How is theory used in assessment and feedback research? A critical review

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2023, Pages 77-94

  Nieminen, Juuso Henrik ^a   Bearman, Margaret ^b   Tai, Joanna ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Assessment and feedback research; critical review; reflexivity; theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 85126454340     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2022.2047154     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. The 56 studies that were included in the review are marked with an asterisk.
2. * Adalberon, Erik. 2021. “ Providing Assessment Feedback to Pre-Service Teachers: A Study of Examiners’ Comments.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 46 (4): 601–614. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2020.1795081.
3. * Adams, Anne-Marie, HannahWilson, JulieMoney, SusanPalmer-Conn, and JamieFearn. 2020. “ Student Engagement with Feedback and Attainment: The Role of Academic Self-Efficacy.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (2): 317–329. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1640184.
4. * Ajjawi, Rola, JoannaTai, Tran LeHuu Nghia, DavidBoud, LizJohnson, and Carol-JoyPatrick. 2020. “ Aligning Assessment with the Needs of Work-Integrated Learning: The Challenges of Authentic Assessment in a Complex Context.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (2): 304–316. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1639613.
5. * Akimov, Alexandr, and, MirelaMalin. 2020. “ When Old Becomes New: A Case Study of Oral Examination as an Online Assessment Tool.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (8): 1205–1221. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2020.1730301.
6. * Amigud, Alexander, and, ThomasLancaster. 2020. “ I Will Pay Someone to Do My Assignment: An Analysis of Market Demand for Contract Cheating Services on Twitter.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (4): 541–553. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1670780.
7. Ashwin, P. 2009. Analysing Teaching-Learning Interactions in Higher Education: Accounting for Structure and Agency. London: Continuum
8. Ashwin, P. 2012. “ How Often Are Theories Developed through Empirical Research into Higher Education? ” Studies in Higher Education 37 (8): 941–955. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2011.557426.
9. Ball, S. J. 1995. “ Intellectuals or Technicians? The Urgent Role of Theory in Educational Studies.” British Journal of Educational Studies 43 (3): 255–271. doi: 10.2307/3121983.
10. Beaumont, C., M.O’Doherty, and S.Lee. 2011. “ Reconceptualising Assessment Feedback: A Key to Improving Student Learning? ” Studies in Higher Education 36 (6): 671–687. doi: 10.1080/03075071003731135.
11. Biesta, G. 2010. “ Why “What Works” Still Won’t Work: From Evidence-Based Education to Value-Based Education.” Studies in Philosophy and Education 29 (5): 491–503. doi: 10.1007/s11217-010-9191-x.
12. Biesta, G., Allan, J. J., and R.Edwards. 2011. “ The Theory Question in Research Capacity Building in Education: Towards an Agenda for Research and Practice.” British Journal of Educational Studies 59 (3): 225–239. doi: 10.1080/00071005.2011.599793.
13. Biesta, G., J.Allan, and R.Edwards. 2014. “ Introduction: The Theory Question in Education and the Education Question in Theory.” In Making a Difference in Theory, edited by G.Biesta, J.Allan, and R.Edwards, 1–9. New York: Routledge.
14. * Bong, Jiyae, and, Min SookPark. 2020. “ Peer Assessment of Contributions and Learning Processes in Group Projects: An Analysis of Information Technology Undergraduate Students’ Performance.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (8): 1155–1168. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2020.1727413.
15. Boud, D., and N.Falchikov. 1989. “ Quantitative Studies of Student Self-Assessment in Higher Education: A Critical Analysis of Findings.” Higher Education 18 (5): 529–549. doi: 10.1007/BF00138746.
16. Boud, D., P.Dawson, M.Bearman, S.Bennett, G.Joughin, and E.Molloy. 2018. “ Reframing Assessment Research: Through a Practice Perspective.” Studies in Higher Education 43 (7): 1107–1118. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2016.1202913.
17. * Bygren, Magnus. 2020. “ Biased Grades? Changes in Grading after a Blinding of Examinations Reform.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (2): 292–303. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1638885.
18. * Carless, David. 2020. “ Longitudinal Perspectives on Students’ Experiences of Feedback: A Need for Teacher–student Partnerships.” Higher Education Research & Development 39 (3): 425–438. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2019.1684455.
