SELF-REGULATION WITHIN GAME-BASED LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS

Serious Educational Game Assessment: Practical Methods and Models for Educational Games, Simulations and Virtual Worlds

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 19-42

  Neitfeld, John ^a   Shores, Lucy R ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85142032350     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-6091-329-7_2     Document Type: Chapter

References (111)

1. Ainley, M., Hidi, S., and Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 545-561.
2. Aleven, V., and Koedinger, K. (2002). An effective metacognitive strategy: Learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based cognitive tutor. Cognitive Science, 26, 147-179.
3. Ames, C., and Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Student learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260-267.
4. Annetta, L. A. (2008). Video games in education: Why they should be used and how they are being used. Theory Into Practice, 47, 229-239.
5. Aylett, R., Louchart, S., Dias, J., Paiva, A., and Vala, M. (2005). FearNot! An experiment in emergent narrative. 5th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents.
6. Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., Winters, F. I., Moos, D. C., and Greene, J. A. (2005). Adaptive human scaffolding facilitates adolescents’ self-regulated learning with hypermedia. Instructional Science, 33, 381-412.
7. Baker, L., and Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. Kamil, and P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research. New York: Longmans.
8. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
9. Barab, S., Zuiker, S., Warren, S., Hickey, D., Ingram, A., Kwon, E., et al. (2007). Situationally embodied curriculum: Relating formalisms and contexts. Science Education, 91, 750-792.
10. Barab, S. A., Dodge, T., Tuzun, H., et al. (2007). The Quest Atlantis project: A socially-responsive play space for learning. In B. E. Shelton and D. Wiley (Eds.), The educational design and use of simulation computer games (pp. 159-186). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
11. Barab, et al. (2009). Transformational plays as a curricular scaffold: Using videogames to support science education. Journal of Science Education and Technology.
12. Biswas, G., Leelawong, K., Belynne, K., Viswanath, K., Vye, N., Schwartz, D., et al. (2004). Incorporating self regulated learning techniques into learning by teaching environments. Twenty Sixth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Biswas, G., Roscoe, R., Jeong, H., and Sulcer, B. (2009). Promoting self-regulated learning skills in agentbased learning environments. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on computers in education. Hong Kong: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.
14. Boekaerts, M. (1995). Self-regulated learning: Bridging the gap between metacognitive and metamotivation theories. Educational Psychologist, 30, 195-200.
15. Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction, 7, 161-186.
16. Boekarts, M., Pintrich, P. R., and Zeidner, M. (Eds.), (2000). Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic.
17. Bruning, R., Schraw, G., Norby, M., and Ronning, R. (2004). Cognitive psychology and instruction (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
18. Butler, D. L., and Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245-281.
19. Cao, L., and Nietfeld, J. L. (2007). College students’ metacognitive awareness of difficulties in learning the class content does not automatically lead to adjustment of study strategies. Australian Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 7, 31-46.
20. Carlson, R., Chandler, P., and Sweller, J. (2003). Learning and understanding science instructional material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 629-640.
21. Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., and Farr, M. J. (Eds.). (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Clarebout, G., and Elen, J. (2006). Open learning environments and the impact of a pedagogical agent. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35, 211-226.
23. Craik, F., and Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268-294.
24. D’Mello, S. K., and Graesser, A. C. (2009). Automatic detection of learners’ emotions from gross body language. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 23, 123-150.
25. Dweck, C., and Leggett, E. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.
26. Elliot, A., and McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2×2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501-519.
27. Ellis, D., and Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Enhancing self-monitoring during self-regulated learning of speech. In H. J. Hartman (Ed.), Metacognition in learning and instruction (pp. 205-228). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
28. Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. J., and Hoffman, R. R. (2006). The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29. Garris, R., Ahlers, R., and Driskell, J. E. (2002). Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. Simulation and Gaming, 33, 441-467.
30. Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
31. Gee, J. P. (2005). Learning by design: Good video games as learning machines. E-Learning, 2, 5-16.
32. Glenberg, A., and Epstein, W. (1985). Calibration of comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 702-718.
33. Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., and Van Lehn, K. (2005). Scaffolding deep comprehension strategies through point and query, AutoTutor, and iSTART. Educational Psychologist, 40, 225-234.
