Resisting unlearning: Understanding science education's response to the United States's national accountability movement

Review of Research in Education

Volumn 31, Issue , 2007, Pages 45-77

  Southerland, Sherry A ^a   Smith, Leigh K ^b   Sowell, Scott P ^c   Kittleson, Julie M ^d  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247197745     PISSN: 0091732X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0091732X06299015     Document Type: Article

References (207)

1. Abd-El Khalick, F. (2001). Embedding nature of science instruction in preservice elementary science courses: Abandoning scientism, but... Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12(3), 215-233.
2. Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665-701.
3. Abell, S. K., & Bryan, L. A. (1997). Reconceptualizing the elementary science methods course using a reflection orientation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 8(3), 153-166.
4. Abell, S. K., & Roth, M. (1992). Constraints to teaching elementary science: A case study of a science enthusiast student teacher. Science Education, 76(6), 581-595.
5. Abell, S. K., & Smith, D. C. (1994). What is science? Preservice elementary teachers' conceptions of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 16(4), 475-487.
6. Abrams, E., Southerland, S. A., & Silva, P. (Eds.). (2007). Inquiry in the classrooms: Challenges and opportunities. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
7. Adams, B. A. J., Undreiu, A., & Cobern, W. W. (2006). The presence of inquiry in science education: What do we know?. . . and what don't we know yet? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching San Francisco, CA.
8. Aikenhead, G. S. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27, 1-52.
9. Aikenhead, G., Ryan, A., & Fleming, R. (1989). Views on science-technology-society (from CDN.mc.5). Saskatoon, Canada: Department of Curriculum Studies, University of Saskatchewan.
10. Alexopoulou, E., & Driver, R. (1996). Small-group discussion in physics: Peer interaction modes in pairs and fours. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(10), 1099-1114.
11. Alsop, S. (2005). The affective dimensions of cognition: Studies from education in the sciences, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
12. American Association for Advancement of Science. (AAAS). (1989). Science for all Americans: Project 2061. Washington, DC: Author.
13. Anderson, C. W. (2003, March). Difficulties with inquiry in science classrooms. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia.
14. Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13, 1-12.
15. Atkin, J. M., Black, P., & Coffey, J. (2001). Classroom assessment and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
16. Aydeniz, M. (2007). Understanding the challenges of implementing assessment reform in science classrooms: A case study of science teachers, conceptions and practices of assessment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee.
17. Baker, D. (2002). Where is gender and equity in science education? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 39, 659-663.
18. Barab, S., & Luehmann, A. (2003). Building sustainable science curriculum: Acknowledging and accommodating local adaptation. Science Education, 87, 454-467.
19. Barton, A. C. (1998). Teaching science with homeless children: Pedagogy, representation, and identity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 379-394.
20. Bianchini, J. (1997). Where meaning making, equity, and context intersect: Student learning of science in small groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 1039-1065.
21. Blanchard, M., Southerland, S. A., & Granger, D. E. (2005). A quantitative study of inquiry-based versus traditional science teaching methods. Multi-University Reading, Mathematics, and Science Initiative, Learning Systems Institute, Tallahassee, FL.
22. Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, and experience & school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
23. Brickhouse, N. W. (2006). Editorial: Celebrating 90 years of Science Education: Reflections on the gold standard and ways of promoting good research. Science Education, 90(1), 1-7.
24. Brickhouse, N., & Bodner, G. M. (1992). The beginning science teacher: Classroom narratives of convictions and constraints. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(5), 471-485.
25. Brickhouse, N. W., Lowery, P., & Schultz, K. (2000). What kind of a girl does science? The construction of school science identities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 441-458.
26. Carlone, H. (2003). (Re)producing good science students: Girls' participation in high school physics. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 9(1), 17-34.
27. Carlone, H. (2005, October). Science identity in science education: Possibilities and complexities. Paper presented at the Science Education at the Crossroads Conference, Storrs, CT.
28. Carlsen, W. S. (1991). Questioning in classrooms: A sociolinguistic perspective. Review of Educational Research, 61, 157-178.
29. Cavanagh, S. (2004). NCLB could alter science teaching. Education Week. Retrieved June 30, 2006, from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2004/ 11/10/11science.h24.html?r&levelId+1000&level1d=1000.
