Unresolved problems with the “I”, the “A”, and the “T”: A logical and psychometric critique of the Implicit Association Test (IAT)

European Review of Social Psychology

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 74-147

  Fiedler, Klaus ^a   Messner, Claude ^b   Bluemke, Matthias ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847272428     PISSN: 10463283     EISSN: 1479277X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10463280600681248     Document Type: Article

References (250)

1. *Aberson, C. L., Shoemaker, C., and Tomolillo, C., 2004. Implicit bias and contact: The role of interethnic friendships. Journal of Social Psychology, 144 (3): 335–347.
2. *Aidman, E. V., and Carroll, S. M., 2003. Implicit individual differences: Relationships between implicit self-esteem, gender identity, and gender attitudes. European Journal of Personality, 17 (1): 19–36.
3. *Arkes, H. R., and Tetlock, P. E., 2004. Attributions of implicit prejudice, or “Would Jesse Jackson ‘fail’ the Implicit Association Test?”. Psychological Inquiry, 15 (4): 257–278.
4. *Asendorpf, J. B., Banse, R., and Mücke, D., 2002. Double dissociation between implicit and explicit personality self-concept: The case of shy behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83 (2): 380–393.
5. *Ashburn-Nardo, L., Voils, C. I., and Monteith, M. J., 2001. Implicit associations as the seeds of intergroup bias: How easily do they take root?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81 (5): 789–799.
6. *Baccus, J. R., Baldwin, M. W., and Packer, D. J., 2004. Increasing implicit self-esteem through classical conditioning. Psychological Science, 15 (7): 498–502.
7. *Back, M. D., Schmukle, S. C., and Egloff, B., 2005. Measuring task-switching ability in the Implicit Association Test. Experimental Psychology, 52 (3): 167–179.
8. Baeumler, G., 1965. Interferenz und Intelligenz. Psychologische Beiträge, 8: 596–619.
9. *Banaji, M. R., Nosek, B. A., and Greenwald, A. G., 2004. No place for nostalgia in science: A response to Arkes and Tetlock. Psychological Inquiry, 15 (4): 279–310.
10. *Banse, R., Seise, J., and Zerbes, N., 2001. Implicit attitudes towards homosexuality: Reliability, validity, and controllability of the IAT. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48 (2): 145–160.
11. *Bassett, J. F., and Dabbs, J. M., Jr. 2003. Evaluating explicit and implicit death attitudes in funeral and university students. Mortality, 8 (4): 352–371.
12. *Bassett, J. F., Washburn, D. A., Vanman, E. J., and Dabbs, J. M. J., 2004. Assessing the affective Simon paradigm as a measure of individual differences in implicit social cognition about death. Current Research in Social Psychology, 9 (17) [np]
13. *Bazerman, M. H., and Banaji, M. R., 2004. The social psychology of ordinary ethical failures. Social Justice Research, 17 (2): 111–115.
14. Binet, A., Simon, T., and Town, C. H., 1913. A method of measuring the development of the intelligence of young children, Chicago, IL: Chicago Med. Book Co.
15. *Blair, I. V., 2002. The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6 (3): 242–261.
16. *Blair, I. V., Ma, J. E., and Lenton, A. P., 2001. Imagining stereotypes away: The moderation of implicit stereotypes through mental imagery. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81 (5): 828–841.
17. Blanton, H., and Jaccard, J., 2006. Tests of multiplicative models in psychology: A case study using the unified: Theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 113: 155–165.
18. Blanton, H., Jaccard, J., Gonzales, P. M., and Christie, C., 2006. Decoding the Implicit Association Test: Implications for criterion prediction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42: 192–212.
19. Bluemke, M., and Friese, M., 2006. Do features of stimuli influence IAT effects?. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42: 163–176.
20. *Boniecki, K. A., and Jacks, J. Z., 2002. The elusive relationship between measures of implicit and explicit prejudice. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 26: 1–14.
21. *Bosson, J. K., Swann, W. B., Jr. and Pennebaker, J. W., 2000. Stalking the perfect measure of implicit self-esteem: The blind men and the elephant revisited?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79 (4): 631–643.
22. *Brendl, C. M., Markman, A. B., and Messner, C., 2001. How do indirect measures of evaluation work? Evaluating the inference of prejudice in the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81 (5): 760–773.
23. *Brunel, F., Tietje, B. C., and Greenwald, A. G., 2004. Is the Implicit Association Test a valid and valuable measure of implicit consumer social cognition?. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14 (4): 385–404.
24. *Brunstein, J. C., and Schmitt, C. H., 2004. Assessing individual differences in achievement motivation with the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Research in Personality, 38 (6): 536–555.
25. Cacioppo, J. T., and Petty, R. E., 1982. The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42: 116–131.
26. *Cai, H., Sriram, N., Greenwald, A. G., and McFarland, S. G., 2004. The Implicit Association Test's D measure can minimize a cognitive skill confound: Comment on McFarland and Crouch (2002). Social Cognition, 22 (6): 673–684.
27. Campbell, D. T., and Fiske, D. W., 1959. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait – multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56: 81–105.
28. Carr, T. H., and Dagenbach, D., 1990. Semantic priming and repetition priming from masked words: Evidence for centre – surround attention mechanism in perceptual recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16: 341–350.
29. *Chambliss, H. O., Finley, C. E., and Blair, S. N., 2004. Attitudes towards obese individuals among exercise science students. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 36 (3): 468–474.
30. *Chassin, L., Presson, C., Rose, J., Sherman, S. J., and Prost, J., 2002. Parental smoking cessation and adolescent smoking. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 27 (6): 485–496.
