How should species phylogenies be inferred from sequence data?

Systematic Biology

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 814-825

  Slowinski, Joseph B ^a   Page, Roderic D M ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; PHYLOGENY; SNAKE; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; PHYLOGENY; SNAKES; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0033278654     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/106351599260030     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. ASSALI, N. E., R. MACHE, AND S. L. DE GOER. 1990. Evidence for a composite phylogenetic origin of the plastid genome of the brown alga Pylaiella littoralis (L.). Kjellm. Plant Mol. Biol. 15:307-315.
2. AVISE, J. C., J. F. SHAPIRO, S. W. DANIEL, C. F. AQUADRO, AND R. A. LANSMAN. 1983. Mitochondrial DNA differentiation during the speciation process in Peromyscus. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1:38-56.
3. BAUM, B. R. 1992. Combining trees as a way of combining data sets for phylogenetic inference, and the desirability of combining gene trees. Taxon 41:3-10.
4. BULL, J. J., J. P. HUELSENBECK, C. W. CUNNINGHAM, D. L. SWOFFORD, AND P. J. WADDELL. 1993. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42:384-397.
5. CHARLESTON, M. A. 1998. Jungles: A new solution to the host/parasite phylogeny reconciliation problem. Math. Biosci. 149:191-223.
6. DE QUEIROZ, A. 1993. For consensus (sometimes). Syst. Biol. 42:368-372.
7. DOYLE, J. J. 1992. Gene trees and species trees: Molecular systematics as one-character taxonomy. Syst. Bot. 17:144-163.
8. DOYLE, J. J. 1995. The irrelevance of allele tree topologies for species delimitation, and a nontopological alternative. Syst. Bot. 20:574-588.
9. DOYLE, J. J. 1997. Trees within trees: Genes and species, molecules and morphology. Syst. Biol. 46:537-553.
10. DURET, L., D. MOUCHIROUD, AND M. GOUY. 1994. HOVERGEN: A database of homologous vertebrate genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:2360-2365.
11. DYKHUIZEN, D. E., AND L. GREEN. 1991. Recombination in Escherichia coli and the definition of biological species. J. Bacteriol. 173:7257-7268.
12. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1978. Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27:401-410.
13. GIBBS, A. J., AND P. K. KEESE. 1995. In search of origins of viral genes. Pages 76-91 in Molecular basis of virus evolution (A. J. Gibbs, C. H. Callisher, and F. Garcia-Arenal, eds.). Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK.
14. GOODMAN, M., J. CZELUSNIAK, G. W. MOORE, A. E. ROMERO-HERRERA, AND G. MATSUDA. 1979. Fitting the gene lineage into its species lineage, a parsimony strategy illustrated by cladograms constructed from globin sequences. Syst. Zool. 28:132-163.
15. GUIGO, R., I. MUCHNIK, AND T. F. SMITH. 1996. Reconstruction of ancient molecular phytogeny. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 6:189-213.
16. HUELSENBECK, J. P., J. J. BULL, AND C. W. CUNNINGHAM. 1996. Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:152-158.
17. KLUGE, A. G. 1989. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Syst. Zool. 38:7-25.
18. KLUGE, A. G., AND A. J. WOLF. 1993. Cladistics: What's in a word. Cladistics 9:183-199.
19. LAWRENCE, J. G., AND H. OCHMAN. 1998. Molecular archaeology of the Escherichia coli genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:9413-9417.
20. MADDISON, W. P. 1996. Molecular approaches and the growth of phylogenetic biology. Pages 47-63 in Molecular zoology: Advances, strategies, and protocols (J. D. Ferraris and S. R. Palumbi, eds.). Wiley-Liss, New York.
21. MADDISON, W. P. 1997. Gene trees in species trees. Syst. Biol. 46:523-536.
22. MIRKIN, B., I. MUCHNIK, AND T. F. SMITH. 1995. A biologically consistent model for comparing molecular phytogenies. J. Comp. Biol. 2:493-507.