19. * Carroll, Danny. 2020. “ Observations of Student Accuracy in Criteria-Based Self-Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (8): 1088–1105. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2020.1727411.
20. * Chirumamilla, Aparna, GuttormSindre, and AnhNguyen-Duc. 2020. “ Cheating in e-Exams and Paper Exams: The Perceptions of Engineering Students and Teachers in Norway.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (7): 940–957. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2020.1719975.
21. Chong, S. W. 2021. “ Reconsidering Student Feedback Literacy from an Ecological Perspective.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 46 (1): 92–104. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2020.1730765.
22. Daenekindt, S., and J.Huisman. 2020. “ Mapping the Scattered Field of Research on Higher Education. A Correlated Topic Model of 17,000 Articles, 1991–2018.” Higher Education 1–17. doi: 10.1007/s10734-020-00500-x.
23. * Dai, Kun., Kelly EMatthews, and VicenteReyes. 2020. “ Chinese Students’ Assessment and Learning Experiences in a Transnational Higher Education Programme.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (1): 70–81. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1608907.
24. * Dawson, Phillip, WendySutherland-Smith, and MarkRicksen. 2020. “ Can Software Improve Marker Accuracy at Detecting Contract Cheating? a Pilot Study of the Turnitin Authorship Investigate Alpha.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (4): 473–482. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1662884.
25. * Ellis, Cath, KarenVan Haeringen, RowenaHarper, TraceyBretag, IanZucker, ScottMcBride, PearlRozenberg, PhilNewton, and SoniaSaddiqui. 2020. “ Does Authentic Assessment Assure Academic Integrity? Evidence from Contract Cheating Data.” Higher Education Research & Development 39 (3): 454–469. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2019.1680956.
26. * Flores, Maria Assunção, GavinBrown, DianaPereira, ClaraCoutinho, PatríciaSantos, and CláudiaPinheiro. 2020. “ Portuguese University Students’ Conceptions of Assessment: taking Responsibility for Achievement.” Higher Education 79 (3): 377–394. doi: 10.1007/s10734-019-00415-2.
27. Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. “ Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 12 (2): 219–245. doi: 10.1177/1077800405284363.
28. * Fortun, Jenny, and, HelenTempest. 2020. “ A Case for Written Examinations in Undergraduate Medical Education: experiences with Modified Essay Examinations.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (7): 926–939. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2020.1714543.
29. * Fraser, Stuart T. 2020. “ A New Frontier: developing an Undergraduate Assessment Task Aimed at Improving the Representation of Biomedical Scientific Information on Wikipedia.” Studies in Higher Education 45 (5): 972–983. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2020.1749794.
30. Gallagher, D. 2014. “ Theories Have Consequences, Don’t They? On the Moral Nature of Educational Theory and Research.” In Making a Difference in Theory: The Theory Question in Education and the Education Question in Theory, edited by G.Biesta, J.Allan, and R.Edwards, 85–99. New York: Routledge.
31. * Gaynor, J. W. 2020. “ Peer Review in the Classroom: student Perceptions, Peer Feedback Quality and the Role of Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (5): 758–775. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1697424.
32. * Golan, Maya, GonenSinger, NetaRabin, and DvirKleper. 2020. “ Integrating Actual Time Usage into the Assessment of Examination Time Extensions Provided to Disabled College Engineering Students.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (7): 988–1000. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2020.1717434.
33. * Grainger, Peter. 2020. “ How Do Pre-Service Teacher Education Students Respond to Assessment Feedback?.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (7): 913–925. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1096322.
34. Grant, M. J., and A.Booth. 2009. “ A Typology of Reviews: An Analysis of 14 Review Types and Associated Methodologies.” Health Information and Libraries Journal 26 (2): 91–108. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x.
35. * Hains-Wesson, Rachael, VikkiPollard, FriederikaKaider, and KarenYoung. 2020. “ STEM Academic Teachers’ Experiences of Undertaking Authentic Assessment-Led Reform: A Mixed Method Approach.” Studies in Higher Education 45 (9): 1797–1808. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2019.1593350.
36. Hamann, J., and A.Kosmützky. 2021. “ Does Higher Education Research Have a Theory Deficit? Explorations on Theory Work.” European Journal of Higher Education 11 (sup1): 421–468. doi: 10.1080/21568235.2021.2003715.
