CAPTURING AND MODELING SELF-REGULATED LEARNING USING THINK-ALOUD PROTOCOLS

Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance, Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 323-337

  Greene, Jeffrey A ^a   Deekens, Victor M ^a   Copeland, Dana Z ^a   Yu, Seung ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85141493234     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315697048-21     Document Type: Chapter

References (71)

1. Alexander, P. A. (2004). A model of domain learning: Reinterpreting expertise as a multidimensional, multistage process. In D. Y. Dai and R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 273-298). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Alexander, P. A., Dinsmore, D. L., Parkinson, M. M., and Winters, F. I. (2011). Self-regulated learning in academic domains. In B. Zimmerman and D. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 393-407). New York: Routledge.
3. Azevedo, R. (2005). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of selfregulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 40 (4), 199-209.
4. Azevedo, R. (2014). Issues in dealing with sequential and temporal characteristics of self-and socially-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 9 (2), 217-228.
5. Azevedo, R., and Cromley, J. G. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students’ learning with hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 523-535.
6. Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., and Seibert, D. (2004). Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students’ ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29 (3), 344-370.
7. Azevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Greene, J. A., Winters, F. I., and Cromley, J. C. (2008). Why is externally-facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia? Educational Technology Research and Development, 56 (1), 45-72.
8. Azevedo, R., Taub, M., and Mudrick, N. (2015). Think-aloud protocol analysis. In M. Spector, C. Kim, T. Johnson, W. Savenye, D. Ifenthaler, and G. Del Rio (Eds.), The SAGE encyclopedia of educational technology (pp. 763-766). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
9. Bannert, M., and Mengelkamp, C. (2008). Assessment of metacognitive skills by means of instruction to think aloud and reflect when prompted: Does the verbalization method affect learning? Metacognition and Learning, 3 (1), 39-58.
10. Bannert, M., and Reimann, P. (2012). Supporting self-regulated hypermedia learning through prompts. Instructional Science, 40, 193-211.
11. Bannert, M., Reimann, P., and Sonnenberg, C. (2014). Process mining techniques for analysing patterns and strategies in students’ self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 9 (2), 161-185.
12. Ben-Eliyahu, A., and Bernacki, M. L. (2015). Addressing complexities in self-regulated learning: A focus on contextual factors, contingencies, and dynamic relations. Metacognition and Learning, 10 (1), 1-13.
13. Binbasaran Tüysüzoglu, B., and Greene, J. A. (2015). An investigation of the role of contingent metacognitive behavior in self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 10, 77-98.
14. Biswas, G., Baker, R. S., Paquette, L. (2018/this volume). Data mining methods for assessing self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk and J. A. Greene (Eds.), The handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
15. Butler, D. L., and Cartier, S. C. (2018/this volume). Advancing research and practice about self-regulated learning: The promise of in-depth case study methodologies. In D. H. Schunk and J. A. Greene (Eds.), The handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
16. Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6 (3), 271-315.
17. Chi, M. T. H. (2006). Laboratory methods for assessing experts’ and novices’ knowledge. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, R. R. Hoffman, and P. J. Feltovich (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 167-184). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
18. Cleary, T. J., Callan, G. L., Malatesta, J., and Adams, T. (2015). Examining the level of convergence among selfregulated learning microanalytic processes, achievement, and a self-report questionnaire. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33 (5), 439-450.
19. Cotton, D., and Gresty, K. (2006). Reflecting on the think-aloud method for evaluating e-learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37 (1), 45-54.
20. De Backer, L., Van Keer, H., and Valcke, M. (2011). Exploring the potential impact of reciprocal peer tutoring on higher education students’ metacognitive knowledge and regulation. Instructional Science, 40 (3), 559-588.
21. De Backer, L., Van Keer, H., and Valcke, M. (2012). Exploring the potential impact of reciprocal peer tutoring on higher education students’ metacognitive knowledge and regulation. Instructional Science, 40, 559-588.
22. De Backer, L., Van Keer, H., and Valcke, M. (2015). Promoting university students’ metacognitive regulation through peer learning: The potential of reciprocal peer tutoring. Higher Education, 70 (3), 469-486.
