Research Designs

Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, Third Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 715-761

  Ross, Steven M ^a   Morrison, Gary R ^b   Hannafin, Robert D ^c   Young, Michael ^d   van den Akker, Jan ^e   Kuiper, Wilmad ^e   Richey, Rita C ^f   Klein, James D ^g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

^b OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^f WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Component investigation: The identification or confirmation through research of steps (procedural models) and factors (conceptual models) critical to the instructional design process.; Design and development research: Research that seeks to create knowledge grounded in data systematically derived from practice and based upon a systematic analysis of specific cases.; Experiment: A design that involves the comparison of one treatment to another, using two or more different groups.; External validity: The degree to which the results of an experiment can be generalized to other settings.; In program learner behaviors: Measures of learner activities and outcomes while engaged in an instructional task.; Instructional strategies: The prescribed sequences and methods of instruction to achieve a learning objective.; Internal validity: The degree to which the results of a study can be attributed to the treatment rather than extraneous or confounding variables.; Log files: A sequence of behavioral data stored in a permanent file, offering time or location stamped records of human choices made through computer interfaces with learning environments.; Mixed methods research: Studies that combine qualitative and quantitative data collection methods.; Model research: Research that addresses the validity or effectiveness of an existing or newly constructed development model, process, or technique.; Model validation: Experiments, quasi experiments, interviews, and expert reviews that are used for verification and evaluation of a particular design and development technique.; Open ended learning environment: Instructional projects based, to varying degrees, on constructivist principles in which learners self discover concepts and principles while engaged in authentic learning tasks.; Qualitative research: Research that emphasizes verbal descriptions or narrative accounts of observed or recorded events.; Quasi experiment: An experimental design in which participants are not randomly assigned to treatments.; Technology enhanced learning environments: Technology based learning and instructional systems through which students acquire skills or knowledge, usually with the help of teachers or facilitators, learning support tools, and technological resources.; Tool research: The research based design and development of products and tools to enhance learning.

Indexed keywords

EID: 85144986586     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203880869-60     Document Type: Chapter

References (171)

1. Adamski, A. J. (1998). The Development of a Systems Design Model for Job Performance Aids: A Qualitative Developmental Study, Ph.D. dissertation, Wayne State University, 1998. Dissert. Abstr. Int. A, 59(03), 789.
2. Aleven, V., Stahl, E., Schworm, S., Fischer, F., and Wallace, R. (2003). Help seeking and help design in interactive learning environments, Rev. Educ. Res., 73, 277-320.
3. Anand, P. G. and Ross, S. M. (1987). Using computer-assisted instruction to personalize arithmetic materials for elementary school children. J. Educ. Psychol., 79, 72-78.
4. Andrews, D. H. and Goodson, L. A. (1980). A comparative analysis of models of instructional design. J. Instruct. Dev., 3(4), 2-16.
5. Anglin, G. J. and Morrison, G. R. (2001). Cognitive Load Theory: Implications for Instructional Design Research and Practice. Paper presented at the Association for Educational Communications and Technology Annual Meeting, Atlanta, GA.
6. Barab, S. and Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: putting a stake in the ground. J. Learn. Sci., 13(1), 1-14.*
7. Berliner, D. C. (2002). Educational research: the hardest science of all. Educ. Res., 31(8), 18-20.
8. Borg, W. R., Gall, J. P., and Gall, M. D. (1993). Applying Educational Research, 3rd ed. New York: Longman.
9. Borman, G. D., Hewes, G., Overman, L. T., and Brown, S. (2003). Comprehensive school reform and achievement: a meta-analysis. Rev. Educ. Res., 73(2), 125-230.
10. Börner, K., Hazlewood, W. R., and Sy-Miaw, L. (2002) Visualizing the spatial and temporal distribution of user interaction data collected in three-dimensional virtual worlds. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Information Visualization (IV’02), July 10-12, London, pp. 25-31 (http://vw.indiana.edu/cive02/004_borner_ VisSpatialTemporal.pdf).
11. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. J. Learn. Sci., 2(2), 141-178.
