The power of a story: New, automatic associations from a single reading of a short scenario

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 139-144

  Foroni, Francesco ^a   Mayr, Ulrich ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21244468750     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196359     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. AHN, W.-K., KIM, N. S., LASSALINE, M. E., & DENNIS, M. (2000). Causal status as a determinant of feature centrality. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 361-416.
2. ASHBURN-NARDO, L., VOILS, C. I., & MONTEITH, M. J. (2001). Implicit associations as the seeds of intergroup bias: How easily do they take root? Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 81, 789-799.
3. BARGH, J. A. (1999). The cognitive monster: The case against the controllability of automatic stereotype effects. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 361-382). New York: Guilford.
4. BLAIR, I. V., MA, J. E., & LENTON, A. P. (2001). Imagining stereotypes away: The moderation of implicit stereotypes through mental imagery. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 81, 828-841.
5. BODENHAUSEN, G. V., & MACRAE, C. N. (1998). Stereotype activation and inhibition. In R. S. Wyer, Jr. (Ed.), Advances in social cognition: Vol. 11. Stereotype activation and inhibition (pp. 1-52). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. BRENDL, C. M., MARKMAN, A. B., & MESSNER, C. (2001). How do indirect measures of evaluation work? Evaluating the inference of prejudice in the implicit association test. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 81, 760-773.
7. BREWER, M. B. (1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In T. K. Srull & R. S. Wyer, Jr. (Eds.), Advances in social cognition: Vol. I. A dual process model of impression formation (pp. 1-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. DASGUPTA, N., & GREENWALD, A. G. (2001). On the malleability of automatic attitudes: Combating automatic prejudice with images of ad mired and disliked individuals. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 81, 800-814.
9. DEHAENE, S., KERSZBERG, M., & CHANGEUX, J.-P. (1998). A neuronal model of a global workspace in effortful cognitive tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95, 14529-14534.
10. DEVINE, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 56, 5-18.
11. DEVINE, P. G. (2001). Implicit prejudice and stereotyping: How automatic are they? Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 81, 757-759.
12. FISKE, S. T., & NEUBERG, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1-74). San Diego: Academic Press.
13. FOLK, C. L., REMINGTON, R. W., & JOHNSTON, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 1030-1044.
14. GOLLWITZER, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54, 493-503.
15. GREENWALD, A. G., McGHEE, D. E., & SCHWARTZ, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
16. HOLYOAK, K. J., & SIMON, D. (1999). Bidirectional reasoning in decision making by constraint satisfaction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 3-31.
17. HOMMEL, B. (2000). The prepared reflex: Automaticity and control in stimulus-response translation. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 247-273). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. KLAUER, K. C., & MUSCH, J. (2002). Goal-dependent and goal-independent effects of irrelevant evaluations. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 802-814.
19. LOGAN, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527.
20. MAYR, U., & KEELE, S. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4-26.
21. MCCONNELL, A. R., & LEIBOLD, J. M. (2001). Relations among the implicit association test, discriminatory behavior, and explicit measures of racial attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 435-442.
22. MEDIN, D. L., & ORTONY, A. (1989). Psychological essentialism. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 179-195). New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. NEUMANN, O., & KLOTZ, W. (1994). Motor responses to nonreportable, masked stimuli: Where is the limit of direct parameter specification? In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 123-150). San Diego: Academic Press.
24. NOSEK, B. A., & BANAJI, M. R. (2001). The go/no-go association task. Social Cognition, 19, 625-666.
25. SIMON, D., & HOLYOAK, K. J. (2002). Structural dynamics of cognition: From consistency theories to constraint satisfaction. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 6, 283-294.