30. Chang, C., & Mao, S. (1999). Comparison of Taiwan science students' outcomes with inquiry-group versus traditional instruction. The Journal of Educational Research, 92(6), 340-346.
31. Chen, S. (2006). Development of an instrument to assess views on nature of science and attitudes toward teaching science. Science Education, 90(5), 803-819.
32. Chi, M. T. H. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: Examples from learning and discovery in science. In R. N. Giere (Ed.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science: Vol. XV. Cognitive models of science (pp. 129-186). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
33. Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175-218.
34. Clandinin, D. J. (1986). Classroom practice: Teacher images in action. Philadelphia: Palmer.
35. Cobern, W., Lederman, N., Schwartz, R., & Schuster, D. (2004). An experimental efficacy study of science achievement and attitude development amongst 8th grade students using an inquiry, integrated science-mathematics- engineering model of instruction. Retrieved July 7, 2006, from http://drdc.uchicago.edu/offhm/index.html?http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/ showAward.do?AwardNumber=0437655.
36. Cobern, W., & Loving, C. (1998). The card exchange: Introducing the philosophy of science. In W. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 73-82). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
37. Cochran-Smith, M. (2005). No child left behind: 3 years and counting. Journal of Teacher Education, 56(2), 99-103.
38. Collins, A. (1998). National science education standards: A political document. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(7), 711-727.
39. Craig, C. J. (2006). Why is dissemination so difficult? The nature of teacher knowledge and the spread of curriculum reform. American Educational Research Journal, 43(2), 257-293.
40. Crawford, B. A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 916-937.
41. Crawford, B., Zembal-Saul, C., Munford, D., & Friedrichsen, P. (2005). Confronting prospective teachers' ideas of evolution and scientific inquiry using technology and inquiry-based tasks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(6), 613-637.
42. Cuban, L. (1988). A fundamental puzzle of school reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 69(5), 341-344.
43. Davis, K. S. (2002). "Change is hard": What science teachers are telling us about reform and teacher learning of innovative practices. Science Education, 87(1), 3-30.
44. DeBoer, G. (2002). Student centered teaching in a standards based world: Finding a sensible balance. Science & Education, 11(4), 405-417.
45. Demastes-Southerland, S., Good, R., & Peebles, P. (1995). Students' conceptual ecologies and the process of conceptual change in evolution. Science Education, 79(6), 637-666.
46. Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5-12.
47. Driver, R. A., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312.
48. Druva, C. A., & Anderson, R. D. (1983). Science teacher characteristics by teacher behavior and by student outcome. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(5), 467-479.
49. Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671-688.
50. Duschl, R. A. (1990). Restructuring science education: The importance of theories and their development. New York: Teacher's College Press.
51. Duschl, R. A. (2000). Making the nature of science explicit. In R. Millar, J. Leach, & J. Osborne (Eds.), Improving science education: The contribution of research (pp. 187-206). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
52. Duschl, R. A., & Gitomer, D. H. (1997). Strategies and challenges to change the focus of assessment and instruction in science classrooms. Educational Assessment, 4(1), 37-73.
53. Duschl, R. A., & Grandy, R. (2005, February). Reconsidering the character and role of inquiry in school science: Framing the debates. Paper presented at Inquiry Conference on Developing a Consensus Research Agenda, New Brunswick, NJ.
54. Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H., & Shouse, A. W. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
55. Eick, C., & Dias, M. (2005). Building the authority of experience in communities of practice: The development of preservice teachers' practical knowledge through coteaching in inquiry classrooms. Science Education, 89(3), 470-491.
56. Elby, A., & Hammer, D. (2001). On the substance of a sophisticated epistemology. Science Education, 85, 554-567.
57. Flick, F. B. (2003, March). Inquiry as cognitive process. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia.
58. Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Secondary teachers' knowledge and beliefs about subject matter and their impact on instruction. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 51-94). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
59. Gess-Newsome, J., Southerland, S. A., Johnston, A., & Woodbury, S. (2003). Educational reform, personal practical theories, and dissatisfaction: The anatomy of change in college science teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 731-767.
60. Grandy, R., & Duschl, R. (2005). Reconsidering the character and role of inquiry in school science: Analysis of a conference. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International History, Philosophy, Sociology and Science Teaching Conference, Leeds, England.
61. Hammer, D. (1996). Misconceptions or P-Prims: How may alternative perspective of cognitive structure influence instructional perceptions and intentions. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5, 97-127.