12. Buch, E. E. (1989). A systematically developed training program for microcomputer users in an industrial setting, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, 1988. Dissert. Abstr. Int. A, 49(4), 750.
13. Burkhardt, H. (2006). From design research to large-scale impact: engineering research in education. In Educational Design Research, edited by J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, and N. Nieveen, pp. 121-150. London: Routledge.
14. Burkhardt, H. and Schoenfeld, A. H. (2003). Improving educational research: towards a more useful, more influential and better funded enterprise. Educ. Res., 32(9), 3-14.
15. Cambre, M. A. (1979). The development of formative evaluation procedures for instructional film and television: the first fifty years, Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University, 1978. Dissert. Abstr. Int. A, 39(7), 3995
16. Campbell, D. T. and Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching. In Handbook of Research on Teaching, edited by N. L. Gage, pp. 171-246. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.*
17. Carrier, C. A. (1984). Do learners make good choices? Instruct. Innov., 29(2), 15-17.
18. Carrier, C. A., Davidson, G. V., Higson, V., and Williams, M. D. (1984). Selection of options by field independent and field dependent children in a computer-based coordinate concept lesson. J. Comput.-Based Instruct., 11(2), 49-54.
19. Carrier, C. A., Davidson, G. V., Williams, M. D., and Kalweit, C. M. (1986). Instructional options and encouragement effects in a microcomputer-delivered concept lesson. J. Educ. Res., 79, 222-229.
20. Cavalier, J. C., Klein, J. D., and Cavalier, F. J. (1995). Effects of cooperative learning on performance, attitude, and group behaviors in a technical team environment. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 43(3), 61-71.
21. Chandler, P. and Sweller, J. (1992). The split-attention effect as a factor in the design of instruction. Br. J. Educ. Psychol., 62, 233-246.
22. Chase, C. A. (2003). The effects of gender differences and levels of expertise on instructional design, Ph.D. dissertation, Wayne State University, 2002. Dissert. Abstr. Int. A, 63(11), 3815.
23. Chou, C. and Sun, C. (1996). Constructing a cooperative distance learning system: the CORAL experience. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 44(4), 71-84.
24. Chung J. and Reigeluth, C. M. (1992). Instructional prescriptions for learner control, Educ. Technol., 32(10), 14-20.
25. Clariana, R. B. and Lee, D. (2001). The effects of recognition and recall study tasks with feedback in a computer-based vocabulary lesson. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 49(3), 23-36.
26. Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering the research on learning from media. Rev. Educ. Res., 53(4), 445-459.*
27. Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 42(2), 21-29.
28. Clarke, T., Ayres, P., and Sweller, J. (2005). The impact of sequencing and prior knowledge on learning mathematics through spreadsheet applications. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 53(3), 15-24.
29. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., and Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educ. Res., 32(1), 9-13.
30. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (CTGV). (1990). Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition. Educ. Res., 19(6), 2-10.
31. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (CTGV). (1993). Anchored instruction and situated cognition revisited. Educ. Technol., 33(3), 52-70.
32. Corry, M. D., Frick, T. W., and Hansen, L. (1997). User-centered design and usability testing of a Web site: an illustrative case study. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 45(4), 65-76.
33. Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
34. Cronbach, L. J. and Snow, R. E. (1981). Aptitudes and Instructional Methods: A Handbook for Research on Interactions. New York: Irvington.
35. Cronjé, J. (2006). Paradigms regained: toward integrating objectivism and constructivism in instructional design and the learning sciences. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 54(4), 387-416.
36. Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and Machines: The Classroom Use of Technology Since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.
37. Dede, C. (2003). MUVEES project, http://vista.uconn.edu/webct/cobaltMainFrame.dowebct.
38. Dede, C. (2006). River City, videoconference interview presented to students and faculty at the University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
39. Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design based research: an emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educ. Res., 32(1), 5-8.
40. Dick, W. and Carey, L. (1996). The Systematic Design of Instruction, 4th ed. New York: HarperCollins.
41. DiVesta, F. J. (1975). Trait-treatment interactions, cognitive processes, and research on communication media. AV Commun. Rev., 23, 183-196.
