Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students' learning with hypermedia?

Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 96, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 523-535

  Azevedo, Roger ^a   Cromley, Jennifer G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4544272533     PISSN: 00220663     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.523     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Azevedo, R. (2002). Beyond intelligent tutoring systems: Computers as metacognitive tools to enhance learning? Instructional Science, 30, 31-45.
2. Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., & Seibert, D. (2004). Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students' ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 344-370.
3. Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., Seibert, D., & Tron, M. (2003, April). The role of co-regulated learning during students' understanding of complex systems with hypermedia. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
4. Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., Thomas, L., Seibert, D., & Tron, M. (2003, April). Online process scaffolding and students' self-regulated learning with hypermedia. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
5. Azevedo, R., Guthrie, J. T., & Seibert, D. (2004). The role of self-regulated learning in fostering students' conceptual understanding of complex systems with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30, 87-111.
6. Butler, D. (1997, March). The roles of goal setting and self-monitoring in students' self-regulated engagement of tasks. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
7. Butler, D. (1998). The strategic content learning approach to promoting self-regulated learning: A report of three studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 682-697.
8. Chi, M. T. H. (2000). Self-explaining: The dual processes of generating inference and repairing mental models. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology: Educational design and cognitive science (Vol. 5, pp. 161-238). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M.-H., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439-477.
10. Chi, M. T. H., Siler, S., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T., & Hausmann, R. (2001). Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science, 25, 471-534.
11. Dillon, A., & Gabbard, R. (1998). Hypermedia as educational technology: A review of the quantitative research literature on learner comprehension, control, and style. Review of Educational Research, 68, 322-349.
12. Eom, W., & Reiser, R. (2000). The effects of self-regulation and instruc tional control on performance and motivation in computer-based instruction. International Journal of Instructional Media, 27, 247-257.
13. Graham, S., & Harris, K. (2003). Students with learning disabilities and the process of writing; A meta-analysis of SRSD studies. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 323-344). New York: Guilford Press.
14. Greene, B., & Land, S. (2000). A qualitative analysis of scaffolding use in a resource-based learning environment involving the World Wide Web. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23, 151-179.
15. Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & VonSecker, C. (2000). Effects of integrated instruction on motivation and strategy use in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 331-341.
16. Hadwin, A., & Winne, P. (2001). CoNoteS2: A software tool for promoting self-regulation. Educational Research and Evaluation, 7, 313-334.
17. Hadwin, A., Winne, P., Stockley, D., Nesbit, J., & Woszczyna, C. (2001). Context moderates students' self-reports about how they study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 477-487.
18. Hannafin, M. J., & Land, S. M. (1997). The foundations and assumptions of technology-enhanced student-centered learning environments. In-structional Science, 25, 167-202.
19. Hartley, K. (2001). Learning strategies and hypermedia instruction. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10, 285-305.
20. Hill, J., & Hannafin, M. (1997). Cognitive strategies and learning from the World Wide Web. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(4), 37-64.
21. Jacobson, M., & Archodidou, A. (2000). The design of hypermedia tools for learning: Fostering conceptual change and transfer of complex scientific knowledge. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 149-199.
22. Jonassen, D. (1996). Computers as mind tools for schools, Columbus, OH: Merrill.
23. Kozma, R., Chin, E., Russell, J., & Marx, N. (2000). The roles of representations and tools in the chemistry laboratory and their implications for chemistry learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 105-144.
24. Magliano, J., Trabasso, T., & Graesser, A. (1999). Strategic processing during comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 615-629.
25. Mayer, R., Dow, G., & Mayer, S. (2003). Multimedia learning in an interactive self-explaining environment: What works in the design of agent-based microworlds? Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 806-813.
26. McManus, T. (2000). Individualizing instruction in a Web-based hypermedia learning environment: Nonlinearity, advanced organizers, and self-regulated learners. Journal of Interactive Learning Environments, 11, 219-251.
27. Pintrich, P. R. (2000), The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
28. Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1997). Cognitive strategy instruction in reading. In S. A. Stahl & D. A. Hayes (Eds.), Instructional models in reading (pp. 85-107), Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Shapiro, A. M. (1998). Promoting active learning: The role of system structure in learning from hypertext. Human-Computer Interaction, 13, 1-35.
30. Shapiro, A. M. (1999). The relevance of hierarchies to learning biology from hypertext. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8, 215-243.
31. Shapiro, A. M. (2000). The effect of interactive overviews on the development of conceptual structure in novices learning from hypermedia. Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9, 57-78.
32. Shapiro, A. M., & Niederhauser, D. (2004). Learning from hypertext: Research issues and findings. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed, pp. 605-620). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. (1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535-586.
34. Williams, M. (1996). Learner control and instructional technologies. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 957-983). New York: Scholastic.
35. Winne, P. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 153-189). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. (1998), Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277-304). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Winne, P. H., & Jamieson-Noel, D. (2002). Exploring students' calibration of self-reports about study tactics and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 551-572.
38. Winne, P. H., Jamieson-Noel, D., & Muis, K. (2002). Methodological issues and advances in researching tactics, strategies, and self-regulated learning. In P. Pintrich & M. Maehr (Eds.), New directions in measures and methods (pp. 121-156). Amsterdam: JAI Press.
39. Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531-566). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
40. Winne, P. H., & Stockley, D. (1998). Computing technologies as sites for developing self-regulated learning. In D. Schunk & B. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 106-136). New York: Guilford Press.
41. Wong, B., Harris, K., Graham, S., & Butler, D. (2003). Cognitive strategies instruction research in learning disabilities. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 383-402). New York: Guilford Press.
42. Young, J. D. (1996). The effect of self-regulated learning strategies on performance in learner controlled computer-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(2), 17-27.
43. Zimmerman, B. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
44. Zimmerman, B. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 1-37). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. Zimmerman, B., & Schunk, D. (Eds.). (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.