62. Hammer, D., & Elby, A. (2003). Tapping epistemological resources for learning physics. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 72(1), 53-90.
63. Hodson, D. (1999). Going beyond cultural pluralism: Science education for sociopolitical action. Science Education, 83(1), 775-796.
64. Hopkins, D. (1990). Integrating staff development and school improvement: A study of personality and school climate. In B. Joyce (Ed.), ASCD yearbook: Changing school culture through staff development (pp. 41-67). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
65. Hostetler, K. (2005). What is "good" education research? Educational Researcher, 34(6), 16-21.
66. Hovey, A., Hazelwood, C., & Svedkauskaire, A. (2005). Critical issue: Science education in the era of No Child Left Behind. History, benchmarks, and standard. North Central Regional Education Laboratories. Retrieved July 1, 2006, from http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/content/ cntareas/science/sc600.htm#references.
67. Huber, R. A., & Moore, C. J. (2002). High stakes testing and science learning assessment. Science Educator, 11(1), 18-23.
68. Ingersoll, R. (2003). Is there really a teacher shortage? Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved, July 12, 2006, from http://www.gse.upenn.edu/faculty/ingersoll.html.
69. Johnston, A. T. (2001). A conceptual change analysis of nature of science conceptions: The deep roots and entangled vines of a conceptual ecology. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
70. Kelly, G. J. (2004, April). Toward an empirical program of epistemology in science education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
71. Kelly, G., & Green, J. (1998). The social nature of knowing: Toward a sociocultural perspective on conceptual change and meaning making. In B. Guzzetti & C. Hynd (Eds.), Perspectives on conceptual change (pp. 145-182). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
72. King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
73. Kittleson, J. M. (2005, October). Responsibility in the face of accountability. Paper presented at Science Education at the Cross Roads, Storrs, CT.
74. Kittleson, J. M. (2006). Epistemological beliefs and epistemological practices in elementary science education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Delaware, Newark.
75. Kittleson, J., & Southerland, S. A. (2004). The role of "discourse" in group knowledge construction: A case study of engineering students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(3), 267-293.
76. Klopfer, L. E., & Champagne, A. B. (1990). Ghosts of crisis past. Science Education, 74(2), 133-154.
77. Kober, N. (2001). It takes more than testing: Closing the achievement gap. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.
78. Kuhn, D., & Weinstock, M. (2002). What is epistemological thinking and why does it matter? In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 121-144). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
79. Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
80. Laplante, B. (1997). Teachers' beliefs and instructional strategies in science: Pushing analysis further. Science Education, 81, 277-294.
81. Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331-359.
82. Lederman, N. G., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (1998). Avoiding de-natured science: Activities that promote understandings of the nature of science. In W. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 83-126). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
83. Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire (VNOS): Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497-521.
84. Lederman, N. G., & O'Malley, M. (1990). Students' perceptions of tentativeness in science: Development, use, and sources of change. Science Education, 74(2), 225-239.
85. Lederman, N. G., Wade, P., & Bell, R. L. (1998). Assessing understanding of the nature of science: A historical perspective. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education (pp. 331-350). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
86. Lee, O. (1997). Scientific literacy for all: What is it and how can we achieve it? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(3), 219-222.
87. Lee, O. (2001). Culture and language in science educating: What do we know and what do we need to know? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(5), 499-501.
88. Lee, O. (2003). Equity for linguistically and culturally diverse students in science education: A research agenda. Teachers College Record, 105(3), 465-489.
89. Lee, O., & Fradd, S. H. (1998). Science for all, including students from non-English-language backgrounds. Educational Researcher, 27(4), 12-21.
90. Lee, O., Hart, J. E., Cuevas, P., & Enders, C. (2004). Professional development in inquiry-based science for elementary teachers of diverse student groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 1021-1043.
91. Lee, O., & Luykx, A. (2006). Science education and student diversity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
92. Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
93. Letts, W. J. (1999). Teaching science/learning gender: Preservice elementary curriculum discourse. An anti-essentialist approach to gender-inclusive science. Gender and Education, 13(3), 275-290.
94. Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
95. Lott, G. W. (1983). The effect of inquiry teaching and advance organizers upon student outcomes in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(5), 437-451.
96. Loving, K., & Foster, A. (2000). The religion in the science classroom issue: Seeking graduate student conceptual change. Science Education, 84, 445-468.
