysis of covariance by computer simulation. Syst. Biol., 42, 265-292.
8. Gaut.B.S. and Lewis, P.O. (1995) Success of maximum likelihood phytogeny inference in the four-taxon case. Mol. Biol. Evol., 12, 152-162.
9. Goldman, N. (1993a) Simple diagnostic statistical tests of models for DNA substitution. J. Mol. Evol., 37, 650-661.
10. Goldman.N. (1993b) Statistical tests of models of DNA substitution. J. Mol. Evol., 36, 182-198.
11. Hasegawa.M., Kishino.H. and Yano.T. (1985) Dating the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol., 22, 160-174.
12. Hillis.D.M. (1995) Approaches for assessing phylogenetic accuracy. Syst. Biol., 44, 3-16.
13. Hillis.D.M., Bull.J.J., White.M.E., Badgett.M.R. and Molineux.I.J. (1992) Experimental phylogenetics: Generation of a known phylogeny. Science, 255, 589-592.
14. Hillis.D.M., Mable.B.K. and Moritz.C. (1996) Applications of molecular systematics: the state of the field and a look to the future. In Hillis.D.M., Montz.C. and Mable.B.K. (eds.). Molecular Systematics, Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland.
15. Huelsenbeck.J.P. (1995) Performance of phylogenetic methods in simulation. Syst. Biol., 44, 17-48.
16. Huelsenbeck.J.P., Hilhs.D.M. and Jones.R. (1995) Parametric bootstrapping in molecular phylogenetics: Applications and performance. In FerrarisJ. and Palumbi.S. (eds). Molecular Zoology: Strategies and Protocols, Wiley, New York.
17. Jukes.T.H. and Cantor.C.R. (1969) Evolution of protein molecules. In Munro.H.N. (ed.) Mammalian Protein Metabolism, Academic Press, New York, pp. 21-123.
18. Kimura.M. (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol., 16, 111-120.
19. Olsen.G.J., Matsuda.H., Hagstrom.R. and Overbeek.R. (1994) fastDNAml: A tool for construction of phylogenetic trees of DNA sequences using maximum likelihood. Comput. Applic. Biosci., 10, 41-48.
20. Rambaut, A., Grassly.N.C, Nee.S. and Harvey.P.H. (1996) Bi-De: An application for simulating phylogenetic processes. Comput. Applic. Biosci., in press.
21. Schoniger.M. and von Haeseler.A. (1995) Simulating efficiently the evolution of DNA sequences. Comput. Applic. Biosci., 11, 111-115.
22. Swofford, D.L. (1993) Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (PAUP), Version 3.1.1. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign.
23. Tateno.Y., Takezaki.N. and Nei.M. (1994) Relative efficiencies of the maximum-likelihood, neighbor-joining, and maximum-parsimony method when substitution rate varies with site. Mol. Biol. Evol., 11, 261-277.
24. Thorne, J.L., Kishino, H. and Felsenstein, J. (1992) Inching toward reality: An improved likelihood model of sequence evolution. J. Mol. Evol., 34, 3-16.
25. Yang.Z. (1993) Maximum-likelihood estimation of phytogeny from DNA sequences when substitution rates differ over sites. Mol. Biol. Evol., 10, 1396-1401.
26. Yang.Z. (1994) Estimating the pattern of nucleotide substitution. J. Mol. Evol., 39, 105-111.
27. Yang, Z. (1995) Phylogenetic Analysis by Maximum Likelihood (PAML), Version 1.1. Institute of Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. The Pennsylvania State University.
28. Yang.Z. (1996) Among-site rate variation and its impact on phylogenetic analyses. Jr. Ecol. Evol., 11, 367-372.