Cognitive requirements for learning with open-ended learning environments

Educational Technology Research and Development

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 61-78

  Land, Susan M ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034346441     PISSN: 10421629     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02319858     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Atkins, M., & Bussett, G. (1992). Interactive video and cognitive problem-solving skills. Educational Technology, 32(1), 44-50.
2. Ausubel, D.P. (1963). Cognitive structure and the facilitation of meaningful verbal learning. Journal of Teacher Education, 14, 217-221.
3. Bell, P. (1998, April). The knowledge integration environment: Relating debate and conceptual change through design experiments. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego, CA.
4. Blumenfeld, P., Soloway, E., Marx, R., Krajcik, J., Guzdial, & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3&4), 369-398.
5. Brickhouse, N.W. (1994). Children's observations, ideas, and the development of classroom theories about light. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(6), 639-656.
6. Brown, A.L., Bransford, J.D., Ferrara, R.A., & Campione, J.C. (1983). Learning, remembering, and understanding. In J.H. Flavell & E.H. Markman (Eds.) Handbook of Child Psychology, Vol. 3, Cognitive Development (pp. 177-266). New York: Wiley.
7. Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 38(1), 32-41.
8. Brungardt, J.B., & Zollman, D. (1995). Influence of interactive videodisc instruction using simultaneous-time analysis on kinematics graphing skills of high school physics students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(8), pp. 855-869.
9. Carey, S. (1986). Cognitive science and science education. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1123-1130.
10. Champagne, A., Gunstone, R., & Klopfer, L. (1985). Instructional consequences of students' knowledge about physical phenomena. In West, L.H.T., & Pines, A.L. (Eds.), Cognitive structure and conceptual change (pp. 61-90). Orlando: Academic Press.
11. Chi, M., Feltovich, P., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 8, 121-152.
12. Chinn, C. & Brewer, W. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63(1), 1-49.
13. Cobb, P., & Bowers. J. (1999). Cognitive and situated learning perspectives in theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28(2), pp. 4-15.
14. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1992). The Jasper experiment: An exploration of issues in learning and instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(1), 65-80.
15. deGroot, A. (1965). Thought and choice in chess. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
16. dejong, T., & van Joolingen, W. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), pp. 179-201.
17. Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5-12.
18. Foley, B.J. (1998, April). Designing visualization tools for learning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA). San Diego, CA.
19. Garner R., & Alexander, P.A. (1989). Metacognition: Answered and unanswered questions. Educational Psychologist, 24, 143-158.
20. Gick, M.L. (1986). Problem-solving strategies. Educational Psychologist, 21, 99-120.
21. Gordin, D., Edelson, D., & Pea, R. (1996, April). Supporting students' science inquiry through scientific visualization activities. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New York, NY.
22. Gordin, D., & Pea, R. (1995). Prospects for scientific visualization as an educational technology. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(3), 249-279.
23. Greene, B. A. (1995). Comprehension of text in an unfamiliar domain: Effects of instruction that provides either domain or strategy knowledge. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 313-319.
24. Greene, B.A., & Land, S.M. (in press). A qualitative analysis of scaffolding use in a resource-based learning environment involving the World Wide Web. Journal of Educational Computing Research.
25. Gyllenhaal, E., & Perry, D. (1998, May). Doing something about the weather: Summative evaluation of Science Museum of Minnesota's atmospheric explorations computer interactives. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of Museums. Los Angeles, CA.
26. Hamel, C., & Ryan-Jones, D.L. (1997). Using three-dimensional interactive graphics to teach equipment procedures. Educational Technology Research & Development, 45(4), pp. 77-87.
27. Hannafin, M.J., Hall, C., Land, S., & Hill, J. (1994). Learning in open-ended environments: Assumptions, methods, and implications. Educational Technology, 34(8), 48-55.
28. Hannafin, M.J., Land, S.M., & Oliver, K. (1999). Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. In C. Reigeluth's (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models, Volume II (pp. 115-140). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Hannafin, M.J., & Peck, K.L. (1988). The design, development, and evaluation of instructional software. New York: Macmillan.
30. Hannafin, M.J., & Rieber, L.P. (1989). Psychological foundations of instructional design for emerging computer-based instructional technologies: Part I. Educational Technology Research and Development, 37, 91-101.
31. Hill, J. (1999). A conceptual framework for understanding information seeking in open-ended information systems. Educational Technology Research & Development, 47(1), 5-27.
32. Hill, J.R., & Hannafin, M.J. (1997). Cognitive strategies and learning from the world wide web. Educational Technology Research & Development, 45(4), 37-64.
33. Hmelo, C., & Day, R. (1999). Contextualized questioning to scaffold learning from simulations. Computers and Education, 32, 151-164.
34. Jared, E., & Jared, A. (1997). Launching into improved comprehension: Integrating the KWL Model into middle level courses. Technology Teacher, 56(6), pp. 24-31.
35. Jorassen, D.H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models, Volume II (pp. 215-239). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Karmiloff-Smith, A., & Inhelder, B. (1975). "If you want to get ahead, get a theory." Cognition, 3(3), 195-212.
37. Kelly, G., & Crawford, T. (1996). Students' interactions with computer representations: Analysis of discourse in laboratory groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(7), 693-707.
38. Kuhn, D. (1999). A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 16-26, 46.
39. Lajoie, S.P. (1993). Computer environments as cognitive tools for enhancing learning. In S.P. Lajoie and S.J. Derry (Eds.), Computers as Cognitive Tools. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. Land, S.M., & Greene, B.A. (2000). Project-based learning with the World Wide Web: A qualitative study of resource integration. Educational Technology Research & Development, 48(1), pp. 45-67.