97. Luera, G. R., & Otto, C. A. (2005). Development and evaluation of an inquiry-based elementary science teacher education program reflecting current reform movements. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16(3), 241-258.
98. Luft, J. (2001). Changing inquiry practices and beliefs: The impact of an inquiry-based professional development programme on beginning and experienced secondary science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 517-534.
99. Luft, J., Roehrig, G., Brown, M., Fletcher, S., Kern, A., & Puthoff, E. (2007). Beginning secondary science teachers in different induction programs: Findings from the pilot year. Submitted for review.
100. Lynch, S. (2001). "Science for all" is not equal to "one size fits all": Linguistic and cultural diversity and science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(5), 622-627.
101. Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., Fishman, B., Soloway, E., Geier, R., et al. (2004). Inquiry-based science in the middle grades: Assessment of learning in urban systemic reform. Journal of Research in Science Education, 41(10), 1063-1080.
102. Matese, G., Griesdorn, J., & Edelson, D. C. (2002). Teacher beliefs about assessment in inquiry-based science: Research to inform professional development. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
103. McCarthy, C. B. (2005). Effects of thematic-based, hands-on science teaching versus a textbook approach for students with disabilities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(3), 245-263.
104. McKibbin, M., & Joyce, B. R. (1981). Psychological states. Theory Into Practice, 19(4), 248-255.
105. Meadows, L. (2005, October). Vision & reality: Sustaining teacher change. Paper presented at Science Education at the Crossroads, Storrs, CT.
106. Moje, E., Collazo, T., Carrillo, R., & Marx, R. (2001). "Maestro, what is 'quality'?" Language, literacy, and discourse in project-based science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 469-498.
107. Moje, E. B., & Shepardson, D. P. (1998). Social interactions and children's changing understanding of electric circuits: Exploring unequal power relations in "peer"-learning groups. In B. Guzzetti & C. Hynd (Eds.), Perspectives on conceptual change (pp. 225-234). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
108. Moss, D. M., Abrams, E. D., & Robb-Kull, J. (1998). Can we be scientists too? Secondary students' perceptions of scientific research from a project-based classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 7(2) 149-161.
109. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (NCEE). (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. A report to the nation and the Secretary of Education United States Department of Education by the National Commission on Excellence in Education. Retrieved June 30, 2006, from http://www.goalline.org/Goal%20Line/NatAtRisk.html.
110. National Research Council. (NRC). (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
111. National Research Council. (NRC). (1997). Science teaching reconsidered: A handbook. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
112. National Research Council. (NRC). (2000). Inquiry and the national standards in science education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
113. No Child Left Behind Act. (NCLB). (2001). Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425. Retrieved June 30, 2006, from http://www.ed.gov/legislation/ESEA02.
114. Norman, O., Ault, C., Bentz, B., & Meskimen, L. (2001). The black-white achievement gap as a perennial challenge of urban science education: A sociocultural and historical overview with implications for research and practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(10), 1101-1114.
115. Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224-240.
116. Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-322.
117. Parsons, E. C., Travis, C., & Simpson, J. S. (2005). The Black cultural ethos, students' instructional context preferences, and student achievement: An examination of culturally congruent science instruction in the eighth grade classes of one African American and one Euro-American teacher. The Negro Educational Review, 56(2, 3), 183-203.
118. Pfundt, H., & Duit, R. (1994). Bibliography: Students' alternative frameworks and science education (4th ed.). Keil, Germany: Institute for Science Education at the University of Keil.
119. Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63, 167-199.
120. Poole, M. (1996). "... for more and better religious education." Science and Education, 5, 165-174.
121. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gerrzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Towards a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 67(4), 489-508.
122. Ramey-Gassert, L., Shroyer, M. G., & Staver, J. R. (1996). A qualitative study of factors influencing science teaching self-efficacy of elementary level teachers. Science Education, 80(3), 283-315.
123. Rivet, A. E., & Krajcik, J. S. (2004). Achieving standards in urban systemic reform: An example of a sixth grade project-based science curriculum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(7), 669-692.
124. Rodriguez, A. J. (1998). Strategies for counterresistance: Toward sociotransformative constructivism and learning to teach science for diversity and for understanding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 589-622.