42. Eisenhart, M. and Towne, L. (2003). Contestation and change in national policy on ‘scientifically based’ education research. Educ. Res., 32(7), 31-38.
43. Feuer, M. J., Towne, L., and Shavelson, R. J. (2002). Scientific culture and educational research. Educ. Res., 31(8), 4-14.
44. Fleming, M. and Levie, W. H. (1978). Instructional Message Design: Principles from the Behavioral Sciences. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
45. Friedman, T. L. (2005). The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
46. Glaser, R. (1976). Components of a psychology of instruction: towards a science of design. Rev. Educ. Res., 46, 1-24.
47. Goel, V. and Pirolli, P. (1988). Motivating the Notion of Generic Design within Information Processing Theory: The Design Problem Space, Report No. DPS-1. Washington, D.C.: Office of Naval Research (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 315 041).
48. Goetzfried, L. and Hannafin, M. J. (1985). The effect of the locus of CAI control strategies on the learning of mathematics rules. Am. Educ. Res. J., 22(2), 273-278.
49. Gray, S. H. (1987). The effect of sequence control on computer assisted learning. J. Comput.-Based Instruct., 14(2), 54-56.
50. Greenhill, L. P. (1955). A Study of the Feasibility of Local Production of Minimum Cost Sound Motion Pictures, Technical Report No. SDC 269-7-48, Pennsylvania State University Instructional Film Research Program. Port Washington, NY: U.S. Naval Training Device Center, Office of Naval Research.
51. Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educ. Commun. Technol. J., 29, 75-92.
52. Gustafson, K. L. (1981). Survey of Instructional Development Models. Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology, Syracuse University.
53. Gustafson, K. L. (1991). Survey of Instructional Development Models, 2nd ed. Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology, Syracuse University.
54. Gustafson, K. L. and Branch, R. M. (1997). Survey of Instructional Development Models, 3rd ed. Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology.
55. Gustafson, K. L. and Branch, R. M. (2002a). Survey of Instructional Development Models, 4th ed. Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology.
56. Gustafson, K. L. and Branch, R. M. (2002b). What is instructional design? In Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology, edited by R. A. Reiser and J. V. Dempsey, pp. 16-25. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.*
57. Hagler, P. and Knowlton, J. (1987). Invalid implicit assumption in CBI comparison research. J. Comput.-Based Instruct., 14, 84-88.
58. Hannafin, M. J. (1984), Guidelines for using locus of instructional control in the design of computer-assisted instruction. J. Instruct. Dev., 7(2), 6-10.
59. Hannafin, M. J. (1986). The status and future of research in instructional design and technology. J. Instruct. Dev., 8, 24-30.
60. Hannafin, R. D. and Sullivan, H. J. (1995). Learner control in full and lean CAI programs. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 43(1), 7-19.
61. Hannafin, R. D. and Sullivan, H. J. (1996). Learner preferences and learner control over amount of instruction. J. Educ. Psychol., 88, 162-173.
62. Hargreaves, A. and Fink, D. (2006). Sustainable Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
63. Hativa, N. (1988). Differential characteristics and methods of operation underlying CAI/CMI drill and practice systems. J. Res. Comput. Educ., 20, 258-270.
64. Hicken, S., Sullivan, H. J., and Klein, J. P. (1992). Learner control modes and incentive variations in computer-delivered instruction, Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 40(4), 15-26.
65. Hoban, C. F. (1953). Determinants of audience reaction to a training film. Audio Visual Commun. Rev., 1(1), 30-52.
66. Hsieh, P., Acee, T., Chung, W., Hsieh, Y., Kim, H., Thomas, G., Levin, J. R., and Robinson, D. H. (2005). Is educational intervention research on the decline? J. Educ. Psychol., 97(4), 523-529.
67. Hulshof, C. D. (2004). Log file analysis. In Encyclopedia of Social Measurement, edited by K. Kempf-Leonard. New York: Academic Press.
68. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
69. Jackson, S., Stratford, S. J., Krajcik, J., and Soloway, E. (1995). Making System Dynamics Modeling Accessible to Pre-College Science Students. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, April 3-6, San Francisco, CA.
