Self-regulated learning with hypermedia: The role of prior domain knowledge

Contemporary Educational Psychology

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 270-298

  Moos, Daniel C ^a   Azevedo, Roger ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b University of Memphis   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive processes; Hypermedia; Mental models; Mixed methodology; Prior domain knowledge; Science; Self regulated learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 40749147266     PISSN: 0361476X     EISSN: 10902384     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Afflerbach P. The influence of prior domain knowledge on expert readers' importance assignment process. In: Niles J.A., and Lalik R.V. (Eds). National reading conference yearbook. Solving problems in literacy: Learners, teachers, and researchers Vol. 35 (1986), National Reading Conference, NY 30-40
2. Alexander P.A. The development of expertise: the journey from acclimation to proficiency. Educational Researcher 32 8 (2003) 10-14
3. Alexander P.A., and Jetton T.M. Learning from text: a multidimensional and developmental perspective. In: Kamil M.L., Mosenthal P.B., Pearspn D.P., and Barr R. (Eds). Handbook of reading research Vol. 3 (2000), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 285-310
4. Alexander P.A., and Jetton T.L. Learning from traditional and alternative texts: new conceptualizations for the information age. In: Graesser A., Gernsbacher M., and Goldman S. (Eds). Handbook of discourse processes (2003), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 199-241
5. Alexander P.A., Jetton T.L., and Kulikowich J.M. Interrelationship of knowledge, interest, and recall: assessing the model of domain learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 87 (1995) 559-575
6. Alexander P.A., and Kulikowich J.M. Domain-specific and strategic knowledge as predictors of expository text comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior 23 (1991) 165-190
7. Alexander P.A., Kulikowich J., and Schulze S. The influence of topic knowledge, domain knowledge, and interest on the comprehension of scientific exposition. Learning and Individual Differences 6 (1994) 379-397
8. Alexander P.A., and Murphy K.P. Profiling the differences in students' knowledge, interest, and strategic processing. Journal of Educational Psychology 90 3 (1998) 435-447
9. Anderson J.R. Methodologies for studying human knowledge. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10 (1987) 467-505
10. Azevedo R. Computer environments as metacognitive tools for enhancing learning. Educational Psychologist 40 4 (2005) 193-197
11. Azevedo R., and Cromley J.G. Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students' learning with hypermedia?. Journal of Educational Psychology 96 3 (2004) 523-535
12. Azevedo R., Cromley J.G., and Seibert D. Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students' ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia. Contemporary Educational Psychology 29 (2004) 344-370
13. Azevedo R., Cromley J.G., Winters F.I., Moos D.C., and Greene J.A. Adaptive human scaffolding facilitates adolescents' self-regulated learning with hypermedia. Instructional Science 33 (2005) 381-412
14. Azevedo R., Guthrie J.T., and Seibert D. The role of self-regulated learning in fostering students' conceptual understanding of complex systems with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research 30 1 (2004) 87-111
15. Azevedo R., Winters F.I., and Moos D.C. Can students collaboratively use hypermedia to lean about science? The dynamics of self- and other-regulatory processes in an ecology classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research 31 3 (2004) 215-245
16. Bartlett M.S. A further note on tests of significance in factor analysis. The British Journal of Psychology 4 (1951) 1-2
17. Best R.M., Rowe M., Ozuru Y., and McNamara D.S. Deep-level comprehension of science texts: the role of the reader and the text. Top Lang Disorders 25 1 (2005) 65-83
18. In: Boekaerts M., Pintrich P., and Zeidner M. (Eds). Handbook of self-regulation (2000), Academic Press, San Diego, CA
19. Butler D.L., and Winne P.H. Feedback and self-regulated learning: a theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research 65 (1995) 245-281
20. Caliser F., and Gurel Z. Influence of text structure and prior domain knowledge of the learner on reading comprehension, browsing and perceived control. Computers in Human Behavior 19 2 (2003) 135-145
21. Carr M., Alexander J., and Schwanenflugel P. Where gifted children do and do not excel on metacognitive tasks. Roeper Review 18 3 (1996) 212-217
22. Catell R.B. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research 1 (1966) 245-276
23. Chen S.Y., Fan J.P., and Macredie R.D. Navigation in hypermedia learning systems: experts vs. novices. Computers in Human Behavior 22 (2006) 251-266
24. Chen S.Y., and Ford N. Modeling user navigation behaviours in a hypermedia- based learning system: an individual differences approach. Journal of Knowledge Organization 25 (1998) 67-78
25. Chi M.T.H. Self-explaining: the dual processes of generating inference and repairing mental models. In: Glaser R. (Ed). Advances in instructional psychology: Educational design and cognitive science Vol. 5 (2000), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 161-238
26. Chi M.T.H. Commonsense conceptions of emergent processes: why some misconceptions are robust. Journal of the Learning Sciences 14 2 (2005) 161-199