31. *Chee, M. W. L., Sriram, N., Soon, C. S., and Lee, K. M., 2000. Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the implicit association of concepts and attributes. Neuroreport: For Rapid Communication of Neuroscience Research, 11 (1): 135–140.
32. *Chugh, D., 2004. Societal and managerial implications of implicit social cognition: Why milliseconds matter. Social Justice Research, 17 (2): 203–222.
33. Cialdini, R. B., and Kenrick, D. T., 1976. Altruism and hedonism: A social developmental perspective on the relationship of negative mood state and helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34: 907–914.
34. *Crisp, R. J., and Nicel, J. K., 2004. Disconfirming intergroup evaluations: Asymmetric effects for in-groups and out-groups. Journal of Social Psychology, 144 (3): 247–271.
35. Cronbach, L. J., and Furby, L., 1970. How should we measure “change” – or should we?. Psychological Bulletin, 74: 68–80.
36. *Cross, S. E., Morris, M. L., and Gore, J. S., 2002. Thinking about oneself and others: The relational-interdependent self-construal and social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82 (3): 399–418.
37. *Cunningham, W. A., Nezlek, J. B., and Banaji, M. R., 2004. Implicit and explicit ethnocentrism: Revisiting the ideologies of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30 (10): 1332–1346.
38. *Cunningham, W. A., Preacher, K. J., and Banaji, M. R., 2001. Implicit attitude measures: Consistency, stability, and convergent validity. Psychological Science, 121 (2): 163–170.
39. *Czopp, A. M., Monteith, M. J., Zimmerman, R. S., and Lynam, D. R., 2004. Implicit attitudes as potential protection from risky sex: Predicting condom use with the IAT. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 26 (2): 227–236.
40. *Dabbs, J. M. J., Bassett, J. F., and Dyomia, N. V., 2003. The Palm IAT: A portable version of the Implicit Association Task. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 35 (1): 90–95.
41. *Dambrun, M., and Guimond, S., 2004. Implicit and explicit measures of prejudice and stereotyping: Do they assess the same underlying knowledge structure?. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34 (6): 663–676.
42. *Dasgupta, N., 2004. Implicit ingroup favoritism, outgroup favoritism, and their behavioral manifestations. Social Justice Research, 17 (2): 143–169.
43. *Dasgupta, N., and Greenwald, A. G., 2001. On the malleability of automatic attitudes: Combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81 (5): 800–814.
44. *Dasgupta, N., Greenwald, A. G., and Banaji, M. R., 2003. The first ontological challenge to the IAT: Attitude or mere familiarity?. Psychological Inquiry, 14 (3): 238–243.
45. *Dasgupta, N., McGhee, D. E., Greenwald, A. G., and Banaji, M. R., 2000. Automatic preference for White Americans: Eliminating the familiarity explanation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36 (3): 316–328.
46. *De Houwer, J., 2001. A structural and process analysis of the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37 (6): 443–451.
47. *De Houwer, J., 2002. The Implicit Association Test as a tool for studying dysfunctional associations in psychopathology: Strengths and limitations. Journal of Behaviour Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 33 (2): 115–133.
48. De Houwer, J., 2003a. “ A structural analysis of indirect measures of attitudes ”. In The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion, Edited by: Musch, J., and Klauer, K. C., 219–244. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
49. *De Houwer, J., 2003b. The extrinsic affective Simon task. Experimental Psychology, 50 (2): 77–85.
50. De Houwer, J., 2006. “ What are implicit measures and why are we using them? ”. In The handbook of implicit cognition and addiction, Edited by: Wiers, R. W., and Stacy, A. W., 11–28. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers.
51. *De Houwer, J., Crombez, G., Koster, E. H. W., and De Beul, N., 2004. Implicit alcohol-related cognitions in a clinical sample of heavy drinkers. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 35 (4): 275–286.
52. De Houwer, J., Geldof, T., and De Bruycker, E., 2005. The Implicit Association Test as a general measure of similarity. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59: 228–239.
53. *De Jong, P. J., 2002. Implicit self-esteem and social anxiety: Differential self-favouring effects in high and low anxious individuals. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40 (5): 501–508.
54. *De Jong, P. J., Pasman, W., Kindt, M., and Van den Hout, M. A., 2001. A reaction time paradigm to assess (implicit) complaint-specific dysfunctional beliefs. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 39 (1): 101–113.
55. *De Jong, P. J., Van den Hout, M. A., Rietbroek, H., and Huijding, J., 2003. Dissociations between implicit and explicit attitudes towards phobic stimuli. Cognition and Emotion, 17 (4): 521–545.
56. *DeSteno, D., Dasgupta, N., Bartlett, M. Y., and Cajdric, A., 2004. Prejudice from thin air: The effect of emotion on automatic intergroup attitudes. Psychological Science, 15 (5): 319–324.
57. Devine, P. G., 1989. Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56: 5–18.
58. *Devine, P. G., 2001. Implicit prejudice and stereotyping: How automatic are they? Introduction to the special section. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81 (5): 757–759.
59. *Devine, P. G., Plant, E. A., Amodio, D. M., Harmon-Jones, E., and Vance, S. L., 2002. The regulation of explicit and implicit race bias: The role of motivations to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82 (5): 835–848.
60. *Devos, T., and Banaji, M. R., 2005. American = White?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88 (3): 447–466.
61. *Dijksterhuis, A., 2004. I like myself but I don't know why: Enhancing implicit self-esteem by subliminal evaluative conditioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86 (2): 345–355.
62. *Dijksterhuis, A., and Smith, P. K., 2002. Affective habituation: Subliminal exposure to extreme stimuli decreases their extremity. Emotion, 2 (3): 203–214.
