The shapes of neutral gene genealogies in two species: Probabilities of monophyly, paraphyly, and polyphyly in a coalescent model

Evolution

Volumn 57, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 1465-1477

  Rosenberg, Noah A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Coalescence; Gene tree; Labeled histories; Population divergence; Speciation; Yule model

Indexed keywords

COALESCENCE; DIVERGENCE; EVOLUTION; GENEALOGY; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

EID: 0042697667     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00355.x     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Aldous, D. J. 2001. Stochastic models and descriptive statistics for phylogenetic trees, from Yule to today. Stat. Sci. 16:23-34.
2. Arbogast, B. S., S. V. Edwards, J. Wakeley, P. Beerli, and J. B.Slowinski. 2002. Estimating divergence times from molecular data on phylogenetic and population genetic timescales. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33:707-740.
3. Brown, J. K. M. 1994. Probabilities of evolutionary trees. Syst. Biol. 43:78-91.
4. Clark, A. 1997. Neutral behavior of shared polymorphism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:7730-7734.
5. Edwards, A. W. F. 1970. Estimation of the branch points of a branching diffusion process. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 32:155-174.
6. Gould, H. W. 1972. Combinatorial identities. Rev. ed. Gould Publications, Morgantown, WV.
7. Griffiths, R. C. 1984. Asymptotic line-of-descent distributions. J. Math. Biol. 21:67-75.
8. Griffiths, R. C., and S. Tavaré. 2003. The genealogy of a neutral mutation. In P. Green, N. Hjort, and S. Richardson, eds. Highly structured stochastic systems. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K. In press.
9. Harcourt-Brown, K. G., P. N. Pearson, and M. Wilkinson. 2001. The imbalance of paleontological trees. Paleobiology 27:188-204.
10. Harding, E. F. 1971. The probabilities of rooted tree-shapes generated by random bifurcation. Adv. Appl. Prob. 3:44-77.
11. Hey, J. 1991. The structure of genealogies and the distribution of fixed differences between DNA sequence samples from natural populations. Genetics 128:831-840.
12. _. 1994. Bridging phylogenetics and population genetics with gene tree models. Pp. 435-449 in B. Schierwater, B. Streit, G. P. Wagner, and R. DeSalle, eds. Molecular ecology and evolution: approaches and applications. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel.
13. Hudson, R. R., and J. A. Coyne. 2002. Mathematical consequences of the genealogical species concept. Evolution 56:1557-1565.
14. Ioerger, T. R., A. G. Clark, and T.-H. Kao. 1990. Polymorphism at the self-incompatibility locus in Solanaceae predates speciation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:9732-9735.
15. Kreitman, M. 2000. Methods to detect selection in populations with applications to the human. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 1:539-559.
16. Maddison, W. P., and M. Slatkin. 1991. Null models for the number of evolutionary steps in a character on a phylogenetic tree. Evolution 45:1184-1197.
17. Mooers, A. O., and S. B. Heard. 1997. Evolutionary process from phylogenetic tree shape. Q. Rev. Biol. 72:31-54.
18. Moore, W. S. 1995. Inferring phylogenies from mtDNA variation: mitochondrial-gene trees versus nuclear-gene trees. Evolution 49:718-726.
19. Neigel, J. E., and J. C. Avise. 1986. Phylogenetic relationships of mitochondrial DNA under various demographic models of speciation. Pp. 515-534 in S. Karlin and E. Nevo, eds. Evolutionary processes and Theory. Academic Press, New York.
20. Nordborg, M. 1998. On the probability of Neanderthal ancestry. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 63:1237-1240.
21. _. 2001. Coalescent theory. Pp. 179-212 in D. J. Balding, C. Cannings, and M. Bishop, eds. Handbook of statistical genetics. Wiley, Chichester, U.K.
22. Palumbi, S. R., F. Cipriano., and M. P. Hare. 2001. Predicting nuclear gene coalescence from mitochondrial data: the three-times rule. Evolution 55:859-868.
23. Rosenberg, N. A. 2002. The probability of topological concordance of gene trees and species trees. Theor. Popul. Biol. 61:225-247.
24. Sanderson, M. J. 1996. How many taxa must be sampled to identify the root node of a large clade? Syst. Biol. 45:168-173.
25. Saunders, I. W., S. Tavaré, and G. A. Watterson. 1984. On the genealogy of nested subsamples from a haploid population. Adv. Appl. Prob. 16:471-491.
26. Slowinski, J. B., and C. Guyer. 1989. Testing the stochasticity of patterns of organismal diversity: An improved null model. Am. Nat. 134:907-921.
27. Steel, M., and A. McKenzie. 2001. Properties of phylogenetic trees generated by Yule-type speciation models. Math. Biosci. 170:91-112.
28. Tajima, F. 1983. Evolutionary relationship of DNA sequences in finite populations. Genetics 105:437-460.
29. Takahata, N. 1989. Gene genealogy in three related populations: consistency probability between gene and population trees. Genetics 122:957-966.
30. Takahata, N., and M. Nei. 1985. Gene genealogy and variance of interpopulational nucleotide differences. Genetics 110:325-344.
31. _. 1990. Allelic genealogy under overdominant and frequency dependent selection and polymorphism of major histocompatibility complex loci. Genetics 124:967-978.
32. Takahata, N., and M. Slatkin. 1990. Genealogy of neutral genes in two partially isolated populations. Theor. Popul. Biol. 38:331-350.
33. Tavaré, S. 1984. Line-of-descent and genealogical processes, and their applications in population genetics models. Theor. Popul. Biol. 26:119-164.
34. Teshima, K. M., and F. Tajima. 2002. The effect of migration during the divergence. Theor. Popul. Biol. 62:81-95.
35. Ting, C.-T., S.-C. Tsaur, and C.-I. Wu. 2000. The phylogeny of closely related species as revealed by the genealogy of a speciation gene, Odysseus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:5313-5316.
36. Wakeley, J. 2000. The effects of subdivision on the genetic divergence of populations and species. Evolution 54:1092-1101.
37. Wakeley, J., and J. Hey. 1997. Estimating ancestral population parameters. Genetics 145:847-855.
38. Wang, R.-L., A. Stec., J. Hey., L. Lukens., and J. Doebley. 1999. The limits of selection during maize domestication. Nature 398:236-239.
39. Yule, G. U. 1924. A mathematical theory of evolution based on the conclusions of Dr. J. C. Willis, F. R. S. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 213:21-87.