125. Romberg, T. A., & Price, G. G. (1983). Curriculum implementation and staff development as cultural change. In G. Griffin (Ed.), Staff development: 82nd yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 154-184). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
126. Rosebery, A. (2004, May). Some thoughts about culture and the preparation of science teachers for urban classrooms. Wingspread conference on Urban Science Education, Racine, Wisconsin.
127. Roth, W. M. (1993). Construction sites: Science labs and classrooms. In K. Tobin & D. Tippins (Eds.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 145-170). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
128. Rubba, P., & Anderson, H. (1978). Development of an instrument to assess secondary school students' understanding of the nature of scientific knowledge. Science Education, 62(4), 449-458.
129. Rudolph, J. (2002). Scientists in the classroom: The cold war reconstruction of American science education. New York: Palgrave Macmillian.
130. Saka, Y. (2007). What happens to our reform minded beginning science teachers? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee.
131. Sandall, B. R. (2003). Elementary science: Where are we now? Journal of Elementary Science Education, 15(2), 13-30.
132. Sandholtz, J. H., & Finan, E. C. (1998). Cooperating teachers' perspectives on the student teaching triad. Journal of Teacher Education, 49(2), 108-119.
133. Sandoval, W. (2003). The inquiry paradox: Why doing science doesn't necessarily change ideas about science. In C. P. Constantinou & Z. C. Zacharia (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Computer-Based Learning in Science Conference 2003 (pp. 825-834). Nicosia, Cyprus.
134. Sandoval, W. (2005). Understanding students' practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89(4), 634-656.
135. Schmidt, W. H. (2003, February 6). International perspective. Presentation made at the Secretary's Summit on Mathematics, Washington, DC. Retrieved July 1, 2006, from http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/progs/ mathscience/schmidt.html.
136. Schwab, J. (1962). The teaching of science as enquiry. In The teaching of science (pp. 1-103). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
137. Settlage, J. (2003, January). Inquiry's allure and illusion: Why it remains just beyond our reach. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia.
138. Settlage, J. (2006, September). Prospects of pragmatism: The generation of science education adventurist. Plenary session at Science Education at the Crossroads, Ogden, UT.
139. Settlage, J., & Meadows, L. (2002). Standards-based reform and its unintended consequences: Implications for science education within America's urban schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(2), 114-127.
140. Shaver, A., Cuevas, P., Lee, O., & Avalos, M. (in press). Teachers' perceptions of policy influences on science instruction with culturally and linguistically diverse elementary students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
141. Shepardson, D. P., & Britsch, S. J. (2006). Zones of interaction: Differential access to elementary science discourse. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 443-466.
142. Smith, L. K. (2005). The impact of early life history on teachers' beliefs: In-school and out-of-school experiences as learners and knowers of science. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 11(1), 5-36.
143. Smith, L. K., & Gess-Newsome, J. (2004). Elementary science methods courses and the National Science Education Standards: Are we adequately preparing teachers? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15(2), 91-110.
144. Smith, L. K., & Southerland, S. A. (2007). Reforming practice or modifying reforms? Elementary teachers' response to the tools of reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(3).
145. Smith, M. U., & Scharmann, L. C. (1999). Defining versus describing the nature of science: A pragmatic analysis for classroom teachers and science educators. Journal for Research in Science Teaching, 83, 493-509.
146. Southerland, S. A. (2000). Epistemic universalism and the shortcomings of curricular multicultural science education. Science and Education, 9, 289-307.
147. Southerland, S. A., & Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Preservice teachers' views of inclusive science teaching as shaped by images of teaching, learning, and knowledge. Science Education, 83, 131-150.
148. Southerland, S. A., Gess-Newsome, J., & Johnston, A. (2003). Portraying science in the classroom: The manifestation of scientists' beliefs in classroom practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 669-691.
149. Southerland, S. A., Johnston, A., & Sowell, S. (2006). Describing teachers' conceptual ecologies for the nature of science. Science Education, 90(5), 874-906.
150. Southerland, S. A., Johnston, A., Sowell, S., & Settlage, J. (2005). Perhaps triangulatin isn't enough: A call for crystallization as methodological reference in NOS research. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
151. Southerland, S. A., Kittleson, J., Settlage, J., & Lanier, K. (2005). Individual and group meaning making in an urban, third grade classroom: Red fog, cold cans, and seeping vapor. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(9), 1032-1061.