34. Greene, J. A., and Azevedo, R. (2005). Adolescent’s use of SRL behaviors and their relation to qualitative mental model shifts while using hypermedia. Artificial Intelligence in Education: Supporting Learning through Intelligent and Socially Informed Technology, IOS Press.
35. Hacker, D. J., Bol, L., Horgan, D. D., and Rakow, E. A. (2000). Test prediction and performance in a classroom context. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 160-170.
36. Hacker, D. J., Bol, L., and Keener, M. C. (2009). Metacognition in education: A focus on calibration. In J. Dunlosky, and R. Bjork (Eds.), Handbook of memory and metacognition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Hadwin, A. F., Nesbit, J. C., Code, J., Jamieson-Noel, D. L., and Winne, P. H. (2007). Examining trace data to explore self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 2, 107-124.
38. Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60, 549-571.
39. Hofer, B. K., Yu, S. L., and Pintrich, P. R. (1998). Teaching college students to be self-regulated learners. In D. H. Schunk, and B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 57-85). New York: Guilford.
40. Huff, J. D., and Nietfeld, J. L. (2009). Using strategy instruction and confidence judgments to improve metacognitive monitoring. Metacognition and Learning, 4, 161-176.
41. Hsieh, P. H., Cho. Y., Liu, M., and Schallert, D. L. (2008). Examining the interplay between middle school students’ achievement goals and self-efficacy in a technology-enhanced learning environment. American Secondary Education Journal, 36, 33-50.
42. Johnson, W. L., Vilhjálmsson, H. H., and Marsella, S. (2005). Serious games for language learning: How much game, how much AI? In Artificial intelligence in education (pp. 306-313). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.
43. Ke, F. (2008). A case study of computer gaming for math: Engaged learning from gameplay? Computers and Education, 51, 1609-1620.
44. Ketelhut, D. (2007). The impact of student self-efficacy on scientific inquiry skills: An exploratory investigation in river city, a multi-user virtual environment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16, 99-111.
45. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., and Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75-86.
46. Koedinger, K., and Aleven, V. (2007). Exploring the assistance dilemma in experiments with cognitive tutors. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 239-264.
47. Lajoie, S. P., and Acevedo, R. (2006). Teaching and learning in technology-rich environments. In P. Alexander and P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 803-821, 2nd ed.).Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. Lan, W. (2005). Self-Monitoring and its relationship with educational level and task performance. Educational Psychology, 25(1), 109-127.
49. Liu, M., Hsieh, P., Cho, Y. J., and Schallert, D. L. (2006). Middle school students’ self-efficacy, attitudes, and achievement in a computer-enhanced problem-based learning environment. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 17, 225-242.
50. Mathan, S. A., and Koedinger, K. R. (2005). Fostering the intelligent novice: Learning from errors with metacognitive tutoring. Educational Psychologist, 40, 257-265.
51. McCormick, C. B. (2003). Metacognition and learning. In W. M. Reynolds, and G. E. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 7. Educational psychology (pp. 79-102). New York: Wiley and Sons.
52. McNamara, D. S., Levinstein, I. B., and Boonthum, C. (2004). iSTART: Insteractive strategy trainer for active reading and thinking. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 222-233.
53. McQuiggan, S. W., Hoffmann, K. L., Nietfeld, J. L., Robison, J., and Lester, J. (2008, June). Examining self-regulated learning in a narrative-centered learning environment: An inductive approach to modeling metacognitive monitoring. To appear in Proceedings of the ITS’08 Workshop on Metacognition and Self-Regulated Learning in Educational Technologies, Montreal, Canada.
54. McQuiggan, S. W., Mott, B. W., and Lester, J. C. (2008). Modeling self-efficacy in intelligent tutoring systems: An inductive approach. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 18, 81-123.
55. McQuiggan, S. W., Rowe, J. P., Lee, S., and Lester, J. C. (2008). Story-Based learning: The impact of narrative on learning experiences and outcomes. In Proceedings of the ninth international conference on intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 530-539). Montreal, Canada.
56. Merton, C., and Conati, C. (2006). Eye-tracking to model and adapt to user meta-cognition in intelligent learning environments. In Proceedings of the 11th international conference of user interfaces (pp. 39-46). Sydney, Australia.