70. Jones, T. S. and Richey, R. C. (2000). Rapid prototyping in action: a developmental study. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 48(2), 63-80.
71. Kearsley, G. (1986). Automated instructional development using personal computers: research issues. J. Instruct. Dev., 9(1), 9-15.
72. Kelly, A. (2003). Research as design. Educ. Res., 32(1), 3-4.
73. Kerr, S. T. (1983). Inside the black box: making design decisions for instruction. Br. J. Educ. Technol., 14, 45-58.
74. Kim, Y., Baylor, A. L., and Group, P. (2006). Pedagogical agents as learning comparisons: the role of agent competency and type of interaction. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 54(3), 223-243.
75. Kinzie, M. B. and Sullivan, H. J. (1989). Continuing motivation, learner control, and CIA. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 37(2), 5-14.
76. Kinzie, M. B., Sullivan, H. J., and Berdel, R. L. (1988). Learner control and achievement in science computer-assisted instruction. J. Educ. Psychol., 80, 299-303.
77. Kirschner, P. A., Carr, C., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., and Sloep, P. (2002). How expert designers design. Perform. Improv. Q., 15(4), 86-104.
78. Koszalka, T. A. (2001). Designing synchronous distance education: a demonstration project. Q. Rev. Dist. Educ., 2(4), 333-345.
79. Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with media. Rev. Educ. Res., 61, 179-212.*
80. Kozma, R. B. (1994). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 42, 7-19.
81. Ku, H. and Sullivan, H. J. (2000). Personalization of mathematics word problems in Taiwan. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 48(3), 49-59.
82. Kulikowich, J. M. and Young, M. F. (2001). Locating an ecological psychology methodology for situated action. J. Learn. Sci., 10(1/2), 165-202.
83. Lamberski, R. J. and Dwyer, F. M. (1983). The instructional effect of coding (color and black and white) on information acquisition and retrieval. Educ. Commun. Technol., 31(1), 9-21.
84. Land, S. M. (2000). Cognitive requirements for learning with open-ended learning environments, Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 48(3), 61-78.
85. Le Maistre, C. (1998). What is an expert instructional designer? Evidence of expert performance during formative evaluation. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 46, 21-36.
86. Leu, Jr., D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., and Cammack, D. (2004). Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the Internet and other information and communication technologies. In Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading, 5th ed., edited by R. B. Ruddell and N. Unrau, pp. 1568-1611. Newark, DE: International Reading Association (http://www.readingonline.org/newliteracies/lit_index.asp?HREF=/newliteracies/leu).
87. Levin, J. R. (2004). Random thoughts on the (in)credibility of educational-psychological intervention research. Educ. Psychol., 39(3), 173-184.*
88. Levin, J. R. and O’Donnell, A. M. (1999). What to do about educational psychology’s credibility gaps? Issues Educ. Contrib. Educ. Psychol., 5, 177-229.
89. Levonian, E. (1963). Opinion change as mediated by an audience-tailored film. Audio Visual Commun. Rev., 11(4), 104-113.
90. Lewis, E. L., Stern, J. L., and Linn, M. C. (1993). The effect of computer simulations on introductory thermodynamics understanding. Educ. Technol., 33(1), 45-58.
91. Liu, M. and Bera, S. (2005). An analysis of cognitive tool use patterns in a hypermedia learning environment, Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 53(1), 5-21.
92. Liu, M., Williams, D., and Pedersen, S. (2002). Alien Rescue: a problem-based hypermedia learning environment for middle school science, J. Educ. Technol. Syst., 30(3), 255-270.
93. Lou, Y., Bernard, R. M., and Abrami, P. C. (2006). Media and pedagogy in undergraduate distance education: a theorybased meta-analysis of empirical literature. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 54(2), 141-176.
94. McKenney, S. (2002). Computer-Based Support for Science Education Materials Developers in Africa: Exploring Potentials, Ph.D. dissertation. Enschede: University of Twente.
