Exploring the notion of teacher feedback literacies through the theory of practice architectures

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 2023, Pages 201-213

  Tai, Joanna ^a   Bearman, Margaret ^a   Gravett, Karen ^b   Molloy, Elizabeth ^c  

^a DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

feedback; Feedback literacy; practice; sociomaterial; teacher feedback literacy

Indexed keywords

EID: 85110980224     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2021.1948967     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bearman, M., P. Dawson, S. Bennett, M. Hall, E. Molloy, D. Boud, and G. Joughin. 2017. “ How University Teachers Design Assessments: A Cross-Disciplinary Study.” Higher Education 74 (1): 49–64. doi: 10.1007/s10734-016-0027-7.
2. Bloxham, S. 2009. “ Marking and Moderation in the UK: False Assumptions and Wasted Resources.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34 (2): 209–220. doi: 10.1080/02602930801955978.
3. Boud, D., and P. Dawson. 2021. “ What Feedback Literate Teachers Do: An Empirically-Derived Competency Framework.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 0 (0): 1–14. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2021.1910928.
4. Boud, D., and E. Molloy. 2013. “ Rethinking Models of Feedback for Learning: The Challenge of Design.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (6): 698–712. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2012.691462.
5. Braidotti, R., V. Bozalek, T. Shefer, and M. Zembylas. 2018. Socially Just Pedagogies: Posthumanist, Feminist and Materialist Perspectives in Higher Education. London: Bloomsbury Academic. doi: 10.5040/9781350032910.
6. Brookfield, S. D. 2015. The Skillful Teacher: On Technique, Trust, and Responsiveness in the Classroom. Somerset: John Wiley.
7. Carless, D. 2019. “ Feedback Loops and the Longer-Term: Towards Feedback Spirals.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44 (5): 705–714. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1531108.
8. Carless, D., and D. Boud. 2018. “ The Development of Student Feedback Literacy: Enabling Uptake of Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (8): 1315–1325. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354.
9. Carless, D., J. To, C. Kwan, and J. Kwok. 2020. “ Disciplinary Perspectives on Feedback Processes: Towards Signature Feedback Practices.” Teaching in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/13562517.2020.1863355.
10. Carless, D., and N. Winstone. 2020. “ Teacher Feedback Literacy and Its Interplay with Student Feedback Literacy.” Teaching in Higher Education. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2020.1782372.
11. Chan, C. K. Y., and J. Luo. 2021. “ Exploring Teacher Perceptions of Different Types of ‘Feedback Practices’ in Higher Education: Implications for Teacher Feedback Literacy.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2021.1888074.
12. Chong, S. W. 2021. “ Reconsidering Student Feedback Literacy from an Ecological Perspective.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 46 (1): 92–104. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2020.1730765.
13. Ellsworth, E. 1989. “ Why Doesn’t This Feel Empowering? Working through the Repressive Myths of Critical Pedagogy.” Harvard Educational Review 59 (3): 297–325. doi: 10.17763/haer.59.3.058342114k266250.
14. Freire, P. 1985. “ Reading the World and Reading the Word: An Interview with Paulo Freire.” Language Arts 62 (1): 15–21.
15. Gravett, K. 2019. “ Making Learning Happen: Students’ Development of Academic and Information Literacies.” In Engaging Student Voices in Higher Education, edited by S. Lygo-Baker, I. Kinchin, and N. E. Winstone, 175–190. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-20824-0_11.
16. Gravett, K. 2020. “ Feedback Literacies as Sociomaterial Practice.” Critical Studies in Education. doi: 10.1080/17508487.2020.1747099.
17. Gravett, K., I. M. Kinchin, N. E. Winstone, K. Balloo, M. Heron, A. Hosein, S. Lygo-Baker, and E. Medland. 2020. “ The Development of Academics’ Feedback Literacy: Experiences of Learning from Critical Feedback via Scholarly Peer Review.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (5): 651–665. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1686749.
18. Heerden, M. v. 2020. “ (How) Do Written Comments Feed-Forward? A Translation Device for Developing Tutors’ Feedback-Giving Literacy.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 00 (00): 1–10. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2020.1788411.
19. Henderson, M., M. Phillips, T. Ryan, D. Boud, P. Dawson, E. Molloy, and P. Mahoney. 2019. “ Conditions That Enable Effective Feedback.” Higher Education Research & Development 38 (7): 1401–1416. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2019.1657807.
20. Joughin, G., D. Boud, P. Dawson, and J. Tai. 2021. “ What Can Higher Education Learn from Feedback Seeking Behaviour in Organisations? Implications for Feedback Literacy.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 46 (1): 80–91. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2020.1733491.
