The implicit prejudice exchange: Islands of consensus in a sea of controversy

Psychological Inquiry

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 311-321

  Tetlock, Philip E ^a   Arkes, Hal R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 15244338792     PISSN: 1047840X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327965pli1504_03     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Boring, E. G. (1950). A history of experimental psychology. New York: Appleton.
2. Donald, D. H. (1996). Lincoln. New York: Simon & Schuster.
3. Dunton, B. C., & Fazio, R. H. (1997). An individual-difference measue of motivation to control prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 316-326.
4. Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual review of psychology, 54, 297-327.
5. Fazio, R., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., & Williams, C. J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobrrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipline? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1013-1027.
6. Frantz, C. M., Cuddy, A. J. C., Burnett, M., Ray, H., & Hart, A. (in press). A threat in the computer: The race Implicit Association Test as a stereotype threat experience. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
7. Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1999). Betting on one good reason: Take the best heuristic. In G. Gigerenzer, P. M. Todd, & The ABC Research Group, Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Gilbert, D. J. (1998). The prejudice perception assessment scale: Measuring stigma vulnerability among African American students at predominately Euro-American universities. Journal of Black Psychology, 24, 305-321.
9. Judd, C. M., Blair, I. & Chapleau, K. (2004). Automatic stereotypes vs. automatic prejudice: Sorting out the possibilities in the Payne (2001) weapon paradigm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 75-81.
10. Mellers, B. A., Hertwig, R., & Kahneman, D. (2001). Do frequency representations eliminate conjunction effects? An exercise in adversarial collaboration. Psychological Science, 12, 269-275.
11. Schauer, F. (2003). Profiles, probabilities, and stereotypes. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
12. Sniderman, P. (2003). Black pride and Black prejudice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13. Sniderman, P. M., & Tetlock, P. E. (1986a). Reflections on American racism. Journal of Social Issues, 42, 173-188.
14. Sniderman, P. M., & Tetlock, P. E. (1986b). Symbolic racism: Problems of motive attribution in political debate. Journal of Social Issues, 42, 129-150.
15. Stein, H. (2004, January 30). Dumb and dumber. Wall Street Journal, p. A15.
16. Tetlock, P. E. (1994). Political psychology or politicized psychology: Is the road to scientific hell paved with good intentions? Political Psychology, 15, 509-529.
17. Tetlock, P. E., Kristel, O. V., Elson, S. B., Green, M. C., & Lerner, J. S. (2000). The psychology of the unthinkable: Taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 853-870.
18. Tetlock, P. E. (in press). Expert political judgment: How good is it? How can we know? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.