27. Chi M.T.H., de Leeuw N., Chiu M.H., and LaVancher C. Eliciting self-explanation improves understanding. Cognitive Science 18 (1994) 439-477
28. Chi M.T.H., Feltovich P., and Glaser R. Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science 5 (1981) 121-152
29. Chi M.T.H., Glaser R., and Farr M.J. The nature of expertise (1988), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
30. Deffner G. Interaction of thinking aloud, solution strategies and task characteristics? An experimental test of the Ericsson and Simon model. Spracher und Kognition 9 (1989) 98-111
31. Dochy F., and Alexander P.A. Mapping prior domain knowledge: a framework for discussion among researchers. European Journal of Psychology of Education 10 3 (1995) 225-242
32. Ericsson K.A. The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports, and games (1996), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
33. Ericsson K.A. Protocol analysis and expert thought: concurrent verbalizations of thinking during experts' performance on representative tasks. In: Ericsson K.A., Charness N., Hoffman R.R., and Feltovich P.J. (Eds). The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (2006), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA 223-242
34. Ericsson K.A., and Kintsch W. Long-term working memory. Psychologist Review 102 (1995) 211-245
35. Ericsson K.A., and Simon H.A. Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. 2nd ed. Vol. 3 (1993), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
36. Ericsson K.A., and Smith J. Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits (1991), Cambridge University Press, New York, NY
37. Feltovich P.J., Ford K.M., and Hoffman R.R. Expertise in context: Human and Machine (1997), American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park, CA
38. Graesser A.C., McNamara D.S., and VanLehn K. Scaffolding deep comprehension strategies through Point & Query, AutoTutor, and iStart. Educational Psychologist 40 4 (2005) 225-234
39. Greene J., and Azevedo R. Adolescents' use of self-regulatory processes and their relation to qualitative mental model shifts while using hypermedia. In: Barab S., Hay K., and Hickey D. (Eds). Proceedings of the 7th international conference of the learning sciences (2006), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 203-209
40. Greene, J. A., Moos, D. C., Azevedo, R., & Winters, F. I. (in press). Exploring differences between gifted and grade-level students' use of self-regulatory learning processes with hypermedia, Computers and Education.
41. Guadagnoli E., and Velicer W.F. The relationship of sample size to the stability of component patterns: a simulation study. Psychological Bulletin 103 (1988) 265-275
42. Hasan B. The influence of specific computer experiences on computer self-efficacy beliefs. Computers in Human Behavior 19 4 (2003) 443-450
43. Heydemann M. The relation between eye-moveness and think aloud for Raven matrices. Psychologische Beitrage 28 (1986) 76-87
44. Jacobson M., and Archodidou A. The design of hypermedia tools for learning: fostering conceptual change and transfer of complex scientific knowledge. Journal of the Learning Sciences 9 2 (2000) 145-199
45. Jonassen D., and Reeves T. Learning with technology: using computers as cognitive tools. In: Jonassen D. (Ed). Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (1996), Macmillan, NY 694-719
46. Kanfer R., and Ackerman P.L. Motivation and cognitive abilities: an integrative/aptitude-treatment approach to skill acquisition. Journal of Applied Psychology 74 (1989) 657-690
47. Kintsch W. Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition (1998), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA
48. Lajoie S.P., and Azevedo R. Teaching and learning in technology-rich environments. In: Alexander P., and Winne P. (Eds). Handbook of educational psychology (2006), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
49. Last D.A., O'Donnell A.M., and Kelly A.E. The effects of prior domain knowledge and goal strength on the use of hypermedia. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 7 1 (2001) 51-69
50. Laszlo J., Meutsch D., and Viehoff R. Verbal reports as data in text comprehension: an introduction. Text 8 (1988) 283-294
51. Lawless K.A., and Brown S.W. Multimedia learning environments: issues of learner control and navigation. Instructional Science 25 2 (1997) 117-131
52. Leahy W., Chandler P., and Sweller J. When auditory presentation should and should not be a component of multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology 17 4 (2003) 401-418
53. Lundeberg M. Metacognitive aspects of reading comprehension: studying understanding in legal case analysis. Reading Research Quarterly 22 (1987) 407-432
54. McDonald S., and Stevenson R.J. Effects of text structure and prior domain knowledge of the learner on navigation in hypermedia. Human Factors 40 1 (1998) 18-27
55. McNamara D.S. Reading both high-coherence and low-coherence texts: effects of text sequence and prior domain knowledge. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 55 1 (2001) 51-62
56. McNamara D.S. SERT: self-explanation reading training. Discourse Processes 38 1 (2004) 1-30
57. McNamara D.S., Kintsch E., Songer N.B., and Kintsch W. Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction 14 1 (1996) 1-43
58. Moos D.C., and Azevedo R. The role of goal structure in undergraduates' use of self-regulatory variables in two hypermedia learning tasks. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 15 1 (2006) 49-86
