An assessment of accuracy, error, and conflict with support values from genome-scale phylogenetic data

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 21, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 1534-1537

  Taylor, Derek J ^a   Piel, William H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian phylogenetic inference; Bootstrap; Incongruence; Yeast genome

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; DATA ANALYSIS; FUNGAL GENE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOME; MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY; NONHUMAN; PROBABILITY; RELIABILITY; WILCOXON SIGNED RANKS TEST; YEAST;

MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; YEASTS;

EID: 3242795999     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msh156     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Alfaro, M. E., S. Zoller, and F. Lutzoni. 2003. Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20:255-266.
2. Daubin, V., N. A. Moran, and H. Ochman. 2003. Phylogenetics and the cohesion of bacterial genomes. Science 301:829-832.
3. Douady, C. J., F. Delsuc, Y. Boucher, W. F. Doolittle, and E. J. P. Douzery. 2003. Comparison of Bayesian and maximum likelihood bootstrap measures of phylogenetic reliability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20:248-254.
4. Erixon, P., B. Svennblad, T. Britton, and B. Oxelman. 2003. Reliability of Bayesian posterior probabilities and bootstrap frequencies in phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 52:664-673.
5. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791.
6. Gee, H. 2003. Ending incongruence. Nature 425:782.
7. Hillis, D. M., and J. J. Bull. 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42:182-192.
8. Huelsenbeck, J. P., and F. Ronquist. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754-755.
9. Minin, V., Z. Abdo, P. Joyce, and J. Sullivan. 2003. Performance-based selection of likelihood models for phylogeny estimation. Syst. Biol. 52:674-683.
10. Phillips, M. J., F. Delsuc, and D. Penny. 2004. Genome-scale phylogeny and the detection of systematic biases. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21: (in press).
11. Posada, D., and K. A. Crandall. 1998. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817-818.
12. Rokas, A., B. L. Williams, N. King, and S. B. Carroll. 2003. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature 425:798-804.
13. Sanderson, M. J., and H. B. Shaffer. 2002. Troubleshooting in molecular phylogenetic analysis. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33:49-72.
14. Simmons, M. P., K. M. Pickett, and M. Miya. 2004. How meaningful are Bayesian support values? Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:188-199.
15. Soltis, P. S., and D. E. Soltis. 2003. Applying the bootstrap in phylogeny reconstruction. Stat. Sci. 18:256-267.
16. Suzuki, Y., G. V. Glazko, and M. Nei. 2002. Overcredibility of molecular phylogenies obtained by Bayesian phylogenetics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:16138-16143.
17. Whelan, S., and N. Goldman. 2001. A general empirical model of protein evolution derived from multiple protein families using a maximum-likelihood approach. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:691-699.
18. Wilcox, T. P., D. J. Zwickl, T. A. Heath, and D. M. Hillis. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships of the dwarf boas and a comparison of Bayesian and bootstrap measures of phylogenetic support. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 25:361-371.