37. * Han, Ye, and YuetingXu. 2020. “ The Development of Student Feedback Literacy: The Influences of Teacher Feedback on Peer Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (5): 680–696. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1689545.
38. Hew, K. F., M.Lan, Y.Tang, C.Jia, and C. K.Lo. 2019. “ Where is the “Theory” Within the Field of Educational Technology Research? ” British Journal of Educational Technology 50 (3): 956–971. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12770.
39. * Hill, Jennifer, and, HarryWest. 2020. “ Improving the Student Learning Experience through Dialogic Feed-Forward Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (1): 82–97. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1608908.
40. Hindmarsh, J. H. 1993. “ Tensions and Dichotomies between Theory and Practice: A Study of Alternative Formulations.” International Journal of Lifelong Education 12 (2): 101–115. doi: 10.1080/0260137930120203.
41. * Hoo, Hui-Teng, KelvinTan, and ChristopherDeneen. 2020. “ Negotiating Self- and Peer-Feedback with the Use of Reflective Journals: An Analysis of Undergraduates’ Engagement with Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (3): 431–446. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1665166.
42. * Ibarra-Sáiz, María Soledad, GregorioRodríguez-Gómez, and DavidBoud. 2020. “ Developing Student Competence through Peer Assessment: The Role of Feedback, Self-Regulation and Evaluative Judgement.” Higher Education 80 (1): 137–156. doi: 10.1007/s10734-019-00469-2.
43. * Jopp, Ryan. 2020. “ A Case Study of a Technology Enhanced Learning Initiative That Supports Authentic Assessment.” Teaching in Higher Education 25 (8): 942–958. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2019.1613637.
44. * Kilgour, Peter, MariaNorthcote, AnthonyWilliams, and AndrewKilgour. 2020. “ A Plan for the Co-Construction and Collaborative Use of Rubrics for Student Learning.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (1): 140–153. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1614523.
45. Lea, M. R., and B. V.Street. 1998. “ Student Writing in Higher Education: An Academic Literacies Approach.” Studies in Higher Education 23 (2): 157–172. doi: 10.1080/03075079812331380364.
46. * Lim, Lisa-Angelique, ShaneDawson, DraganGašević, SreckoJoksimović, AbelardoPardo, AntheaFudge, and SheridanGentili. 2021. “ Students’ Perceptions of, and Emotional Responses to, Personalised Learning Analytics-Based Feedback: An Exploratory Study of Four Courses.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 46 (3): 339–359. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2020.1782831.
47. Lincoln, Y., and E.Guba. 2000. “ Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2nd ed., edited by N.Denzin and Y.Lincoln, 163–188. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
48. * Macleod, Gale, NeilLent, XiaomengTian, YunyingLiang, MeredithMoore, and ShrawaniSen. 2020. “ Balancing Supportive Relationships and Developing Independence: An Activity Theory Approach to Understanding Feedback in Context for Master’s Students.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (7): 958–972. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2020.1719976.
49. Malthouse, R., J.Roffey-Barentsen, and M.Watts. 2014. “ Reflectivity, Reflexivity and Situated Reflective Practice.” Professional Development in Education 40 (4): 597–609. doi: 10.1080/19415257.2014.907195.
50. * Matshedisho, Knowledge Rajohane. 2020. “ Straddling Rows and Columns: Students’ (Mis)Conceptions of an Assessment Rubric.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (2): 169–179. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1616671.
51. * McQuade, Richard, SimonKometa, JeremyBrown, DebraBevitt, and JudithHall. 2020. “ Research Project Assessments and Supervisor Marking: maintaining Academic Rigour through Robust Reconciliation Processes.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (8): 1181–1191. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2020.1726284.
52. * Mercader, Cristina, GeorgetaIon, and AnnaDíaz-Vicario. 2020. “ Factors Influencing Students’ Peer Feedback Uptake: instructional Design Matters.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (8): 1169–1180. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2020.1726283.
53. * Merry, Stephen, and, PaulOrsmond. 2020. “ Peer Assessment: The Role of Relational Learning through Communities of Practice.” Studies in Higher Education 45 (7): 1312–1322. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2018.1544236.
54. Merton, R. 1949. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press.
55. Messick, S. 2005. “ Standards of Validity and the Validity of Standards in Performance Assessment.” Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 14 (4): 5–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3992.1995.tb00881.x.