95. McKenney, S. and van den Akker, J. (2005). Computer-based support for curriculum designers: a case of developmental research. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 53(2), 41-66.*
96. McKenney, S., Nieveen, N., and van den Akker, J. (2006). Design research from a curriculum perspective. In Educational Design Research, edited by J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, and N. Nieveen, pp. 67-90. London: Routledge.
97. Messick, S. (1995). Standards of validity and the validity of standards in performance assessment. Educ. Meas. Issues Pract., 14(4), 5-8.
98. Metcalf, S. J., Krajcik, J., and Soloway, E. (2000). Model-It: a design retrospective. In Innovations in Science and Mathematics Education: Advanced Design for Technologies of Learning, edited by M. J. Jacobson and R. B. Kozma, pp. 77-115. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
99. Morrison, G. R. and Anglin, G. J. (2005). Research on cognitive load theory: application to e-learning. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 53(3), 94-104.
100. Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., Gopalakrishnan, M., and Casey, J. (1995). The effects of incentives and feedback on achievement in computer-based instruction. Contemp. Educ. Psychol., 20, 32-50.
101. Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., and Kemp, J. E. (2007). Designing Effective Instruction, 5th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass.
102. Munro, A. and Towne, D. M. (1992). Productivity tools for simulation-centered training development. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 40(4), 65-80.
103. Nelson, W. A. (1990). Selection and utilization of problem information by instructional designers, Ph.D. dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1988. Dissert. Abstr. Int. A, 50(4), 866.
104. Nguyen, F. (2005). EPSS needs assessment: oops, I forgot how to do that! Perform. Improv., 44(9), 33-39.
105. Nguyen, F., Klein, J. D., and Sullivan, H. J. (2005). A comparative study of electronic performance support systems. Perform. Improv. Q., 18(4), 71-86.
106. Nieveen, N. (1999). Computer Support for Curriculum Developers. A Study on the Potential of Computer Support in the Domain of Formative Curriculum Evaluation, Ph.D. dissertation. Enschede: University of Twente.
107. Nieveen, N. and van den Akker, J. (1999). Exploring the potential of a computer tool for instructional developers. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 47(3), 77-98.
108. Nieveen, N., McKenney, S., and van den Akker, J. (2006). Educational design research: the value of variety. In Educational Design Research, edited by J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, and N. Nieveen, pp. 151-158. London: Routledge.*
109. No Child Left Behind Act. (2001). Pub. L. No. 107-110, 107th Congress.
110. Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., and Darabi, A. A. (2005). A motivational perspective on the relation between mental effort and performance. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 53(3), 25-34.
111. Park, O. and Tennyson, R. D. (1986). Computer-based responsesensitive design strategies for selecting presentation form and sequence of examples in learning of coordinate concepts. J. Educ. Psychol., 78, 153-158.
112. Pea, R. D. (1985). Beyond amplification: using the computer to reorganize mental functioning. Educ. Psychol., 20, 167-182.
113. Perez, R. S. and Emery, C. D. (1995). Designer thinking: how novices and experts think about instructional design. Perform. Improv. Q., 8(3), 80-95.
114. Petkovich, M. D. and Tennyson, R. D. (1984). Clark’s ‘Learning from media’: a critique. Educ. Commun. Technol. J., 32, 233-241.
115. Pieters, J. M. and Bergman, R. (1995). The empirical basis of designing instruction. Perform. Improv. Q., 8(3), 118-129.
116. Plummer, K. H., Gillis, P. D., Legree, P. J., and Sanders, M. G. (1992). The development and evaluation of a job aid to support mobile subscriber radio-telephone terminal (MSRT). Perform. Improv. Q., 5(1), 90-105.
117. Pollock, J. C. and Sullivan, H. J. (1990). Practice mode and learner control in computer-based instruction. Contemp. Educ. Psychol., 15, 251-260.