59. Murphy P.K., and Alexander P.A. What counts? The predictive powers of subject-matter knowledge, strategic processing, and interest in domain-specific performance. The Journal of Experimental Education 70 3 (2002) 197-214
60. Newell A., and Simon H.A. Human problem solving (1972), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
61. Nielson J. Designing web usability: The practice of simplicity (2000), New Rider Publishing, USA
62. Norris S.P. Effect of eliciting verbal reports of thinking on critical thinking test performance. Journal of Educational Measurement 27 (1991) 41-58
63. Nunnally J.C. Psychometric theory. 2nd ed. (1978), McGraw Hill, New York
64. Osborne J.W., and Costello A.B. Sample size and subject to item ratio in principal components analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, & Evaluation 9 11 (2004)
65. Pintrich P. The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In: Boekaerts M., Pintrich P., and Zeidner M. (Eds). Handbook of self-regulation (2000), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 452-502
66. Pintrich P., and Zusho A. The development of academic self-regulation: the role of cognitive and motivational factors. In: Wigfield A., and Eccles J. (Eds). Development of achievement motivation (2002), Academic Press, San Diego 249-284
67. Pressley M., and Afflerbach P. Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading (1995), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
68. Rhenius D., and Heydemann M. Think aloud during the administration of Raven's matrices. Zeitschrift fur experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie 76 (1984) 308-327
69. Salanova M., Grau R.M., and Cifre E. Computer training, frequency of usage and burnout: the moderating role of computer self-efficacy. Computers in Human Behavior 16 6 (2000) 575-590
70. Shapiro A. The relationship between prior domain knowledge and interactive overviews during hypermedia-aided learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research 20 2 (1999) 143-167
71. Shapiro A. The effects of interactive overviews on the development of conceptual structure in novices learning from hypermedia. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 9 1 (2000) 57-78
72. Shapiro A. How including prior domain knowledge as a subject variable may change outcomes of learning. American Educational Research Journal 41 1 (2004) 159-189
73. Shapiro A., and Niederhauser D. In: Jonassen D. (Ed). Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2004), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 605-620
74. Shin E., Schallert D., and Savenye C. Effects of learner control, advisement, and prior domain knowledge on young students' learning in a hypermedia environment. Educational Technology Research and Development 42 1 (1994) 33-46
75. Sweller J. Evolution of human cognitive architecture. In: Ross B. (Ed). The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (2003), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 215-266
76. Sweller J. Instructional design consequences of an analogy between evolution by natural selection and human cognitive architecture. Instructional Science 32 1/2 (2004) 9-31
77. Sweller J. The redundancy principle in multimedia learning. In: Mayer R. (Ed). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2005), Cambridge, NY 159-167
78. Sweller J., van Merrienboer J.J.G., and Pass F.G. Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review 10 (1998) 251-296
79. Tabachnick B.G., and Fidell L.S. Using multivariate statistics. 3rd ed. (1996), Harper Collins, New York
80. Velicer W., and Jackson D. Component analysis versus common factor analysis: some issues in selecting an appropriate procedure. Multivariate Behavioral Research 25 1 (1990) 1-28
81. Wells G., and Arauz R.M. Dialogue in the classroom. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 15 3 (2006) 379-428
82. Williams M. Student control and instructional technologies. In: Jonassen D. (Ed). Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (1996), Macmillan, NY 957-983
83. Winne P.H. A metacognitive view of individual differences in self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences 8 (1996) 327-353
84. Winne P.H. Experimenting to bootstrap self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 89 (1997) 397-410
85. Winne P.H. Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In: Zimmerman B.J., and Schunk D.H. (Eds). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2001), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
86. Winne P.H. Key issues in modeling and applying research on self-regulated learning. Applied Psychology: An International Review 54 2 (2005) 232-238
87. Winne P.H., and Hadwin A.F. Studying as self-regulated learning. In: Hacker D.J., and Dunlosky J. (Eds). Metacognition in educational theory and practice (1998), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 277-304
88. Winne P.H., and Perry N.E. Measuring self-regulated learning. In: Boekaerts M., Pintrich P., and Zeidner M. (Eds). Handbook of self-regulation (2000), Academic Press, Orlando, FL 531-566
89. Zimmerman B.J. Attaining self-regulation: a social cognitive perspective. In: Boekaerts M., Pintrich P.R., and Zeidner M. (Eds). Handbook of self-regulation (2000), Academic Press, San Diego, CA
90. Zimmerman B.J., and Martinez-Pons M. Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated strategies. American Educational Research Journal 23 (1986) 614-628
91. Zimmerman B.J., and Schunk D.H. Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (2001), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