56. * Molloy, Elizabeth, DavidBoud, and MichaelHenderson. 2020. “ Developing a Learning-Centred Framework for Feedback Literacy.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (4): 527–540. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1667955.
57. * Myyry, Liisa, TerhiKaraharju-Suvanto, MarjoVesalainen, Anna-MaijaVirtala, MarjaRaekallio, OutiSalminen, KatariinaVuorensola, and AnneNevgi. 2020. “ Experienced Academics’ Emotions Related to Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (1): 1–13. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1601158.
58. Nestel, D., and M.Bearman. 2015. “ Theory and Simulation-Based Education: Definitions, Worldviews and Applications.” Clinical Simulation in Nursing 11 (8): 349–354. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2015.05.013.
59. * Nieminen, Juuso Henrik, and, LauraTuohilampi. 2020. “ Finally Studying for Myself’–Examining Student Agency in Summative and Formative Self-Assessment Models.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (7): 1031–1045. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2020.1720595.
60. * Olave-Encina, Karen, KarenMoni, and PeterRenshaw. 2021. “ Exploring the Emotions of International Students about Their Feedback Experiences.” Higher Education Research & Development 40 (4): 810–824. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2020.1786020.
61. Petticrew, M., and Roberts, H. 2006. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Oxford: Blackwell.
62. Pillow, W. 2003. “ Confession, Catharsis, or Cure? Rethinking the Uses of Reflexivity as Methodological Power in Qualitative Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 16 (2): 175–196. doi: 10.1080/0951839032000060635.
63. * Preston, Robyn, MonicaGratani, KimberleyOwens, PoornimaRoche, MonikaZimanyi, and BunmiMalau-Aduli. 2020. “ Exploring the Impact of Assessment on Medical Students’ Learning.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (1): 109–124. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1614145.
64. * Pui, Priscillia, BrendaYuen, and HappyGoh. 2021. “ Using a Criterion-Referenced Rubric to Enhance Student Learning: A Case Study in a Critical Thinking and Writing Module.” Higher Education Research & Development 40 (5): 1056–1069. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2020.1795811.
65. Shay, S. 2008. “ Researching Assessment as Social Practice: Implications for Research Methodology.” International Journal of Educational Research 47 (3): 159–164. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2008.01.003.
66. * Simonsmeier, Bianca AHenrikePeiffer, MajaFlaig, and MichaelSchneider. 2020. “ Peer Feedback Improves Students’ Academic Self-Concept in Higher Education.” Research in Higher Education 61 (6): 706–724. doi: 10.1007/s11162-020-09591-y.
67. * Simper, Natalie. 2020. “ Assessment Thresholds for Academic Staff: constructive Alignment and Differentiation of Standards.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (7): 1016–1030. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2020.1718600.
68. Skinner, Q. 1985. The Return of Grand Theory in the Human Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69. * Sotardi, Valerie A, and ErikBrogt. 2020. “ Influences of Learning Strategies on Assessment Experiences and Outcomes during the Transition to University.” Studies in Higher Education 45 (9): 1973–1985. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2019.1647411.
70. * Suri, Harsh, and, SivaKrishnan. 2020. “ Assessment Hurdles in Core First Year Courses in Australian Universities: Are We Trying to Catch out Students?.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (2): 251–265. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1632795.
71. Tai, J., M.Bearman, K.Gravett, and E.Molloy. 2021. “ Exploring the Notion of Teacher Feedback Literacies through the Theory of Practice Architectures.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education: 1–13. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2021.1948967.
72. Tan, Y. H., and S. C.Tan. 2020. “ Understanding Personal Epistemology.” In Conceptions of Knowledge Creation, Knowledge and Knowing, edited by Y. H.Tan, and S. C.Tan, 35–45. Singapore: Springer.
73. Tannock, S. 2017. “ No Grades in Higher Education Now! Revisiting the Place of Graded Assessment in the Reimagination of the Public University.” Studies in Higher Education 42 (8): 1345–1357. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1092131.
74. * Tempelaar, Dirk. 2020. “ Supporting the Less-Adaptive Student: The Role of Learning Analytics, Formative Assessment and Blended Learning.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (4): 579–593. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1677855.