118. Preese, F. and Foshay, W. (1999). The PLATO courseware development environment. In Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training, edited by J. van den Akker et al., pp. 195-204. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
119. Reeves, T., Herrington, J., and Oliver, R. (2005). Design research: a socially responsible approach to instructional technology research in higher education. J. Comput. Higher Educ., 16(2), 97-116.*
120. Reiser, R. A. (2007). What field did you say you were in? Defining and naming our field. In Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology, 2nd ed., edited by R. A. Reiser and J. V. Dempsey, pp. 2-9. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
121. Reiser, R. A. and Dempsey, J. V. (2002). What field did you say you were in? Defining and naming our field. In Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology, edited by R. A. Reiser and J. V. Dempsey, pp. 5-15. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
122. Richey, R. C. (2005). Validating instructional design and development models. In Innovations in Instructional Technology: Essays in Honour of David Merrill, edited by J. M. Spector, C. Ohrazda, A. van Schaack, and D. A. Wiley, pp. 171-185. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.*
123. Richey, R. C. and Klein, J. D. (2005). Developmental research methods: creating knowledge from instructional design and development practice. J. Comput. Higher Educ., 16(2), 23-38.
124. Richey, R. C. and Klein, J. D. (2007). Design and Development Research: Methods, Strategies, and Issues. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
125. Richey, R. C. and Nelson, W. A. (1996). Developmental research. In Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology, edited by D. Jonassen, pp. 1213-1245. New York: Simon and Schuster.
126. Richey, R. C., Klein, J. D., and Nelson, W. A. (2004). Developmental research: studies of instructional design and development. In Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 2nd ed., edited by D. H. Jonassen, pp. 1099-1130. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
127. Richmond, B. (1985). STELLA. Lyme, NH: High Performance Systems.
128. Rogoff, B. and Lave, J. (1999). Everyday Cognition: Its Development in Social Context. New York: iUniverse.
129. Ross, S. M. (2003). Effective schools correlates as indicators of educational improvement: an examination of three urban reform initiatives. J. Effective Schools, 2(2), 67-81.
130. Ross, S. M. (2005). Randomized field trials: challenges and strategies. TransFormation, Spring/Summer, p. 7.
131. Ross, S. M. and Morrison, G. R. (1989). In search of a happy medium in instructional technology research: issues concerning external validity, media replications, and learner control. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 37, 19-24.*
132. Ross, S. M. and Rakow, E. A. (1981). Learner control versus program control as adaptive strategies for selection of instructional support on math rules. J. Educ. Psychol., 73, 745-753.
133. Ross, S. M., Morrison, G. R., and O’Dell, J. K. (1989). Uses and effects of learner control of context and instructional support in computer-based instruction, Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 37(4), 29-39.
134. Ross, S. M., Morrison, G. R., and Lowther, D. (2005). Using experimental methods in higher education. J. Comput. Higher Educ., 16(2), 39-64.*
135. Rowland, G. (1992). What do instructional designers actually do? An initial investigation of expert practice. Perform. Improv. Q., 5(2), 65-86.
136. Rowland, G. (1993). Designing and instructional design. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 41(1), 79-91.
137. Rummel, N., Levin, J. R., and Woodward, M. M. (2003). Do pictorial mnemonic text-learning aids give students something worth writing about? J. Educ. Psychol., 95, 327-334.
138. Salomon, G. and Clark, R. W. (1977). Reexamining the methodology of research on media and technology in education. Rev. Educ. Res., 47, 99-120.
139. Salomon, G., Perkins, D. N., and Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies. Educ. Res., 20(3), 2-9.
140. Savenye, W. C. and Robinson, R. S. (2004). Qualitative research issues and methods. In Handbook for Educational Communications and Technology, 2nd ed., edited by D. H. Jonassen, pp. 1045-1071. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
141. Scarr, S. (1985). Constructing psychology: making facts and fables of our times. Am. Psychol., 40, 449-512.
142. Schatz, S. C. (2005). Unique metadata schemas: a model for user-centric design of a performance support system. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 53(4), 69-84.
143. Seels, B. and Richey, R. (1994). Instructional Technology: The Definitions and Domains of the Field. Washington, D.C.: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
144. Shapiro, W. L., Roskos, K., and Cartwright, G. P. (1995). Technology-enhanced learning environments, Change, 27(6), 67-69.
145. Shavelson, R. J., Phillips, D. C., Towne, L., and Feuer, M. J. (2003). On the science of education design studies, Educ. Res., 32(1), 25-28.