57. Messick, S. (1987). Validity (RR-87-40). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
58. Moos, D. C., and Azevedo, R. (2009). Self-efficacy and prior domain knowledge: To what extent does monitoring mediate their relationship with hypermedia learning? Metacognition and Learning, 4, 197-216.
59. Morris, R., Hadwin, A. F., Gress, C. L. Z., Miller, M., Fior, M., Church, H., et al. (In Press). Designing roles, scripts, and prompts to support CSCL in gStudy. Computers in Human Behavior.
60. Nietfeld, J. L., Cao, L., and Osborne, J. W. (2006). The effect of distributed monitoring exercises and feedback on performance and monitoring accuracy. Metacognition and Learning, 2, 159-179.
61. Nietfeld, J. L., Cao, L., and Osborne, J. W. (2005). Metacognitive monitoring accuracy and student performance in the postsecondary classroom. Journal of Experimental Education, 74, 7-28.
62. Nietfeld, J. L., Hoffmann, K. L., McQuiggan, S. W., and Lester, J. (2008, July). Self-regulated learning in a narrative centered learning environment. Vienna, Austria: Annual meeting of Ed-Media.
63. Nietfeld, J. L., Hoffmann, K. F., and Shores, L. R. (2010, January). Gender differences in motivation within a narrative-centered learning environment. Annual meeting of Hawaii International Conference on Education, Honolulu, HI.
64. Nietfeld, J. L., and Schraw, G. (2002). The effect of knowledge and strategy training on monitoring accuracy. The Journal of Educational Research, 95, 131-142.
65. Nietfeld, J. L., Shores, L. R., and Hoffmann, K. F. (2010). The impact of a narrative-centered learning environment on application-level science knowledge. Unpublished manuscript.
66. O’Neil, H. F., Wainess, R., and Baker, E. L. (2005). Classification of learning outcomes: Evidence from the computer games literature. The Curriculum Journal, 16, 455-474.
67. Pajares, F. (1997). Current directions in self-efficacy research. In M. Maehr and P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 10, pp. 1-49). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
68. Papastergiou, M. (2009). Digital game-based learning in high school computer science education:Impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation. Computers and Education, 52, 1-12.
69. Parker, L. E., and Lepper, M. R. (1992). The effects of fantasy contexts on children’s learning and motivation: Making learning more fun. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 625-633.
70. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaert, P. R. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulated learning (pp. 13-39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
71. Pintrich, P. R., and De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.
72. Pressley, M., and Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
73. Pressley, M., Borkowski, J. G., and Schneider, W. (1987). Cognitive strategies: Good strategies users coordinate metacognition and knowledge. In R. Vasta, and G. Whitehurst (Eds.), Annals of child development (Vol. 5, pp. 89-129). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
74. Pressley, M., and Ghatala, E. S. (1990). Self-regulated learning: Monitoring learning from text. Educational Psychologist, 25, 19-34.
75. Pressley, M., Ghatala, E., Woloshyn, V., and Pirie, J. (1990). Sometimes adults miss the main ideas and do not realize it: Confidence in responses to short-answer and multiple-choice comprehension questions. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 233-249.
76. Quintana, C., Zhang, M., and Krajcik, J. (2005). A framework for supporting metacognitive aspects of online inquiry through software-based scaffolding. Educational Psychologist, 40, 235-244.
77. Roll, I., Aleven, V., McLaren, B. M., and Koedinger, K. R. (2007). Designing for metacognition- applying cognitive tutor principles to the tutoring of help seeking. Metacognition and Learning, 2, 125-140.
78. Rowe, J. P., Shores, L. R., Mott, B. W., and Lester, J. C. (submitted for 2010, June). Integrating learning and engagement in narrative-centered learning environments. If accepted: To appear in Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS). Pittsburgh, PA.
79. Schiefele, U. (1999). Interest and learning from text. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 257-280.
80. Schraw, G. (2007). The use of computer-based environments for understanding and improving selfregulation. Metacognition and Learning, 2, 169-176.
81. Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., and Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education:Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111-139.
82. Schraw, G., Dunkle, M. E., and Bendixen, L. D. (1995). Does a general monitoring skill exist? Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 433-444.
83. Schraw, G., and Impara, J. C. (2000). Issues in the measurement of metacognition. Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurement and Department of Educational Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
84. Schraw, G., and Lehman, S. (2001). Situational interest: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 23-52.
85. Schraw, G., and Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7, 351-371.
86. Schraw, G., and Nietfeld, J. (1998). A further test of the general monitoring skill hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 236-248.
