Is it safe? Social, interpersonal, and human effects of peer assessment: A review and future directions

Handbook of Human and Social Conditions in Assessment

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 247-266

  Panadero, Ernesto ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85108042954     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315749136-22     Document Type: Chapter

References (57)

1. Alonso-Tapia, J., & Fernandez, B. (2008). Development and initial validation of the classroom motivational climate questionnaire (CMCQ). Psicothema, 20(4), 883-889.
2. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-73. doi: 10.1080/0969595980050102
3. Bryant, D. A., & Carless, D. R. (2010). Peer assessment in a test-dominated setting: Empowering, boring or facilitating examination preparation? Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 9(1), 3-15. doi:10.1007/s10671-009-9077-2
4. Carvalho, A. (2012). Students’ perceptions of fairness in peer assessment: Evidence from a problem-based learning course. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(5), 491-505. doi:10.1080/13562517.2012.753051
5. Cheng, K. H., Hou, H. T., & Wu, S. Y. (2014). Exploring students’ emotional responses and participation in an online peer assessment activity: A case study. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(3), 271-287. doi:10.180/10494820.2011.649766
6. Cheng, K. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2012). Students’ interpersonal perspectives on, conceptions of and approaches to learning in online peer assessment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(4), 599-618.
7. Corgnet, B. (2012). Peer evaluations and team performance: When friends do worse than strangers. Economic Inquiry, 50(1), 171-181. doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.2010.00354.x
8. Dixon, H. R., Hawe, E., & Parr, J. (2011). Enacting Assessment for Learning: The beliefs practice nexus. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(4), 365-379. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2010.526587
9. Dochy, F. (2006). A guide for writing scholarly articles or reviews for the Educational Research Review. Educational Research Review. Retrieved from http://www.journals.elsevier.com/educational-research-review/
10. Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peer- and co-assessment in higher education. A review. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 331-350. doi:10.1080/03075079912331379935
11. Falchikov, N. (1995). Peer feedback marking: Developing peer assessment. Innovations in Education & Training International, 32(2), 175-187. doi: 10.1080/1355800950320212
12. Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 287-322.
13. Gao, M. (2009). Students’ voices in school-based assessment of Hong Kong: A case study. In D. M. McInerney, G.T.L. Brown, & G.A.D. Liem (Eds.), Student perspectives on assessment: What students can tell us about assessment for learning (pp. 107-130). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
14. Harris, L. R., & Brown, G.T.L. (2013). Opportunities and obstacles to consider when using peer- and selfassessment to improve student learning: Case studies into teachers’ implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36(0), 101-111. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2013.07.008
15. Hou, H. T., & Cheng, K. H. (2012). Analyzing the latent emotional transfer pattern (LETP) of a learning community in an online peer-assessment activity. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), E113-E116. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01301.x
16. Hunter, D., & Russ, M. (1996). Peer assessment in performance studies. British Journal of Music Education, 13(01), 67-78. doi:10.1017/S0265051700002953
17. Hwang, G. J., Hung, C. M., & Chen, N. S. (2014). Improving learning achievements, motivations and problemsolving skills through a peer assessment-based game development approach. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(2), 129-145. doi:10.1007/s11423-013-9320-7
18. Johnson, N., & Winterbottom, M. (2010). Supporting girls’ motivation in science: A study of peer- and selfassessment in a girls-only class. Educational Studies, 37(4), 391-403. doi: 10.1080/03055698.2010.508605
19. Karaca, E. (2009). An evaluation of teacher trainees’ opinions of the peer assessment in terms of some variables. World Applied Sciences Journal, 6(1), 123-128.
20. Kim, M., & Ryu, J. (2013). The development and implementation of a web-based formative peer assessment system for enhancing students’ metacognitive awareness and performance in ill-structured tasks. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(4), 549-561. doi:10.1007/s11423-012-9266-1
21. Koc, C. (2011). The views of prospective class teachers about peer assessment in teaching practice. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 11(4), 1979-1989.
22. Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2010). Peer assessment as collaborative learning: A cognitive perspective. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 344-348. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.005
23. Lee, S., & Ditko, S. (1962, August 15). Spider Man. Amazing Fantasy, 15, 1-11.
24. Li, L., & Steckelberg, A. (2004). Using peer feedback to enhance student meaningful learning. Paper presented at the Conference of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Chicago, USA.
25. Lin, S. S. J., Liu, E. Z. F., & Yuan, S. M. (2002). Student attitudes toward networked peer assessment: Case studies of undergraduate students and senior high school students. International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(2), 241-254.
26. Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Pihlajamäki, H., & Kotkas, T. (2006). Self-, peer- and teacher-assessment of student essays. Active Learning in Higher Education, 7(1), 51-62. doi:10.1177/1469787406061148
27. Magin, D. (2001). Reciprocity as a source of bias in multiple peer assessment of group work. Studies in Higher Education, 26(1), 53-63. doi:10.1080/03075070020030715
28. McConlogue, T. (2010). But is it fair? Developing students’ understanding of grading complex written work through peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation In Higher Education, 37(1), 113-123. doi:10.1080/02602938.2010.515010