41. Land, S.M., & Hannafin, M.J. (1996). A conceptual framework for the development of theories-in-action with open-ended learning environments. Educational Technology Research & Development, 44(3), pp. 37-53.
42. Land, S.M., & Hannafin, M.J. (1997). Patterns of understanding with open-ended learning environments: A qualitative study. Educational Technology Research & Development, 45(2), 47-73.
43. Lee, S-Y, & Songer, N. (1998, April). Characterizing discourse in an electronic community of science learners: A case of the Kids as Global Scientists '97 message board. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. San Diego, CA.
44. Lewis, E., Stern, J., & Linn, M. (1993). The effect of computer simulations on introductory thermodynamics understanding. Educational Technology, 33(1), 45-58.
45. Lin, X., Hmelo, C., Kinzer, C., & Secules, T. (1999). Designing technology to support reflection. Educational Technology Research & Development, 47(3), 43-62.
46. Linn, M., Shear. L., Bell, P., & Slotta, J. (1999). Organizing principles for science education partnerships: Case studies of students' learning about 'rats in space' and 'deformed frogs'. Educational Technology Research & Development, 47(2), pp. 61-84.
47. Loh, B., Radinsky, J., Reiser, B., Gomez, L., Edelson, D., & Russell, E. (1997). The Progress Portfolio: Promoting reflective inquiry in complex investigation environments. In Proceedings of the 1997 Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Available online at: http://www.oise.utoronto.ca/cscl/.
48. Lyons, D., Huffman, J., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (1997, April). An investigation of the use of the world wide web for on-line inquiry in a science classroom. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Chicago, IL.
49. Mayer, R.E. (1999). Designing instruction for constructivist learning. In C. Reigeluth's (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models, Volume II (pp. 141-159). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. Moore, (1995). Information problem solving: A wider view of library skills. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 1-31.
51. Nicaise, M., & Crane, M. (1999). Knowledge constructing through hypermedia authoring. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(1), 29-50.
52. Oliver, K. (1999, February). Computer-based tools in support of internet-based problem solving. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology. St. Louis, MO.
53. Palincsar, A.S. (1998). Keeping the metaphor of scaffolding fresh - A response to C. Addisone Stone's "The metaphor of scaffolding: Its utility for the field of learning disabilities." Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32(4), 370-373.
54. Palincsar, A.S., & Brown, A.L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities, Cognition and Instruction, 2, 117-175.
55. Pea, R.D. (1985). Beyond amplification: Using the computer to reorganize mental functioning. Educational Psychologist, 20(4), 167-182.
56. Pea, R.D. (1993). The collaborative visualization project. Communications of the ACM, 36(5), 60-63.
57. Perkins, D.N. (1985). The fingertip effect: How information-processing technology shapes thinking. Educational Researcher, 14(7), pp. 11-17.
58. Perkins, D.N., & Unger, C. (1999). Teaching and learning for understanding. In C. Reigeluth's (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models, Volume II (pp. 91-114). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
59. Petraglia, J. (1998). The real world on a short leash: The (mis)application of constructivism to the design of educational technology. Educational Technology Research & Development, 46(3), pp. 53-65.
60. Petre, M. (1995). Readership skills and graphical programming. Communications of the ACM, 38(6), 33-43.
61. Piaget, J. (1976). The grasp of consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
62. Rakes, G. (1996). Using the internet as a tool in a resource-based learning environment. Educational Technology, 36(5), 52-56.
63. Rieber, L. (1995). A historical view of visualization in human cognition. Educational Technology Research & Development, 43(1), 45-56.
64. Rieber, L., Noah, D., & Nolan, M. (1998, April). Metaphors as graphical representations within open-ended computer simulations. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego, CA.
65. Rieber, L., Tzeng, S-C, Tribble, K., & Chu, G. (1996, April). Feedback and elaboration within a computer-based simulation: A dual coding perspective. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New York, NY.
66. Roth, W-M. (1995). Affordances of computers in teacher-student interactions: The case of Interactive Physics™. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(4), 329-347.
67. Salomon, G. (1986). Information technologies: What you see is not (always) what you get. Educational Psychologist, 20, 207-216.
68. Salomon, G., Globerson, T., & Guterman, E. (1989). The computer as a zone of proximal development: Internalizing reading-related metacognitions from a reading partner. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(4), 620-627.
69. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., McLean, R., Swallow, J., & Woodruff, E. (1989). Computer-supported intentional learning environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 51-68.
70. Schön, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
71. Schwartz, D., Brophy, S., Lin, X., & Bransford, J. (1999). Software for managing complex learning: Examples from an educational psychology course. Educational Technology Research & Development, 47(2), pp. 39-59.
72. Steinberg, E. (1989). Cognition and learner control: A literature review, 1977-1988. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 16, 117-121.
73. Stepans, J. (1996). Targeting students' science misconceptions. Riverview, FL: Idea Factory, Inc.
74. Strike, K., & Posner, G. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R. Duschl and R. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice, (147-176).
75. Suthers, D., Toth, E., & Weiner, A. (1997). An integrated approach to implementing collaborative inquiry in the classroom. In Proceedings from the 1997 Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning conference. Available online at: http://www.oise.utoronto.ca/cscl/.
76. Tufte, E.R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
77. Vosniadou, S., & Ortony, A. (1989). Similarity and analogical reasoning: A synthesis. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 1-17). New York: Cambridge University Press.
78. Wallace, R., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (1997, April). Digital libraries in the science classroom: An opportunity for inquiry. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association: Chicago, IL.
79. Wallace, R., & Kupperman, J. (1997, April). On-line search in the science classroom: Benefits and possibilities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.