Supporting the less-adaptive student: the role of learning analytics, formative assessment and blended learning

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2020, Pages 579-593

  Tempelaar, Dirk ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

assessment of for and as learning; Learning analytics; learning dispositions

Indexed keywords

EID: 85075435655     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1677855     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Buckingham Shum, S., and R., Deakin Crick. 2012. “Learning Dispositions and Transferable Competencies: Pedagogy, Modelling and Learning Analytics.” In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, edited by S., Buckingham Shum, D., Gasevic, and R., Ferguson, 92–101. New York, NY: ACM.
2. Buckingham Shum, S., and R., Ferguson. 2012. “Social Learning Analytics.” Educational Technology and Society 15 (3): 3–26.
3. Coffield, F., D., Moseley, E., Hall, and K., Ecclestone. 2004. Learning Styles and Pedagogy in Post-16 Learning: A Systematic and Critical Review. London: Learning and Skills Research Centre.
4. Crisp, G. T., 2012. “Integrative Assessment: Reframing Assessment Practice for Current and Future Learning.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 37 (1): 33–43. doi:10.1080/02602938.2010.494234.
5. Entwistle, N. J., 1997. “Reconstituting Approaches to Learning: A Response to Webb.” Higher Education 33 (2): 213–218.
6. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., 2004. “Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn?” Educational Psychology Review 16 (3): 235–266. doi:10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3.
7. Jones, J. R., J., Levine Laufgraben, and N., Morris. 2006. “Developing an Empirically Based Typology of Attitudes of Entering Students toward Participation in Learning Communities.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 31 (3): 249–265. doi:10.1080/02602930500352766.
8. Loyens, S. M. M., D., Gijbels, L., Coertjens, and D. J., Côté. 2013. “Students’ Approaches to Learning in Problem-Based Learning: Taking into account Professional Behavior in the Tutorial Groups, Self-Study Time, and Different Assessment Aspects.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 39 (1): 23–32. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2012.10.004.
9. Martin, A. J., 2007. “Examining a Multidimensional Model of Student Motivation and Engagement Using a Construct Validation Approach.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 77 (2): 413–440. doi:10.1348/000709906X118036.
10. Pardo, A., 2018. “A Feedback Model for Data-Rich Learning Experiences.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (3): 428–438. doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1356905.
11. Pekrun, R., and L., Linnenbrink-Garcia. 2012. “Academic Emotions and Student Engagement.” In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, edited by S. L., Christenson, A. L., Reschly, and C., Wylie, 259–282. New York, NY: Springer Verlag.
12. Pekrun, R., E., Vogl, K. R., Muis, and G. M., Sinatra. 2017. “Measuring Emotions during Epistemic Activities: The Epistemically-Related Emotion Scales.” Cognition and Emotion 31 (6): 1268–1276. doi:10.1080/02699931.2016.1204989.
13. Reimann, N., and I., Sadler. 2017. “Personal Understanding of Assessment and the Link to Assessment Practice: The Perspectives of Higher Education Staff.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (5): 724–736. doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1184225.
14. Rodríguez-Gómez, G., V., Quesada-Serra, and M., Soledad Ibarra-Sáiz. 2016. “Learning-Oriented e-Assessment: The Effects of a Training and Guidance Programme on Lecturers’ Perceptions.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41 (1): 35–52. doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.979132.
15. Sclater, N., J., Mullan, and A., Peasgood. 2016. Learning Analytics in Higher Education: A Review of UK and International Practice. Bristol: JISC.
16. Tempelaar, D., B., Rienties, and B., Giesbers. 2015. “In Search for the Most Informative Data for Feedback Generation: Learning Analytics in a Data-Rich Context.” Computers in Human Behavior 47: 157–167. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.038.
17. Tempelaar, D., B., Rienties, J., Mittelmeier, and Q., Nguyen. 2018. “Student Profiling in a Dispositional Learning Analytics Application Using Formative Assessment.” Computers in Human Behavior 78: 408–420. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.010.
18. Tempelaar, D., B., Rienties, and Q., Nguyen. 2017. “Towards Actionable Learning Analytics Using Dispositions.” IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 10 (1): 6–16. doi:10.1109/TLT.2017.2662679.
19. Tempelaar, D., B., Rienties, and Q., Nguyen. 2018. “Investigating Learning Strategies in a Dispositional Learning Analytics Context: The Case of Worked Examples.” In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, Sydney, Australia, March 2018 (LAK’18), p. 201–205.
20. Vermunt, J. D., 1996. “Metacognitive, Cognitive and Affective Aspects of Learning Styles and Strategies: A Phenomenographic Analysis.” Higher Education 31 (1): 25–50. doi:10.1007/BF00129106.
21. Vermunt, J. D., and V., Donche. 2017. “A Learning Patterns Perspective on Student Learning in Higher Education: State of the Art and Moving Forward.” Educational Psychology Review 29 (2): 269–299. doi:10.1007/s10648-017-9414-6.
22. Williams, P., 2017. “Assessing Collaborative Learning: Big Data, Analytics and University Futures.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (6): 978–989. doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1216084.