21. Kemmis, S., J. Wilkinson, and C. Edwards-Groves. 2017. “ Roads Not Travelled, Roads Ahead: How the Theory of Practice Architectures Is Travelling.” In Exploring Education and Professional Practice: Through the Lens of Practice Architectures, edited by K. Mahon, S. Francisco, and S. Kemmis, 239–256. Singapore: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-2219-7_14.
22. Lea, M. R., and B. V. Street. 1998. “ Student Writing in Higher Education: An Academic Literacies Approach.” Studies in Higher Education 23 (2): 157–172. doi: 10.1080/03075079812331380364.
23. Lea, M. R., and B. V. Street. 2006. “ The ‘Academic Literacies’ Model: Theory and Applications.” Theory into Practice 45 (4): 368–377. doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4504_11.
24. Leathwood, C., and B. Read. 2020. “ Short-Term, Short-Changed? A Temporal Perspective on the Implications of Academic Casualisation for Teaching in Higher Education.” Teaching in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/13562517.2020.1742681.
25. Molloy, E., and M. Bearman. 2019. “Embracing the Tension between Vulnerability and Credibility: ‘Intellectual Candour’ in Health Professions Education.” Medical Education 53 (1): 32–41. doi: 10.1111/medu.13649.
26. Molloy, E., D. Boud, and M. Henderson. 2020. “ Developing a Learning-Centred Framework for Feedback Literacy.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (4): 527–540. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1667955.
27. Nicol, D. 2020. “ The Power of Internal Feedback: Exploiting Natural Comparison Processes.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1823314.
28. Noble, C., S. Billett, L. Armit, L. Collier, J. Hilder, C. Sly, and E. Molloy. 2020. “ It’s Yours to Take’: Generating Learner Feedback Literacy in the Workplace.” Advances in Health Sciences Education 25 (1): 55–74. doi: 10.1007/s10459-019-09905-5.
29. Penman, M., J. Tai, T. Thompson, and K. Thomson. 2021. “ Feedback Practices as Part of Signature Pedagogy for Clinical Placements.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 28 (2): 15 1–169. doi: 10.1080/0969594X.2021.1892587.
30. Rees, C. E., C. Davis, O. A. King, A. Clemans, P. E. S. Crampton, N. Jacobs, T. McKeown, J. Morphet, and K. Seear. 2020. “ Power and Resistance in Feedback during Work-Integrated Learning: Contesting Traditional Student-Supervisor Asymmetries.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (8): 1136–1154. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1704682.
31. Reimann, N., I. Sadler, and K. Sambell. 2019. “ What’s in a Word? Practices Associated with ‘Feedforward’ in Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44 (8): 1279–1290. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1600655.
32. Richardson, J. T. E., J. Mittelmeier, and B. Rienties. 2020. “ The Role of Gender, Social Class and Ethnicity in Participation and Academic Attainment in UK Higher Education: An Update.” Oxford Review of Education 46 (3): 346–362. doi: 10.1080/03054985.2019.1702012.
33. Rowlands, J., T. Gale, and S. Parker. 2019. Practice Methodologies in Education Research, edited by J. Lynch. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780429202063.
34. Schatzki, T. R. 2012. “ A Primer on Practices.” In Practice-Based Education, edited by H. Joy, B. Ronald, S. Billett, M. Hutchings, and F. Trede, 13–26. Rotterdam: SensePublishers. doi: 10.1007/978-94-6209-128-3_2.
35. Steen-Utheim, A., and A. L. Wittek. 2017. “ Dialogic Feedback and Potentialities for Student Learning.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 15: 18–30. doi: 10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.06.002.
36. Sutton, P. 2012. “ Conceptualizing Feedback Literacy: Knowing, Being, and Acting.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 49 (1): 31–40. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2012.647781.
37. Tai, J., B. J. Canny, T. P. Haines, and E. K. Molloy. 2017. “Implementing Peer Learning in Clinical Education: A Framework to Address Challenges in the "Real World".” Teaching and Learning in Medicine 29 (2): 162–172. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2016.1247000.
38. Valero, P., K. M. Jørgensen, and K. Brunila. 2019. “ Affective Subjectivation in the Precarious Neoliberal Academia.” In Resisting Neoliberalism in Higher Education, Vol. I, edited by D. Bottrell and C. Manathunga, 135–154. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-95942-9_7.
39. Watermeyer, R., T. Crick, C. Knight, and J. Goodall. 2021. “ COVID-19 and Digital Disruption in UK Universities: Afflictions and Affordances of Emergency Online Migration.” Higher Education 81 (3): 623–641. doi: 10.1007/s10734-020-00561-y.
40. Webster, D., and N. Rivers. 2019. “ Resisting Resilience: Disrupting Discourses of Self-Efficacy.” Pedagogy.” Culture & Society 27 (4): 523–535. doi: 10.1080/14681366.2018.1534261.
41. Winstone, N. E., K. Balloo, and D. Carless. 2020. “ Discipline-Specific Feedback Literacies: A Framework for Curriculum Design.” Higher Education. doi: 10.1007/s10734-020-00632-0.