75. Thomas, G. 2007. Education and Theory: Strangers in Paradigms. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
76. Thurlings, M., M.Vermeulen, T.Bastiaens, and S.Stijnen. 2013. “ Understanding Feedback: A Learning Theory Perspective.” Educational Research Review 9: 1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2012.11.004.
77. Tight, M. 2004. “ Research into Higher Education: An a‐Theoretical Community of Practice? ” Higher Education Research & Development 23 (4): 395–411.
78. Tight, M. 2014. “ Discipline and Theory in Higher Education Research.” Research Papers in Education 29 (1): 93–110. doi: 10.1080/02671522.2012.729080.
79. Tight, M. 2015. “ Theory Application in Higher Education Research: The Case of Communities of Practice.” European Journal of Higher Education 5 (2): 111–126. doi: 10.1080/21568235.2014.997266.
80. Trowler, P. 2012. “ Wicked Issues in Situating Theory in Close-Up Research.” Higher Education Research & Development 31 (3): 273–284. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2011.631515.
81. Tummons, J. 2012. “ Theoretical Trajectories Within Communities of Practice in Higher Education Research.” Higher Education Research & Development 31 (3): 299–310. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2011.631516.
82. Van der Kleij, F. M., and A. A.Lipnevich. 2021. “ Student Perceptions of Assessment Feedback: A Critical Scoping Review and Call for Research.” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 33 (2): 345–373. doi: 10.1007/s11092-020-09331-x.
83. * Van Heerden, Martina. 2020. “ It Has a Purpose beyond Justifying a Mark’: examining the Alignment between the Purpose and Practice of Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (3): 359–371. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1644602.
84. * Van Woezik, Tamara, JurKoksma, RobReuzel, DebbieJaarsma, and GertJan Van Der Wilt. 2020. “ How to Encourage a Lifelong Learner? the Complex Relation between Learning Strategies and Assessment in a Medical Curriculum.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (4): 513–526. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1667954.
85. * Wang, Shutao, and, DemeiZhang. 2020. “ Perceived Teacher Feedback and Academic Performance: The Mediating Effect of Learning Engagement and Moderating Effect of Assessment Characteristics.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (7): 973–987. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2020.1718599.
86. * Wang, Jiandong, RuiqinGao, XiuyanGuo, and JinLiu. 2020. “ Factors Associated with Students’ Attitude Change in Online Peer Assessment–A Mixed Methods Study in a Graduate-Level Course.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (5): 714–727. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1693493.
87. * Weis, Robert, and, Esther LBeauchemin. 2020. “ Are Separate Room Test Accommodations Effective for College Students with Disabilities?.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (5): 794–809. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1702922.
88. * Wicking, Paul. 2020. “ Formative Assessment of Students from a Confucian Heritage Culture: Insights from Japan.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (2): 180–192. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1616672.
89. * Yan, Zi. 2020. “ Self-Assessment in the Process of Self-Regulated Learning and Its Relationship with Academic Achievement.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (2): 224–238. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1629390.
90. * Youde, Andrew. 2020. “ I Don’t Need Peer Support: effective Tutoring in Blended Learning Environments for Part-Time, Adult Learners.” Higher Education Research & Development 39 (5): 1040–1054. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2019.1704692.
91. * Zhan, Ying. 2020. “ Motivated or Informed? Chinese Undergraduates’ Beliefs about the Functions of Continuous Assessment in Their College English Course.” Higher Education Research & Development 39 (5): 1055–1069. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2019.1699029.
92. * Zhang, Fuhui, ChristianSchunn, WentaoLi, and MiyinLong. 2020. “ Changes in the Reliability and Validity of Peer Assessment across the College Years.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (8): 1073–1087. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2020.1724260.
93. * Zhang, Yinxia, and, HongbiaoYin. 2020. “ Collaborative Cheating among Chinese College Students: The Effects of Peer Influence and Individualism-Collectivism Orientations.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (1): 54–69. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1608504.
94. * Zhou, Jiming, KeZhao, and PhillipDawson. 2020. “ How First-Year Students Perceive and Experience Assessment of Academic Literacies.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (2): 266–278. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1637513.
95. * Zhou, Jiming, YongyanZheng, and Joanna Hong-MengTai. 2020. “ Grudges and Gratitude: The Social-Affective Impacts of Peer Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (3): 345–358. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1643449.