63. *Egloff, B., and Schmukle, S. C., 2002. Predictive validity of an Implicit Association Test for assessing anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83 (6): 1441–1455.
64. *Egloff, B., and Schmukle, S. C., 2003. Does social desirability moderate the relationship between implicit and explicit anxiety measures?. Personality and Individual Differences, 35 (7): 1697–1706.
65. *Egloff, B., and Schmukle, S. C., 2004. Gender differences in implicit and explicit anxiety measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 36 (8): 1807–1815.
66. *Egloff, B., Schwerdtfeger, A., and Schmukle, S. C., 2005. Temporal stability of the Implicit Association Test – Anxiety. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84 (1): 82–88.
67. Fazio, R. H., 1986. “ How do attitudes guide behaviour? ”. In Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behaviour, Edited by: Sorrentino, R. M., and Higgins, E. T., 204–243. New York: The Guilford Press.
68. *Fazio, R. H., 2001. On the automatic activation of associated evaluations: An overview. Cognition and Emotion, 15 (2): 115–141.
69. Fazio, R. H., Chen, J., McDonel, E. C., and Sherman, S. J., 1982. Attitude accessibility, attitude – behaviour consistency, and the strength of the object – evaluation association. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18: 339–357.
70. *Fazio, R. H., and Olson, M. A., 2003. Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and uses. Annual Review of Psychology, 54: 297–327.
71. Fiedler, K., and Bluemke, M., 2005. Faking the IAT: Aided and unaided response control on the Implicit Association Tests. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27: 307–316.
72. Fiedler, K., Brinkmann, B., Betsch, T., and Wild, B., 2000. A sampling approach to biases in conditional probability judgments: Beyond base rate neglect and statistical format. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129: 399–418.
73. Fiedler, K., Schmid, J., and Stahl, T., 2002. What is the current truth about polygraph lie detection?. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24: 313–324.
74. Fiedler, K., and Zogmaister, C., 2002. Self-referent accentuation as a process underlying the IAT effect, Germany: University of Heidelberg. Unpublished research
75. *Field, A. P., and Lawson, J., 2003. Fear information and the development of fears during childhood: Effects on implicit fear responses and behavioural avoidance. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41 (11): 1277–1293.
76. *Field, M., Mogg, K., and Bradley, B. P., 2004. Cognitive bias and drug craving in recreational cannabis users. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 74 (1): 105–111.
77. *Florack, A., Scarabis, M., and Bless, H., 2001. When do associations matter? The use of automatic associations towards ethnic groups in person judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37 (6): 518–524.
78. *Foroni, F., and Mayr, U., 2005. The power of a story: New, automatic associations from a single reading of a short scenario. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12 (1): 139–144.
79. *Frantz, C. M., Cuddy, A. J. C., Burnett, M., Ray, H., and Hart, A., 2004. A threat in the computer: The race Implicit Association Test as a stereotype threat experience. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30 (12): 1611–1624.
80. *Gawronski, B., 2002. What does the Implicit Association Test measure? A test of the convergent and discriminant validity of prejudice-related IATs. Experimental Psychology, 49 (3): 171–180.
81. *Gawronski, B., Ehrenberg, K., Banse, R., Zukova, J., and Klauer, K. C., 2003. It's in the mind of the beholder: The impact of stereotypic associations on category-based and individuating impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39 (1): 16–30.
82. *Gawronski, B., Geschke, D., and Banse, R., 2003. Implicit bias in impression formation: Associations influence the construal of individuating information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33 (5): 573–589.
83. *Gawronski, B., and Strack, F., 2004. On the propositional nature of cognitive consistency: Dissonance changes explicit, but not implicit attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40 (4): 535–542.
84. *Gehring, W. J., Karpinski, A., and Hilton, J. L., 2003. Thinking about interracial interactions. Nature Neuroscience, 6 (12): 1241–1243.
85. *Geier, A. B., Schwartz, M. B., and Brownell, K. D., 2003. “Before and after” diet advertisements escalate weight stigma. Eating and Weight Disorders, 8 (4): 282–288.
86. *Gemar, M. C., Segal, Z. V., Sagrati, S., and Kennedy, S. J., 2001. Mood-induced changes on the Implicit Association Test in recovered depressed patients. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110 (2): 282–289.
87. Gigerenzer, G., and Hoffrage, U., 1995. How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. Psychological Review, 102: 684–704.
88. *Glen, I. S., and Banse, R., 2004. Probing the malleability of implicit and explicit self-esteem: An interview approach. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition, 22 (2): 133–158.
89. *Govan, C. L., and Williams, K. D., 2004. Changing the affective valence of the stimulus items influences the IAT by re-defining the category labels. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40 (3): 357–365.
90. *Gray, N. S., Brown, A. S., MacCulloch, M. J., Smith, J., and Snowden, R. J., 2005. An implicit test of the associations between children and sex in pedophiles. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114 (2): 304–308.
91. *Gray, N. S., MacCulloch, M. J., Smith, J., Morris, M., and Snowden, R. J., 2003. Violence viewed by psychopathic murderers: Adapting a revealing test may expose those psychopaths who are most likely to kill. Nature, 423: 497–498.
92. Greenwald, A. G., 2006, January 29. “ Paper presented at the SPSP Attitudes Preconference, Austin, Texas ”. In Revised Top Ten list of things wring with the IAT Retrieved January 24, 2006, from http://faculty.washington.edu/agg/pdf/RevisedTop10.29Jan04.pdf
93. Greenwald, A. G., and Banaji, M. R., 1995. Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 105: 4–27.
94. *Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., Rudman, L. A., Farnham, S. D., Nosek, B. A., and Mellot, D. S., 2002a. A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 109 (1): 3–25.