29. McMahon, T. (2009). Combining peer-assessment with negotiated learning activities on a day-release undergraduatelevel certificate course (ECTS level 3). Assessment & Evaluation In Higher Education, 35(2), 223-239. doi:10.1080/02602930902795919
30. Montero Garcia-Celay, I., & León, O. (2007). A guide for naming research studies in Psychology. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 7(3), 847-862.
31. Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Reiling, K. (1996). The importance of marking criteria in the use of peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation In Higher Education, 21(3), 239-250. doi:10.1080/0260293960210304
32. Panadero, E., & Alonso-Tapia, J. (2013). Self-assessment: Theoretical and practical connotations. When it happens, how is it acquired and what to do to develop it in our students. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 11(2), 551-576. doi:10.14204/ejrep.30.12200
33. Panadero, E., & Brown, G.T.L. (2015). Higher education teachers’ assessment practices: Formative espoused but not yet fully implemented. Paper presented at the Fifth Assessment in Higher Education Conference 2015, Birmingham, (UK).
34. Panadero, E., & Brown, G.T.L. (2016). Teachers’ reasons for using peer assessment: Positive experience predicts use. European Journal of Psychology of Education. doi: 10.1007/s10212-015-0282-5
35. Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Strijbos, J. W. (2016). Enhancing ownership, relinquishing control: Scaffolding students regulated learning through involvement via Assessment for Learning. In D. Laveault & L. Allal (Eds.), Assessment for Learning: Meeting the challenge of implementation.
36. Panadero, E., Romero, M., & Strijbos, J. W. (2013). The impact of a rubric and friendship on construct validity of peer assessment, perceived fairness and comfort, and performance. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39(4), 195-203. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.005
37. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91-105. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4
38. Peterson, E. R., & Irving, S. E. (2008). Secondary school students’ conceptions of assessment and feedback. Learning and Instruction, 18(3), 238-250.
39. Reinholz, D. (2015). The assessment cycle: A model for learning through peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1-15. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1008982
40. Sadler, P. M., & Good, E. (2006). The impact of self- and peer-grading on student learning. Educational Assessment, 11(1), 1-31.
41. Sluijsmans, D.M.A., Brand-Gruwel, S., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2002). Peer assessment training in teacher education: Effects on performance and perceptions. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(5), 443-454. doi:10.1080/0260293022000009311
42. Stanier, L. (1997). Peer assessment and group work as vehicles for student empowerment: A module evaluation. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 21(1), 95-98. doi:10.1080/03098269708725413
43. Strijbos, J. W., Ochoa, T. A., Sluijsmans, D.M.A., Segers, M.S.R., & Tillema, H. H. (2009). Fostering interactivity through formative peer assessment in (web-based) collaborative learning environments. In C. Mourlas, N. Tsianos, & P. Germanakos (Eds.), Cognitive and emotional processes in web-based education: Integrating human factors and personalization (pp. 375-395). Hersey, PA: IGI Global.
44. Topping, K. J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-276.
45. Topping, K. J. (2003). Self and peer assessment in school and university: Reliability, validity and utility. In M. Segers, F. Dochy, & E. Cascallar (Eds.), Optimising new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards (Vol. 1, pp. 55-87). Netherlands: Springer.
46. Topping, K. J. (2012). Peers as a source of formative and summative assessment. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), Handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 395-412). Los Angeles: SAGE.
47. Topping, K. J., Smith, E. F., Swanson, I., & Elliot, A. (2000). Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(2), 149-169. doi:10.1080/713611428
48. van Gennip, N. (2012a). Arranging peer assessment: The role of interpersonal beliefs Assessing together. Peer assessment from an interpersonal perspective (Vol. PhD, pp. 45-57): Universiteit Leiden.
49. van Gennip, N. (2012b). Assessing together. Peer assessment from an interpersonal perspective. (PhD), Universiteit Leiden.
50. van Gennip, N., Gijbels, D., Segers, M., & Tillema, H. H. (2010). Reactions to 360° feedback: The role of trust and trust-related variables. International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, 10(4), 362-379. doi:10.1504/IJHRDM.2010.036088
51. van Gennip, N. A. E., Segers, M.S.R., & Tillema, H. H. (2009). Peer assessment for learning from a social perspective: The influence of interpersonal variables and structural features. Educational Research Review, 4(1), 41-54. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2008.11.002
52. van Gennip, N.A.E., Segers, M.S.R., & Tillema, H. H. (2010). Peer assessment as a collaborative learning activity: The role of interpersonal variables and conceptions. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 280-290. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.010
53. van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D., & Van Merriënboer, J. (2010). Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 270-279. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004
54. Vanderhoven, E., Raes, A., Montrieux, H., Rotsaert, T., & Schellens, T. (2015). What if pupils can assess their peers anonymously? A quasi-experimental study. Computers & Education, 81, 123-132. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.001
55. Wen, M. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2006). University students’ perceptions of and attitudes toward (online) peer assessment. Higher Education, 51(1), 27-44. doi:10.1007/s10734-004-6375-8
56. Willey, K., & Gardner, A. (2010). Investigating the capacity of self and peer assessment activities to engage students and promote learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(4), 429-443. doi:10.1080/03043797.2010.490577
57. Wilson, M. J., Diao, M. M., & Huang, L. (2015). ‘I’m not here to learn how to mark someone else’s stuff ': An investigation of an online peer-to-peer review workshop tool. Assessment & Evaluation In Higher Education, 40(1), 15-32. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2014.881980