Validating instructional design and development models

Innovations in Instructional Technology: Essays in Honor of M. David Merrill

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 171-185

  Richey, Rita C ^a  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250205942     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410613684     Document Type: Chapter

References (46)

1. Adamski, A. J. (1998). The development of a systems design model for job performance aids: A qualitative developmental study. Doctoral dissertation,Wayne State University. Dissertation Abstracts International-A, 59(03), 789.
2. Andrews, D. H., & Goodson, L. A. (1980). A comparative analysis of models of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 3(4), 2-16.
3. Barrett, B. H. (2002). The technology of teaching revisited: A reader's companion to B. F. Skinner's book. Concord, MA: Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies.
4. Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: Longman.
5. Brolin, R. M., Milheim, W. D., & Viechnicki, K. J. (1993-1994). The development of a model for the design of motivational adult instruction in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 22(1), 3-17.
6. Carr-Chellman, A., Cuyar, C., & Breman, J. (1998). User-design: A case application in health care training. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(4), 97-114.
7. Dale, E. (1946). Audio-visual methods in teaching. New York: Dryden Press.
8. Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2001). The systematic design of instruction (5th ed.). New York: Addison-Wesley Longman.
9. Edmonds, G. S., Branch, R. C.,&Mukherjee, P. (1994). A conceptual framework for comparing instructional design models. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(4), 55-72.
10. Forsyth, J. E. (1998). The construction and validation of a model for the design of community-based train-the-trainer instruction. Doctoral dissertation,Wayne State University. Dissertation Abstracts International-A, 58(11), 4242.
11. Gagné, R. M. (1972). Domains of learning. Interchange, 3, 1-8. Reprinted in R. M. Gagné (1989), Studies of learning (pp. 485-496). Tallahassee, FL: Learning Systems Institute.
12. Gagné, R. M., Briggs, L. J.,&Wager,W.W. (1992). Principles of instructional design (4th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
13. Gropper, G. L. (1983). A behavioral approach to instructional prescription. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 101-161). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Gustafson, K. L.,&Branch, R. M. (2002). Survey of instructional development models (4th ed.). Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information & Technology.
15. Hannafin, M. J., & Rieber, L. P. (1989). Psychological foundations of instructional design for emerging computer-based instructional technologies: Part 2. Educational Technology Research and Development, 37(2), 102-114.
16. Higgins, N., & Reiser, R. (1985). Selecting media for instruction: An exploratory study. Journal of Instructional Development, 8(2), 6-10.
17. Jones, T. S., & Richey, R. C. (2000). Rapid prototyping in action: A developmental study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(2), 63-80.
18. Keller, J. M. (1987). The systematic process of motivational design. Performance and Instruction, 26(10), 1-8.
19. Kibler, R. J., Cegala, D. J., Barker, L. L., & Miles, D. T. (1974). Objectives for instruction and evaluation. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
20. McKenney, S. (2002). Computer-based support for science education materials development in Africa: Exploring potentials. Doctoral dissertation, Universiteit Twente, the Netherlands. Dissertation Abstracts International-C, 63(03), 355.
21. Martin, B. L., & Briggs, L. J. (1986). The affective and cognitive domains: Integration for instruction and research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
22. Means, T. B. (1997). Enhancing relevance: Embedded ARCS strategies vs. purpose. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 5-171.
23. Merrill, M. D., Drake, L., Lacy, M. J., Pratt, J. A., & the ID2 Research Group. (1996). Reclaiming instructional design. Educational Technology, 36(5), 5-7.
24. Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., & Kemp, J. E. (2003). Designing effective instruction (4th ed.). New York: Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
25. Noe, R., & Schmitt, N. (1986). The influence of trainee attitudes on training effectiveness:Test of a model. Personnel Psychology, 44, 51-65.
26. Perez, R. S., & Emery, C. D. (1995). Designer thinking: How novices and experts think about instructional design. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 8(3), 80-95.
27. Quinones, M. A., Sego, D. J., Ford, J. K., & Smith, E. M. (1995/1996). The effects of individual and transfer environment characteristics on the opportunity to perform trained tasks. Training Research Journal, 1(1), 29-49.
28. Reiser, R. A., & Gagné, R. M. (1983). Selecting media for instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
29. Richey, R. C. (1986). The theoretical and conceptual bases of instructional design. London:Kogan Page.
30. Richey, R. C. (1992). Designing instruction for the adult learner: Systemic theory and practice for employee training. London: Kogan Page.
31. Richey, R. C., Klein, J. D., & Nelson,W. A. (2004) Developmental research: Studies of instructional design and development. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 1099-1130). Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32. Rosenthal, R. (1984). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
33. Rothwell, W. J., & Kazanas, H. C. (1998). Mastering the instructional design process: A systematic approach (2nd ed.) San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
34. Rowland, G. (1993). Designing and instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(1), 79-91.
35. Saroyan, A. (1993). Differences in expert practice: A case from formative evaluation. Instructional Science, 21, 451-472.
36. Seels, B. (1997). Taxonomic issues and the development of theory in instructional technology. Educational Technology, 37(1), 12-21.
37. Seels, B., & Glasgow, Z. (1997). Making instructional design decisions (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
38. Sleezer, C. M. (1991). The development and validation of a performance analysis for training model (Vol. I-III). Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1990. Dissertation Abstracts International-A, 52(01), 144.
39. Small, R. V., & Gluck, M. (1994). The relationship of motivational conditions to effective instructional attributes:Amagnitude scaling approach. Educational Technology, 34(8), 33-40.
40. Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (2005). Instructional design (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
41. Sullivan, H., Ice, K., & Niedermeyer, F. (2000). Long-term instructional development: A 20-year ID and implementation project. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 87-99.
42. Tessmer, M., & Richey, R. C. (1997). The role of context in learning and instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(2), 85-115.
43. Tessmer, M., & Wedman, J. F. (1990). A layers of necessity instructional development model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38(2), 77-85.
44. Tracey, M.W. (2002). The construction and validation of an instructional design model for incorporating multiple intelligences. Doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University, 2001. Dissertation Abstracts International-A, 62(12), 4135.
45. Tripp, S., & Bichelmeyer, B. (1990). Rapid Prototyping: An alternative instructional design strategy. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38(1), 31-44.
46. Willis, J. (1995). A recursive, reflective instructional design model based on constructivist-interpretivist theory. Educational Technology, 35(6), 5-23.