95. *Greenwald, A. G., and Farnham, S. D., 2000. Using the Implicit Association Test to measure self-esteem and self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79 (6): 1022–1038.
96. *Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., and Schwartz, J. L. K., 1998. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74 (6): 1464–1480.
97. *Greenwald, A. G., and Nosek, B. A., 2001. Health of the Implicit Association Test at age 3. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48 (2): 85–93.
98. *Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., and Banaji, M. R., 2003. Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85 (2): 197–216.
99. *Greenwald, A. G., Pickrell, J. E., and Farnham, S. D., 2002b. Implicit partisanship: Taking sides for no reason. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83 (2): 367–379.
100. *Gregg, A. P., 2003. Optimally conceptualizing implicit self-esteem: Comment. Psychological Inquiry, 14 (1): 35–38.
101. *Grover, V. P., Keel, P. K., and Mitchell, J. P., 2003. Gender differences in implicit weight identity. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 34 (1): 125–135.
102. *Hammond, J. L., 1973. Two sources of error in ecological correlations. American Sociological Review, 38: 764–777.
103. *Hausmann, L. R. M., and Ryan, C. S., 2004. Effects of external and internal motivation to control prejudice on implicit prejudice: The mediating role of efforts to control prejudiced responses. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 26 (2): 215–225.
104. Hofmann, W., Gawronski, B., Gschwendner, T., Le, H., and Schmitt, M., 2005a. A meta-analysis on the correlation between the Implicit Association Test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31: 1369–1385.
105. *Hofmann, W., Gschwendner, T., and Schmitt, M., 2005b. On implicit – explicit consistency: The moderating role of individual differences in awareness and adjustment. European Journal of Personality, 19 (1): 25–49.
106. Honts, C. R., Hodes, R. L., and Raskin, D. C., 1985. Effects of physical countermeasures on the physiological detection of deception. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 70: 177–187.
107. *Huijding, J. J., de Jong, P. J., Wiers, R. W., and Verkooijen, K., 2005. Implicit and explicit attitudes towards smoking in a smoking and a nonsmoking setting. Addictive Behaviours, 30 (5): 949–961.
108. *Hummert, M. L., Garstka, T. A., O'Brien, T. A., Greenwald, A. G., and Mellot, D. S., 2002. Using the Implicit Association Test to measure age differences in implicit social cognitions. Psychology and Aging, 17 (3): 482–495.
109. *Jajodia, A., and Earleywine, M., 2003. Measuring alcohol expectancies with the Implicit Association Test. Psychology of Addictive Behaviours, 17 (2): 126–133.
110. Jarman, R. F., 1980. Cognitive processes and syntactical structures: Analyses of paradigmatic and syntagmatic associations. Psychological Research, 41: 153–167.
111. *Jelenec, P., and Steffens, M. C., 2002. Implicit attitudes towards elderly women and men. Current Research in Social Psychology, 7 (16): 275–293.
112. *Jellison, W. A., McConnell, A. R., and Gabriel, S., 2004. Implicit and explicit measures of sexual orientation attitudes: Ingroup preferences and related behaviours and beliefs among gay and straight men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30 (5): 629–642.
113. *Jordan, C. H., Spencer, S. J., and Zanna, M. P., 2005. Types of high self-esteem and prejudice: How implicit self-esteem relates to ethnic discrimination among high explicit self-esteem individuals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31 (5): 693–702.
114. *Jordan, C. H., Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., Hoshino-Browne, E., and Correll, J., 2003. Secure and defensive high self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85 (5): 969–978.
115. *Jost, J. T., Pelham, B. W., and Carvallo, M. R., 2002. Non-conscious forms of system justification: Implicit and behavioural preferences for higher status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38 (6): 586–602.
116. *Kaminska-Feldman, M., 2004. The relation between two different implicit attitude measures: Asymmetry in self – others distance rating and Implicit Association Test. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 35 (1): 65–70.
117. Kang, J., and Banaji, M. R., in press. Fair measures: A behavioral realist revision of ‘Affirmative Action’. California Law Review,
118. *Karpinski, A., 2004. Measuring self-esteem using the Implicit Association Test: The role of the other. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30 (1): 22–34.
119. *Karpinski, A., and Hilton, J. L., 2001. Attitudes and the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81 (5): 774–788.
120. *Karpinski, A., Steinman, R. B., and Hilton, J. L., 2005. Attitude importance as a moderator of the relationship between implicit and explicit attitude measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31 (7): 949–962.
121. *Kim, D -Y., 2003a. Voluntary controllability of the Implicit Association Test (IAT). Social Psychology Quarterly, 66 (1): 83–96.
122. *Kim, D -Y., 2003b. After the South and North Korea summit: Malleability of explicit and implicit national attitudes of South Koreans. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 9 (2): 159–170.
123. *Kim, D -Y., 2004. The Implicit Life Satisfaction Measure. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7 (3): 236–262.
124. *Kim, D -Y., and Oh, H -J., 2001. Psychosocial aspects of Korean reunification: Explicit and implicit national attitudes and identity of South Koreans and North Korean defectors. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 7 (3): 265–288.
125. *Kitayama, S., and Uchida, Y., 2003. Explicit self-criticism and implicit self-regard: Evaluating self and friend in two cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39 (5): 476–482.
126. *Klauer, K. C., and Mierke, J., 2005. Task – set inertia, attitude accessibility, and compatibility-order effects: New evidence for a task – set switching account of the Implicit Association Test effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31 (2): 208–217.