23. MIYAMOTO, M. M., AND J. CRACRAFT. 1991. Phylogenetic inference, DNA sequence analysis, and the future of molecular systematics. Pages 3-17 in Phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequences (M. M. Miyamoto and J. Cracraft, eds.). Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
24. MIYAMOTO, M. M., AND W. M. FITCH. 1995. Testing species phytogenies and phylogenetic methods with congruence. Syst. Biol. 44:64-76.
25. NIXON, K. C., AND J. M. CARPENTER. 1996. On simultaneous analysis. Cladistics 12:221-241.
26. PAGE, R. D. M. 1993a. Genes, organisms, and areas: The problem of multiple lineages. Syst. Biol. 42: 77-84.
27. PAGE, R. D. M. 1993b. COMPONENT, version 2.0. The Natural History Museum, London.
28. PAGE, R. D. M. 1994a. Maps between trees and cladistic analysis of historical associations among genes, organisms, and areas. Syst. Biol. 43:58-77.
29. PAGE, R. D. M. 1994b. Parallel phytogenies: Reconstructing the history of host-parasite assemblages. Cladistics 10:155-173.
30. PAGE, R. D. M. 1996. On consensus, confidence, and "total evidence." Cladistics 12:83-92.
31. PAGE, R. D. M. 1998. GeneTree: Comparing gene and species phylogenies using reconciled trees. Bioinformatics 14:819-820.
32. PAGE, R. D. M., AND M. A. CHARLESTON. 1997a. From gene to organismal phylogeny: Reconciled trees and the gene tree/species tree problem. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 7:231-240.
33. PAGE, R. D. M., AND M. A. CHARLESTON. 1997b. Reconciled trees and incongruent gene and species trees. Pages 57-70 in Mathematical hierarchies in biology, volume 37 (B. Mirkin, F. R. McMorris, F. S. Roberts, and A. Rzhetsky, eds.). American Mathematical Society.
34. PAMILO, P., AND M. NEI. 1988. Relationships between gene trees and species trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5:568-583.
35. PENNY, D., L. R. FOULDS, AND M. D. HENDY. 1982. Testing the theory of evolution by comparing phylogenetic trees constructed from five different protein sequences. Nature 297:197-200.
36. RAGAN, M. A. 1992. Phylogenetic inference based on matrix representation of trees. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1:53-58.
37. RODRIGO, A. G. 1993. A comment on Baum's method for combining phylogenetic trees. Taxon 42:631-636.
38. SANDERSON, M. J., A. PURVIS, AND C. HENZE. 1998. Phylogenetic supertrees: Assembling the trees of life. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13:105-109.
39. SAWYER, S. 1989. Statistical tests for detecting gene conversion. Mol. Biol. Evol. 6:526-538.
40. SIDDALL, M. E. 1997. Prior agreement: Arbitration or arbitrary. Syst. Biol. 46:765-769.
41. SLOWINSKI, J. B. 1993. "Unordered" versus "ordered" characters. Syst. Biol. 42:155-165.
42. SLOWINSKI, J. B., AND C. GUYER. 1989. Testing the stochasticity of patterns of organismal diversity: An improved null model. Am. Nat. 134:907-921.
43. SLOWINSKI, J. B., A. KNIGHT, AND A. P. ROONEY. 1997. Inferring species trees from gene trees: A phylogenetic analysis of the Elapidae (Serpentes) based on the amino acid sequences of venom proteins. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 8:349-362.
44. STEPHENS, J. C. 1985. Statistical methods of DNA sequence analysis: Detection of intragenic recombination or gene conversion. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2:539-556.
45. SWOFFORD, D. L., G. J. OLSEN, P. J. WADDELL, AND D. M. HILLIS. 1996. Phylogeny inference. Pages 407-514 in Molecular systematics, 2nd edition (D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz, and B. K. Mable, eds.). Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
46. TAKAHATA, N. 1989. Gene genealogy in three related populations: Consistency probability between gene and population trees. Genetics 122:957-966.
47. WEILLER, G. F. 1998. Phylogenetic profiles: A graphical method for detecting genetic recombinations in homologous sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:326-335.
48. WU, C.-I. 1991. Inferences of species phylogeny in relation to segregation of ancient polymorphisms. Genetics 127:429-435.