146. Shavelson, R. J., Towne, L., and the Committee on Scientific Principles for Education Research, Eds. (2002). Scientific Research in Education. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
147. Shute, V. J. (1993). A macroadaptive approach to tutoring. J. Artif. Intell. Educ., 4(1), 61-93.
148. Slavin, R. E. (2002). Evidence-based educational policies: transforming educational practice and research. Educ. Res., 31(7), 15-21.
149. Slavin, R. (2006). Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice, pp. 133-162. Boston, MA: Pearson.
150. Sullivan, H. J., Ice, K., and Niedermeyer, F. (2000). Long-term instructional development: a 20-year ID and implementation project. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 48(4), 87-99.
151. Tennyson, R. D. (1980). Instructional control strategies and content structures as design variables in concept acquisition using computer-based instruction. J. Educ. Psychol., 72, 525-532.
152. Tennyson, R. D. (1998). Defining the core competencies of an instructional developer. J. Courseware Eng., 1, 31-36.
153. Tennyson, R. D. and Buttrey, T. (1980). Advisement and management strategies as design variables in computer-assisted instruction. Educ. Commun. Technol. J., 28, 169-176.
154. Tennyson, R. D. and Rothen, W. (1979). Management of computer-based instruction: design of an adaptive control strategy. J. Comput.-Based Instruct., 5, 63-71.
155. Tracey, M. W. (2002). The construction and validation of an instructional design model for incorporating multiple intelligences, Ph.D. dissertation, Wayne State University 2001. Dissert. Abstr. Int. A, 62(12), 4135.
156. Tracey, M. W. and Richey, R. C. (2007). ID model construction and validation: a multiple intelligences case. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 55(4), 369-390.
157. Ullmer, E. J. (1994). Media and learning: are there two kinds of truth? Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 42, 21-32.
158. Underwood, B. J. (1966). Experimental Psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
159. van den Akker, J. (1999). Principles and methods of development research. In Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training, edited by J. van den Akker, R. M. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen, and T. Plomp, pp. 1-14. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
160. van den Akker, J. (2003). Curriculum perspectives: an introduction. In Curriculum Landscapes and Trends, edited by J. van den Akker, W. Kuiper, and U. Hameyer, pp. 1-10. Dordrecht: Kluwer.*
161. van den Akker, J, Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S., and Nieveen, N. (2006a). Introducing educational design research. In Educational Design Research, edited by J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, and N. Nieveen, pp. 1-8. London: Routledge.
162. van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S., and Nieveen, N., Eds. (2006b), Educational Design Research. London: Routledge.
163. Visscher-Voerman, I. (1999). Design Approaches in Training and Education. A Reconstructive Study, Ph.D. dissertation. Enschede: University of Twente.
164. Visscher-Voerman, I. and Gustafson, K. L. (2004). Paradigms in the theory and practice of education and training design. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 52(2), 69-89.
165. Visscher-Voerman, I., Gustafson, K., and Plomp, T. (1999). Educational design and development: an overview of paradigms. In Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training, edited by J. van den Akker, R. M. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen, and T. Plomp, pp. 15-28. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
166. Visser, L., Plomp, T., Amirault, R. J., and Kuiper, W. (2002). Motivating students at a distance: the case of an international audience. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 50(2), 94-110.
167. Wang, F. and Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 53(4), 5-24.*
168. Wedman, J. F. and Tessmer, M. (1993). Instructional designers’ decisions and priorities. a survey of design practice. Perform. Improv. Q., 8, 43-57.
169. Winer, L. R. and Vasquez-Abad, J. (1995). The present and future of ID practice. Perform. Improv. Q., 8(3), 55-67.
170. Winn, W. (2004). Cognitive perspectives in psychology. In Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology, 2nd ed., edited by D. Jonassen, pp. 79-112. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
171. Woloshyn, V. E., Paivio, A., and Pressley, M. (1994). Use of elaborative interrogation to help students acquire information consistent with prior knowledge and information inconsistent with prior knowledge. J. Educ. Psychol., 86(1), 79-90.