127. *Kobayashi, C., and Greenwald, A. G., 2003. Implicit – explicit differences in self-enhancement for Americans and Japanese. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34 (5): 522–541.
128. *Kühnen, U., Schießl, M., Bauer, N., Paulig, N., Pöhlmann, C., and Schmidthals, K., 2001. How robust is the IAT? Measuring and manipulating implicit attitudes of East- and West-Germans. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48 (2): 135–144.
129. Lepore, L., and Brown, R., 1997. Category and stereotype activation: Is prejudice inevitable?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72: 275–287.
130. Lilienfeld, S. O., Wood, J. M., and Garp, H. O., 2000. The scientific status of projective techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1: 27–66.
131. *Livingston, R. W., 2002. The role of perceived negativity in the moderation of African Americans' implicit and explicit racial attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38 (4): 405–413.
132. *Lowery, B. S., Hardin, C. D., and Sinclair, S., 2001. Social influence effects on automatic racial prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81 (5): 842–855.
133. *Madon, S., Smith, A. E., and Guyll, M., 2005. Social norms regarding protected status and threat reactions to the stigmatized. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35 (3): 572–602.
134. *Maison, D., Greenwald, A. G., and Bruin, R., 2001. The Implicit Association Test as a measure of implicit consumer attitudes. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 32 (1): 61–69.
135. *Maison, D., Greenwald, A. G., and Bruin, R. H., 2004. Predictive validity of the Implicit Association Test in studies of brands, consumer attitudes, and behaviour. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14 (4): 405–415.
136. *Marsh, K. L., Johnson, B. T., and Scott-Sheldon, L. A., 2001. Heart versus reason in condom use: Implicit versus explicit attitudinal predictors of sexual behaviour. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48 (2): 161–175.
137. *McConnell, A. R., and Leibold, J. M., 2001. Relations among the Implicit Association Test, discriminatory behaviour, and explicit measures of racial attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37 (5): 435–442.
138. *McFarland, S. G., and Crouch, Z., 2002. A cognitive skill confound on the Implicit Association Test. Social Cognition, 20 (6): 483–510.
139. *McGregor, I., and Marigold, D. C., 2003. Defensive zeal and the uncertain self: What makes you so sure?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85 (5): 838–852.
140. *Meagher, B. E., and Aidman, E. V., 2004. Individual differences in implicit and declared self-esteem as predictors of response to negative performance evaluation: Validating Implicit Association Test as a measure of self-attitudes. International Journal of Testing, 4 (1): 19–42.
141. *Mierke, J., and Klauer, K. C., 2001. Implicit association measurement with the IAT: Evidence for effects of executive control processes. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48 (2): 107–122.
142. *Mierke, J., and Klauer, K. C., 2003. Method-specific variance in the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85 (6): 1180–1192.
143. *Mihailides, S., Devilly, G. J., and Ward, T., 2004. Implicit cognitive distortions and sexual offending. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 16 (4): 333–350.
144. *Milne, E., and Grafman, J., 2001. Ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions in humans eliminate implicit gender stereotyping. Journal of Neuroscience, 21 (12): 1–6.
145. *Mitchell, C. J., 2004. Mere acceptance produces apparent attitude in the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40 (3): 366–373.
146. *Mitchell, C. J., Anderson, N. E., and Lovibond, P. F., 2003. Measuring evaluative conditioning using the Implicit Association Test. Learning and Motivation, 34 (2): 203–217.
147. *Mitchell, J. P., Nosek, B. A., and Banaji, M. R., 2003. Contextual variations in implicit evaluations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132 (3): 455–469.
148. *Monteith, M. J., Voils, C. I., and Ashburn-Nardo, L., 2001. Taking a look underground: Detecting, interpreting, and reacting to implicit racial biases. Social Cognition, 19 (4): 395–417.
149. *Neumann, R., Hülsenbeck, K., and Seibt, B., 2004. Attitudes towards people with AIDS and avoidance behaviour: Automatic and reflective bases of behaviour. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40 (4): 543–550.
150. *Neumann, R., and Seibt, B. 2001. The structure of prejudice: Associative strength as a determinant of stereotype endorsement. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31 (6): 609–620.
151. *Nier, J. A., 2005. How dissociated are implicit and explicit racial attitudes? A bogus pipeline approach. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 8 (1): 39–52.
152. *Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., and Greenwald, A. G., 2002a. Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site. Group Dynamics, 6 (1): 101–115.
153. *Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., and Greenwald, A. G., 2002b. Math = male, me = female, therefore math = not me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83 (1): 44–59.
154. *Nosek, B. A., Greenwald, A. G., and Banaji, M. R., 2005. Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: II Method variables and construct validity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31 (2): 166–180.
155. Nosek, B. A., Greenwald, A. G., and Banaji, M. R., “ The Implicit Association Test at age 7: A methodological and conceptual review ”. In Automatic processes in social thinking and behaviour, Edited by: Bargh, J. A., Hove, UK: Psychology Press. in press
156. *Olson, M. A., and Fazio, R. H., 2001. Implicit attitude formation through classical conditioning. Psychological Science, 12 (5): 413–417.
157. Olson, M. A., and Fazio, R. H., 2002. Implicit acquisition and manifestation of classically conditioned attitudes. Social Cognition, 20: 89–103.
158. *Olson, M. A., and Fazio, R. H., 2003. Relations between implicit measures of prejudice: What are we measuring?. Psychological Science, 14 (6): 636–639.
159. *Olson, M. A., and Fazio, R. H., 2004. Reducing the influence of extrapersonal associations on the Implicit Association Test: Personalizing the IAT. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86 (5): 653–667.
