Minority members' implicit attitudes: Automatic ingroup bias as a function of group status

Social Cognition

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 294-320

  Rudman, Laurie A ^a   Feinberg, Joshua ^a   Fairchild, Kimberly ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036390346     PISSN: 0278016X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1521/soco.20.4.294.19908     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Ashburn-Nardo, L., Voils, C. I., & Monteith, M. J. (2001). Implicit associations as the seeds of intergroup bias: How easily do they take root? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 789-799.
2. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Crocker, J., & Major, B. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608-630.
4. De Houwer, J. (2001). A structural and process analysis of the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 443-451.
5. Dasgupta, N., McGhee, D. E., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. B. (2000). Automatic preference for White Americans: Eliminating the familiarity explanation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 316-328.
6. Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5-18.
7. Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., Johnson, C., Johnson, B., & Howard, A. (1997). On the nature of prejudice: Automatic and controlled processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 510-540.
8. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
9. Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., & Williams, C. J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes. A bona fide pipeline? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1013-1027.
10. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11. Greenwald, A. G. (2001, October). What's wrong with the IAT? Paper presented at the meetings of the Society for Experimental Social Psychology, Spokane, WA.
12. Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4-27.
13. Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., Rudman, L. A., Farnham, S. D., Nosek, B. A., & Mellott, D. S. (2002). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 109, 3-25.
14. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
15. Greenwald., A. G., & Nosek, B. A. (2001). The health of the Implicit Association Test at age 3. Zeitschrift fuer Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 85-93.
16. James, K. (1997). Worker social identity and health-related costs for organizations: A comparative study between ethnic groups. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 2, 108-117.
17. Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false-consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-27.
18. Jost, J. T., & Burgess, D. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence and the conflict between group and system justification motives in low status groups, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 293-305.
19. Jost, J.T., Burgess, D., & Mosso, C. (2001). Conflicts of legitimation among self, group, and system: The integrative potential of system justification theory. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp.363-388). New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Jost, J. T., Pelham, B. W., & Carvallo, M. R. (in press). Non-conscious forms of system justification: Implicit and behavioral preferences for higher status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.
21. Kim, D., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Voluntary controllability of the IAT. Manuscript submitted for publication.
22. Kleugel, J. R., & Smith, E. R. (1986). Beliefs about inequality: Americans' views of what is and what ought to be. New York: Aldine DeGruyter.
23. Lerner, M. J. (1981). The belief in a just world. New York: Plenum Press.
24. Major, B., & Schmader, T. (2001). Legitimacy and the construal of social disadvantage. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy (pp. 176-204). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
25. Miller, C. T., & Myers, A. M. (1998). How overweight people (and others) control outcomes despite prejudice. In J. K. Swim & C. Stangor (Eds.), Prejudice: The target's perspective (pp. 191-219). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
26. McConnell, A., R. & Leibold, J. M. (2001). Relations among the Implicit Association Test, explicit attitudes, and discriminatory behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 435-442.
27. Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. B., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, 101-115.
28. Ottaway, S. A., Hayden, D. C., & Oakes, M. A. (2001). Implicit attitudes and racism: Effect of word familiarity and frequency on the Implicit Association Test. Social Cognition, 19, 97-144.
29. Richeson, J., & Ambady, N. (2000). Implicit associations in context: Effects of group membership and situational roles. Unpublished manuscript. Harvard University.
30. Ridgeway, C. L. (2001). The emergence of status beliefs: From structural inequality to legitimizing ideologies. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 257-277). New York: Cambridge University Press.
31. Rudman, L. A., Feinberg, J. M., & Rey, A. (2001). Minority members' implicit attitudes and stereotypes.
32. Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 743-762.
33. Rudman, L. A., Greenwald, A. G., & McGhee, D. E. (2001). Implicit self-concept and evaluative implicit gender stereotypes: Self and ingroup share desirable traits. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1164-1178.
34. Rudman, L. A., Greenwald, A. G., Mellott, D. S., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1999). Measuring the automatic components of prejudice: Flexibility and generality of the Implicit Association Test. Social Cognition, 17(4), 1-29.
35. Rudman, L. A., & Lee, M. R. (2002). Implicit and explicit consequences of exposure to violent and misogynous rap music. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 5, 133-150.
36. Swanson, J. E., Rudman, L. A., & Greenwald, A. G. (2001). Using the Implicit Association Test to investigate attitude-behavior consistency for stigmatized behavior. Cognition and Emotion, 15, 207-230.
37. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
38. Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2002). Self-esteem and socioeconomic status: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 59-71.
39. Wittenbrink, B., Judd, C. M., & Park, B. (1997). Evidence for racial prejudice at the implicit level and its relationship with questionnaire measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 262-274.