Social interactions and children’s changing understanding of electric circuits: Exploring unequal power relations in "peer"-Learning groups

Perspectives on Conceptual Change: Multiple Ways to Understand Knowing and Learning in a Complex World

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 225-234

  Moje, Elizabeth B ^a   Shepardson, Daniel P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85070011878     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315045108-23     Document Type: Chapter

References (21)

1. Alvermann, D. E., & Anders, P. (1994, July). Speaking out: Whose interests are served? Paper presented at the 15th World Congress on Reading of the International Reading Association, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
2. Alvermann, D. E. (1996). Peer-led discussions: Whose interests are served? Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 39, 282-289.
3. American Association of University Women. (1992). How schools shortchange girls: American Association of University Women Report. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women Educational Foundation.
4. Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (C. Emerson & M. Holhquist, Eds.; V. W. McGee, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
5. Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex.�? New York & London: Routledge.
6. Code, L. (1991). What can she know? Feminist theory and the construction of knowledge. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
7. Evans, K. (1994). Just when you thought it was complicated enough: Critical theory meets literature discussion groups. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson.
8. Forman, E. A., & Cazden, C. B. (1985). Exploring Vygotskian perspectives in education: The cognitive value of peer interaction. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 323-347). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
9. Foucault, M. (1980). Two lectures. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings (pp. 78-108). New York: Pantheon.
10. Guzzetti, B. J., & Williams, W. O. (1996). Gender, text, and discussion: Examining intellectual safety in the science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 5-20.
11. Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge?: Thinking from women’s lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
12. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
13. Lee, O., & Anderson, C. W. (1993). Task engagement and conceptual change in middle school science classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 585-610.
14. Perrett-Clermont, A. N. (1980). Social interaction and cognitive development in children. New York: Academic Press.
15. Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget’s theory. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael's manual of child psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 703-702). New York: Wiley.
16. Piaget, J. (1977). Problems of the psycho-sociology of the child. In Sociological Studies. Geneva: Library Droz. (Reprinted from Traits of Sociology, G. Gurvitch, Paris: University of France Press, 1963, pp. 229-254).
17. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three plans: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J. V. Wertsch, P. del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139-164). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
19. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. (A. Kozulin, Trans. & Ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1934)
21. Wertsch, J. V. (1995). The need for action in sociocultural research. In J. V. Wertsch, P. del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 56-74). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.