160. *Ottaway, S. A., Hayden, D. C., and Oakes, M. A., 2001. Implicit attitudes and racism: Effects of word familiarity and frequency on the implicit association test. Social Cognition, 19 (2): 97–144.
161. *Paladino, M -P., Leyens, J -P., Rodriguez, R., Rodriguez, A., Gaunt, R., and Demoulin, S., 2002. Differential association of uniquely and non uniquely human emotions with the ingroup and the outgroup. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 5 (2): 105–117.
162. *Palfai, T. P., and Ostafin, B. D., 2003. Alcohol-related motivational tendencies in hazardous drinkers: Assessing implicit response tendencies using the modified-IAT. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41 (10): 1149–1162.
163. *Park, J. H., and Schaller, M., 2005. Does attitude similarity serve as a heuristic cue for kinship? Evidence of an implicit cognitive association. Evolution and Human Behaviour, 26 (2): 158–170.
164. Peeters, G., 1983. “ Relational and informational patterns in social psychology ”. In Current issues in European social psychology, Edited by: Doise, W., and Moscovici, S., Vol. 1, 201–237. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
165. Peeters, G., 1989. Evaluative positive – negative asymmetry in adjective – noun compounds. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 20: 255–266.
166. *Perugini, M., 2005. Predictive models of implicit and explicit attitudes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44 (1): 29–45.
167. Pettigrew, T. F., and Meertens, R. W., 1995. Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25: 57–75.
168. *Phelps, E. A., Cannistraci, C. J., and Cunningham, W. A., 2003. Intact performance on an indirect measure of face bias following amygdala damage. Neuropsychologia, 41 (2): 203–208.
169. *Phelps, E. A., O'Connor, K. J., Cunningham, W. A., Funayama, E. S., Gatenby, J. C., Gore, J. C., 2000. Performance on indirect measures of race evaluation predicts amygdala activation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12 (5): 729–738.
170. *Phelps, E. A., and Thomas, L. A., 2003. Race, behaviour, and the brain: The role of neuroimaging in understanding complex social behaviours. Political Psychology, 24 (4): 747–758.
171. *Pinter, B., and Greenwald, A. G., 2005. Clarifying the role of the “other” category in the self-esteem IAT. Experimental Psychology, 52 (1): 74–79.
172. *Plessner, H., and Banse, R., 2001. Attitude measurement using the Implicit Association Test (IAT): Editorial. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48 (2): 82–84.
173. Raven, J. C., 1941. Standardisation of progressive matrices, 1938. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 19: 137–150.
174. *Redding, R. E., 2004. Bias on prejudice? The politics of research on racial prejudice: Comment. Psychological Inquiry, 15 (4): 289–293.
175. *Richeson, J. A., and Ambady, N., 2001. Who's in charge? Effects of situational roles on automatic gender bias. Sex Roles, 44 (9): 493–512.
176. *Richeson, J. A., and Ambady, N., 2003. Effects of situational power on automatic racial prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39 (2): 177–183.
177. *Richeson, J. A., Baird, A. A., Gordon, H. L., Heatherton, T. F., Wyland, C. L., Trawalter, S., 2003. An fMRI investigation of the impact of interracial contact on executive function. Nature Neuroscience, 6 (12): 1323–1328.
178. *Richeson, J. A., and Shelton, J. N., 2003. When prejudice does not pay: Effects of interracial contact on executive function. Psychological Science, 14 (3): 287–290.
179. *Richeson, J. A., and Shelton, J. N., 2005. Thin slices of racial bias. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 29 (1): 75–86.
180. *Richetin, J., Croizet, J -C., and Huguet, P., 2004. Facial make-up elicits positive attitudes at the implicit level: Evidence from the Implicit Association Test. Current Research in Social Psychology, 9 (11): 145–164.
181. Robinson, W. S., 1950. Ecological correlations and the behaviour of individuals. American Sociological Review, 15: 351–357.
182. Roediger, H. L., 1990. Implicit memory: Retention without awareness. American Psychologist, 45: 1043–1056.
183. *Roefs, A., and Jansen, A., 2002. Implicit and explicit attitudes towards high-fat foods in obesity. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111 (3): 517–521.
184. *Rothermund, K., and Wentura, D., 2001. Figure – ground asymmetries in the Implicit Association Test (IAT). Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48 (2): 94–106.
185. *Rothermund, K., and Wentura, D., 2004. Underlying processes in the Implicit Association Test: Dissociating salience from associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133 (2): 139–165.
186. Rothermund, K., Wentura, D., and Bak, P., 2000. Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of approach- and avoidance-related social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78: 1024–1037.
187. *Rowatt, W. C., and Franklin, L. M., 2004. Christian orthodoxy, religious fundamentalism, and right-wing authoritarianism as predictors of implicit racial prejudice. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 14 (2): 125–138.
188. *Rowatt, W. C., Franklin, L. M., and Cotton, M., 2005. Patterns and personality correlates of implicit and explicit attitudes towards Christians and Muslims. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 44 (1): 29–43.
189. *Rudman, L. A., 2004a. Sources of implicit attitudes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13 (2): 79–82.
190. *Rudman, L. A., 2004b. Social justice in our minds, homes, and society: The nature, causes, and consequences of implicit bias. Social Justice Research, 17 (2): 129–142.
191. *Rudman, L. A., Ashmore, A. D., and Gary, M. L., 2001a. “Unlearning” automatic biases: The malleability of implicit prejudice and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81 (5): 856–868.
192. *Rudman, L. A., Feinberg, J., and Fairchild, K., 2002. Minority members' implicit attitudes: Automatic ingroup bias as a function of group status. Social Cognition, 20 (4): 294–320.