152. Sowell, S. (2004). Doing gender/teaching science: A feminist poststructural analysis of middle school science teachers' identity negotiations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee.
153. Sowell, S., Southerland, S. A., & Blanchard, M. (2006, May). Who are the "they"in "They say . . . ?" Finding fruitfulness of nature of science within an urban context. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science, San Francisco.
154. Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R. Duschl & R. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice. Albany: State University of New York Press.
155. Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68, 202-248.
156. Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
157. Varelas, M., Pappas, C. C., & Rife, A. (2004). Dialogic inquiry in an urban 2nd grade classroom: How intertextuality shapes and is shaped by social interactions and conceptual understandings. In R. Yerrick & W. -M. Roth (Eds.), Establishing scientific classroom discourse communities: Multiple voices of research on teaching and learning (pp. 139-168). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
158. Wallace, C. S., & Kang, N. (2004). An investigation of experienced secondary science teachers' beliefs about inquiry: An examination of competing belief sets. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(9), 936-960.
159. Wandersee, J. H., & Fisher, K. M. (2000). Knowing biology. In K. M. Fisher, J. H. Wandersee, & D. Moody (Eds.), Mapping biology knowledge (pp. 39-54). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
160. Wandersee, J. H., Mintzes, J. J., & Novak, J. D. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 177-210). New York: Macmillan.
161. Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonowski, M., Rosebery, A. S., & Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2001). Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense-making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(5), 529-552.
162. Weld, J., & Funk, L. (2005). "I'm not the science type": Effect of an inquiry biology content course on preservice elementary teachers' intentions about teaching science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16(3), 189-204.
163. Wideen, M. F., O'Shea, T., Pye, I., & Ivany, G. (1997). High-stakes testing and the teaching of science. Canadian Journal of Education, 22(4), 428-444.
164. Wilson, M. R., & Bertenthal, M. W. (Eds.). (2005). Systems for state science assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
165. Windschitl, M. (2003). Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice? Science Education, 87(1), 112-143.
166. Windschitl, M. (2004). Folk theories of "inquiry": How pre-service teachers reproduce the discourse and practices of an atheoretical scientific method. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 481-512.
167. Windschitl, M. (2006). Why we can't talk to one another about science education reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(5), 348-355.
168. Yerrick, R., Parke, H., & Nugent, J. (1997). Struggling to promote deeply rooted change: The "filtering effect" of teachers' beliefs on understanding transformational views of teaching science. Science Education, 81, 137-159.
169. Yore, L. D., Bisanz, G. L., & Hand, B. M. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 689-725.
170. Yore, L., Henriques, L., Crawfbrd, B., Smith, L. K., Zwiep, S., & Tillotson, J. (in press). Selecting and using inquiry approaches to teach science: The influence of context in elementary, middle & secondary schools. In E. Abrams, S. A. Southerland, & P. Silva (Eds.), Inquiry in the classrooms: Challenges and opportunities. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
171. Sandoval, W. (2005). Understanding students' practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89(4), 634-656.
172. Schmidt, W. H. (2003, February 6). International perspective. Presentation made at the Secretary's Summit on Mathematics, Washington, DC. Retrieved July 1, 2006, from http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/progs/ mathscience/schmidt.html.
173. Schwab, J. (1962). The teaching of science as enquiry. In The teaching of science (pp. 1-103). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
174. Settlage, J. (2003, January). Inquiry's allure and illusion: Why it remains just beyond our reach. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia.
175. Settlage, J. (2006, September). Prospects of pragmatism: The generation of science education adventurist. Plenary session at Science Education at the Crossroads, Ogden, UT.
176. Settlage, J., & Meadows, L. (2002). Standards-based reform and its unintended consequences: Implications for science education within America's urban schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(2), 114-127.
177. Shaver, A., Cuevas, P., Lee, O., & Avalos, M. (in press). Teachers' perceptions of policy influences on science instruction with culturally and linguistically diverse elementary students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
178. Shepardson, D. P., & Britsch, S. J. (2006). Zones of interaction: Differential access to elementary science discourse. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 443-466.
179. Smith, L. K. (2005). The impact of early life history on teachers' beliefs: In-school and out-of-school experiences as learners and knowers of science. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 11(1), 5-36.
180. Smith, L. K., & Gess-Newsome, J. (2004). Elementary science methods courses and the National Science Education Standards: Are we adequately preparing teachers? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15(2), 91-110.