87. Schunk, D. H. (1995). Inherent details of self-regulated learning include student perceptions. Educational Psychologist, 30, 213-216.
88. Schunk, D. (2008). Metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning: Research recommendations. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 463-467.
89. Schunk, D. H., and Swartz, C. W. (1993). Goals and progress feedback: Effects on self-efficacy and writing instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 337-354.
90. Schunk, D. H., and Zimmerman, B. J. (2003). Self-regulation and learning. In W. M. Reynolds, and G. E. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 7. Educational psychology (pp. 59-78). New York: Wiley and Sons.
91. Schunk, D., and Zimmerman, B. (2008). Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications. New York: Erlbaum.
92. Shores, L. R., Hoffmann, K. F., and Nietfeld, J. L. (2010, February). The impact of narrative-centered learning environments on situational interest and problem-solving transfer. Savannah, GA: Annual meeting of Eastern Educational Research Association.
93. Shores, L. R., Robison, J. L., Rowe, J. P., Hoffmann, K. F., and Lester, J. C. (2009). Narrative-centered learning environments: A self-regulated learning perspective. The 2009 AAAI Fall Symposium on Cognitive and Metacognitive Educational Systems, Washington, DC.
94. Shute, V. J., Masduki, I., Donmez, O., Kim, Y. J., Dennen, V. P., Jeong, A. C., et al. (2010). Modeling, assessing, and supporting key competencies within game environments. To appear in D. Ifenthaler, P. Pirnay-Dummer, and N. M. Seel (Eds.), Computer-based diagnostics and systematic analysis of knowledge. New York: Springer-Verlag.
95. Sperling, R. A., Howard, B. C., Staley, R., and Dubois, N. (2004). Metacognition and self-regulated learning constructs. Educational Research and Evaluation, 10, 117-139.
96. Spiro, R. J., Vispoel, W. P., Schmitz, J. G., Samarapungavan, A., and Boerger, A. E. (1987). Knowledge acquisition for application: Cognitive flexibility and transfer in complex content domains. In B. K. Britton, and S. M. Glynn (Eds.), Executive control processes in reading (pp. 177-199). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
97. Squire, K. (2006). From content to context: Videogames as designed experience. Educational Researcher, 35, 19-29.
98. Thiede, K. W., Anderson, M. C., and Therriault, D. (2003). Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 66-73.
99. VanZile-Tamsen, C., and Livingston, J. (1999). The differential impact of motivation on the self-regulated strategy use of high-and low-achieving college students. Journal of College Student Development, 40(1), 54-60.
100. Wery, J., and Nietfeld, J. L. (2010). Supporting self-regulated learning with exceptional children. Teaching Exceptional Children, 42, 70-78.
101. White, B., and Frederiksen, J. (2005). A theoretical framework and approach for fostering metacognitive development. Educational Psychologist, 40, 211-223.
102. Winne, P. H. (1995). Self-regulation is ubiquitous but its forms vary with knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 30, 223-228.
103. Winne, P. H., and Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, and A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 227-304). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
104. Winne, P. H., and Jamieson-Noel, D. (2002). Exploring students’ calibration of self reports about study tactics and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 551-572.
105. Winne, P. H., and Jamieson-Noel, D. (2003). Self-regulating studying by objectives for learning: Students’ reports compared to a model. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 259-276.
106. Winne, P. H., and Nesbit, J. C. (2009, April). Data for modeling self-regulated learning. San Diego, CA:Annual meeting of American Educational Research Association.
107. Winters, F. I., and Azevedo, R. (2005). High school students’ regulation of learning during computer-based science inquiry. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33, 189-215.
108. Winters, F., Greene, J., and Costich, C. (2008). Self-Regulation of learning within computer-based learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 429-444.
109. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaert, P. R. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulated learning (pp. 13-39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
110. Zimmerman, B. J., and Bandura, A. (1994). Impact of self regulatory influences on writing course attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 845-862.
111. Zimmerman, B., Tsikalas, K. (2005). Can computer-based learning environments (CBLEs) be used as self-regulatory tools to enhance learning. Educational Psychologist, 40, 267-271.