193. *Rudman, L. A., and Goodwin, S. A., 2004. Gender differences in automatic in-group bias: Why do women like women more than men like men?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87 (4): 494–509.
194. *Rudman, L. A., Greenwald, A. G., and McGhee, D. E., 2001b. Implicit self-concept and evaluative implicit gender stereotypes: Self and ingroup share desirable traits. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27 (9): 1164–1178.
195. *Rudman, L. A., Greenwald, A. G., Mellot, D. S., and Schwartz, J. L. K., 1999. Measuring the automatic components of prejudice: Flexibility and generality of the Implicit Association Test. Social Cognition, 17 (4): 437–465.
196. *Rudman, L. A., and Heppen, J. B., 2003. Implicit romantic fantasies and women's interest in personal power: A glass slipper effect?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29 (11): 1357–1370.
197. *Rudman, L. A., and Kilianski, S. E., 2000. Implicit and explicit attitudes towards female authority. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26 (11): 1315–1328.
198. *Rudman, L. A., and Lee, M. R., 2002. Implicit and explicit consequences of exposure to violent and misogynous rap music. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 5 (2): 133–150.
199. *Rutland, A., Cameron, L., Milne, A., and McGeorge, P., 2005. Social norms and self-presentation: Children's implicit and explicit intergroup attitudes. Child Development, 76 (2): 451–466.
200. Schacter, D., 1987. Implicit memory: History and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12: 432–444.
201. *Schaller, M., Park, H. J., and Mueller, A., 2003. Fear of the dark: Interactive effects of beliefs about danger and ambient darkness on ethnic stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29 (5): 637–649.
202. *Schimmack, U., and Diener, E., 2003. Predictive validity of explicit and implicit self-esteem for subjective well being. Journal of Research in Personality, 37 (2): 100–106.
203. *Schmid Mast, M., 2004. Men are hierarchical, women are egalitarian: An implicit gender stereotype. Swiss Journal of Psychology – Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Psychologie – Revue Suisse de Psychologie, 63 (2): 107–111.
204. *Schmukle, S. C., and Egloff, B., 2004. Does the Implicit Association Test for assessing anxiety measure trait and state variance?. European Journal of Personality, 18 (6): 483–494.
205. *Schmukle, S. C., and Egloff, B., 2005. A latent state-trait analysis of implicit and explicit personality measures. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21 (2): 100–107.
206. Schnabel, K., Banse, R., and Asendorpf, J. B., 2006. Employing automatic approach and avoidance tendencies for the assessment of implicit personality self-concept: The Implicit Association Procedure (IAP). Experimental Psychology, 53: 69–76.
207. *Schultz, P. W., Shriver, C., Tabanico, J. J., and Khazian, A. M., 2004. Implicit connections with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24 (1): 31–42.
208. Schwarz, N., and Sudman, S., eds. 1996. Answering questions: Methodology for determining cognitive and communicative processes in survey research, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
209. *Sears, D. O., 2004. A perspective on implicit prejudice from survey research: Comment. Psychological Inquiry, 15 (4): 293–297.
210. *Seise, J., Banse, R., and Neyer, F. J., 2002. Individuelle Unterschiede in impliziten und expliziten Einstellungen zur Homosexualität: Eine empirische Studie [Individual differences in terms of implicit and explicit attitudes towards homosexuality: An empirical study]. Zeitschrift für Sexualforschung, 15 (1): 21–42.
211. *Shelton, J. N., Richeson, J. A., Salvatore, J., and Trawalter, S., 2005. Ironic effects of racial bias during interracial interactions. Psychological Science, 16 (5): 397–402.
212. *Sherman, S. J., Rose, J. S., Koch, K., Presson, C. C., and Chassin, L., 2003. Implicit and explicit attitudes towards cigarette smoking: The effects of context and motivation. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 22 (1): 13–39.
213. *Sinclair, S., Dunn, E., and Lowery, B. S., 2005. The relationship between parental racial attitudes and children's implicit prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41 (3): 283–289.
214. *Skowronski, J. J., and Lawrence, M. A., 2001. A comparative study of the implicit and explicit gender attitudes of children and college students. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25 (2): 155–165.
215. Steffens, M., Lichau, J., Still, Y., Jelenec, P., Anheuser, J., Goergens, N. K., 2004. Individuum oder Gruppe, Exemplar oder Kategorie? Ein Zweifaktorenmodell zur Erklärung der Reaktionszeitunterschiede im Implicit Association Test (IAT) [Individual or group, exemplar or category? A two-factor model for the explanation of reaction time differences in the Implicit Association Test (IAT)]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 212: 57–65.
216. *Steffens, M. C., 2004. Is the Implicit Association Test immune to faking?. Experimental Psychology, 51 (3): 165–179.
217. *Steffens, M. C., and Buchner, A., 2003. Implicit Association Test: Separating transsituationally stable and variable components of attitudes towards gay men. Experimental Psychology, 50 (1): 33–48.
218. *Steffens, M. C., and Plewe, I., 2001. Items' cross-category associations as a confounding factor in the Implicit Association Test. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48 (2): 123–134.
219. Stroop, J. R., 1935/1992. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18: 643–662. [reprinted in Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 15 – 23]
220. *Suedfeld, P., 2004. Racism in the brain; or is it racism on the brain: Comment. Psychological Inquiry, 15 (4): 298–302.
221. *Swanson, J. E., Rudman, L. A., and Greenwald, A. G., 2001. Using the Implicit Association Test to investigate attitude – behaviour consistency for stigmatised behaviour. Cognition and Emotion, 15 (2): 207–230.
