Improved consensus network techniques for genome-scale phylogeny

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 848-855

  Holland, Barbara R ^a   Jermiin, Lars S ^b,c   Moulton, Vincent ^d  

^a MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c INSTITUT PASTEUR   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Consensus networks; Gene trees; Genome scale phylogeny

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; ERROR; GENETIC DISTANCE; GENOME; GYMNOSPERM; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MULTIGENE FAMILY; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENETIC TREE CONSTRUCTION METHOD; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TAXONOMIC IDENTIFICATION; VERTEBRATE; YEAST; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; FUNGUS; GENETICS; GENOMICS; METHODOLOGY; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PLANT; PROBABILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

GYMNOSPERMAE; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; VERTEBRATA;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FUNGI; GENOME; GENOMICS; GYMNOSPERMS; MARKOV CHAINS; MODELS, GENETIC; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PHYLOGENY; PLANTS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; VERTEBRATES;

EID: 33646584166     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msj061     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Bandelt, H.-J. 1995. Combination of data in phylogenetic analysis. Plant Syst. Evol. Suppl. 9:355-361.
2. Baroni, M., C. Semple, and M. Steel. 2004. A framework for representing reticulate evolution. Ann. Comb. 8:391-408.
3. Buckley, T. R. 2002. Model misspecification and probabilistic tests of topology: evidence from empirical data sets. Syst. Biol. 51:509-523.
4. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791.
5. Goremykin, V. V., K. I. Hirsch-Ernst, S. Wölfl, and F. H. Hellwig. 2003. Analysis of the Amborella trichopoda chloroplast genome sequence suggests that Amborella is not a basal angiosperm. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20:1499-1505.
6. _. 2004. The chloroplast genome of Nymphaea alba: whole-genome analyses and the problem of identifying the most basal angiosperm. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:1445-1454.
7. Goremykin, V. V., B. Holland, K. I. Hirsch-Ernst, and F. H. Hellwig. 2005. Analysis of Acorus calamus chloroplast genome and its phylogenetic implications. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22:1813-1822.
8. Hardy, M. P., C. M. Owczarek, L. S. Jermiin, M. Ejdebäck, and P. J. Hertzog. 2004. Characterization of the type I interferon locus and identification of novel genes. Genomics 84:331-345.
9. Hillis, D. M., J. P. Huelsenbeck, and D. L. Swofford. 1994. Hobgoblin of phylogenetics? Nature 369:363-364.
10. Ho, S. Y. W., and L. S. Jermiin. 2004. Tracing the decay of the historical signal in biological sequence data. Syst. Biol. 53:623-637.
11. Holland, B. R., F. Delsuc, and V. Moulton. 2005. Visualising conflicting evolutionary hypotheses in large collections of trees: using consensus networks to study the origins of placentals and hexapods. Syst. Biol. 54:66-76.
12. Holland, B. R., K. T. Huber, V. Moulton, and P. J. Lockhart. 2004. Using consensus networks to visualize contradictory evidence for species phylogeny. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:1459-1461.
13. Holland, B., and V. Moulton. 2003. Consensus networks: a method for visualising incompatibilities in collections of trees. Pp. 165-176 in G. Benson and R. Page, eds. Algorithms in bioinformatics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
14. Huber, K. T., M. Langton, D. Penny, V. Moulton, and M. Hendy. 2002. Spectronet: a package for computing spectra and median networks. Appl. Bioinform. 1:159-161.
15. Huelsenbeck, J. P., B. Larget, R. E. Miller, and F. Ronquist. 2002. Potential applications and pitfalls of Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 51:673-688.
16. Huson, D. H., and D. Bryant. 2005. Estimating phylogenetic trees and networks using SplitsTree4. (http://www.splitstree.org).
17. Huson, D. H., T. Dezulian, T. Kloepper, and M. Steel. 2004. Phylogenetic super-networks from partial trees. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 1:151-158.
18. Jermiin, L. S., S. Y. W. Ho, F. Ababneh, J. Robinson, and A. W. D. Larkum. 2004. The biasing effect of compositional heterogeneity on phylogenetic estimates may be underestimated. Syst. Biol. 53:637-643.
19. Jermiin, L. S., G. J. Olsen, K. L. Mengersen, and S. Easteal. 1997. Majority-rule consensus of phylogenetic trees obtained by maximum-likelihood analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:1296-1302.
20. Jones, D. T, W. R. Taylor, and J. M. Thornton. 1992. The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 8:275-282.
21. Kishino, H., and M. Hasegawa. 1989. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea. J. Mol. Evol. 29:170-179.
22. Kishino, H., T. Miyata, and M. Hasegawa. 1990. Maximum likelihood inference of protein phylogeny and the origin of chloroplasts. J. Mol. Evol. 30:151-160.
23. Morrison, D. 2005. Networks in phylogenetic analysis: new tools for population biology. Int. J. Parasitol. 35:567-582.
24. Pagel, M., and A. Meade. 2004. A phylogenetic mixture model for detecting pattern-heterogeneity in gene sequence or characterstate data. Syst. Biol. 53:571-581.
25. Phillips, M. J., F. Delsuc, and D. Penny. 2004. Genome-scale phylogeny and the detection of systematic biases. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:1455-1458.
26. Poladian, L., and L. S. Jermiin. 2006. Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms and phylogenetic inference with multiple data sets. Soft Comput. 10:359-368.
27. Posada, D., and K. A. Crandall. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817-818.
28. Rokas, A., B. L. Williams, N. King, and S. B. Carroll. 2003. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature 425:798-803.
29. Schmidt, H. A., K. Strimmer, M. Vingron, and A. von Haeseler. 2002. TREE-PUZZLE: maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis using quartets and parallel computing. Bioinformatics 18:502-504.
30. Seo, T.-K., H. Kishino, and J. L. Thorne. 2005. Incorporating gene-specific variation when inferring and evaluating optimal evolutionary tree topologies from multilocus sequence data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:4436-4441.
31. Shimodaira, H., and M. Hasegawa. 1999. Multiple comparison of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:1114-1116.
32. Stefanovic, S., D. W. Rice, and J. D. Palmer. 2004. Long branch attraction, taxon sampling, and the earliest angiosperms: Amborella or monocots? BMC Evol. Biol. 4:35.
33. Strimmer, K., and A. Rambaut. 2002. Inferring confidence sets of possibly misspecified gene trees. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269:137-142.
34. Swofford, D. L. 2002. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.