Fostering the Intelligent novice: Learning from errors with metacognitive tutoring

Educational Psychologist

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 257-265

  Mathan, Santosh A ^a   Koedinger, Kenneth R ^b  

^a HONEYWELL TECHNOLOGY CENTER   (United States)

^b Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33144464259     PISSN: 00461520     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15326985ep4004_7     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
2. Anderson, J. R., Conrad, F. G., & Corbett, A. T. (1989). Skill acquisition and the LISP Tutor. Cognitive Science, 13, 467-506.
3. Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive Tutors: Lessons Learned. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(2), 167-207.
4. Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C. -L. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61, 213-238.
5. Bjork, R. A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In J. Metcalfe & A. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 185-205). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
6. Bruer, J. (1993). The Mind's Journey from Novice to Expert. American Educator, 17(2), 6-46.
7. Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245-281.
8. Corbett, A. T., & Anderson, J. R. (2001). Locus of feedback control in computer-based tutoring: impact on learning rate, achievement and attitudes. Proceedings of CHI 2002, Human Factors in Computing Systems (March 31-April 5, 2001, Seattle, WA, USA), ACM, 245-252.
9. Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Hadley, W. H. (2001). Cognitive Tutors: From the research classroom to all classrooms. In P. S. Goodman (Ed.), Technology enhanced learning: Opportunities for change (pp. 235-263). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
10. Fox, B. (1993). Correction in tutoring. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, University of Colorado, Boulder.
11. Hendry, D. G., & Green, T. R. G. (1994). Creating, comprehending, and explaining spreadsheets: A cognitive interpretation of what discretionary users think of the spreadsheet model. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 40, 1033-1065.
12. Lee, A. Y. (1992). Using tutoring systems to study learning: An application of HyperCard. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 24(2), 205-212.
13. Lepper, M. R., & Chabay, R. W. (1988). Socializing the intelligent tutor: Bringing empathy to computer tutors. In H. Mandl & A. Lesgold (Eds.), Learning issues for intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 242-257). New York: Springer.
14. Lewis, M. W., & Anderson, J. R. (1985). Discrimination of operator schemata in problem solving: Learning from examples. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 26-65.
15. Mathan, S., & Koedinger, K. R. (2003). Recasting the feedback debate: Benefits of tutoring error detection and correction skills. In H. U. Hoppe, M. F. Verdejo, & J. Kay (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education: Shaping the future of learning through intelligent techolgies. Proceedings of AI-ED 2003 (pp. 39-46). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS.
16. Merrill, D. C., Reiser, B. J., Merrill, S. K., & Landes, S. (1995). Tutoring: Guided learning by doing. Cognition and Instruction, 13, 315-372.
17. Merrill, D. C., Reiser, B. J., Ranney, M., & Trafton, J. G. (1992). Effective tutoring techniques: A comparison of human tutors and intelligent tutoring systems. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 277-306.
18. Nardi, B. (1993). A small matter of programming: Perspectives on end user computing, Cambridge, MA: MIT.
19. Nathan, M. J. (1998). Knowledge and situational feedback in a learning environment for algebra story problem solving. Interactive Learning Environment, 5, 161-180.
20. Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992). New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science, 3(4), 207-217.
21. Schmidt, R. A., Young, D. E., Swinnen, S., & Shapiro, D. C. (1989). Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: Support for the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 352-359.
22. Schommer, M. (1993). Epistemological development and academic performance among secondary students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 406-411.
23. Schooler, L. J., & Anderson, J. R. (1990). The Disruptive Potential of Immediate Feedback. In M. Piattelli-Palmarini (Ed.), Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 702-708). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.