181. Smith, L. K., & Southerland, S. A. (2007). Reforming practice or modifying reforms? Elementary teachers' response to the tools of reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(3).
182. Smith, M. U., & Scharmann, L. C. (1999). Defining versus describing the nature of science: A pragmatic analysis for classroom teachers and science educators. Journal for Research in Science Teaching, 83, 493-509.
183. Southerland, S. A. (2000). Epistemic universalism and the shortcomings of curricular multicultural science education. Science and Education, 9, 289-307.
184. Southerland, S. A., & Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Preservice teachers' views of inclusive science teaching as shaped by images of teaching, learning, and knowledge. Science Education, 83, 131-150.
185. Southerland, S. A., Gess-Newsome, J., & Johnston, A. (2003). Portraying science in the classroom: The manifestation of scientists' beliefs in classroom practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 669-691.
186. Southerland, S. A., Johnston, A., & Sowell, S. (2006). Describing teachers' conceptual ecologies for the nature of science. Science Education, 90(5), 874-906.
187. Southerland, S. A., Johnston, A., Sowell, S., & Settlage, J. (2005). Perhaps triangulatin isn't enough: A call for crystallization as methodological reference in NOS research. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
188. Southerland, S. A., Kittleson, J., Settlage, J., & Lanier, K. (2005). Individual and group meaning making in an urban, third grade classroom: Red fog, cold cans, and seeping vapor. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(9), 1032-1061.
189. Sowell, S. (2004). Doing gender/teaching science: A feminist poststructural analysis of middle school science teachers' identity negotiations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee.
190. Sowell, S., Southerland, S. A., & Blanchard, M. (2006, May). Who are the "they"in "They say . . . ?" Finding fruitfulness of nature of science within an urban context. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science, San Francisco.
191. Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R. Duschl & R. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice. Albany: State University of New York Press.
192. Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68, 202-248.
193. Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
194. Varelas, M., Pappas, C. C., & Rife, A. (2004). Dialogic inquiry in an urban 2nd grade classroom: How intertextuality shapes and is shaped by social interactions and conceptual understandings. In R. Yerrick & W. -M. Roth (Eds.), Establishing scientific classroom discourse communities: Multiple voices of research on teaching and learning (pp. 139-168). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
195. Wallace, C. S., & Kang, N. (2004). An investigation of experienced secondary science teachers' beliefs about inquiry: An examination of competing belief sets. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(9), 936-960.
196. Wandersee, J. H., & Fisher, K. M. (2000). Knowing biology. In K. M. Fisher, J. H. Wandersee, & D. Moody (Eds.), Mapping biology knowledge (pp. 39-54). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
197. Wandersee, J. H., Mintzes, J. J., & Novak, J. D. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 177-210). New York: Macmillan.
198. Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonowski, M., Rosebery, A. S., & Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2001). Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense-making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(5), 529-552.
199. Weld, J., & Funk, L. (2005). "I'm not the science type": Effect of an inquiry biology content course on preservice elementary teachers' intentions about teaching science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16(3), 189-204.
200. Wideen, M. F., O'Shea, T., Pye, I., & Ivany, G. (1997). High-stakes testing and the teaching of science. Canadian Journal of Education, 22(4), 428-444.
201. Wilson, M. R., & Bertenthal, M. W. (Eds.). (2005). Systems for state science assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
202. Windschitl, M. (2003). Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice? Science Education, 87(1), 112-143.
203. Windschitl, M. (2004). Folk theories of "inquiry": How pre-service teachers reproduce the discourse and practices of an atheoretical scientific method. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 481-512.
204. Windschitl, M. (2006). Why we can't talk to one another about science education reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(5), 348-355.
205. Yerrick, R., Parke, H., & Nugent, J. (1997). Struggling to promote deeply rooted change: The "filtering effect" of teachers' beliefs on understanding transformational views of teaching science. Science Education, 81, 137-159.
206. Yore, L. D., Bisanz, G. L., & Hand, B. M. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 689-725.
207. Yore, L., Henriques, L., Crawfbrd, B., Smith, L. K., Zwiep, S., & Tillotson, J. (in press). Selecting and using inquiry approaches to teach science: The influence of context in elementary, middle & secondary schools. In E. Abrams, S. A. Southerland, & P. Silva (Eds.), Inquiry in the classrooms: Challenges and opportunities. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.