23. DeMaris, A. (2004). Regression with social data: Modeling continuous and limited response variables. Hoboken: Wiley.
24. Dent, A. L., and Hoyle, R. H. (2015). A framework for evaluating and enhancing alignment in self-regulated learning research. Metacognition and Learning, 10 (1), 165-179.
25. Dent, A. L., and Koenka, A. C. (2016). The relation between self-regulated learning and academic achievement across childhood and adolescence. Educational Psychology Review, 28 (3), 425-474.
26. Dignath, C., and Büttner, G. (2008). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students: A metaanalysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level. Metacognition and Learning, 3, 231-264.
27. Dinsmore, D. L., and Alexander, P. A. (2016). A multidimensional investigation of deep-level and surface-level processing. The Journal of Experimental Education, 84 (2), 213-244.
28. Dinsmore, D. L., Loughlin, S. M., Parkinson, M. M., and Alexander, P. A. (2015). The effects of persuasive and expository text on metacognitive monitoring and control. Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 54-60.
29. Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., and Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14 (1), 4-58.
30. Efklides, A., Schwartz, B. L, and Brown, V. (2018/this volume). Motivation and affect in self-regulated learning: Does metacognition play a role? In D. H. Schunk and J. A. Greene (Eds.), The handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
31. Eilam, B., and Reiter, S. (2014). Long-term self-regulation of biology learning using standard junior high school science curriculum. Science Education, 98 (4), 705-737.
32. Ericsson, K. A. (2006). Protocol analysis and expert thought: Concurrent verbalizations of thinking during experts’ performance on representative tasks. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, R. R. Hoffman, and P. J. Feltovich (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 223-242). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
33. Ericsson, K. A., and Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215-251.
34. Ericsson, K. A., and Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (revised ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
35. Eveland, W. P., Jr., and Dunwoody, S. (2000). Examining information processing on the world wide web using think aloud protocols. Media Psychology, 2 (3), 219-244.
36. Fox, E. (2009). The role of reader characteristics in processing and learning from informational text. Review of Educational Research, 79 (1), 197-261.
37. Fox, E., Ericsson, K. A., and Best, R. (2011). Do procedures for verbal reporting of thinking have to be reactive? A meta-analysis and recommendations for best reporting methods. Psychological Bulletin, 137 (2), 316-344.
38. Gibbons, J. D., and Chakraborti, S. (2010). Nonparametric statistical inference (5th ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Taylor and Francis Group.
39. Greene, J. A., and Azevedo, R. (2009). A macro-level analysis of SRL processes and their relations to the acquisition of a sophisticated mental model of a complex system. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34 (1), 18-29.
40. Greene, J. A., Bolick, C. M., Jackson, W. P., Caprino, A. M., Oswald, C., and McVea, M. (2015). Domain-specificity of self-regulated learning processing in science and history. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 111-128.
41. Greene, J. A., Bolick, C. M., and Robertson, J. (2010). Fostering historical knowledge and thinking skills using hypermedia learning environments: The role of self-regulated learning. Computers and Education, 54, 230-243.
42. Greene, J. A., Costa, L.-J., and Dellinger, K. (2011). Analysis of self-regulated learning processing using statistical models for count data. Metacognition and Learning, 6, 275-301.
43. Greene, J. A., Costa, L. J., Robertson, J., Yi, P., and Deekens, V. M. (2010). Exploring relations among college students’ prior knowledge, implicit theories of intelligence, and self-regulated learning in a hypermedia environment. Computers and Education, 55 (3), 1027-1043.
44. Greene, J. A., Dellinger, K., Binbasaran Tuysuzoglu, B., and Costa, L. (2013). A two-tiered approach to analyzing self-regulated learning process data to inform the design of hypermedia learning environments. In R. Azevedo and V. Aleven (Eds.), International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies (pp. 117-128). New York: Springer.
45. Greene, J. A., Hutchison, L. A., Costa, L., and Crompton, H. (2012). Investigating how college students’ task definitions and plans relate to self-regulated learning processing and understanding of a complex science topic. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37, 307-230.