222. Swets, J. A., Dawes, R. M., and Monahan, J., 2000. Psychological science can improve diagnostic decisions. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1: 1–26. [whole issue]
223. *Teachman, B. A., Gapinski, K. D., Brownell, K. D., Rawkins, M., and Jeyaram, S., 2003. Demonstrations of implicit anti-fat bias: The impact of providing causal information and evoking empathy. Health Psychology, 22 (1): 68–78.
224. *Teachman, B. A., Gregg, A. P., and Woody, S. R., 2001. Implicit associations for fear-relevant stimuli among individuals with snake and spider fears. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110 (2): 226–235.
225. *Teachman, B. A., and Woody, S. R., 2003. Automatic processing in spider phobia: Implicit fear associations over the course of treatment. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112 (1): 100–109.
226. *Teachman, B. A., and Woody, S. R., 2004. Staying tuned to research in implicit cognition: Relevance for clinical practice with anxiety disorders. Cognitive and Behavioural Practice, 11 (2): 149–159.
227. *Teige, S., Schnabel, K., Banse, R., and Asendorpf, J. B., 2004. Assessment of multiple implicit self-concept dimensions using the Extrinsic Affective Simon Task (EAST). European Journal of Personality, 18 (6): 495–520.
228. *Tetlock, P. E., and Arkes, H. R., 2004. The implicit prejudice exchange: Islands of consensus in a sea of controversy: Response. Psychological Inquiry, 15 (4): 311–321.
229. Thurstone, L. L., 1927. A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review, 34: 273–286.
230. *Uhlmann, E., Dasgupta, N., Elgueta, A., Greenwald, A. G., and Swanson, J., 2002. Subgroup prejudice based on skin colour among Hispanics in the United States and Latin America. Social Cognition, 20 (3): 198–226.
231. *Uhlmann, E., and Swanson, J., 2004. Exposure to violent video games increases automatic aggressiveness. Journal of Adolescence, 27 (1): 41–52.
232. *Vanman, E. J., Saltz, J. L., Nathan, L. R., and Warren, J. A., 2004. Racial discrimination by low-prejudiced Whites facial movements as implicit measures of attitudes related to behaviour. Psychological Science, 15 (11): 711–714.
233. *Vargas, P. T., von Hippel, W., and Petty, R. E., 2004. Using partially structured attitude measures to enhance the attitude – behaviour relationship. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30 (2): 197–211.
234. *Vartanian, L. R., Polivy, J., and Herman, C. P., 2004. Implicit cognitions and eating disorders: Their application in research and treatment. Cognitive and Behavioural Practice, 11 (2): 160–167.
235. *von Hippel, W., 2004. Implicit prejudice: Pentimento or Inquisition: Comment. Psychological Inquiry, 15 (4): 302–305.
236. *VonDras, D. D., and Lor-Vang, M. N., 2004. Using an Internet activity to enhance students' awareness of age bias in social perceptions. Educational Gerontology, 30 (4): 261–273.
237. *Wang, S. S., Brownell, K. D., and Wadden, T. A., 2004. The influence of the stigma of obesity on overweight individuals. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders, 28 (10): 1333–1337.
238. Wänke, M., De Houwer, J., Plessner, H., Richter, L., and Gärtner, T., 2002. The sensitivity of the IAT to elaborated and elaborated attitude change, Switzerland: University of Basel. Unpublished manuscript
239. *Wenger, J. L., and Yarbrough, T. D., 2005. Religious individuals: Evaluating their intrinsic and extrinsic motivations at the implicit level of awareness. Journal of Social Psychology, 145 (1): 5–16.
240. Wentura, D., Rothermund, K., and Bak, P., 2000. Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of approach- and avoidance-related social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78: 1024–1037.
241. *Weyant, J. M., 2005. Implicit stereotyping of Hispanics: Development and validity of a Hispanic version of the Implicit Association Test. Hispanic Journal of Behavioural Sciences, 27 (3): 355–363.
242. *Wiers, R. W., de Jong, P. J., Havermans, R., and Jelicic, M., 2004. How to change implicit drug use-related cognitions in prevention: A transdisciplinary integration of findings from experimental psychopathology, social cognition, memory, and experimental learning psychology. Substance Use and Misuse, 39 (10): 1625–1684.
243. *Wiers, R. W., Stacy, A. W., Ames, S., Noll, J. A., Sayette, M. A., Zack, M., 2002. Implicit and explicit alcohol-related cognitions. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 26 (1): 129–137.
244. *Wiers, R. W., Van Woerden, N., Smulders, F. T. Y., and De Jong, P. J., 2002. Implicit and explicit alcohol-related cognitions in heavy and light drinkers. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111 (4): 648–658.
245. Wigboldus, D. H. J., Holland, R. W., and van Knippenberg, A., 2004. Single target implicit associations Manuscript submitted for publication
246. Wilson, T. D., Lindsey, S., and Schooler, T. Y., 2000. A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107: 101–126.
247. *Wittenbrink, B., 2004. Ordinary forms of prejudice: Comment. Psychological Inquiry, 15 (4): 306–310.
248. *Wittenbrink, B., Judd, C. M., and Park, B., 2001. Spontaneous prejudice in context: Variability in automatically activated attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81 (5): 815–827.
249. *Zayas, V., and Shoda, Y., 2005. Do automatic reactions elicited by thoughts of romantic partner, mother, and self relate to adult romantic attachment?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31 (8): 1011–1025.
250. *Ziegert, J. C., and Hanges, P. J., 2005. Employment discrimination: The role of implicit attitudes, motivation, and a climate for racial bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90 (3): 553–562.