46. Greene, J. A., Moos, D. C., Azevedo, R., and Winters, F. I. (2008). Exploring differences between gifted and gradelevel students’ use of self-regulatory learning processes with hypermedia. Computers and Education, 50 (3), 1069-1083.
47. Greene, J. A., Robertson, J., and Costa, L. J. (2011). Assessing self-regulated learning using think-aloud protocol methods. In B. J. Zimmerman and D. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 313-328). New York: Routledge Publishers.
48. Greene, J. A., Yu, S., and Copeland, D. Z. (2014). Measuring critical components of digital literacy and their relationships with learning. Computers and Education, 76, 55-69.
49. Jacobse, A. E., and Harskamp, E. G. (2012). Towards efficient measurement of metacognition in mathematical problem solving. Metacognition and Learning, 7, 133-149.
50. Johnson, A. M., Azevedo, R., and D’Mello, S. K. (2011). The temporal and dynamic nature of self-regulatory processes during independent and externally assisted hypermedia learning. Cognition and Instruction, 29 (4), 471-504.
51. Karabenick, S. A., and Zusho, A. (2015). Examining approaches to research on self-regulated learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 10, 151-163.
52. Kistner, S., Rakoczy, K., Otto, B., Dignath-van Ewijk, C., Buttner, G., and Klieme, E. (2010). Promotion of selfregulated learning in classrooms: Investigating frequency, quality, and consequences for student performance. Metacognition and Learning, 5, 157-171.
53. Moos, D. C. (2011). Self-regulated learning and externally generated feedback with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44 (3), 265-297.
54. Moos, D. C. (2013). Examining hypermedia learning: The role of cognitive load and self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 22 (1), 39-61.
55. Moos, D. C., and Azevedo, R. (2008a). Exploring the fluctuation of motivation and use of self-regulatory processes during learning with hypermedia. Instructional Science, 36, 203-231.
56. Moos, D. C., and Azevedo, R. (2008b). Self-regulated learning with hypermedia: The role of prior domain knowledge. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33 (2), 270-298.
57. Moos, D. C., and Miller, A. (2015). The cyclical nature of self-regulated learning phases: Stable between learning tasks? Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 14 (2), 199-218.
58. Muis, K. (2008). Epistemic profiles and self-regulated learning: Examining relations in the context of mathematics problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 177-208.
59. Panadero, E., Tapia, J. A., and Huertas, J. A. (2012). Rubrics and self-assessment scripts effects on self-regulation, learning and self-efficacy in secondary education. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 806-813.
60. Poitras, E., Lajoie, S., and Hong, Y. J. (2012). The design of technology-rich learning environments as metacognitive tools in history education. Instructional Science, 40 (6), 1033-1061.
61. Schellings, G. L. M., and Broekkamp, H. (2011). Signaling task awareness in think-aloud protocols from students selecting relevant information from text. Metacognition and Learning, 6 (1), 65-82.
62. Sonnenberg, C., and Bannert, M. (2015). Discovering the effects of metacognitive prompts on the sequential structure of SRL-process using process mining techniques. Journal of Learning Analytics, 2 (1), 72-100.
63. Usher, E. L., and Schunk, D. H. (2018/this volume). Social cognitive theoretical perspective of self-regulation. In D. H. Schunk and J. A. Greene (Eds.), The handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
64. Veenman, M. V. J., Elshout, J. J., and Groen, M. G. M. (1993). Thinking aloud: Does it affect regulatory processes in learning. Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch, 18, 322-330.
65. Wang, C.-Y. (2015). Exploring general versus task-specific assessments of metacognition in university chemistry students: A multitrait-multimethod analysis. Research in Science Education, 45, 555-579.
66. Wineburg, S. S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83 (1), 73-87.
67. Winne, P. H. (2018/this volume). Cognitive and metacognitive processing within self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk and J. A. Greene (Eds.), The handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
68. Winne, P. H., and Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531-566). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
69. Wolters, C. A., and Won, S. (2018/this volume). Validity and the use of self-report questionnaires to assess selfregulated learning. In D. H. Schunk and J. A. Greene (Eds.), The handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
70. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
71. Zimmerman, B. J., and Schunk, D. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. New York: Routledge.